<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed #62</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:30:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Desert Son</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-79489</link>
		<dc:creator>Desert Son</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-79489</guid>
		<description>The line &quot;I don&#039;t remember feeling that way&quot; sure sounds like Johnson&#039;s covering up.  I&#039;m really more inclined to believe Stan Lee on this one.  I mean do seriously believe that this guy would admit to being a homophobe in this day and age?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The line "I don't remember feeling that way" sure sounds like Johnson's covering up.  I'm really more inclined to believe Stan Lee on this one.  I mean do seriously believe that this guy would admit to being a homophobe in this day and age?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-24809</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-24809</guid>
		<description>I have seen Lee make that point a few times, too, Andrew, but the fact of the matter is, Stan Lee is just not a good source for, well, ANYthing.

Note how Lee has not been used as a source for any of these Urban Legends so far - the guy, great as he is, just doesn&#039;t have the best memory, and he seems to go by the theory of &quot;If I don&#039;t remember it, let me just go with what sounds most interesting.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen Lee make that point a few times, too, Andrew, but the fact of the matter is, Stan Lee is just not a good source for, well, ANYthing.</p>
<p>Note how Lee has not been used as a source for any of these Urban Legends so far - the guy, great as he is, just doesn't have the best memory, and he seems to go by the theory of "If I don't remember it, let me just go with what sounds most interesting."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew W</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-24779</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-24779</guid>
		<description>I, a while ago, saw the Kevin Smith interview dvd - And Evening With Kevin Smith, I think it is. On it, there was a small bit with Stan Lee.

In this interview, Stan Lee himself, said the name &#039;Bruce&#039; was changed because it sounded &#039;gay&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, a while ago, saw the Kevin Smith interview dvd - And Evening With Kevin Smith, I think it is. On it, there was a small bit with Stan Lee.</p>
<p>In this interview, Stan Lee himself, said the name 'Bruce' was changed because it sounded 'gay'.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yo go re</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-7538</link>
		<dc:creator>yo go re</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-7538</guid>
		<description>All it really takes is for one non-fictional, non-celebrity person to have an alliterative name to shoot holes in his theory. It may be comicbooky, but it&#039;s not unrealistic...

--yo
went to school with Sara Stewart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All it really takes is for one non-fictional, non-celebrity person to have an alliterative name to shoot holes in his theory. It may be comicbooky, but it's not unrealistic...</p>
<p>--yo<br />
went to school with Sara Stewart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-7535</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-7535</guid>
		<description>&quot;Fictional characters, particularly superheroes who have their â€œsuperâ€ names for recognizability, are supposed to be everyday type people with everyday type names. There are some explicit exceptions, of course, but THEY are just that, exceptions.&quot;


On the other hand, they are in fact fictional characters and are better remembered with a snappy name, whether it&#039;s their real name or their super-hero name.  I don&#039;t see what the problem is, especially when most of them are pretty common first and last names to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Fictional characters, particularly superheroes who have their â€œsuperâ€ names for recognizability, are supposed to be everyday type people with everyday type names. There are some explicit exceptions, of course, but THEY are just that, exceptions."</p>
<p>On the other hand, they are in fact fictional characters and are better remembered with a snappy name, whether it's their real name or their super-hero name.  I don't see what the problem is, especially when most of them are pretty common first and last names to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Watson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-7160</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 19:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-7160</guid>
		<description>&quot;If it works for entertainment industry figures, why doesn&#039;t it work for fictional characters?&quot;

Fictional characters, particularly superheroes who have their &quot;super&quot; names for recognizability, are supposed to be everyday type people with everyday type names. There are some explicit exceptions, of course, but THEY are just that, exceptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"If it works for entertainment industry figures, why doesn't it work for fictional characters?"</p>
<p>Fictional characters, particularly superheroes who have their "super" names for recognizability, are supposed to be everyday type people with everyday type names. There are some explicit exceptions, of course, but THEY are just that, exceptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Forever</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-7005</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Forever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-7005</guid>
		<description>For that matter, it would be stupid for real life people to be calling themselves Spider-Man or Hulk, so I guess fictional characters can&#039;t be named that either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For that matter, it would be stupid for real life people to be calling themselves Spider-Man or Hulk, so I guess fictional characters can't be named that either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Forever</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-7003</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Forever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-7003</guid>
		<description>Russell H: &quot;It works for entertainment industry figures the way it allegedly worked for Stan, i.e., it makes the name easier to remember, and itâ€™s important to those folks that WE remember them. I still say such names sound silly in everyday life and, analogously, with fictional characters.&quot;

If it works for entertainment industry figures, why doesn&#039;t it work for fictional characters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russell H: "It works for entertainment industry figures the way it allegedly worked for Stan, i.e., it makes the name easier to remember, and itâ€™s important to those folks that WE remember them. I still say such names sound silly in everyday life and, analogously, with fictional characters."</p>
<p>If it works for entertainment industry figures, why doesn't it work for fictional characters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Watson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-6542</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-6542</guid>
		<description>Russell H:

It works for entertainment industry figures the way it allegedly worked for Stan, i.e., it makes the name easier to remember, and it&#039;s important to those folks that WE remember them. I still say such names sound silly in everyday life and, analogously, with fictional characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russell H:</p>
<p>It works for entertainment industry figures the way it allegedly worked for Stan, i.e., it makes the name easier to remember, and it's important to those folks that WE remember them. I still say such names sound silly in everyday life and, analogously, with fictional characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell H</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-6494</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-6494</guid>
		<description>Ted Watson - &quot;No one has, to my knowledge, EVER said one damned word about ALL those silly names Stan Lee gave to early Marvel characters, beginning with Reed Richards and Sue Storm in FF#1, and continuing through Peter Parker, Matt Murdock and Stephen Strange, as well as Bruce/Bob Banner.&quot;

I don&#039;t think Bill Bryson considers alliterative initials silly. Or Mike Marts. Or Stephen Stills, Parker Posey, Robbie Robertson, Mike Myers, Joe Jackson, Jermaine Jackson, Janet Jackson, Geoff Johns (phonetic), Jack Johnson, Ben Browder, Claudia Christian, Alan Alda, Don Davis, Dom DeLouise, Mark Millar, Gary Groth, Helen Hunt, Holly Hunter, Chris Kattan, Kevin Keegan, Dana Delaney, Noel Neill, Barry Bonds, Bob Barker, Brigitte Bardot, Ted Turner...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted Watson - "No one has, to my knowledge, EVER said one damned word about ALL those silly names Stan Lee gave to early Marvel characters, beginning with Reed Richards and Sue Storm in FF#1, and continuing through Peter Parker, Matt Murdock and Stephen Strange, as well as Bruce/Bob Banner."</p>
<p>I don't think Bill Bryson considers alliterative initials silly. Or Mike Marts. Or Stephen Stills, Parker Posey, Robbie Robertson, Mike Myers, Joe Jackson, Jermaine Jackson, Janet Jackson, Geoff Johns (phonetic), Jack Johnson, Ben Browder, Claudia Christian, Alan Alda, Don Davis, Dom DeLouise, Mark Millar, Gary Groth, Helen Hunt, Holly Hunter, Chris Kattan, Kevin Keegan, Dana Delaney, Noel Neill, Barry Bonds, Bob Barker, Brigitte Bardot, Ted Turner...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anastasios Pelekanos</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-6424</link>
		<dc:creator>Anastasios Pelekanos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 02:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-6424</guid>
		<description>The glossy was 4 pages of Fantastic Four villain pin-ups.  If I recall correctly there were two villains per page with a brief paragraph about each villain.  They included Dr. Doom, Moleman, the Wizard (and as mentioned in his paragraph &quot;nee Wingless Wizard&quot;) and the Trapster.

I don&#039;t believe Stan actually made it to Nixon&#039;s enemies list.  It sounded more like a little bureaucratic issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The glossy was 4 pages of Fantastic Four villain pin-ups.  If I recall correctly there were two villains per page with a brief paragraph about each villain.  They included Dr. Doom, Moleman, the Wizard (and as mentioned in his paragraph "nee Wingless Wizard") and the Trapster.</p>
<p>I don't believe Stan actually made it to Nixon's enemies list.  It sounded more like a little bureaucratic issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelvingreen</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-5457</link>
		<dc:creator>kelvingreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-5457</guid>
		<description>I see you&#039;ve moved since I last visited. 

It&#039;s not really an urban legend as such, but I&#039;d like to know whatever happened to the Doctor Strange series JMS was supposed to be doing, and which kept being footnoted and set-up in issues of &lt;b&gt;Amazing Spider-Man&lt;/b&gt;, and ended up with Strange bing whisked off to stand on trial for crimes against the timestream in &lt;b&gt;ASM&lt;/b&gt; #500, complete with a &quot;To be continued in &lt;b&gt;Doctor Strange&lt;/b&gt; #1&quot;. The subsequent orgin retelling that JMS co-wrote doesn&#039;t seem to have much to do with that plotline, so what happened to JMS&#039; original series? Did it get cancelled, turned into the origin miniseries, or is it still on the way?

Was there a &lt;b&gt;New Avengers&lt;/b&gt; tie-in issue that featured Daredevil as a member in previews, only to include &quot;Ronin&quot; when it was published? I don&#039;t remember which book it would be, but I recall it waas one of the third-tier titles, possibly one of the anthology books, and undoubtedly cancelled since.

Oh, and did Warren Ellis really [SPOILER!] tell fans that &lt;b&gt;Planetary&lt;/b&gt;&#039;s Elijah Snow &lt;i&gt;wasn&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; the &quot;Fourth Man&quot; because he&#039;d made the mystery far too obvious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see you've moved since I last visited. </p>
<p>It's not really an urban legend as such, but I'd like to know whatever happened to the Doctor Strange series JMS was supposed to be doing, and which kept being footnoted and set-up in issues of <b>Amazing Spider-Man</b>, and ended up with Strange bing whisked off to stand on trial for crimes against the timestream in <b>ASM</b> #500, complete with a "To be continued in <b>Doctor Strange</b> #1". The subsequent orgin retelling that JMS co-wrote doesn't seem to have much to do with that plotline, so what happened to JMS' original series? Did it get cancelled, turned into the origin miniseries, or is it still on the way?</p>
<p>Was there a <b>New Avengers</b> tie-in issue that featured Daredevil as a member in previews, only to include "Ronin" when it was published? I don't remember which book it would be, but I recall it waas one of the third-tier titles, possibly one of the anthology books, and undoubtedly cancelled since.</p>
<p>Oh, and did Warren Ellis really [SPOILER!] tell fans that <b>Planetary</b>'s Elijah Snow <i>wasn't</i> the "Fourth Man" because he'd made the mystery far too obvious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DiRT</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-5416</link>
		<dc:creator>DiRT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-5416</guid>
		<description>&quot;And if you liked Big John Buscema&#039;s pandemonious pin-ups as much as we do - you&#039;ve already got &#039;em all hangin&#039; loose on your living room wall, just as we intended!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"And if you liked Big John Buscema's pandemonious pin-ups as much as we do - you've already got 'em all hangin' loose on your living room wall, just as we intended!"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruben</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-5312</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-5312</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got one for you... Howard Mackie was writer &quot;X&quot; from the Brotherhood? The early 00&#039;s mutant series

That one&#039;s been nagging me for a while

Regards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've got one for you... Howard Mackie was writer "X" from the Brotherhood? The early 00's mutant series</p>
<p>That one's been nagging me for a while</p>
<p>Regards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Watson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-5060</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 19:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-5060</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s something for your consideration, Brian. Again, the documentation is something I no longer possess, sorry, but sometime and somewhere, I read an article or maybe even a lettercolumn about the troubles Jack Kirby was having with Marvel, and it was mentioned more or less in passing that Jack at least threatened legal action (successfully) to remove a &quot;Created by Stan Lee&quot; credit from a Captain America movie. The piece was no more specific than that, leaving the question, which &quot;Cap&quot; flick? NONE of what came out of the late 1970s development deal between Marvel Comics, Universal Studios, and CBS--TV have any sort of a creator credit, just a notice that Marvel owns and licensed the property, and a &quot;Consultant&quot; credit for Smiley. Was Jack still alive when the Cannon Films flop with Matt Salinger (finally) came out? Of course, it could be a case of B.S. seeing print because it jibed with somebody&#039;s pro--Kirby/anti--Marvel (or Lee) feelings. Or does somebody here know more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's something for your consideration, Brian. Again, the documentation is something I no longer possess, sorry, but sometime and somewhere, I read an article or maybe even a lettercolumn about the troubles Jack Kirby was having with Marvel, and it was mentioned more or less in passing that Jack at least threatened legal action (successfully) to remove a "Created by Stan Lee" credit from a Captain America movie. The piece was no more specific than that, leaving the question, which "Cap" flick? NONE of what came out of the late 1970s development deal between Marvel Comics, Universal Studios, and CBS--TV have any sort of a creator credit, just a notice that Marvel owns and licensed the property, and a "Consultant" credit for Smiley. Was Jack still alive when the Cannon Films flop with Matt Salinger (finally) came out? Of course, it could be a case of B.S. seeing print because it jibed with somebody's pro--Kirby/anti--Marvel (or Lee) feelings. Or does somebody here know more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jer</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-5034</link>
		<dc:creator>Jer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-5034</guid>
		<description>You know, I&#039;ve always heard the same thing that Jim Kosmicki did about the price increase - that it was Marvel attempting to screw over DC and get their price increase at the same time.  Marvel telegraphed to DC that they were raising their cover price to 25 cents, DC followed suit, and Marvel backed off to 20 cents, leaving DC with more expensive comics (because DC couldn&#039;t move as fast as Marvel did - they were much bigger).  Something rings false about the idea that Marvel wouldn&#039;t have checked their costs enough to see whether the new price would be sustainable or not and would have to back off of it so quickly.  Plus, the fact that I&#039;ve seen this referenced as the tipping point from when DC went from #1 to #2 in the industry also makes it seem shadier than the above story would indicate.

And yo, a price freeze may sound asinine now, but back in the day it was conventional wisdom that a Price and Wage Freeze was how you slowed down inflation.  The little pokes and prods that the Central Banks do now are a result of a shift away from the model of freezes that were, while not common, thought to be one of the only ways to keep inflation under control back in the day.  From an economic standpoint, it seems to make sense (since you&#039;re directly impacting the rising prices and rising wages which are the primary cause of inflation), but its a really heavy-handed intervention into the market that fell out of favor as the seventies progressed and inflation got worse regardless (mainly due to skyrocketing energy prices, which could only be controlled so much by a national price freeze, given that most oil was imported, even at the time.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I've always heard the same thing that Jim Kosmicki did about the price increase - that it was Marvel attempting to screw over DC and get their price increase at the same time.  Marvel telegraphed to DC that they were raising their cover price to 25 cents, DC followed suit, and Marvel backed off to 20 cents, leaving DC with more expensive comics (because DC couldn't move as fast as Marvel did - they were much bigger).  Something rings false about the idea that Marvel wouldn't have checked their costs enough to see whether the new price would be sustainable or not and would have to back off of it so quickly.  Plus, the fact that I've seen this referenced as the tipping point from when DC went from #1 to #2 in the industry also makes it seem shadier than the above story would indicate.</p>
<p>And yo, a price freeze may sound asinine now, but back in the day it was conventional wisdom that a Price and Wage Freeze was how you slowed down inflation.  The little pokes and prods that the Central Banks do now are a result of a shift away from the model of freezes that were, while not common, thought to be one of the only ways to keep inflation under control back in the day.  From an economic standpoint, it seems to make sense (since you're directly impacting the rising prices and rising wages which are the primary cause of inflation), but its a really heavy-handed intervention into the market that fell out of favor as the seventies progressed and inflation got worse regardless (mainly due to skyrocketing energy prices, which could only be controlled so much by a national price freeze, given that most oil was imported, even at the time.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanctumSanctorumComix</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-4997</link>
		<dc:creator>SanctumSanctorumComix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 21:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-4997</guid>
		<description>Uh...So, what WAS in that INSERT?

A pin-up?
Some gov&#039;t line?
A coupon for free gov&#039;t cheese?

What??

~P~
P-TOR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh...So, what WAS in that INSERT?</p>
<p>A pin-up?<br />
Some gov't line?<br />
A coupon for free gov't cheese?</p>
<p>What??</p>
<p>~P~<br />
P-TOR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Bacardi</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-4956</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Bacardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 04:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-4956</guid>
		<description>Waitaminnit- &lt;i&gt;Kenneth Johnson&lt;/i&gt; created the Hulk? Stan and Jack- those dirty liars!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waitaminnit- <i>Kenneth Johnson</i> created the Hulk? Stan and Jack- those dirty liars!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Watson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-4950</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 20:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-4950</guid>
		<description>Brian---&quot;Saying Johnson was on the record is one thing. Having a quote from Johnson on the record is something else.&quot;

First, as I mentioned somewhere else (probably on the Kirby&#039;s--leaving--DC thread which was left on the old site), I liquidated a great deal of my library some years ago (specifically early 1994), so I couldn&#039;t even begin to track the statement down and list the citation, but I KNEW he had said it, and therefore felt it needed to be pointed out.
Second, what I meant was that NOBODY was saying anything about the alliteration in and of itself and not necessarily in connection with the Hulk TV show, not that you didn&#039;t do an update or something like that about Johnson. Of course, THAT&#039;s no longer true, either, I see. Thank you, Chris. Speaking of his comment, I wonder just how much Stan was actually writing then. After all, said huge quantity doesn&#039;t justify expressly depicting the Human Torch&#039;s true identity of Johnny Storm as a secret in his Strange Tales solo series, especially since Lee has claimed that he made the Fantastic Four&#039;s identities non--secret in the first place as a deliberate change of pace from most superhero comics. True, the GCD gives him only plot credit on the Torch stories with brother Larry Lieber scripting, but didn&#039;t the relevant volume of the old Marvel Comics Index series (my copy being among that aforementioned long--gone stuff, so I am truly ASKING) list Stan as THE writer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian---"Saying Johnson was on the record is one thing. Having a quote from Johnson on the record is something else."</p>
<p>First, as I mentioned somewhere else (probably on the Kirby's--leaving--DC thread which was left on the old site), I liquidated a great deal of my library some years ago (specifically early 1994), so I couldn't even begin to track the statement down and list the citation, but I KNEW he had said it, and therefore felt it needed to be pointed out.<br />
Second, what I meant was that NOBODY was saying anything about the alliteration in and of itself and not necessarily in connection with the Hulk TV show, not that you didn't do an update or something like that about Johnson. Of course, THAT's no longer true, either, I see. Thank you, Chris. Speaking of his comment, I wonder just how much Stan was actually writing then. After all, said huge quantity doesn't justify expressly depicting the Human Torch's true identity of Johnny Storm as a secret in his Strange Tales solo series, especially since Lee has claimed that he made the Fantastic Four's identities non--secret in the first place as a deliberate change of pace from most superhero comics. True, the GCD gives him only plot credit on the Torch stories with brother Larry Lieber scripting, but didn't the relevant volume of the old Marvel Comics Index series (my copy being among that aforementioned long--gone stuff, so I am truly ASKING) list Stan as THE writer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen cade</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/comment-page-1/#comment-4941</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen cade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 08:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/03/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-62/#comment-4941</guid>
		<description>Hmm, so that explains why I never really got into the Hulk series, well that and it was a watered down version of &quot;The Fugitive.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, so that explains why I never really got into the Hulk series, well that and it was a watered down version of "The Fugitive."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
