CBI Archive
What I bought - 23 August 2006
Thursday, August 24th, 2006 at 3:51 PM EST
Updated: Friday, August 25th, 2006 at 2:41 PM EST
It was a big week in comics only because two mini-series I’ve been holding off on reading ended, so I had extra books to read! Man, reading comics is hard! So let’s get to it!
I should mention, before we begin, that the UPS guy who delivers comics to my store dropped one of the boxes with its booty inside, so several comics were bent in ungainly ways. Although I don’t really care if my comics are “mint” or not, I do like them to not have big folds in the covers and crumpled edges where the staples are, so I did not get Daredevil or Fell this week. Next week I shall purchase them and provide you with very late reviews of them both! Now that’s service!
Action Philosophers! #6: The People’s Choice by Fred van Lente and Ryan Dunleavy. $2.95, Evil Twin Comics.
Action Philosophers! has been one of the best books out there since its inception, despite some grumpy nay-sayers right here on this very blog! (I can’t be bothered to go back and check who it was - chime in if it was you!) Therefore, it’s ironic that the book devoted to the three philosophers the fans wanted is the weakest of the bunch so far. However, that doesn’t mean it’s a bad book - not unlike a Prince album, the weakest is still better than 75% of what’s out there - but for fans who have come to expect absolute wonderfulness from this book, it’s a bit of a letdown. If you haven’t read Action Philosophers! yet, I would actually not recommend this issue as your starting point. Issue #2 remains my favorite, but any of the previous five would be a good place to begin.
The problem seems to be that Van Lente and Dunleavy don’t actually like two of the three philosophers in this book. They think Kierkegaard is mind-numbingly boring, and they don’t appear to enjoy Wittgenstein, either (going so far as to spell his name wrong on the cover). Aquinas gets off a little more easily (even though they spelled his name wrong on the cover, too), but that’s probably because the book has always skewed a little more toward the older philosophers - the modern ones rarely seem to spark the same goofy creativity we get from the creators that the pre-Enlightenment ones do. It’s possible that the modern philosophers are far too full of themselves to sufficiently mock beyond pointing out how full of themselves they are, or perhaps their philosophy is just too deadly dull. I would guess both. Aquinas, as with the other older philosophers in the other issues, was much less interested in idiotic arguments about the representations of language, like Wittgenstein, and more interested in man’s relationship to God, which makes their philosophies a bit less abstract and easier to get across in comic book form. At least that’s my theory.
There are funny parts in both the Wittgenstein and Kierkegaard sections, but nothing beats Aquinas lifting up his robe to reveal that his naughty bits are gone. That’s good stuff.
I would recommend finding the other issues if you haven’t already. This one’s okay, but not on par with the others. Next issue is ancient Greek dudes, and I expect a return to form for one of the best titles on the market today.
Batman # 656 by Baldy McBalderson, Andy Kubert, and Jesse Delperdang. $2.99, DC.
Because I’m anal, I went back and checked my Batman: Son of the Demon graphic novel, written by Mike W. Barr and illustrated by Jerry Bingham, for reference. You know this book - it’s the one that DC pretended didn’t exist until The God of All Comics wanted to use it in his story! Well, I’m certainly glad someone is using it, because it always bugged me that DC had swept it under the carpet, but, um, Grant? Can I point something out? Batman says, and I quote, “I remember being drugged senseless and refusing to cooperate in some depraved eugenics experiment” when Talia brings up the night their son was conceived. Well, unless Mike W. Barr has a weird idea of what “drugged senseless” means, Bats was getting it on pretty readily in the graphic novel. Now, is this the case of Morrison not wanting to admit that Bruce willingly boinked Talia and had a kid, or is this denial by Batman because he doesn’t want to admit to it? I would guess the latter, because of Morrison’s Cronin-esque knowledge of comic book history, but I wish that sentence wasn’t in this book. Little things like that bother me.
The issue itself is fine. Batman fights ninja man-bats. Whoopee! The thing that makes it interesting is, of course, the pop art behind the fight that shows various emotions the participants are having while the fight lasts. When Batman punches a man-bat in the face, the painting behind him shows a woman saying “ouch!” Clever, but nothing spectacular. I wonder if that was a Morrison idea or if Kubert came up with it.
Oh, and people in the DC Universe are stupider than I thought. I have never gotten the idea of Clark Kent taking off his glasses and suddenly no one recognizes him (Byrne tried to explain it in Man of Steel and failed, although good job trying!), but the fact that nobody guesses that Bruce Wayne is Batman is just ludicrous. Oh no, man-bats are attacking! Everyone runs for it! Bruce Wayne is among the missing! Suddenly, Batman, who only ever works in Gotham City, shows up in London at the same time as Bruce Wayne, another Gothamite! At least in the very excellent Detective issue from years ago (#590), Bruce realizes it wouldn’t do for Bruce Wayne and Batman to be seen in London at the same time.
One last thing: Jezebel Jet? Really?
Batman and the Mad Monk #1 by Matt Wagner. $3.50, DC.
Oh, Matt Wagner. Such very beautiful art work. Such a good grasp on the character of Batman and even the character of Julie Madison. Such a creepy story with the draining of the blood and the kidnapping of the innocents. Such a great cover homage to Detective Comics #31. And then you go and do that.
You know what I’m talking about, Matt Wagner! It’s on the first page! A reference to Frank Miller’s “Year One.” Oh, Matt Wagner!
Why am I bent out of shape about this? Well, I’m not really. I just wish that if Wagner is going to write stories from way back in the past of Batman, we’d see the purple dress with the green cape again. That’s all. C’est la vie.
I probably shouldn’t have even read this issue, because I know I’m going to buy the mini-series anyway. It’s creepy. Just like the last one. And pretty to look at. And weird. No excuse, really, for not buying this. The trade of the first one just came out. Fetch!
The Black Coat: A Call to Arms #1-4 by Ben Lichius, Adam Cogan, and Francesco Francavilla. $2.99, Ape Comics.
I finally got the third issue, which came out a while ago, so I could sit down and read the whole thing. Aren’t you happy?
The Black Coat is the kind of comic book I wish we had more of. It’s not the greatest thing in the world, but it is … well, “fun” wouldn’t be the word I’d use, because it’s somewhat dark, but “entertaining” it certainly is. In 1775, the Black Coat fights evil, along with his legion of do-gooder pals, the Knights of Liberty. They are primarily concerned with fighting British injustice, but the Black Coat isn’t above mixing it up with a monster who kills people and steals their limbs! In this series, the Black Coat gets involved in a case that not only features the crazed, unkillable madman, but also political machinations as the Colonies draw closer and closer to war, a sinister League that is plotting against the colonists and their rebellious tendencies, and a scheme to raise the dead. Not too shabby.
There are several things to recommend about this series. Francavilla’s art is very nice. The interiors are in black and white, which help greatly with the rough mood of colonial New York and its dark alleys, not to mention our hero himself, who blends into the scenery very nicely. Francavilla also does well with the actual landscape - this looks like a colonial city, and although I don’t know how accurate it is at depicting New York itself, I have no trouble believing it’s 1775, despite the presence of several outlandish inventions of the Knights of Liberty, like submarines and bazookas (primitive, sure, but still far ahead of their time). The feeling that this is a continuing story is a slight bit off-putting at first (I want to read about the adventure among the Penobscot!), but on further reflection, is a nice touch. The Black Coat is not a newcomer to the scene, and therefore the book can dive right into the action without worrying about establishing the character. Although this might work against us identifying with the characters, Cogan (Lichius is co-creator but is only credited with writing the first issue) does a good job giving us the relationships between the people in the book without letting up on the plot.
The final thing that makes this an interesting book is also something that frustrates me. I’m torn about whether it makes the book better or not. The story doesn’t end. The fourth issue, in fact, ends with a cliffhanger, as the Black Coat and the seemingly immortal Butcher crash into the harbor and don’t come back up. On the one hand, the Knights of Liberty stop the main plot, but on the other hand, the League and the spooky bandaged man who can disappear at will (he’s the main villain, it seems) are still at large, ready to do more mischief. As I said, I’m torn. I would have liked this to at least wrap up the Butcher part of the story - he’s the focal point of the series, as he is killing innocent people and the Black Coat has to stop him. The idea of a nasty British group conspiring to defeat the colonists before they even rebel is neat and will drive the series forward, I imagine. The creators promise more from this world, which is certainly nice, but in this world of publishers going under and indie books dying with no word, I would have appreciated some resolution.
If the creators come back for another round, I’m on board. It’s a neat, “The Shadow in the eighteenth century” kind of thing that The Black Coat has going on, and it’s a fine read if you like historical drama.
Elephantmen #2 by Richard Starkings, Moritat (Ian Churchill), and Henry Flint. $2.99, Image.
So I suppose “Moritat” is Ian Churchill, but why wouldn’t he use his real name?
Anyway, I guess Richard Starkings sent this to me, because it was from “Comicraft,” which isn’t Image, so that’s my supposition. He sent me the first issue, too, and while I liked it, I wasn’t planning on getting the second issue. I would have reviewed this before Wednesday - I got it on Tuesday - but I had a wicked headache on Tuesday night and went to bed early. So I feel bad.
I could just repeat my review from the first issue. It’s an interesting conceit for a comic book - genetically engineered animal/human hybrids bred for war, now turned loose on a futuristic world - and the stories are well written and nicely illustrated. I still don’t know why it doesn’t pop for me like other books. It might be the fact that the stories are too short - we have gotten four stories in two issues, and there’s not a lot of time to connect with the characters. These two stories are cases in point. The first one, illustrated by Henry Flint (whose art I only saw for the first time in Previews for the Omega Men, but who does a very nice job here), is a fight between Hip Flask, the hippo/man who started this whole thing four years ago, and an alligator/man. I assume they are fighting over the idol that Hip Flask clutches in his hands throughout the story, but I’m not sure, because the only words in the story are from the Book of Job. Yes, that one. It’s the section of Job that talks about the Behemoth and the Leviathan (chapters 40-41), and Starkings does a nice job of fitting the verses into the action of the story. But that’s all it is. At the end, Hip Flask sits by a reservoir, clutching the idol and bleeding. Apparently this story will actually be continued next issue, which would be nice. Meanwhile, the second story brings in a Howard Stern shock-jock type - he’s called Herman Strumm - with his guest, who is a crocodile/man (who can tell me the difference between alligators and crocodiles????). It’s a funny little story that mainly serves to set up the final page, on which the crocodile gets to tell a joke. The art is decent although not as good as the first story, and it’s another slice of life in the 23rd century. Nicely done, but nothing that makes me want to get the next issue.
I’m very glad Starkings sent me the two issues, and I would recommend them to you if you like science fiction and some mild critiques of our society and genetic engineering. It’s not a bad book nor series, but I just don’t get excited about it. Maybe it’s me.
Heroes for Hire #1 by Justin Gray, Jimmy Palmiotti, Billy Tucci, and Tom Palmer. $2.99, Marvel.
How the hell old is Tom Palmer? Dude’s been around, like, forever.
After the atrocity that was Daughters of the Dragon issue #1 (which I had a grand old time eviscerating here, in case you’re wondering), I heard that the rest of the series was pretty good. So why the first issue was so horrific, I don’t know. Anyway, I’m not going to go back and get that series, but I figured I’d give ol’ Misty and her krewe another chance, with the brand spankin’-new Heroes for Hire!
Well, harumph. It ain’t awful, it didn’t anger me like Daughters of the Dragon did, but it didn’t knock my socks off, either. It’s a perfectly serviceable book, but if you don’t read it, there will be nothing to mark its passing. HfH take down a bunch of Mandarin knock-offs, Misty and Colleen get in an argument with Iron Man, Spider-Man, and Reed Richards about the Registration Act (I’ll get back to that), and then beat up a bunch of Z-list baddies who are trying to flee the country. Paladin shows up. I’ve always liked Paladin, and I don’t know why.
A few things: I have commented on Misty’s breasts before, and in this issue, she actually has arrows pointing at her nipples. That’s just weird. I was astonished to see “normal” bodies on Colleen and Tarantula - they are drawn like actual women! Holy Bleepin’ Bleep! (Yes, I know lots of women have breasts like Misty. But they don’t have tiny waists like Misty, nor do they jump around beating people up like Misty. That’s the biggest problem I have with ridiculously-breasted women in comics - they would have serious issues with jumping around.) And I don’t like the throwdown at the end of the book. Again, correct me if I’m wrong, but the Registration Act applies to heroes and villains who live in the United States, right? So why the hell would anyone care if all these villains want to leave the country? Let them go! It makes it easier on everyone. Let them end up in a country where the police shoot first and ask questions later. Maybe then they’ll appreciate the U.S. of A.!
Okay, I’ll back off the patriotism. The argument Misty and Colleen get into with the big three of the pro-Registration side is the best part of the book, and I have to wonder - is the main title doing as good a job as the ancillary books are in examining both sides of the issue? From what I’ve seen, it doesn’t look like it is. X-Factor, then She-Hulk, and now Heroes for Hire have done a very nice job trying to thrash through the very real concerns on both sides of the issue. Misty, as a black woman, is understandably concerned about the ramifications of the act, even though she is on board with it, and Colleen makes a nice point when she asks, “Did I wake up in China this morning?” when Reed ignores her reasonable concerns. Both women also know this is going to end badly, something the heroes don’t want to hear about it. It’s a nice three pages, and makes me wonder, again, if Millar is handling things with this much subtlety.
And I have another question: do non-superpowered capes have to register? Does Moon Knight, for instance (I assume Marvel has completely retconned the brief time when he got stronger with the full moon)? I know he’s a vigilante anyway, so he’s already outside the law, but does he have to sign up? I’m just wondering, since Misty and Colleen bring it up.
I may be back for another issue. Like I said, it’s not awful, it’s somewhat entertaining, but it’s nothing special. We’ll see.
Jack of Fables #2 by Bill Willingham, Matthew Sturges, Tony Akins, and Andrew Pepoy. $2.99, DC/Vertigo.
Another book that falls into that category is issue the second of Jack of Fables. After a solid start, this issue disappoints because of Mr. Revise. His name is explained in this issue, and it’s dull. Guess what? He wants to clean up fairy tales because they’re all so violent and sexual. YAWN. I’m not sure why he’s doing it beyond the “they’re icky” factor, which would be even more boring. At least he could have a better reason for neutering the Fables. I can barely write about the rest of the issue because Jack’s meeting with Revise is so anti-climactic. I like the fact that Gary (the Pathetic Fallacy) and Jack cross the bridge with the man who was not going to St. Ives, and I like that Mary Mary disagrees with Sam toward the end, and I’m not quite sure why Babe isn’t blue, and I don’t think that there were any Cathars left in the fourteenth century because the Church did a pretty good job of slaughtering all of them in the thirteenth century, but that’s just stuff. Mainly, this issue is not good because the main plot point is so stupid. Jack remains a fun character, which means I might - might - buy the next issue, but it would be nice if we could get away from the prison camp as quickly as possible.
Supermarket #4 (of 4) by Brian Wood and Kristian. $3.99, IDW.
Supermarket finally finishes, and it has the same problem as all IDW books have: price. It is, unfortunately, far too flimsy a story, in the end, to justify 16 dollars. I’m sorry, but that’s the way it is. When I buy books, especially when they cost four bucks a pop, they have to have more meat on their bones. This is a perfectly nice book, and it’s enjoyable, but it’s skimpy. More, please! Despite the price, if this had been five issues so Wood could add some more stuff, I think it would have worked better. It feels far too rushed, and added to the price, we get a comic book that should cost about 8-10 dollars but is double that.
See, when I first read this book, I hated Pella. By the end of the first issue, I thought she was more interesting, because the death of her parents gave her a purpose, but I still never really warmed up to her. I don’t mind her, and I was interested in seeing what happened to her, but she’s still a punk. However, her predicament is interesting, and the way she succeeds in defeating both the Yakuza and the Swedish porn cabal - yes, there’s a Swedish porn cabal - is ingenious. But what is lacking, after the first issue and a half or so, is the evil critique of our mass consumerism that the book could sink into much more. The plot takes over, and while I don’t want the plot to go away, I wanted Pella to stop and make pithy comments about the state of the society in which she lives while unironically indulging in that very mass consumerism. That’s why I hated Pella, but that’s what also made her compelling. By the end of the book, she’s kind of a Charlie’s Angel, and it weakens her a bit. I don’t really buy her weeping for her parents at the end, because she was never really established as giving a rat’s ass about them in the first place. That’s why this could probably have used another issue. The plot overwhelms all, and it’s not enough.
The artwork is very keen, though. Kristian has a nice futuristic vibe going on with the city and even the characters, and there’s a nice mania to it. This is a frustrating book, because like a lot of the IDW output, I like it, but can’t recommend spending so much money on it. It does not appear that they are going to lower their prices, though, so I guess we’re stuck with it.
Wasteland #2 by Antony Johnston and Christopher Mitten. $2.99, Oni Press.
This came out last week, but for some reason I missed it until this past weekend, so I didn’t review it. It’s still out there, though, so go get it if you want to!
Ah, but should you? Should you????? Well, like the first issue, it’s pretty good. Johnston is still feeling around this world, so it still, unfortunately, has too much of a Road Warrior/Beyond Thunderdome thing going on, which I hope will lessen as we learn more about the characters and what’s going on. The centerpiece of this issue is the story of how the world got the way it did, and while I always enjoy legends that explain how the people today are horrible and will be punished (and Mitten’s art for the storytelling, which looks like a collage, is very nice), it again adheres too closely to post-Apocalyptic stuff we’ve already seen before. Does that mean it’s not worth it? Well, I’m still waiting to give a final opinion on it. It is not horrible, the characters are slowly becoming interesting, the art is neat, and I’m intrigued by the religious aspect of the book. The Sunners, who are seen as “heathens” by the people in the city, are persecuted by the government, and I hope that we will see more of this divide in the future (I’m sure we will, because why would Johnston include it?). Like I said, this is an intriguing book, and I’m giving it a few issues to really cohere. I hope it does, because it has a lot of potential.
MINI-SERIES I BOUGHT BUT DID NOT READ.
Eternals #3 (of 6) by Neil Gaiman, John Romita Jr., and Danny Miki with Tom Palmer. $3.99, Marvel.
Issue #2 was good, so I decided to stick with the series. I’ll get around to reading it, I swear!
Rex Libris #5 by James Turner. $2.95, SLG Publishing.
This says “end of Book One” at the end of the issue, so I assume it will be awhile before this shows up again. Considering it took a year for five issues to come out, I imagine Turner needs a lot of time to finish even one issue. I promise to read these eventually. It may take me a year to read all five issues, because they’re so dense. I will get to it this weekend, probably, although I doubt I will finish them. Some day!
So that’s another week in the books. Oh, and Justice League sucked. Ha! Okay, I didn’t read it. My komik kung-fu is so strong I can review books without having read them! Bow down before my komik kung-fu!






31 Comments
Bill Reed
August 24, 2006 at 5:17 pm
Justice League was surprisingly okay for a Meltzer book, but I assume it will all be shot to hell in a couple months anyway, and I don’t give a poo about any of the characters because I am a Shil for Giffen and never read the Satellite or Detroit Leagues. But I didn’t, like, buy it or anything. I’m not that crazy.
Batman was fun, but a little empty. I feel like Morrison wrote the whole thing in five minutes, stream-of-consciousness style. Meanwhile, though, I plunked down $3.25 for two old Milligan-penned Batman comics, which means I’ve finally read the conclusion to Dark Knight Dark City (which is great). Haven’t sat down to read “The Bomb” yet. Alls I need now is two chapters of the Idiot Root and I will have all of Milligan’s Batman.
Can’t wait to buy the trade for Rex Libris (though I notice Amazon has the *singles* in stock! Crazy).
moose n squirrel
August 24, 2006 at 5:45 pm
Re: Batman: Where has Morrison explicitly stated that this kid is the same exact kid as the one from “Son of the Demon”? I read that “drugged for a eugenics experiment” line as being deliberately ambiguous, serving as a callback to one plot element in “Son of the Demon” (Batman and Talia get it on!) without actually explicitly saying “yes, that story ‘counts’ now.” This story no more requires “Son of the Demon” to be “in continuity” than last issue’s use of the Batpoles requires the Adam West TV show to be “canonical.”
I think Morrison is deliberately avoiding a direct invocation of “Son of the Demon” for two reasons: first, it makes the story less accessible to newcomers (shockingly, not everyone reading Batman #656 will have read the obscure, fairly mediocre, decades-old graphic novel which inspired it), and second, it involves the use of a much more sympathetic version of Talia than the one Morrison is opting for here, a character who has suddenly turned into Capital-E Evil and is too one-dimensional to even have sex with Batman for anything but nefarious reasons. In a way this is a logical consequence of killing off Ra’s al Ghul and replacing him with Talia (making her basically Ra’s with breasts), which itself was a stupid idea, but what can you do?
Also: Talia in a floral print dress? Am I the only one to notice this is super-lame? As Ra’s al Ghul’s second-in-command she dressed in a slinky-yet-imposing
death-commando catsuit; as leader of her own international terrorist organization she should get an outfit as least as cool, maybe graduating to some female equivalent of Ra’s’ “Dr. No by way of Fu Manchu” look. But a floral pattern dress? Come on! I do not feel like the world is effectively being menaced when the supervillain in question is dressed like June Cleaver.
These first two issues haven’t been all that amazing or exciting, especially considering the fact that they prominently feature ninja man-bats. Maybe this is an argument in favor of Morrison’s usual hypercompression as opposed to the pace he’s using here: an idea like “ninja man-bats!” sounds really awesome and wacky when you first hear it, but really doesn’t lend itself to being stretched out over a multi-issue arc. Morrison could prove me wrong and start firing on all cylinders next issue, of course, but as it stands I have to think his “traditional” approach, as seen on All-Star Superman, is by far the more successful one.
Greg Burgas
August 24, 2006 at 5:52 pm
“Mediocre”? Them’s fightin’ words!
I doubt if Morrison has stated it explicitly. I don’t recall any other time Bruce and Talia made the beast with two backs, however, and the fact that DC is reprinting the graphic novel makes it seem like THEY think it’s the same kid. I think it would have to be, because Morrison leaves himself way too open to stealing from Mike Barr if it’s not, and then we would have a Barr-Morrison throwdown like the Morrison-Miller throwdown that is developing!
(But that’s a story for another day, I suppose.)
Rebis
August 24, 2006 at 6:02 pm
Color me unimpressed by the God on “Batman” so far. If he weren’t the God, I’d stop buying it. But he is the God, and after two issues of set-up for meeting the kid, I’m willing to see what the payoff is.
I liked the new “Justice League of America,” btw. Though after Meltzer’s conclusion to “IC,” I’ll remain highly suspicious of any of his comics. I was, however, never one of the people outraged by the rape. I’m also not one of those guys in love with the Giffen-DeMatteis (sp?) incarnation, so perhaps there’s a connection there. That comic was the Justice League in name only. Perfectly acceptable if you like that kind of thing, but not my personal cup of tea. (Though I stuck with it for quite a while. Ditto Detroit, which I also bought anyway.) As far as I’m concerned, we really didn’t have a flagship Justice League after the satellite was destroyed until Morrison started writing it again.
Now that I’m an adult and not a high-school or college kid, I don’t feel compelled to buy comics just because I like the idea of the title or the characters if I don’t actually enjoy reading the comic itself. Which is why I blew off JLA after Waid took it over, and why I’ve only occasionally read it since then. At least Meltzer gets the notion about the JLA that I’m down with: The team should be a good mix of mostly A-listers with proven B-listers. No brand-new characters please; save them for Titans and Outsiders and such. The League is DC’s crown jewel of team books, and the lineup oughtta reflect that.
moose n squirrel
August 24, 2006 at 6:29 pm
“Mediocre”? Them’s fightin’ words!
Okay, you’re right, “mediocre” isn’t a fair assessment of “Son of the Demon.” A better description would be “poorly paced, ineptly scripted twaddle mired in bad characterization, unremarkable action sequences and a derivative plot anchored around a complete cipher.”
And like I said, just because Morrison’s story is an obvious thematic callback to “Son of the Demon” doesn’t mean he’s making it an outright sequel to “Son of the Demon,” any more than his inclusion of the Batpoles in #565 was an indication that the Adam West series is “canon.” In fact, the only in-story reference to Bats and Talia getting it on clearly contradicts the events of “Son of the Demon.” And DC re-releasing the book means nothing; it only indicates that DC is ready and willing to shill any old junk from its back catalogue should the opportunity to do so arise. You’ll notice that DC is also releasing a trade of the first appearance of the Earth-2 Huntress a few months from now, along with a trade of one of the modern Huntress miniseries, no doubt to cash in on some event happening in Birds of Prey. Does this mean that the Huntress in Birds of Prey is the exact same character as the Earth-2 Huntress? Of course not, but the creation of one was clearly inspired by the previous existence of the other. These things aren’t exactly linear.
moose n squirrel
August 24, 2006 at 6:31 pm
And once again I protest that Morrison is not, and has never been, the God of All Comics. I submit instead that he might - just might - be Deputy Postmaster General of the Superhero Genre.
Goofy-goomba
August 24, 2006 at 6:48 pm
“Talia in a floral print dress? Am I the only one to notice this is super-lame? As Ra’s al Ghul’s second-in-command she dressed in a slinky-yet-imposing death-commando catsuit; as leader of her own international terrorist organization she should get an outfit as least as cool, maybe graduating to some female equivalent of Ra’s’ “Dr. No by way of Fu Manchu” look. But a floral pattern dress? Come on! I do not feel like the world is effectively being menaced when the supervillain in question is dressed like June Cleaver.”
Well, she IS a mom now. Your mom probably didn’t wear the same clothes after you were born. I can’t imagine that wasn’t part of it.
James
August 24, 2006 at 6:50 pm
“It’s a perfectly serviceable book, but if you don’t read it, there will be nothing to mark its passing.”
Sounds like all Gray and Palmiotti books. An engaging read but nothing that sticks with you. Battle for Blüdhaven and Jonah Hex being the two DC examples.
Dave
August 24, 2006 at 7:03 pm
I’m pretty sure that the Dark Moon Rising series are an attempt to redo some of the classic Batman stories while fitting them into the new canon as established by later works DC has adapted. Hence the reference to the Joker’s origin as established by The Killing Joke on the first page of the first issue of Monster Men. Then the second issue of Monster Men has Gordon making reference to Batman saving his wife and son in the fourth issue of Year One.
As for Eternals #3, I liked it, but I feel like this issue pushed the Civil War tie-ins much harder than the previous two issues, which I kind of felt detracted from the issue. I’m waiting for the end of the series before I make final judgements, but based off the first reading I did of it, this feels like the weakest issue so far.
Evan Waters
August 24, 2006 at 7:20 pm
I am a bit curious as to WHY they have the Civil War references in ETERNALS. Sure, maybe they want it to be in-continuity so if it sells really well Marvel can do an ongoing, but they don’t have to be that explicit about it. (Hell, from what I understand, whether or not a series is in-continuity is totally a matter of the editors saying it is or isn’t. I believe FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE JUSTICE LEAGUE changed status at some point.)
Anyway, I do agree that ACTION PHILOSOPHERS was weaker than usual. I think the problem was, with Wittgenstein you have a guy who embraced two separate philosophies, either of which is difficult enough to explain on its own (the authors’ dislike may play a role, but they did an okay job with Derrida); meanwhile, Kirkegaard’s philosophy is just kinda narrow, hence not that much fun to explain.
I am looking forward to the Greeks more.
Jog
August 24, 2006 at 7:54 pm
‘Moritat’ is not Ian Churchill; he’s a fellow named Justin Norman. Churchill did the flip cover on issue #2 with Hip Flask rising out of the water… it’s actually a variation on an ad he did for Comicraft back in ‘99, when Hip Flask was the company mascot.
moose n squirrel
August 24, 2006 at 8:06 pm
Well, she IS a mom now.
By the looks of her kid, she’s been a mom for the last twelve years or so, and she spent most of that time dressed relatively sensibly for a globe-trotting supervillainness.
moose n squirrel
August 24, 2006 at 8:09 pm
Does the canonicity of “Dark Moon Rising” really matter? I mean, seriously, is anyone reading it because they think this is a Critical New Addition To Official Batman Continuity, as opposed to just a neat Batman story by Matt Wagner?
Greg Burgas
August 24, 2006 at 8:11 pm
Thanks, Jog. I was wondering why they had a blurb about Churchill on the inside but didn’t mention what he actually did. “Moritat” certainly doesn’t look like Churchill’s art!
Yeah, David, I know what Wagner is doing with these series, but I don’t have to like it! With the very nice way that he has evoked the 1930s and 1940s with these books, I was hoping he would slip in some pre-Year One stuff and say screw you to the higher-ups at DC. Oh well.
Anun
August 24, 2006 at 8:38 pm
The kid in that Batman story is named “Damien”, which amuses me to no end. Although Batman’s son’s name translates to “Son of the Bat”, the book is still known as “Son of the Demon” and Damien being the name of the Antichrist in the Omen — now that’s a son of a demon!
All of this makes me hope desperately that the twist will not be the revelation of Ra’s al Ghul incest with Talia.
Anun
August 24, 2006 at 8:44 pm
I suppose it should go without saying that I’m joking in that last response.
Mostly. I mean calling him “Damien” is such a weird choice really. But it might be for the cleverness of it all and no more, just like the paintings in the background of this issue.
Anonymous
August 25, 2006 at 3:14 am
10 issues before we’ll get BATMAN #666 !! LOL
Apodaca
August 25, 2006 at 3:20 am
That’d be me who was putting down Action Philosophers. What can I say, it wasn’t making me laugh.
moose n squirrel
August 25, 2006 at 6:46 am
“Damien” is kind of obvious, though, isn’t it? It’s shorthand for “this kid is evil,” which strikes me as fairly lazy is what you intend to do is actually show that the kid is evil.
red_ricky
August 25, 2006 at 12:09 pm
“Damien” is kind of obvious, though, isn’t it? It’s shorthand for “this kid is evil,” which strikes me as fairly lazy is what you intend to do is actually show that the kid is evil.–moose n squirrel
Agreed.
If not original, at least the name “Ibn al Xu’ffasch” was well researched.
Jason
August 25, 2006 at 12:38 pm
Wait…so Batman was drugged while concieving lil Ib’n? Could there be a list of for evil chicks drugging good guys and bearing their child? The only other example is Mist/Nash taking advantage of a drugged-out Jack Knight in Starman.
Emperor Nerd
August 25, 2006 at 1:46 pm
Mr. Revise was trying to ‘neuter’ the Fables as a way of killing them. Famous Fables are very hard to kill (see Goldilocks) but by stripping the stories of all the good stuff, he makes them bland and indistinct - forgettable. A forgotten Fable dies easily.
Greg Burgas
August 25, 2006 at 2:44 pm
Yeah, Emperor Nerd, I don’t know why I spelled “neuter” wrong. I was thinking “nurture” for some reason and blew it. Yes, I am a moron. Anyway, I know WHY Revise is doing what’s he’s doing - I just think it’s a dull reason. What’s his issue with Fables, anyway? If it’s just that they make him uncomfortable in his trousers, that’s a dumb motivation. I really hope we get a real motivation soon, because right now it’s not working for me.
Someone should neuter me because of my poor spelling!
Ryan Dunlavey
August 25, 2006 at 9:25 pm
Thanks for the plug, but my last name is spelled DUNLAVEY. Not “Dunleavy”. Argh. Everyone mis-spells my name. EVERYONE. But I guess that’s only fair since I mis-spelled Aquinas and Wittgenstein on the cover.
Thanks for picking up the latest issue of Action Philosophers - I agree it was weak compared to the others, I think mostly because we were locked into whomever was voted the most popular rather than having a theme of our own choosing. Democracy simply doesn’t work.
Greg Burgas
August 25, 2006 at 9:41 pm
Arrgghh! I’m sorry, Ryan. I’ve been spelling it wrong ever since the darned book came out. I still think it was an educational read (and I liked Wittgenstein’s angry lines!), but I am definitely looking forward to the Greek book.
Emperor Nerd
August 26, 2006 at 6:59 am
I wasn’t harping on your spelling. I’m not one of those people!
Revise said he had almost succeeded in ridding the world of magic, but the Fable influx had reintroduced it. To get rid of magic, he has to kill the Fables.
Tony Akins
August 26, 2006 at 8:18 am
Emperor nerd said what I was going to say. Thanks EN.
Thanks for keeping us honest, Greg.
Omar Karindu
August 26, 2006 at 1:30 pm
Add me as one of the chorus of those unimpressed by Morrison’s Batman, which seems to be a competent superhero story and little else so far. Talia is drained of whatever sympathetic dimensions she once had, to the point that even her love affair with Batman isn’t one anymore, and she appears to be a terrorist because…she enjoys terrorism. Batman is simply one more superhero in a fight. And “ninja Man-Bats” are just one more batch of ciphers for the generic superhero to beat up in a colorful setting.
After the interesting possibilities apparently raised by #655, this the current issue seems like a genuine waste of time, achieving a fair bit of plot progress but zero in the way of thematic movement. And as a result, the superficial eccentricities of Morrison’s recent style — the deliberately stilted dialogue, abrupt and direct fourth wall breaking, and chains of catachresis — are becoming scripting liabilities here. When the new character at the start may as well be carrying a sign labeled “future love interest,” something seems to be going badly wrong. At least Hamed Ali in Animal Man was deliberately constructed as a one-note, plot-function character and then summarily deconstructed into pencil sketches and scrawled dialogue notes. I’m waiting for that to happen with “Jezebel Jet” and whoever this person in a Talia suit is.
Aleem
August 26, 2006 at 3:29 pm
you have great taste in comics greg… only the best eh!
yo go re
August 28, 2006 at 1:11 am
I, too, wondered whether the Pop Art captions were in the script or not. Either way, it was a clever device on someone’s part.
And the “Bruce Wayne shows up somewhere and then Batman conveniently does, too” was also glossed over in The Scottish Connection. And say, who wrote that book? Hmm.
The only place I’ve seen it used well was in the Sword of Azrael miniseries, of all places, where Bruce-as-Bruce does a bunch of stuff while out of the batsuit because he’s in Switzerland and, as he says, “There’s no one here who knows that Bruce Wayne shouldn’t be able to do this.”
The difference between aligators and crocodiles is all in the face - gators’ snouts are short and stout, while a croc’s face is long and narrow. Basically, pretend you have a big ball of Reptile Chow in your shoe: a crocodile could get his face inside your shoe to eat it, while an aligator could swallow your shoe whole. That make sense?
Jennifer de Guzman
August 28, 2006 at 10:06 am
Rex Libris will continue to be published on a quarterly schedule, just as it always has, and just as most independent comics are.