CBI Archive
10/2 - Curious Cat Asks…
- by 2
- in Curious Cat, General
Saturday, October 1st, 2005 at 10:49 PM EST
Updated: Sunday, October 1st, 2006 at 10:50 PM EST
What did you think about Freedom Ring’s death in Marvel Team-Up?


Saturday, October 1st, 2005 at 10:49 PM EST
Updated: Sunday, October 1st, 2006 at 10:50 PM EST
What did you think about Freedom Ring’s death in Marvel Team-Up?


Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.
16 Comments
eqdoktor
October 2, 2006 at 12:44 am
Comicbook Death. He will be back.
Its an easy out since his ring basically alters reality.
Brian Cronin
October 2, 2006 at 12:55 am
But he doesn’t have the ring anymore, right?
Kemayo
October 2, 2006 at 2:25 am
Yeah, Crusader took the ring from him and was using it to get some Skrull lovin’ at the end of the issue.
I was disappointed. It was such a cop-out way to kill him.
Jordan D. White
October 2, 2006 at 7:13 am
Yeah, I thought it was a let down. It made me enjoy the story that preceeded it much less. Waste of my time. I really like Kirkman, too, so it was doubly disappointing. Ah well.
John
October 2, 2006 at 7:44 am
Who the hell is Freedom Ring?
Ian Astheimer
October 2, 2006 at 8:40 am
Was anyone other than Kirkman going to use him anyway?
yo go re
October 2, 2006 at 8:42 am
I wasn’t crazy about the character, living or dying, but I get the feeling he was created specifically to give the villain someone to kill who we’d care about. You can off all the generic SHIELD agents you want, but who’s going to give a flip? He was introduced, set up and set loose specifically to bite it. Man in Refrigerator syndrome…
Nick?!
October 2, 2006 at 10:50 am
Marvel’s most out-and-proud gay super-hero… *penetrated* to death?
I promise not to read too much into that….
Ian
October 2, 2006 at 1:35 pm
I was shocked. After the near death experience earlier in the story, and the near comeback from that I figured “he’s going to be just fine now”. But no, not really. I thought it was wonderful. It was a really interesting story about not everyone being a lucky, succesful super-hero right out the gate. I mean, he wasn’t fooled like Gravity or hurt like Spider-man, he was paralyzed and then killed. And then to see his family’s reaction. It really made the whole story something different.
I hope he NEVER comes back because there is no reason to come back. Yeah he was gay, but as a character there really wasn’t that much to him. Also, his costume was terrible.
Fortress Keeper
October 2, 2006 at 6:39 pm
I think it’s lame that, a week or two before, this character was touted by Joe Quesada as an example of Marvel’s open-mindedness and acceptance of gay characters.
Then, about two weeks later, he’s “penetrated” to death as a poster above put it.
Nice.
fluid state
October 2, 2006 at 9:46 pm
I’m not entirely convinced Joe Q. actually reads the comics he hypes.
Pol Rua
October 2, 2006 at 11:39 pm
The character was born to die.
Katherine
October 3, 2006 at 6:02 am
It was too abrupt — I was left going “huh? Is he — oh. Oh, he’s really dead. Huh.”
He wasn’t a particularly developed character and I didn’t like him much, but there’s plenty of room to resurrect him if somebody really wanted to (just have Crusader get into trouble that he needs help for, get within 15′ of the grave — boom, resurrection; easily done).
On a more meta level… yes, it was atrociously dumb of Joe Q to make hay of Freedom Ring the issue before he was slated to die. (Especially when he could have raised, say, Moondragon and Phyla-Vell in Annihilation, or Karolina in Runaways, or Frenchie in Moon Knight.) He has a bit of a tendency to speak before he thinks, doesn’t he? He should work on that, or he’ll end up saying the wrong thing to the wrong person and get his ass fired.
Chris
October 4, 2006 at 9:24 am
Well since 616 Tony Stark would NEVER kill a hero, and this obviously is an alternate universe Tony…I think. Maybe. Huh. Now I’m confused.
Graeme Burk
October 5, 2006 at 4:46 am
On a more meta level… yes, it was atrociously dumb of Joe Q to make hay of Freedom Ring the issue before he was slated to die.
I think it makes the paucity of Marvel’s position, which seems to be “Marvel has always been always at war with Eastasia, er, proudly publishing gay characters in non-Max titles even if they’re second string characters in soon-to-be-cancelled books called Marvel Team-Up and Batwoman had nothing to do with that nosiree” even more evident. It’s downright embarrassing.
T.
March 17, 2007 at 2:38 pm