CBI Archive
Daredevil #86 Review
- by Brian Cronin
- in Comic Reviews
Saturday, June 28th, 2003 at 2:54 AM EST
Updated: Saturday, June 28th, 2003 at 2:54 AM EST

Now, please note that I have no active knowledge of how Ed Brubaker writes his scripts. Two cool points to the first person who can tell me how Brubaker writes his script (i.e. full script or “Marvel method”). So while I do not know how he writes them, it certainly appears to me, from reading his work, that he has a good deal of control over what the artists draw, and when you’re working with as talented of artists as Brubaker is working with on Daredevil (Michael Lark, Stefano Gaudiano - who really should be getting more credit, most sites don’t even list him, they just say Brubaker and Lark- and Frank D’Armata), it results in some impressive looking scenes.
We’re now five issues into Brubaker’s run, and there has still yet to be a single misstep. This is just as close to note perfect as a superhero comic book can get. What I especially like is that, while Daredevil has the same basic format as Captain America (smaller plots unfolding upon one larger plot), Daredevil, I believe, has more story packed into each issue and each issue fully stands on its own, without any need of the “overall” plot. It is just a remarkable job of writing by Brubaker.
The plot of the issue involves a gang war at the prison instigated by the federal agents who need Daredevil and Kingpin dead. This is why so many bad guys are under one roof, Matt Murdock and Wilson Fisk are to never reach trial. Well, we shall see about that, eh?
There is an awesome scene in the middle of the book, where Brubaker pulls off one of the best outside writing jobs I’ve seen in a comic book. There is a FAIRLY big character who would probably be best served to not be killed off in this comic, but the scene is set up so that it is highly unlikely that this character WOULDN’T die. The way Brubaker explains it is astonishingly natural. You wouldn’t dream that outside influences affected it at all (and heck, maybe it didn’t - maybe Brubaker just likes this character - but in either event, killing off the character wouldn’t be a good idea).
The way the plot unfolds, it is like a beautifully orchestrated pile of dominoes. Almost every single character in the comic gets one “cool” scene.
The book is so good that Brubaker brings in Milla, and I didn’t even hate her that much!
What I especially like is the way that Brubaker plays the “natural reaction” card a lot in the comic. The “natural reaction” is so difficult to pull off in comics, as so often, the way people react is so damned FORCED. You know, the whole “say anything but the one thing that would explain the whole misunderstanding” routine. In this book, Brubaker puts characters into situations where their natural reactions are also the most INTERESTING reactions. Like the reactions of the warden, the reactions of Milla to Matt, the reactions of Matt to Milla - great stuff.
And the Milla scene also has a great, dramatic use of Matt’s powers, both with some words he has for a guard as well as the tense moments of Milla’s departure.
Daredevil has been a remarkable comic so far, and I can only wonder how long Brubaker can pull this off without even a slight misstep. But if/when that happens, it will be forgotten in the midst of all these great issues of Daredevil.
Recommended without reservation.






6 Comments
Ian Astheimer
June 28, 2006 at 5:38 pm
Brubaker writes in full-script but tailors the amount of detail, based on the artist and his familiarity with the artist’s work.
His script for the the Sleeper issue of Coup D’etat, for instance, was more detailed than the scripts for the Sleeper series because he hadn’t worked with Jim Lee before, whereas Brubaker and Sean Phillips had developed a rapport over time.
That’s what he told Lee here, at least: http://www.newsarama.com/pages/JimLeeWeek/Leearama_4.htm
muldertp
June 28, 2006 at 5:40 pm
Definitely his best issue yet. Excellent pacing, minimal decompression (or at least to the extent where I didn’t feel I was buying a Bendis book where one panel was photocopied 6 times).
The characterization was spot-on, as well!
T.
June 29, 2006 at 4:33 am
Wait…you hate Milla? She’s only like the best, most 3-dimensional believable love interest Murdock ever had in the book!! What is there about her to hate? She’s wonderful…
Omar Karindu
July 1, 2006 at 6:28 pm
I sort of hate Milla too. I don’t know that she ever did enough in the Bendis Daredevil to demonstrate multidimensionality. I couldn’t tell you one thing about her tastes or interests, or anything at all about her life aside from the fact that she’s a social liberal and runs the Hell’s Kitchen housing authority, allowing writers to use her for huge infodumps relating the area’s real-world history. Oh, and she sleeps with Matt Murdock when he’s not acting unusually crazy.
She’s extremely believable in that she’s normal to the point of being a thoroughly unremarkable character, just as most real people, if unaltered, do not make good fictional characters..
T.
July 3, 2006 at 5:22 pm
I still think she’s not as one-note as Elektra.
ALM
July 22, 2006 at 2:25 am
“She’s extremely believable in that she’s normal to the point of being a thoroughly unremarkable character, just as most real people, if unaltered, do not make good fictional characters..”
Word. And as one-note as Elektra is, I still find her relatiosnhip with Matt more engaging for the sheer weight of history alone. Same for the Black Widow. Mila? I la-la-la trough her appearances in the book. Just. Not interested.