<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cronin Theory of Comics &#8211; &#8220;Keith Giffen As Plotting God &#8211; Scripting Devil.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2004/12/29/cronin-theory-of-comics-keith-giffen-as-plotting-god-scripting-devil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2004/12/29/cronin-theory-of-comics-keith-giffen-as-plotting-god-scripting-devil/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:53:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill K</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2004/12/29/cronin-theory-of-comics-keith-giffen-as-plotting-god-scripting-devil/comment-page-1/#comment-868680</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 21:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2004/12/29/cronin-theory-of-comics-keith-giffen-as-plotting-god-scripting-devil/#comment-868680</guid>
		<description>First comment, really?

I think everything you say was good, was good.

But so was his Suicide Squad, in my opinion.

In terms of sales, I grant you it was not a success. But in terms of entertainment, it was good.

I don&#039;t think one outlier on the graph necessarily disproves your theory, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First comment, really?</p>
<p>I think everything you say was good, was good.</p>
<p>But so was his Suicide Squad, in my opinion.</p>
<p>In terms of sales, I grant you it was not a success. But in terms of entertainment, it was good.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think one outlier on the graph necessarily disproves your theory, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

