<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I bought - 24 May 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:08:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: restaurants directory</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-31124</link>
		<dc:creator>restaurants directory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 16:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-31124</guid>
		<description>1derful blog !!!!!!!!!!! good work keep it up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1derful blog !!!!!!!!!!! good work keep it up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moose n squirrel</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>moose n squirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 12:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Bill beat me to it. The whole point of the Pitiful One is that he&#039;s a nobody - in fact, such a nobody that no one remembers him, even the most encylopedic comic book geek. That&#039;s why he&#039;s still dead while hell is a revolving door for the Magnetos and Dooms of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill beat me to it. The whole point of the Pitiful One is that he's a nobody - in fact, such a nobody that no one remembers him, even the most encylopedic comic book geek. That's why he's still dead while hell is a revolving door for the Magnetos and Dooms of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Reed</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 03:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>But the Pitiful One isn&#039;t *anybody.* I thought that was the point. Haven&#039;t read #5 yet, though, and probably won&#039;t until August or September, so don&#039;t mind me...

We never found out who Mr. Code from the Henrietta arc was, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the Pitiful One isn't *anybody.* I thought that was the point. Haven't read #5 yet, though, and probably won't until August or September, so don't mind me...</p>
<p>We never found out who Mr. Code from the Henrietta arc was, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 02:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>1962, yes. I forgot the timeline had advanced significantly since the first issue. Another plus, IMO.

But yeah, you have to look at reaction to the New American&#039;s identity both in the context of the turbulent time period, and in light of whom he effectively replaced: Old Glory, the embodiment of the spirit of America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1962, yes. I forgot the timeline had advanced significantly since the first issue. Another plus, IMO.</p>
<p>But yeah, you have to look at reaction to the New American's identity both in the context of the turbulent time period, and in light of whom he effectively replaced: Old Glory, the embodiment of the spirit of America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 00:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I know, Guy, and that&#039;s why I was asking.  (And it&#039;s 1962, damn it!)  It&#039;s ten years before I was born, so it&#039;s kind of strange to see people blasting a black superhero, because it seems that a black sports star would be on par with that.  Then I remember that Texas Western was a big deal in 1966 when they started five black guys in the NCAA Tournament, so it&#039;s not that big a surprise.  I&#039;m glad he&#039;s making it part of the story instead of just throwing it in there, but I wonder if the reaction would be that negative.  I look forward to reading this when it&#039;s all finished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I know, Guy, and that's why I was asking.  (And it's 1962, damn it!)  It's ten years before I was born, so it's kind of strange to see people blasting a black superhero, because it seems that a black sports star would be on par with that.  Then I remember that Texas Western was a big deal in 1966 when they started five black guys in the NCAA Tournament, so it's not that big a surprise.  I'm glad he's making it part of the story instead of just throwing it in there, but I wonder if the reaction would be that negative.  I look forward to reading this when it's all finished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apodaca</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Apodaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 00:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Re: The Dead Girl Mini.

I cam out of this disappointed, too. And I&#039;m the biggest X-Statix fan on the planet. It just... I don&#039;t know. Nothing happened, you know? I mean, we didn&#039;t even get to find out who The Pitiful One was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: The Dead Girl Mini.</p>
<p>I cam out of this disappointed, too. And I'm the biggest X-Statix fan on the planet. It just... I don't know. Nothing happened, you know? I mean, we didn't even get to find out who The Pitiful One was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 20:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>PS: It might help to note that &lt;i&gt;The American Way&lt;/i&gt; is set in 1961, smack in the middle of JFK&#039;s presidency and the Civil Rights movement -- post-Rosa Parks, pre-Malcom X.

John Ridley does an excellent job of making the period an important part of the story instead of simply being a convenient backdrop, and so far his take on the era has been far from simplistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS: It might help to note that <i>The American Way</i> is set in 1961, smack in the middle of JFK's presidency and the Civil Rights movement -- post-Rosa Parks, pre-Malcom X.</p>
<p>John Ridley does an excellent job of making the period an important part of the story instead of simply being a convenient backdrop, and so far his take on the era has been far from simplistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 20:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Just because segregation was declared illegal doesn&#039;t mean that the next day everything was hunky-dory for black people in America.  &lt;b&gt;That&#039;s&lt;/b&gt; a pretty simplistic statement.

On segregation, via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jimcrowhistory.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The History of Jim Crow&lt;/a&gt;:

Although the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. Topeka Board of Education decision formally made segregation illegal, southern states continued to pass Jim Crow legislation well into the 1960s, particularly in the area of school segregation. Historian C. Vann Woodward estimated that 106 new segregation laws were passed between the Brown decision and the end of 1956. By May 1964, the South had enacted 450 laws and resolutions to frustrate the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. Many of these statutes were passed at the local level and were particularly dehumanizing. In 1960, the city of Danville, Virginia, attempted to maintain segregated library facilities by establishing a &quot;stand-up-pick-up-your-books-and-go&quot; policy. Tables and chairs were removed from the library so that patrons could not sit down. The cost of a library card was $2.50 and new applicants (blacks) were required to furnish two credit references and two character witnesses. As late as 1967, the city of Sarasota, Florida, prohibited blacks and whites from using the same beaches and authorized police to clear the area if such mixing occurred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because segregation was declared illegal doesn't mean that the next day everything was hunky-dory for black people in America.  <b>That's</b> a pretty simplistic statement.</p>
<p>On segregation, via <a href="http://www.jimcrowhistory.org" rel="nofollow">The History of Jim Crow</a>:</p>
<p>Although the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. Topeka Board of Education decision formally made segregation illegal, southern states continued to pass Jim Crow legislation well into the 1960s, particularly in the area of school segregation. Historian C. Vann Woodward estimated that 106 new segregation laws were passed between the Brown decision and the end of 1956. By May 1964, the South had enacted 450 laws and resolutions to frustrate the Supreme Court's decision. Many of these statutes were passed at the local level and were particularly dehumanizing. In 1960, the city of Danville, Virginia, attempted to maintain segregated library facilities by establishing a "stand-up-pick-up-your-books-and-go" policy. Tables and chairs were removed from the library so that patrons could not sit down. The cost of a library card was $2.50 and new applicants (blacks) were required to furnish two credit references and two character witnesses. As late as 1967, the city of Sarasota, Florida, prohibited blacks and whites from using the same beaches and authorized police to clear the area if such mixing occurred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Brady</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 15:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t really mind the political discussion in Squadron Supreme, because as a simplistic superhero book, it gave a simplistic portrayal of the issue.  And did they specifically say the US was at fault for all of Africa&#039;s problems?  By saying &quot;It&#039;s your fault&quot;, they could be simply referring to Western society&#039;s meddling in Africa (which you describe very well).  But, to each his own, as they say.

As for American Way, I think somebody mentioned later in the issue that segregation had already been made illegal (although I thought that wasn&#039;t until 1963 or 64...I should look it up), so it seemed kind of weird to me that it would cause such an outcry.  I guess this is the superhero comics simplistically dealing with politics again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn't really mind the political discussion in Squadron Supreme, because as a simplistic superhero book, it gave a simplistic portrayal of the issue.  And did they specifically say the US was at fault for all of Africa's problems?  By saying "It's your fault", they could be simply referring to Western society's meddling in Africa (which you describe very well).  But, to each his own, as they say.</p>
<p>As for American Way, I think somebody mentioned later in the issue that segregation had already been made illegal (although I thought that wasn't until 1963 or 64...I should look it up), so it seemed kind of weird to me that it would cause such an outcry.  I guess this is the superhero comics simplistically dealing with politics again...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 15:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Yeah, you&#039;re right, Paul.  Revealing one&#039;s secret identity to the government is the same as giving it to the public, however, in today&#039;s world.  But you&#039;re right.  It still bugs me, though, because it seems like she&#039;s arguing against her She-Hulk position in court when she berates Iron Man.  It&#039;s a minor thing, and I hope Slott moves on next issue when all this Civil War junk is behind us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, you're right, Paul.  Revealing one's secret identity to the government is the same as giving it to the public, however, in today's world.  But you're right.  It still bugs me, though, because it seems like she's arguing against her She-Hulk position in court when she berates Iron Man.  It's a minor thing, and I hope Slott moves on next issue when all this Civil War junk is behind us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 14:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>There isn&#039;t actually a contradiction between She-Hulk&#039;s opinion and Jennifer&#039;s.  She-Hulk argued in favour of the Registration Act - disclosure to the GOVERNMENT.  Jennifer&#039;s arguing against disclosure to the PUBLIC, which still wouldn&#039;t be allowed under the Act.  To be fair, she does actually make this distinction when John challenges her on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There isn't actually a contradiction between She-Hulk's opinion and Jennifer's.  She-Hulk argued in favour of the Registration Act - disclosure to the GOVERNMENT.  Jennifer's arguing against disclosure to the PUBLIC, which still wouldn't be allowed under the Act.  To be fair, she does actually make this distinction when John challenges her on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 22:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>But if I stopped reading so much, Agustin, I wouldn&#039;t be able to share my vitriol with everyone!  For the most part, I enjoy Squadron Supreme (and its predecessor).  I like the fact that JMS is showing us a cold-blooded and realpolitik look at the United States government.  If Mark Milton and his ilk existed, you can bet that the government would be involved in their deployment.  I just think that it&#039;s very difficult to encapsulate 200 years of colonialism and exploitation by several different European powers into a few pages of a comic book.  I would love to read a superhero comic that is primarily about the way the Third World is treated by the superpowers and how it reacts to that.  Ostrander could write the heck out of that sucker, I&#039;d bet.  In this issue, however, JMS throws this little thing out there, and it&#039;s pretty clear he wants us to just accept that &quot;it&#039;s all America&#039;s fault.&quot;  I just can&#039;t.

Believe me, if I don&#039;t like a title (as opposed to individual issues), I will drop it like a hot potato.  I give individual issues a bit more leeway.

That&#039;s a good point, Phil.  It just seemed strange to me, because you would think (like hard core conservatives who change their tune a bit when someone they know is gay), that she might address her contradiction a bit more.  Perhaps Millar will do that in the main title, although if I know his writing, he won&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if I stopped reading so much, Agustin, I wouldn't be able to share my vitriol with everyone!  For the most part, I enjoy Squadron Supreme (and its predecessor).  I like the fact that JMS is showing us a cold-blooded and realpolitik look at the United States government.  If Mark Milton and his ilk existed, you can bet that the government would be involved in their deployment.  I just think that it's very difficult to encapsulate 200 years of colonialism and exploitation by several different European powers into a few pages of a comic book.  I would love to read a superhero comic that is primarily about the way the Third World is treated by the superpowers and how it reacts to that.  Ostrander could write the heck out of that sucker, I'd bet.  In this issue, however, JMS throws this little thing out there, and it's pretty clear he wants us to just accept that "it's all America's fault."  I just can't.</p>
<p>Believe me, if I don't like a title (as opposed to individual issues), I will drop it like a hot potato.  I give individual issues a bit more leeway.</p>
<p>That's a good point, Phil.  It just seemed strange to me, because you would think (like hard core conservatives who change their tune a bit when someone they know is gay), that she might address her contradiction a bit more.  Perhaps Millar will do that in the main title, although if I know his writing, he won't.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 21:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think they&#039;re saying that She-Hulk and Jennifer have different opinions, but that Jennifer&#039;s abstract opinion when she&#039;s being interviewed for TV is different to what she does in private when someone she knows is in trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't think they're saying that She-Hulk and Jennifer have different opinions, but that Jennifer's abstract opinion when she's being interviewed for TV is different to what she does in private when someone she knows is in trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agustin Mojica</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Agustin Mojica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 20:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Oh, and those Civil War tie-in covers may be ugly, but the big block of solid color makes a lot of sense. New readers jumping on the Civil War bandwagon know that every title they need to read will be quick and easy to find: just look for the half-done covers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and those Civil War tie-in covers may be ugly, but the big block of solid color makes a lot of sense. New readers jumping on the Civil War bandwagon know that every title they need to read will be quick and easy to find: just look for the half-done covers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agustin Mojica</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Agustin Mojica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 20:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Why are politics so shunned in all media but literature?  To quote an unexpected source (the Electronic Gaming Monthly letters section, of all places: &quot;Politics is an unavoidable subject that pops up everywhere (even in games [comics]), and we shouldn&#039;t have to censor ourselves so as not to pollute your magically apolitical fantasy world.&quot;

Of course, they followed that up with their usual adolescent trash responses. Anyway, your reviews are so bitter, it seems like you might want to stop reading so much and start writing the sort of stories you would actually enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are politics so shunned in all media but literature?  To quote an unexpected source (the Electronic Gaming Monthly letters section, of all places: "Politics is an unavoidable subject that pops up everywhere (even in games [comics]), and we shouldn't have to censor ourselves so as not to pollute your magically apolitical fantasy world."</p>
<p>Of course, they followed that up with their usual adolescent trash responses. Anyway, your reviews are so bitter, it seems like you might want to stop reading so much and start writing the sort of stories you would actually enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 20:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>I think the TV equivalent of padded for the trade is &quot;padded for the box set.&quot;  Even movies that would work at 90 minutes or 2 hours get padded to 3 hours just because that supposedly increases the chances of Academy Awards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the TV equivalent of padded for the trade is "padded for the box set."  Even movies that would work at 90 minutes or 2 hours get padded to 3 hours just because that supposedly increases the chances of Academy Awards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 20:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>The Batman issue was a bit of a disappointment to me as well.  This has been a strange arc so far as pacing it out goes.  The first two issues felt like two halves of the same comic split into two parts while some of the later installments felt more complete and now an entire issue to tell us something we could pretty much infer by the title.

Nextwave on the other hand has actually been one of my favorite titles recently.  Since it&#039;s primarily an action-humour title it operates more on a premise basis rather than an ongoing drama one, similar to say Dexter&#039;s Lab, The Simpsons, or The Venture Bros as far as I can tell.  While it could morph itself into fitting with the &quot;small part of a larger piece&quot; mold, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s the point of it.  I can certainly see why one wouldn&#039;t feel the need to keep coming back each month if one isn&#039;t as drawn to the wackiness but I like that there&#039;s title like this out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Batman issue was a bit of a disappointment to me as well.  This has been a strange arc so far as pacing it out goes.  The first two issues felt like two halves of the same comic split into two parts while some of the later installments felt more complete and now an entire issue to tell us something we could pretty much infer by the title.</p>
<p>Nextwave on the other hand has actually been one of my favorite titles recently.  Since it's primarily an action-humour title it operates more on a premise basis rather than an ongoing drama one, similar to say Dexter's Lab, The Simpsons, or The Venture Bros as far as I can tell.  While it could morph itself into fitting with the "small part of a larger piece" mold, I don't think that's the point of it.  I can certainly see why one wouldn't feel the need to keep coming back each month if one isn't as drawn to the wackiness but I like that there's title like this out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Intensity</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Intensity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 19:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>You were right in pointing out that comics aren&#039;t the only place where the &quot;waiting for the trade&quot; mentality has taken over. A lot of television shows are pacing their stories like that too. Wednesday was the Season Finale of Lost and really, it would have made more sense if that was the 11th episode of the season instead of the 22nd. I&#039;m tired of the slow pacing and the three panel pages with just as many word ballons. I don&#039;t mind long stories but please make each part worth it. Did we need an entire issue for Harvey to become Two-Face again? I pretty much stopped reading that story after the first issue because of the slow pacing. Everything in the &quot;Face to Face&quot; story so far could have been covered in two issues tops.

No wonder the audience is getting more alienated from the books</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were right in pointing out that comics aren't the only place where the "waiting for the trade" mentality has taken over. A lot of television shows are pacing their stories like that too. Wednesday was the Season Finale of Lost and really, it would have made more sense if that was the 11th episode of the season instead of the 22nd. I'm tired of the slow pacing and the three panel pages with just as many word ballons. I don't mind long stories but please make each part worth it. Did we need an entire issue for Harvey to become Two-Face again? I pretty much stopped reading that story after the first issue because of the slow pacing. Everything in the "Face to Face" story so far could have been covered in two issues tops.</p>
<p>No wonder the audience is getting more alienated from the books</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 15:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that&#039;s a good point, Steven.  I was just wondering, because I wasn&#039;t around in 1962.  The series intrigued me with the first two issues, so I&#039;m looking forward to reading the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that's a good point, Steven.  I was just wondering, because I wasn't around in 1962.  The series intrigued me with the first two issues, so I'm looking forward to reading the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevenR</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>StevenR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 15:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/05/26/what-i-bought-24-may-2006/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>&gt;

I havent read the comic (and probably wont), so I cant directly make a comment about the first page.  But yes, lots of folks who would be angry about a black superhero then. Keep in mind that in 1962, it was  still legal to allow segregation of schools, bathrooms,  busses, waiting rooms, stores, movies, zoos.  People were actually killed for trying to encourage blacks to register to vote. 
  If you thought blacks were slow mentaly and good only for manual labor (and that includes sports) and not fit to be in the same room with you - having a black with superpowers would be an idea to give you nightmares... 
   hopes this puts 1962 in better view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;</p>
<p>I havent read the comic (and probably wont), so I cant directly make a comment about the first page.  But yes, lots of folks who would be angry about a black superhero then. Keep in mind that in 1962, it was  still legal to allow segregation of schools, bathrooms,  busses, waiting rooms, stores, movies, zoos.  People were actually killed for trying to encourage blacks to register to vote.<br />
  If you thought blacks were slow mentaly and good only for manual labor (and that includes sports) and not fit to be in the same room with you - having a black with superpowers would be an idea to give you nightmares...<br />
   hopes this puts 1962 in better view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
