CBI Archive
Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed #17!
Thursday, September 22nd, 2005 at 2:44 PM EST
Updated: Thursday, May 25th, 2006 at 1:44 AM EST
This is the seventeenth in a series of examinations of comic book urban legends and whether they are true or false. Click here for an archive of the previous sixteen.
Let’s begin!
COMIC URBAN LEGEND: Steve Ditko does not use the original art that Marvel has returned to him, except sometimes as CUTTING BOARDS!
STATUS: True
The beginnings of this situation happened back when Marvel was caught up in the whole “not returning art to the original artists,” using the argument that Marvel not only paid for the production of the art for the comics, but for the art itself. In any event, after some time, Marvel eventually relented, under the following condition - it would give the artists back the art, but it would be as a GIFT due to Marvel’s generosity. They still believe that THEY (Marvel) own the work fair and square, but would allow the artists to have the work itself.
Well, Steve Ditko did not like that arrangement.
As a result of this (and other factors I am sure, like not wanting to look to his past and hell, probably some other stuff, damned if I know), Ditko basically just let the art pile up, and actually used some of his old work as cutting boards!!
The story appeared in an issue of Wizard a few years back (thanks to Linda Burns at Ditkoland, for transcribing this last year):
There’s simply no way to separate the fact from the fiction, no way to determine which Ditko is the real Ditko. One story about him contradicts the next, which-in turn-contradicts the next.
Take for example, one of [Comic publisher and restorer, Greg] Theakston’s last visits to Ditko’s studio. While embroiled in a conversation, the historian noticed a piece of illustration board leaning up against a wall, slashed to pieces.
“He’d been using it as a cutting board,” Theakston said. “I looked a little bit closer and I detected a comics code stamp on it.”
He asked Ditko to turn the board around, a request met with a deadening gaze from the artist.
“I didn’t think he was going to do it,” the historian recounted. “It looked like a ‘Screw you’ look.”
Slowly, however, Ditko reached out and flipped over the board. It was a page of original art from a late 1950s issue of Journey Into Mystery, a splash featuring a hard helmet diver. Theakston couldn’t believe it. Not only was Ditko not displaying, preserving or prizing this piece of original art, he was using it as a cutting board.
Theakston quickly offered Ditko a deal: “Steve, I will go down to the nearest art supply store and buy you a cutting board that will mend itself-a plastic cutting board that’s so smart that when you cut on it, it mends itself-and you’ll have the finest cutting board on the block.” “Nope,” Ditko replied, twisting the artwork-turned-cutting-board back around.
Theakston pleaded. “Steve, geez. That’s worth a fair amount of money. At the very least-damn, Steve-it’s an artifact. It’s an important piece of publishing history in terms of comics.”
The artist turned and pointed to the drapery-obscured window next to Theakston’s chair. “Lift that curtain up,” he said.
The curtain, the historian estimated, was about 18 inches off the floor. He pulled the drape aside and saw a stack of original artwork from Marvel standing roughly a foot-and-a-half high.
“Can I look at these?” Theakston excitedly asked.
“No.”
The writer was dumbfounded. “I was sitting next to a hundred thousand, two hundred thousand dollars, maybe, worth of Ditko artwork and he was cutting it up without letting people look at it.”
For whatever reason-Theakston feels Ditko may have thought Marvel was wrong for returning the pages-the artist seemed to attach no particular affection to his early work.
“He would rather not have people think of Steve Ditko’s best work as being Spider-Man from 30 or 40 years ago,” the historian said. “He wanted to be represented not by what he had done, but by what he’s doing-he wants now to be his best time.
Amazing, isn’t it?
COMIC URBAN LEGEND: Robert Loren Fleming is dead.
STATUS: False
This is a weird little urban legend (which was suggested by reader MarkAndrew), and has been making the rounds for at LEAST the past couple of years (as I remember reading it at the time, and worrying about it, then, until I found out it was false).
In any event, just recently, in the comments section on the super duper blog, Snark Free Waters, Dan Coyle (who will always be Dan Boyle to me…hehe), asked “Wait, Robert Fleming’s not dead? I could have sworn I read an article around the time Ambush Bug returned in the pages of Lobo Unbound referring to him as “the late Robert Loren Fleming.”
Apparently, this comment in Lobe Unbound, coupled with Mr. Fleming not doing any big mainstream comic work, was cause to believe the claims in the comic book.
Mr. Fleming himself showed up later in the comments section of that fantabulous comic blog, Snark Free Waters, to state, “Fleming here, back from the dead… ….p.s.: Those bus crashes really smart!”
So it was all just a joke by Keith Giffen.
Good thing, too, because Robert Loren Fleming is a fine writer. It would be a shame to lose him too soon.
COMIC URBAN LEGEND: The first Marvel/DC crossover was The Wizard of Oz.
STATUS: True
A lot of people generally think that Superman vs. Spider-Man, in 1976, was the first Marvel/DC crossover, but in fact, the first crossover happened a full year earlier!
Both DC and Marvel had been trying to obtain the rights to publish an adaptation of the Wizard of Oz, and ultimately, the decided to just publish the book TOGETHER.
It was this spirit of cooperation, I presume, which led to the other, more memorable, crossover a year later.

Marvel AND DC Presents…wow, we really AREN’T in Kansas anymore!
Well, that’s it for me this week!
Feel free to tell me some urban legends you have heard, and I will try to confirm or deny them!






14 Comments
Carlos Nicolini
June 22, 2006 at 9:10 am
Hmmm… I see the cover of “Wizard of Oz” doesn’t have the seal of approval of the Comics Code Authority. Does the story have some adults-only content, like a lion-human sex scene?
Anonymous
July 19, 2006 at 5:33 am
lol
Milo D Cooper
July 30, 2006 at 1:11 pm
You know, after reading the Ditko bit, I’m wondering if the guy shouldn’t be tossed in a rubber room at the local funny farm. Isn’t destroying historical artifacts illegal in most states? Hell, if using classic art for cutting boards — even if it is his own property — isn’t a crime, then what the frack is?
f
August 20, 2006 at 9:29 am
fff
PC
September 11, 2006 at 1:12 pm
Carlos,
I believe the comic was published as an oversized magazine (similar to the B&W Curtis line or MAD Magazine) so it wasn’t required to have a CCA stamp.
Matt
September 15, 2006 at 3:08 pm
Destroying something you created and own would seem to me to be the most basic of rights. No one has the right to force Ditko or anyone else to dispose of his own property in any manner other than that which he chooses.
Brian Cronin
September 15, 2006 at 5:05 pm
Agreed, Matt.
Barry Pearl
March 16, 2007 at 12:46 pm
There was more involved in the Wizard of Oz Crossover than was originally mentioned.
Marvel did get the rights to the book and was moving ahead with the project.
DC is owned by Time Warner who bought the rights to the Turner properties, which included the MGM library, which included the Wizard of Oz.
If Marvel, alone, adapted the book,they would not be able to use any of the likenesses or plot points developed in the movie.
If DC, alone adapted the book, they would have to stick to the movie script and plot.
They would also be in competition with each other. The compromise was th produce the property together and also avoid the inevitable lawsuits.
Barry Pearl
Pete
May 22, 2007 at 11:57 am
Strictly speaking, “The Wizard of Oz” wasn’t a crossover, but a co-published book. I think most comics fans think of “crossover” to mean that two (or more) particular companies’ characters/universes intersect.
Anonymous
July 2, 2007 at 11:50 pm
Ditko can do whatever he wants with his work, but he’s still nuts.
Anonymous
December 8, 2007 at 11:17 am
THIS
WEBSITE
IS
AWSOME
THE GREAT OZ HAS SPOKEN
jdj
December 21, 2007 at 11:01 am
Not to pick nits on the whole OZ thing, but you really should get your facts straight, Barry.
The Time Warner/Turner marriage wasn’t until 2001. The Wizard of Oz co-published by DC and marvel was done 26 years PRIOR to that particular media giant marriage.
I’d have to go back to the books to see when DC was purchased by Warner, but right now my brain is saying it was sometime in the late 70’s or very early 80’s. (I could be wrong.)
When the book came out in 75, I was a whopping 11 years old and thought is was the dumbest thing I had ever seen and historical context aside, even today, I can’t get past the 5th page.
vincepower
February 2, 2008 at 1:04 pm
I’m still for the first Marvel/DC cross-over being the storyline Steve Englehart used based on the real-life Halloween super-hero Parade in Rutland in the 1970’s.
Both DC and Marvel used the Parade as the basis for storylines for a couple of years in the early 70’s.
One year it spread across The Avengers (issue 119) Justice League of America (103)and Thor (217), with direct references to events in each comic in the others.
Chris Ferguson
February 29, 2008 at 1:51 pm
…and don’t forget the most famous (to me) appearance of the Rutland Superhero parade: The great O’Neil/Adams story “Night of the Reaper” in Batman #237.