<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed #46!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-46/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-46/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:35:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ParanoidObsessive</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-46/comment-page-1/#comment-690933</link>
		<dc:creator>ParanoidObsessive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-46/#comment-690933</guid>
		<description>If you have to be a fanboy to find it incredibly disrespectful and scummy to reprint someone&#039;s personal and private correspondance in a public setting, then call me Captain Fanboy.

I&#039;d find it offensive if someone took a letter of resignation I wrote to an employer and published it on the Internet, especially if it was possible to figure out precisely whose it was through inferrence alone (which it was, in this case).  In the same vein, it&#039;s offensive that someone felt the need to do so in this case, motivated solely by what appears to be childish and immature motives.

I&#039;d say there was no intent behind it other than to be anything other than hurtful to an ex-employee, and ironically enough, the &quot;prank&quot; clearly seems to underline precisely the sort of unfair, malicious, and vindictive treatment that led Cockrum to resign in the first place.

It&#039;s not awesome, amusing, or hilarious - all it really is is clear evidence that someone at Marvel in 1979 was a complete asshat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have to be a fanboy to find it incredibly disrespectful and scummy to reprint someone's personal and private correspondance in a public setting, then call me Captain Fanboy.</p>
<p>I'd find it offensive if someone took a letter of resignation I wrote to an employer and published it on the Internet, especially if it was possible to figure out precisely whose it was through inferrence alone (which it was, in this case).  In the same vein, it's offensive that someone felt the need to do so in this case, motivated solely by what appears to be childish and immature motives.</p>
<p>I'd say there was no intent behind it other than to be anything other than hurtful to an ex-employee, and ironically enough, the "prank" clearly seems to underline precisely the sort of unfair, malicious, and vindictive treatment that led Cockrum to resign in the first place.</p>
<p>It's not awesome, amusing, or hilarious - all it really is is clear evidence that someone at Marvel in 1979 was a complete asshat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DiRT</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-46/comment-page-1/#comment-5412</link>
		<dc:creator>DiRT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-46/#comment-5412</guid>
		<description>It was an awesome prank foiled by fanboys who take things waaaaay too seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was an awesome prank foiled by fanboys who take things waaaaay too seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-46/comment-page-1/#comment-2749</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-46/#comment-2749</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, it wasn&#039;t good for Michelinie either, which is just another reason why I think it was a crummy prank to pull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, it wasn't good for Michelinie either, which is just another reason why I think it was a crummy prank to pull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Goodman</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-46/comment-page-1/#comment-2744</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Goodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-46/#comment-2744</guid>
		<description>Mostly the prank stuck it to David Michelinie and Marvel&#039;s readers, sabotaging the key moment of a storyline that had been building for months. (A story that has generally been seen as the most popular Iron Man storyline ever.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mostly the prank stuck it to David Michelinie and Marvel's readers, sabotaging the key moment of a storyline that had been building for months. (A story that has generally been seen as the most popular Iron Man storyline ever.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-46/comment-page-1/#comment-1602</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 09:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-46/#comment-1602</guid>
		<description>But they weren&#039;t sticking it to the man, really. It was more like sticking it to Cockrum, by making his private correspondence public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But they weren't sticking it to the man, really. It was more like sticking it to Cockrum, by making his private correspondence public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam W</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-46/comment-page-1/#comment-1601</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 07:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-46/#comment-1601</guid>
		<description>&gt; Agreed. That is a pretty crummy prank to pull.

Personally I found that to be quite amusing. Stick it to The Man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Agreed. That is a pretty crummy prank to pull.</p>
<p>Personally I found that to be quite amusing. Stick it to The Man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
