<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judging (DC&#8217;s October) Books By Their Covers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:44:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3633</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3633</guid>
		<description>There is that, as well. 

And please don&#039;t think I&#039;m conflating you with the other two fellas, I get that you&#039;re just trying to explain their possible position a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is that, as well. </p>
<p>And please don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m conflating you with the other two fellas, I get that you&#8217;re just trying to explain their possible position a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3622</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3622</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think such accusations aren&#039;t really worth anything without specific examples anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think such accusations aren&#8217;t really worth anything without specific examples anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3592</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 04:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3592</guid>
		<description>It does not, unless I am praising artists for things I knock in other artists, or knocking artists for things I praise in other artists.

What artist do I knock for the things I praise Eric Powell for?

What artist do I praise for things I knock Michael Turner for?

What artist do I knock for things I praise Frank Quitely for?

What artist do I praise for things I knock Ian Churchill for?

They don&#039;t exist.

If you want to say I like bad art, or whatever, that&#039;s cool, or &quot;You&#039;re wrong, this cover was good,&quot; that&#039;s fine. People do that all the time, and I&#039;m cool with it. Different strokes, and all that.  But to throw around bullshit statements like a lack of logic?

Well, notice the adjective I used to describe said statements, that will give a hint as to what I think of those complaints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does not, unless I am praising artists for things I knock in other artists, or knocking artists for things I praise in other artists.</p>
<p>What artist do I knock for the things I praise Eric Powell for?</p>
<p>What artist do I praise for things I knock Michael Turner for?</p>
<p>What artist do I knock for things I praise Frank Quitely for?</p>
<p>What artist do I praise for things I knock Ian Churchill for?</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t exist.</p>
<p>If you want to say I like bad art, or whatever, that&#8217;s cool, or &#8220;You&#8217;re wrong, this cover was good,&#8221; that&#8217;s fine. People do that all the time, and I&#8217;m cool with it. Different strokes, and all that.  But to throw around bullshit statements like a lack of logic?</p>
<p>Well, notice the adjective I used to describe said statements, that will give a hint as to what I think of those complaints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3591</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 04:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3591</guid>
		<description>Brian, I think the implication to what they&#039;re saying is that you&#039;re playing favorites; something that you&#039;ll criticize in one artist is the exact same thing you&#039;ll praise in another if the latter happens to be one of your favorites.  So by pointing out that you continually pick the same artists for the top covers every month and the same ones for the bottom ones doesn&#039;t actually help your case, it actually hurts it by making it seem that you do indeed choose judge by favorite artists rather than by the actual cover quality.

Not saying I agree with them, just pointing out that your argument didn&#039;t help your case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, I think the implication to what they&#8217;re saying is that you&#8217;re playing favorites; something that you&#8217;ll criticize in one artist is the exact same thing you&#8217;ll praise in another if the latter happens to be one of your favorites.  So by pointing out that you continually pick the same artists for the top covers every month and the same ones for the bottom ones doesn&#8217;t actually help your case, it actually hurts it by making it seem that you do indeed choose judge by favorite artists rather than by the actual cover quality.</p>
<p>Not saying I agree with them, just pointing out that your argument didn&#8217;t help your case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3539</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 08:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3539</guid>
		<description>I figure it&#039;s always worthwhile to see if a criticism is valid, so I looked back at the now over a YEAR&#039;S worth of these bits I have done, and the &quot;unpredictable&quot; thing just doesn&#039;t seem to hold any weight.

How can they not be logical when the same freakin&#039; artists keep showing up in the Top Five? 

Constantly, it&#039;s Matt Wagner, Frank Quitely, Brian Bolland, Eric Powell, Tommy Lee Edwards, Steve Epting, Jock, Joe Kubert, Simone Bianchi (until he got boring recently, which I specifically point out when I explain why I no longer pick his covers), Ladronn, Stuart Immonen, Mike Allred....the same artists get praise almost every month.

And the same artists get knocked almost every month.

In fact, I think it&#039;s so predictable that, as you note this month, Tadhg predicted my number one just based on my expressed tastes.

I&#039;m certainly cool with &quot;You like stupid covers&quot; or &quot;You have bad taste in covers,&quot; which is a totally fair opinion to have.

But that it isn&#039;t logical?

Just doesn&#039;t bear out as a complaint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figure it&#8217;s always worthwhile to see if a criticism is valid, so I looked back at the now over a YEAR&#8217;S worth of these bits I have done, and the &#8220;unpredictable&#8221; thing just doesn&#8217;t seem to hold any weight.</p>
<p>How can they not be logical when the same freakin&#8217; artists keep showing up in the Top Five? </p>
<p>Constantly, it&#8217;s Matt Wagner, Frank Quitely, Brian Bolland, Eric Powell, Tommy Lee Edwards, Steve Epting, Jock, Joe Kubert, Simone Bianchi (until he got boring recently, which I specifically point out when I explain why I no longer pick his covers), Ladronn, Stuart Immonen, Mike Allred&#8230;.the same artists get praise almost every month.</p>
<p>And the same artists get knocked almost every month.</p>
<p>In fact, I think it&#8217;s so predictable that, as you note this month, Tadhg predicted my number one just based on my expressed tastes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m certainly cool with &#8220;You like stupid covers&#8221; or &#8220;You have bad taste in covers,&#8221; which is a totally fair opinion to have.</p>
<p>But that it isn&#8217;t logical?</p>
<p>Just doesn&#8217;t bear out as a complaint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Karindu</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3521</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Karindu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 02:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3521</guid>
		<description>I wonder iof that Atom cover would have been even better as a &#039;worm&#039;s eye view&quot; with the Atom in the foreground -- the main problem to my admittedly untrained eye seems to be that the Atom figure is too stiffly rendered and too, well...small.  Exactly what you need to avoid artistically with a shrinking superhero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder iof that Atom cover would have been even better as a &#8216;worm&#8217;s eye view&#8221; with the Atom in the foreground &#8212; the main problem to my admittedly untrained eye seems to be that the Atom figure is too stiffly rendered and too, well&#8230;small.  Exactly what you need to avoid artistically with a shrinking superhero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clobberin Time</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3507</link>
		<dc:creator>Clobberin Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3507</guid>
		<description>Gotta agree with that reply from &quot;Darn&quot;...  there is no logic to what you like and do not like in a cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta agree with that reply from &#8220;Darn&#8221;&#8230;  there is no logic to what you like and do not like in a cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3420</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3420</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You seem like a nice enough guy Brian but each month your picks just make no sense. Something you dislike in one artist you just LOVE in another.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oddly vague complaint. Although I like the nice guy part!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You seem like a nice enough guy Brian but each month your picks just make no sense. Something you dislike in one artist you just LOVE in another.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oddly vague complaint. Although I like the nice guy part!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3417</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3417</guid>
		<description>Cronin, we all know you just made Tadhg up.  Stop pretending he&#039;s real.

Also, why does every fun, cool idea have to be labeled &quot;retro-Silver Age?&quot;  Can&#039;t it simply be a fun, cool idea?

Good article, as always, Brian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cronin, we all know you just made Tadhg up.  Stop pretending he&#8217;s real.</p>
<p>Also, why does every fun, cool idea have to be labeled &#8220;retro-Silver Age?&#8221;  Can&#8217;t it simply be a fun, cool idea?</p>
<p>Good article, as always, Brian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darn</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3416</link>
		<dc:creator>Darn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3416</guid>
		<description>You seem like a nice enough guy Brian but each month your picks just make no sense.  Something you dislike in one artist you just LOVE in another.

And Jock CAN draw a bad cover and that?  Is a bad cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem like a nice enough guy Brian but each month your picks just make no sense.  Something you dislike in one artist you just LOVE in another.</p>
<p>And Jock CAN draw a bad cover and that?  Is a bad cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3396</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3396</guid>
		<description>I really like the energy to the Blue Beetle cover, too bad the comic never quite seems to caputure that same feel.

Glad to see Karl Kessel back at DC, his 2nd run on Superboy was one of my favorite titles at the time it was running (Super-Kamandi-Boy!).  I wonder what he thinks about DC killing off the character he pretty much created... or if he&#039;ll be able to find a niche in Didio&#039;s DC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the energy to the Blue Beetle cover, too bad the comic never quite seems to caputure that same feel.</p>
<p>Glad to see Karl Kessel back at DC, his 2nd run on Superboy was one of my favorite titles at the time it was running (Super-Kamandi-Boy!).  I wonder what he thinks about DC killing off the character he pretty much created&#8230; or if he&#8217;ll be able to find a niche in Didio&#8217;s DC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Karindu</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3338</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Karindu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3338</guid>
		<description>-- The two covers featuring Supergirl reconfirm for me that her costume is just poorly designed, not least of all because no one, including the designer, has ever gotten that frilly skirt hem to look like anything a real person would deliberately wear in public.  Seeing Kitson&#039;s Supergirl wearing a serious face while that think billows out from her waist is pure comedy.

 -- The basic idea behind Miss Martian isn&#039;t specifically Morrisonesque; the idea of designing her so that she&#039;s also a Sailor Moon reference, however, is exactly the kind of pop syncretism Morrison engineers with characters like Fantomex and the Hyperclan. 

 -- Bianchi&#039;s layouts are quite good, until he swallows them up by adding so many soft shadow effects that the figures actually get lost.  I had to look at that one twice before I worked out that the Penguin was on it thanks to the &quot;super deep focus&quot; method.  When his covers use color, they&#039;re much clearer.  

 -- Why exactly is the Flash&#039;s speed-trail &lt;I&gt;ahead of him&lt;/I&gt; on that &lt;I&gt;Justice&lt;/I&gt; cover?

 -- The color sense on that &lt;I&gt;Rush City&lt;/I&gt; cover is exquisite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8211; The two covers featuring Supergirl reconfirm for me that her costume is just poorly designed, not least of all because no one, including the designer, has ever gotten that frilly skirt hem to look like anything a real person would deliberately wear in public.  Seeing Kitson&#8217;s Supergirl wearing a serious face while that think billows out from her waist is pure comedy.</p>
<p> &#8212; The basic idea behind Miss Martian isn&#8217;t specifically Morrisonesque; the idea of designing her so that she&#8217;s also a Sailor Moon reference, however, is exactly the kind of pop syncretism Morrison engineers with characters like Fantomex and the Hyperclan. </p>
<p> &#8212; Bianchi&#8217;s layouts are quite good, until he swallows them up by adding so many soft shadow effects that the figures actually get lost.  I had to look at that one twice before I worked out that the Penguin was on it thanks to the &#8220;super deep focus&#8221; method.  When his covers use color, they&#8217;re much clearer.  </p>
<p> &#8212; Why exactly is the Flash&#8217;s speed-trail <i>ahead of him</i> on that <i>Justice</i> cover?</p>
<p> &#8212; The color sense on that <i>Rush City</i> cover is exquisite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3312</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3312</guid>
		<description>Fair enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hensel</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3292</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hensel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3292</guid>
		<description>Peter Hensel said:

&quot;Iâ€™d agree that the term applied shouldnâ€™t be morrisonesque, but retro-silver age.&quot;

I think we&#039;re in agreement, T., I just feel that the idea of a Miss Martian isn&#039;t so retro silver age as revisionist silver age(although that&#039;s just arguing semantics at this point), because giving Martian Manhunter a family member drastically alters the character, what with his schtick being the last Martian. The idea isn&#039;t specifically Morrisonesque, I just get the vibe that it was from him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Hensel said:</p>
<p>&#8220;Iâ€™d agree that the term applied shouldnâ€™t be morrisonesque, but retro-silver age.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re in agreement, T., I just feel that the idea of a Miss Martian isn&#8217;t so retro silver age as revisionist silver age(although that&#8217;s just arguing semantics at this point), because giving Martian Manhunter a family member drastically alters the character, what with his schtick being the last Martian. The idea isn&#8217;t specifically Morrisonesque, I just get the vibe that it was from him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3287</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 04:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3287</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Peter Hensel said â€¦

I think the fact that itâ€™s jsut so blatant at being retro silver age when his most recent work is Seven Soldiers and All Star Superman, but Iâ€™d agree that the term applied shouldnâ€™t be morrisonesque, but retro-silver age. &lt;/b&gt;

Doesn&#039;t mean anything considering that DC usually has someone doing retro-silver age on some book 52 weeks out of the year.  At Marvel wallowing in the silver age is not as frequent, but DC ALWAYS has someone doing retro-silver age all year round.  I could argue that Miss Martian came about because of Jeph Loeb&#039;s Silver Age nods, especially bringing back Supergirl.  Johns brings back Hawk and Dove.  I could argue Darwyn Cooke&#039;s New Fronteir brought back Silver Age retro.  Or Alan Moore&#039;s Tom Strong.   Infinite Crisis brought back OMACs reimagined.  Karl Kesel milked Silver Age DC concepts like crazy when he was writing there, especially on Superboy.  Basically, look at any month at DC for the past 10 years and I bet you&#039;ll find some Silver-Age retro going on.  Like I said, I think it&#039;s a reach to call this move specifically Morrisonesque.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Peter Hensel said â€¦</p>
<p>I think the fact that itâ€™s jsut so blatant at being retro silver age when his most recent work is Seven Soldiers and All Star Superman, but Iâ€™d agree that the term applied shouldnâ€™t be morrisonesque, but retro-silver age. </b></p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t mean anything considering that DC usually has someone doing retro-silver age on some book 52 weeks out of the year.  At Marvel wallowing in the silver age is not as frequent, but DC ALWAYS has someone doing retro-silver age all year round.  I could argue that Miss Martian came about because of Jeph Loeb&#8217;s Silver Age nods, especially bringing back Supergirl.  Johns brings back Hawk and Dove.  I could argue Darwyn Cooke&#8217;s New Fronteir brought back Silver Age retro.  Or Alan Moore&#8217;s Tom Strong.   Infinite Crisis brought back OMACs reimagined.  Karl Kesel milked Silver Age DC concepts like crazy when he was writing there, especially on Superboy.  Basically, look at any month at DC for the past 10 years and I bet you&#8217;ll find some Silver-Age retro going on.  Like I said, I think it&#8217;s a reach to call this move specifically Morrisonesque.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Reed</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3286</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3286</guid>
		<description>Michael: &lt;b&gt;So, who *can* I blame for the new Martian Manhunter design?

Because I really, really need a target for my disdain. &lt;/b&gt;

Apparently, from what I hear, *Ladronn* designed it. But I believe Barrionuevo toyed with it after that. Also, I can&#039;t believe Ladronn could come up with such a bad design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael: <b>So, who *can* I blame for the new Martian Manhunter design?</p>
<p>Because I really, really need a target for my disdain. </b></p>
<p>Apparently, from what I hear, *Ladronn* designed it. But I believe Barrionuevo toyed with it after that. Also, I can&#8217;t believe Ladronn could come up with such a bad design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3285</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3285</guid>
		<description>Agreed.

Because who could argue against him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.</p>
<p>Because who could argue against him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hensel</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3284</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hensel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3284</guid>
		<description>I think the fact that it&#039;s jsut so blatant at being retro silver age when his most recent work is Seven Soldiers and All Star Superman, but I&#039;d agree that the term applied shouldn&#039;t be morrisonesque, but retro-silver age. 

I would argue that Morrison is the only currently working superhero writer where sipping on his kool-aid is justified, with Matt Wagner a possible second and Alan Moore less so with a dearth of recent works and not having as much an impact in the day to day workings of a universe&#039;s continuity. I probably shouldn&#039;t kickstart an argument over whether Morrison is the best currently working superhero writer, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the fact that it&#8217;s jsut so blatant at being retro silver age when his most recent work is Seven Soldiers and All Star Superman, but I&#8217;d agree that the term applied shouldn&#8217;t be morrisonesque, but retro-silver age. </p>
<p>I would argue that Morrison is the only currently working superhero writer where sipping on his kool-aid is justified, with Matt Wagner a possible second and Alan Moore less so with a dearth of recent works and not having as much an impact in the day to day workings of a universe&#8217;s continuity. I probably shouldn&#8217;t kickstart an argument over whether Morrison is the best currently working superhero writer, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moose n squirrel</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3282</link>
		<dc:creator>moose n squirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3282</guid>
		<description>I can see it as the type of thing Morrison would come up with, but it&#039;s also the type of thing any number of other Silver Age nostalgia-trippers would come up with. It&#039;s not necessarily Morrison-esque; it&#039;s just retro-Silver Age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see it as the type of thing Morrison would come up with, but it&#8217;s also the type of thing any number of other Silver Age nostalgia-trippers would come up with. It&#8217;s not necessarily Morrison-esque; it&#8217;s just retro-Silver Age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-3281</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/18/judging-dcs-october-books-by-their-covers/#comment-3281</guid>
		<description>Miss Martian? Oh, you mean the green Scrappy Doo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miss Martian? Oh, you mean the green Scrappy Doo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

