<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The problem with Shatter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/30/the-problem-with-shatter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/30/the-problem-with-shatter/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:11:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Callahan</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/30/the-problem-with-shatter/comment-page-1/#comment-4483</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Callahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/30/the-problem-with-shatter/#comment-4483</guid>
		<description>When this book originally came out, I remember being excited about it because it seemed so revolutionary.  Then, I took one look at the artwork and immediately became disillusioned.  I realized then and there (even as a naive teenager) that just because you can do something, it doesn&#039;t mean you should do something.  It&#039;s okay that you can use a computer to make terrible art, but if you want to do it, don&#039;t share it with others or pretend that it&#039;s &quot;groundbreaking.&quot;  Shatter and, from what I&#039;ve seen, Batman: Digital Justice (is that the name of it?) is just unreadable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When this book originally came out, I remember being excited about it because it seemed so revolutionary.  Then, I took one look at the artwork and immediately became disillusioned.  I realized then and there (even as a naive teenager) that just because you can do something, it doesn&#8217;t mean you should do something.  It&#8217;s okay that you can use a computer to make terrible art, but if you want to do it, don&#8217;t share it with others or pretend that it&#8217;s &#8220;groundbreaking.&#8221;  Shatter and, from what I&#8217;ve seen, Batman: Digital Justice (is that the name of it?) is just unreadable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Reed</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/30/the-problem-with-shatter/comment-page-1/#comment-4482</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/30/the-problem-with-shatter/#comment-4482</guid>
		<description>Curse you for stealing my carefully-planned-for-weeks-now title thunder, Burgas! I&#039;ll get you for this!

Anyway, Shatter looks kind of neat. I mean, it&#039;s a cute gimmick, and its existence is worth it for the experimentation alone. I should really check it out some day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curse you for stealing my carefully-planned-for-weeks-now title thunder, Burgas! I&#8217;ll get you for this!</p>
<p>Anyway, Shatter looks kind of neat. I mean, it&#8217;s a cute gimmick, and its existence is worth it for the experimentation alone. I should really check it out some day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

