<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed #66</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:50:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: That French Guy</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-2/#comment-676932</link>
		<dc:creator>That French Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-676932</guid>
		<description>Hi

Just a minor correction Maybe the Fantomas films didn&#039;t have much success when they came out, I don&#039;t know I wasn&#039;t born yet. But decades of TV reruns every other year means they&#039;re very famous now (I was actually joking about one scene with my office pal last week).

anyway, keep up the good work Brian, I just found out about your site and spent the whole afternoon reading CBULR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>Just a minor correction Maybe the Fantomas films didn't have much success when they came out, I don't know I wasn't born yet. But decades of TV reruns every other year means they're very famous now (I was actually joking about one scene with my office pal last week).</p>
<p>anyway, keep up the good work Brian, I just found out about your site and spent the whole afternoon reading CBULR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric the Pilot</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-2/#comment-7227</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric the Pilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 03:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-7227</guid>
		<description>If one can believe YouTube ande the person who posted it, this Batman and Robin short purports to have appeared on Sesame Street:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpG6_FjgY4w</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If one can believe YouTube ande the person who posted it, this Batman and Robin short purports to have appeared on Sesame Street:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpG6_FjgY4w" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpG6_FjgY4w</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Hawkman</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-2/#comment-7163</link>
		<dc:creator>American Hawkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 20:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-7163</guid>
		<description>Since nobody else has mentioned it, I will: Brain-Drain from Omega Flight ISN&#039;T a 90s character. He&#039;s a dusted-off 70s character, who was actually created to be a Golden-Age villain to menace the Invaders, and did so in the Marvel Premier issues featuring the Liberty Legion. I&#039;m still tickled Marvel brought him back.

Oh, and to add fuel to the fire of the Aunt Harriet rumor from above: While she wasn&#039;t created for the TV show, since she originally appeared in 1964&#039;s Detective Comics #328, her history&#039;s somewhat interesting as well, since she wasn&#039;t the first Aunt added to the Batman cast. The original aunt was named Aunt Agatha, who predated the Aunt Harriet name by 10 years. Agatha first appeared in 1954&#039;s Batman #89. Agatha finally has got the respect she was due in modern DC continuity, since she was revived in this month&#039;s Batman issue by Grant Morrison. No idea if Aunt Harriet wasn&#039;t just originally a misnamed Aunt Agatha making a second appearance, but it&#039;s an interesting possiblity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since nobody else has mentioned it, I will: Brain-Drain from Omega Flight ISN'T a 90s character. He's a dusted-off 70s character, who was actually created to be a Golden-Age villain to menace the Invaders, and did so in the Marvel Premier issues featuring the Liberty Legion. I'm still tickled Marvel brought him back.</p>
<p>Oh, and to add fuel to the fire of the Aunt Harriet rumor from above: While she wasn't created for the TV show, since she originally appeared in 1964's Detective Comics #328, her history's somewhat interesting as well, since she wasn't the first Aunt added to the Batman cast. The original aunt was named Aunt Agatha, who predated the Aunt Harriet name by 10 years. Agatha first appeared in 1954's Batman #89. Agatha finally has got the respect she was due in modern DC continuity, since she was revived in this month's Batman issue by Grant Morrison. No idea if Aunt Harriet wasn't just originally a misnamed Aunt Agatha making a second appearance, but it's an interesting possiblity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butch R</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-2/#comment-7117</link>
		<dc:creator>Butch R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 03:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-7117</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got one for you.  The guy I used to buy comics from said that due to the right of characters rolling back to creators, DC lost the rights to Hawkman.  Which was the reason why you didn&#039;t see Hawkman from the end of Hawkworld to Geoff Johns returning him in JSA.  This guy also claims DC lost the rights to Swamp Thing in the contracts for the movies and tv shows.  Or at the very least, there was some sort of confusion over who had the rights of Swamp Thing.  
I&#039;ve found this guy to be full of it, so these are probably lies he made up like lots of other things.  So, anybody?
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've got one for you.  The guy I used to buy comics from said that due to the right of characters rolling back to creators, DC lost the rights to Hawkman.  Which was the reason why you didn't see Hawkman from the end of Hawkworld to Geoff Johns returning him in JSA.  This guy also claims DC lost the rights to Swamp Thing in the contracts for the movies and tv shows.  Or at the very least, there was some sort of confusion over who had the rights of Swamp Thing.<br />
I've found this guy to be full of it, so these are probably lies he made up like lots of other things.  So, anybody?<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Stevens</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-2/#comment-7007</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-7007</guid>
		<description>Arguably Fantomex is as much Midnighter as he is the other characters we&#039;ve touched upon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arguably Fantomex is as much Midnighter as he is the other characters we've touched upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McDonagh</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-2/#comment-6985</link>
		<dc:creator>John McDonagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-6985</guid>
		<description>Did you ever cover the one about aunt Harriett getting added because of the TV show? It is wrong, since she showed up long before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever cover the one about aunt Harriett getting added because of the TV show? It is wrong, since she showed up long before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-2/#comment-6981</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 13:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-6981</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, Clayton. Any Sesame Street fans out there that could help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, Clayton. Any Sesame Street fans out there that could help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clayton Emery</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-2/#comment-6978</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayton Emery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 12:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-6978</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a non-urban legend, just a chunk of comic history that never resolved...

When SESAME STREET was announced back in 1968 or 69 as a new sensational kid&#039;s education program, there were ads in DC comics with Superman and Batman saying THEY would be on this new Sesame Street.  The ads were half-page and fairly common.  My little brother watched Sesame Street, and I&#039;d ask if Superman or Batman ever appeared, but he said no.  DID they ever appear?  My gut feeling is that someone decided two super-fighters were a bad idea for a little kids&#039; show, or the deal may simply have fizzled over rights and revenues, or for some other reason.  Anyone know?

Clayton Emery
http://www.challengersoftheunknown.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a non-urban legend, just a chunk of comic history that never resolved...</p>
<p>When SESAME STREET was announced back in 1968 or 69 as a new sensational kid's education program, there were ads in DC comics with Superman and Batman saying THEY would be on this new Sesame Street.  The ads were half-page and fairly common.  My little brother watched Sesame Street, and I'd ask if Superman or Batman ever appeared, but he said no.  DID they ever appear?  My gut feeling is that someone decided two super-fighters were a bad idea for a little kids' show, or the deal may simply have fizzled over rights and revenues, or for some other reason.  Anyone know?</p>
<p>Clayton Emery<br />
<a href="http://www.challengersoftheunknown.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.challengersoftheunknown.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Superecwfan1</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-2/#comment-6909</link>
		<dc:creator>Superecwfan1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-6909</guid>
		<description>The Fantomex thing someone told me on the X-Boards back in 2003/2004 . Yeah , its not a big Urban legend but I did like the column and the pictures of the character that Grant Morrison lifted in some ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fantomex thing someone told me on the X-Boards back in 2003/2004 . Yeah , its not a big Urban legend but I did like the column and the pictures of the character that Grant Morrison lifted in some ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelvingreen</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-2/#comment-6886</link>
		<dc:creator>kelvingreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 08:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-6886</guid>
		<description>While I think the Fantomas/ex thing is pretty interesting, I&#039;ve got to agree with moose. It&#039;s not really an urban legend as such is it? It&#039;s just an explanation of the character&#039;s origins; there are no big secrets or anything involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I think the Fantomas/ex thing is pretty interesting, I've got to agree with moose. It's not really an urban legend as such is it? It's just an explanation of the character's origins; there are no big secrets or anything involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moose n squirrel</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-1/#comment-6876</link>
		<dc:creator>moose n squirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 03:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-6876</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Grant Morrison took an old French character out of the public domain and made him an X-Men character.&lt;/em&gt;

This is somewhat overstating it. Yes, Fantomex is clearly based on the character of Fantomas (and on Diabolik), but Morrison didn&#039;t just grab the original, public domain character and port him into the X-Men universe (in the way that Alan Moore used the public domain characters of the League of Gentlemen books). Loads of comic book characters are based on preexisting characters, but that doesn&#039;t make them direct grabs. The Mandarin and Ra&#039;s al Ghul are both based on Fu Manchu, for example, but Denny O&#039;Neil didn&#039;t literally &quot;take&quot; Fu Manchu and make him a Batman villain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Grant Morrison took an old French character out of the public domain and made him an X-Men character.</em></p>
<p>This is somewhat overstating it. Yes, Fantomex is clearly based on the character of Fantomas (and on Diabolik), but Morrison didn't just grab the original, public domain character and port him into the X-Men universe (in the way that Alan Moore used the public domain characters of the League of Gentlemen books). Loads of comic book characters are based on preexisting characters, but that doesn't make them direct grabs. The Mandarin and Ra's al Ghul are both based on Fu Manchu, for example, but Denny O'Neil didn't literally "take" Fu Manchu and make him a Batman villain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R David Francis</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-1/#comment-6874</link>
		<dc:creator>R David Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 02:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-6874</guid>
		<description>Although oblique reference to it has been made above, no story involving Northstar&#039;s sexual orientation is complete without mention of how he was handled in the Byrne and Mantlo eras of the book.

NOTE:  the handling, especially Mantlo&#039;s, could have been by editorial fiat, for all I know - I&#039;m simply identifying the writers at the time.

Under Byrne&#039;s hand, Northstar was fairly firmly established as being homosexual, without it being overtly stated.  we see scenes with him and a friend, and only the most obtuse of readers could interpret the scene as not being two men who are gay and romantically involved.

When Byrne and Mantlo swapped books (Byrne took over INCREDIBLE HULK), Mantlo didn&#039;t really do anything of the sort.  Then again, on this book at least, Mantlo&#039;s writing didn&#039;t really seem to have the subtlety necessary to pull off what John had done.

During Mantlo&#039;s tenure, Northstar appears to be ill.  The illness may have started while Byrne was writing the book, and was interpreted to be AIDS.  However, in ALPHA FLIGHT 50, the illness is revealed to be magic-oriented, and Northstar and Aurora are revealed to be magical beings.  Addendum:  A check of Wikipedia implies that Mantlo started the illness, that he intended it to be AIDS and to have Jean-Paul die in #50, and that it was indeed editorial fiat that changed things.  Also, that Northstar&#039;s magical heritage being able to be stated as him being part Faerie was intended as a subtle jab back at editorial.  Like I said, Mantlo didn&#039;t do subtle real well in this book.  In fact (another aside, I know), the one page of his ALPHA FLIGHT run I best remember was the second or third page of the issue (somewhere around # 46).  There were four panels, which where about 50% word balloon, with 6 footnotes.  It was an info dump about the preceding several issues, and was a testbook example of why the current recap page at the front of each book can be a very good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although oblique reference to it has been made above, no story involving Northstar's sexual orientation is complete without mention of how he was handled in the Byrne and Mantlo eras of the book.</p>
<p>NOTE:  the handling, especially Mantlo's, could have been by editorial fiat, for all I know - I'm simply identifying the writers at the time.</p>
<p>Under Byrne's hand, Northstar was fairly firmly established as being homosexual, without it being overtly stated.  we see scenes with him and a friend, and only the most obtuse of readers could interpret the scene as not being two men who are gay and romantically involved.</p>
<p>When Byrne and Mantlo swapped books (Byrne took over INCREDIBLE HULK), Mantlo didn't really do anything of the sort.  Then again, on this book at least, Mantlo's writing didn't really seem to have the subtlety necessary to pull off what John had done.</p>
<p>During Mantlo's tenure, Northstar appears to be ill.  The illness may have started while Byrne was writing the book, and was interpreted to be AIDS.  However, in ALPHA FLIGHT 50, the illness is revealed to be magic-oriented, and Northstar and Aurora are revealed to be magical beings.  Addendum:  A check of Wikipedia implies that Mantlo started the illness, that he intended it to be AIDS and to have Jean-Paul die in #50, and that it was indeed editorial fiat that changed things.  Also, that Northstar's magical heritage being able to be stated as him being part Faerie was intended as a subtle jab back at editorial.  Like I said, Mantlo didn't do subtle real well in this book.  In fact (another aside, I know), the one page of his ALPHA FLIGHT run I best remember was the second or third page of the issue (somewhere around # 46).  There were four panels, which where about 50% word balloon, with 6 footnotes.  It was an info dump about the preceding several issues, and was a testbook example of why the current recap page at the front of each book can be a very good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kid Kyoto</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-1/#comment-6864</link>
		<dc:creator>Kid Kyoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-6864</guid>
		<description>@Tony Bell
&quot;I never really liked Fantomex, but thatâ€™s possibly because I hate the French.&quot;

WTF?

Would you ever, EVER say &quot;I never really liked Banshee but that&#039;s because I hate the Irish&quot;?

Or &quot;I never really liked Storm but that&#039;s because I hate the blacks&quot;?

Prejudice is prejudice pure and simple.  If you can&#039;t outgrow it at least keep it to yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tony Bell<br />
"I never really liked Fantomex, but thatâ€™s possibly because I hate the French."</p>
<p>WTF?</p>
<p>Would you ever, EVER say "I never really liked Banshee but that's because I hate the Irish"?</p>
<p>Or "I never really liked Storm but that's because I hate the blacks"?</p>
<p>Prejudice is prejudice pure and simple.  If you can't outgrow it at least keep it to yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Curran</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-1/#comment-6861</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Curran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 23:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-6861</guid>
		<description>&quot;re: FLICK

back in the late 70s - early 80s, Eddie Campbell (and a friend) released a photocopied comic book they called FLICK, as reference to that little apocrypha. You can read a a bit about it on Campbellâ€™s GRAFFITI KITCHEN, now collected in THREE PIECE SUIT.&quot;

Yeah, that story was the first time I&#039;d ever encountered the flick urban legend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"re: FLICK</p>
<p>back in the late 70s - early 80s, Eddie Campbell (and a friend) released a photocopied comic book they called FLICK, as reference to that little apocrypha. You can read a a bit about it on Campbellâ€™s GRAFFITI KITCHEN, now collected in THREE PIECE SUIT."</p>
<p>Yeah, that story was the first time I'd ever encountered the flick urban legend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tad Ghostal</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-1/#comment-6860</link>
		<dc:creator>Tad Ghostal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-6860</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Mitchell was Joelâ€™s last episode. Diabolik was the showâ€™s last episode.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I sit corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Mitchell was Joelâ€™s last episode. Diabolik was the showâ€™s last episode.</p></blockquote>
<p>I sit corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Superecwfan1</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-1/#comment-6856</link>
		<dc:creator>Superecwfan1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 17:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-6856</guid>
		<description>I really enjoy these columns for the most part. I digged the Morrison/Fantamex urban legend and will check out the others. Great stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoy these columns for the most part. I digged the Morrison/Fantamex urban legend and will check out the others. Great stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Rutherford</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-1/#comment-6855</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Rutherford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 17:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-6855</guid>
		<description>Fantomas also appeared in the Almanac section of &quot;The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen Vol. 2&quot;. He was a member of Les Hommes Mysterieux, France&#039;s equivalent to the League, along with Jean Robur, Arsene Lupin, the Nyctalope, and the Phantom of the Opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantomas also appeared in the Almanac section of "The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen Vol. 2". He was a member of Les Hommes Mysterieux, France's equivalent to the League, along with Jean Robur, Arsene Lupin, the Nyctalope, and the Phantom of the Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hector</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-1/#comment-6851</link>
		<dc:creator>Hector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-6851</guid>
		<description>another FantÃ´mas refference: the Mike Patton band with the same name. google &#039;ipecac records&#039; and &#039;amenaza a el mondo&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another FantÃ´mas refference: the Mike Patton band with the same name. google 'ipecac records' and 'amenaza a el mondo'</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-1/#comment-6850</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-6850</guid>
		<description>Good Lord, it&#039;s only me or Northstar looks like he is going to do something with that alpha flight leaf...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Lord, it's only me or Northstar looks like he is going to do something with that alpha flight leaf...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/comment-page-1/#comment-6848</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 12:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/31/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-66/#comment-6848</guid>
		<description>The identity of X has never been revealed, as far as I know. But the most popular rumor around comics circles was that the identity of X was Howard Mackie. Never confirmed, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The identity of X has never been revealed, as far as I know. But the most popular rumor around comics circles was that the identity of X was Howard Mackie. Never confirmed, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
