<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed #34!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/01/19/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-34/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/01/19/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-34/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:03:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Pelkie</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/01/19/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-34/comment-page-1/#comment-797123</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Pelkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/01/19/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-34/#comment-797123</guid>
		<description>I caught this column due to Joe here, but read for the GL stuff.  (since we&#039;ve been discussing it on recent CBLR and DC 75 moments).  Is there any existence of the &quot;original&quot; GL 48 and 49?  I assume they were somewhat far along with the book when they scrapped it.  And that&#039;s cool that Bill Willingham was the penciller on 48.  Did not know that.  Wonder if part of why there&#039;s no credits on 49 (besides not wanting to cover up any of that sweet cover) is because they weren&#039;t sure WHO was doing the book yet.

What&#039;s Darryl Banks doing now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I caught this column due to Joe here, but read for the GL stuff.  (since we&#8217;ve been discussing it on recent CBLR and DC 75 moments).  Is there any existence of the &#8220;original&#8221; GL 48 and 49?  I assume they were somewhat far along with the book when they scrapped it.  And that&#8217;s cool that Bill Willingham was the penciller on 48.  Did not know that.  Wonder if part of why there&#8217;s no credits on 49 (besides not wanting to cover up any of that sweet cover) is because they weren&#8217;t sure WHO was doing the book yet.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s Darryl Banks doing now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/01/19/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-34/comment-page-1/#comment-797121</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 15:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/01/19/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-34/#comment-797121</guid>
		<description>Marvel has a lot of good points going for them when they just focus on doing good work. Whenever they brag like that or take potshots at DC, it makes them seem classless and stupid.

When all they really need to do is focus on coming up with good books. Which they do. Consistently. Their books generally outsell DC. But are they so insecure about their own brand that they need to belittle their competitors and glorify their own &quot;innovations?&quot; 

This only serves to highlight the fact that MOST of their innovations were just DC ideas which they took to the next level, or  beat them to the punch (Secret Wars coming out before CRISIS), or outright bad ideas (One More Day.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marvel has a lot of good points going for them when they just focus on doing good work. Whenever they brag like that or take potshots at DC, it makes them seem classless and stupid.</p>
<p>When all they really need to do is focus on coming up with good books. Which they do. Consistently. Their books generally outsell DC. But are they so insecure about their own brand that they need to belittle their competitors and glorify their own &#8220;innovations?&#8221; </p>
<p>This only serves to highlight the fact that MOST of their innovations were just DC ideas which they took to the next level, or  beat them to the punch (Secret Wars coming out before CRISIS), or outright bad ideas (One More Day.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Bounty</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/01/19/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-34/comment-page-1/#comment-792704</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Bounty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/01/19/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-34/#comment-792704</guid>
		<description>This possibly deserves a rez, but there&#039;s also a question of &quot;Was there any concept of Blackest Night when Emerald Twilight started?&quot;  I remember reading somewhere that the Yellow Corps symbol was based on the Paralax costume from this arc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This possibly deserves a rez, but there&#8217;s also a question of &#8220;Was there any concept of Blackest Night when Emerald Twilight started?&#8221;  I remember reading somewhere that the Yellow Corps symbol was based on the Paralax costume from this arc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jono11</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/01/19/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-34/comment-page-1/#comment-82978</link>
		<dc:creator>Jono11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/01/19/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-34/#comment-82978</guid>
		<description>&quot;What makes this especially amusing is, if you recall, the Contest of Champions featured a text page where Marvel crowed about how innovative they were for introducing the concept of â€œLimited Series.â€ Forgetting the fact that, at this point, DC had done about five mini-series&quot;--Typical Marvel bullshit.  &quot;House of Ideas&quot; my ass.  The only original ideas they had were detrimental to the industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What makes this especially amusing is, if you recall, the Contest of Champions featured a text page where Marvel crowed about how innovative they were for introducing the concept of â€œLimited Series.â€ Forgetting the fact that, at this point, DC had done about five mini-series&#8221;&#8211;Typical Marvel bullshit.  &#8220;House of Ideas&#8221; my ass.  The only original ideas they had were detrimental to the industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

