free hit counter

javascript

CBI Archive

Flippin’ through Previews - September 2006

Sunday, September 3rd, 2006 at 1:38 PM EST

Updated: Monday, September 4th, 2006 at 5:36 PM EST

Yay! The latest issue of Previews is out! Let’s see what products are contained within designed to separate us from our hard-earned cash. Good times!

Previews, Vol. XVI, No. 9, with Tim Sale’s Superman on one cover and a Locke action figure on the back cover. Is Todd McFarlane the Devil? I’m just wondering …

Dark Horse:

On page 18, Samurai: Heaven and Earth Vol. 2 #1 is solicited for 1 Nov. I was speechless when I saw this. Long-time readers may recall how much I liked the first mini-series and how grumpy I was that it was “to be continued,” because I thought Luke Ross would never come back for another series. Well, it appears I was wrong. I’m glad, because the series really was very good, and I hope Marz doesn’t push his luck and actually wraps things up this time. Samurai action in eighteenth-century Europe! Excellent stuff.

Page 23 gives us Hellgate: London #1 for an 8 Nov. release. Ian Edginton writes and Steve Pugh draws. This looks kind of cool, but I probably won’t buy it because it’s tied in to a video game. Ugh. That’s just how I roll. But it might be for you!

Archenemies is collected in a trade on page 28 for a 31 Jan. (???) release. I didn’t get this when it came out and a few people chided (chid?) me. Should I take the trade plunge? What say you all?

Another 31 Jan. release is Blessed Thistle (page 33), which is 10 bucks but sounds wild. Three separate stories linking common suburban themes with horrific consequences. And the art in the solicitation is wacky in a good way. I’m disturbed just looking at it!

Speaking of horror, on page 34 Jason Hall and Kelley Jones give us The Messengers, which is 7 dollars and will be out on 3 Jan. Kelley Jones is always good for some creepy fun, and apparently I’m one of six or seven people who liked Beware the Creeper, which Hall wrote, so this might be a nice purchase.

I can’t endorse Dark Horse’s schedule for re-releasing Rex Mundi trades, but the second volume on page 35 is coming out on 17 Jan. I wish they had brought them all out before the new number one issue came out, but that’s the way it is, I guess. It’s a great series, as you know (because I keep telling you), and here’s another chance to catch up.

DC:

Page 65 gives us Batman/The Spirit by Jeph Loeb and Darwyn Cooke (29 Nov.). Loeb’s presence makes this an iffy proposition, but why am I bothered by the fact that someone else is using the Spirit even though Eisner is dead? I don’t even own anything with the Spirit in it. Why does it bug me?

Anyone want to lay a wager on when All Star Batman and Robin #5 will actually ship? Page 67 says 29 Nov. I’m betting it will be sometime in 2007.

Why is Richard Donner writing Superman comic books? I can’t say if it will be good or bad, but why is he doing it? How much will that boost sales?

Page 74 has the new Superman book, Superman Confidential by Darwyn Cooke and Tim Sale (1 Nov.). I’d rant about this for a while, but I don’t have the energy. I’m sure it will be fine. I don’t know if I will buy it, and if you really want me to rant about it, I will. But perhaps you can guess why I don’t like it already.

Here’s what I don’t like about Birds of Prey #100 on page 81, which ships 15 Nov. The text says “Who will be asked to join Oracle in her all-new Birds of Prey?” It’s the same thing that bugs me about the Justice League, and yet another reason why the Giffen/DeMatteis run was so interesting: being in the Birds of Prey isn’t a job, right? Oracle, Huntress, and Black Canary just hung out together fighting crime, right? So it’s not like people are competing to join, just like no one is competing to join the Justice League. Are Batman, Superman, and Wonder Woman going to pay their new recruits? Is Oracle? The “international” team actually paid their members, which is why Fire and Ice wanted to join in the first place. Anyone? Does Oracle pay these people, or is she just going to call a few people and say, “Hey, want to hang out, get a pizza, maybe fight some crime?” What’s the deal, readers of Birds of Prey? Gail, are you out there?

JLA #4 (page 88, 15 Nov.): “Who will join Brad Meltzer’s new JLA?” You mean he doesn’t know yet? Sheesh.

I’m going to get myself in a lot of trouble here, but I don’t care! I like the cover for Trials of Shazam #4 on page 94, which comes your way on 22 Nov. How will that get me in trouble? Bear with me. I like it because the woman (whoever she is) actually looks like a real woman - she’s not anorexic! Yay, Howard Porter! Okay, still not in trouble. Okay, how about this: why, in comics, the only women who occasionally escape being anorexic are, shall we say, ethnic? It’s okay for black women to actually look like real people, but all white women must be ridiculously skinny and have big breasts? What’s up with that? Discuss. Please don’t kill me.

All this new Wildstorm stuff (pages 109-113) looks fine, but leaves me distinctly unexcited. It’s 2006, people, not 1992. Sigh.

Page 115 brings us an interesting solicitation text for Manifest Eternity #6 (on sale 1 Nov.). First of all, it’s the last issue. It’s not my fault! Second, it reads “Witness the horrific origin of one of the series [sic] most popular and enduring characters.” How on earth can you have a popular and enduring characters when the book lasts only six issues, only three of which have actually come out? Oh well. Fare thee well, Lobdell and Nguyen.

In the Vertigo section, DC writes weird things again. Crossing Midnight (page 120, 29. Nov.) looks somewhat interesting, but Jim Fern is a “breakout” artist? He’s been around forever. Literally. I actually wondered what happened to him before he showed up on Fables earlier this year for a couple of issues. “Breakout”? Really?

Image Comics:

Drain on page 138 (15 Nov.) looks pretty, but a female ninja vampire? No thanks.

Speaking of looking pretty, The Nightly News, which is on page 140 for a 1 Nov. release, also looks very neat. It sounds like one of those things that could be really cool, but in the hands of a bad writer, could turn ugly quickly. I don’t know Jonathan Hickman, so I can’t be a judge of that yet. But it looks neat.

I just received the Renfield trade in the mail, and it’s offered on page 154 (1 Nov.). I know it’s an old book, but some of you might not have it, so I’ll be sure to review this before it comes out.

There’s a Mr. Glum plush toy on page 155. I mention it only because the ad says, “Twelve inches of awesome!” I just found that funny.

Battle Pope fights God on page 156. I wasn’t impressed when Savage Dragon fought God, so this probably won’t do much for me either.

I know that you’re all interested in buying Phonogram after my interview with Kieron Gillen, and issue #4 ships on 1 Nov. and is on page 165.

I’m sure you’re not buying the Lost action figures, because you would go to hell if you did, but I like how on page 172, the only pose they could come up with Shannon is lying on the beach in her bikini. Isn’t that how we’ll all remember Maggie Grace?

Marvel:

You know, solicitations piss me off. A lot of companies do this, but Marvel and DC are the worst. Ultimate Power #2 (page 7) claims “You cannot miss it!” You know what? I’m going to miss it, and I doubt if it will make one iota of difference in my life. Just tell us what’s going on in the issue, Marvel, and leave the gushing to those who, you know, aren’t on your payroll. Wait until I get to Astonishing X-Men.

Why can’t Mary Jane pull up her shorts on the cover of Sensational Spider-Man #32 (page 15)? Did they fall down because she’s clinging to Spidey’s back?

Bullet Points (page 25) looks good (Tommy Lee Edwards on art) but … why is there an Iron Man in World War II? Things like that annoy me.

I would probably buy Fantastic Four: The End (page34) if it weren’t six issues. Six issues? Really? I mean, Alan Davis writes and draws, so it’s extremely tempting, but six issues?

Ghost Rider #5 (page 42) features a guest appearance by … SATAN! Seriously, that’s what it says. I like how in America today, proprietors of comic book shops can get arrested for selling comics with naked people in them to adults, but Marvel can proudly feature Satan, who a lot of people in this country believe is real and would not like their children associating with him. Fascinating.

The text for Nextwave #10 (page 45) claims that this book is more important to the Marvel Universe than Civil War. I like how they’re being ironic, but it’s actually true.

I love Moon Knight, but the solicitation text for issue #7 (page 47) is awful. I don’t even want to quote it. If you happen to have the Previews, read the solicitation. This is how they’re trying to sell the book? Just read my reviews, because they’re not stupid.

The return of Hawkeye AND the Scarlet Witch (page 49)? Wow, that’s shocking. Who cares?

Others have already blasted this, but Onslaught Reborn (page 51) has the potential to be the absolute worst comic book ever. That’s right - worse that Tarot: Witch of the Black Rose! The text says “the long-awaited return of Onslaught.” Now, I’ll admit I don’t troll message boards, but I have never, in the long, wonderfully Onslaught-free decade since this atrocity, heard one single person wish for the return of Onslaught. I have heard plenty of people wish that they could somehow retcon their own lives so that they never heard of Onslaught in the first place, but yearning for his return? Not so much. Who out there was awaiting the return of Onslaught? Anyone? And as nice as it is that Marvel is donating some of the proceeds to the Sam Loeb College Scholarship Fund, doesn’t it smack a bit of “If you don’t buy this, you hate dead children and don’t want others to get a chance to go to college”? I hate to sound crass, but Marvel doesn’t give a good goddamn about dead children, because they can’t buy comics. This whole page makes me feel like I need a shower. And then we get three pages of horrible Liefeld art to prove that he still sucks.

I’m sure this has been addressed many, many years ago, but is the Silver Surfer naked? That’s his ass on page 58, but Marvel doesn’t care about that nudity. So what’s the story?

Why is the White Tiger showing us jazz hands (page 62)? Well, she would be if Mack had, you know, bothered to draw hands. It still looks like she’s auditioning for a Broadway musical.

Page 64 tells us that Whedon and Cassaday are beginning their final arc. Back in the day, when we first moved over here, I pissed some people off by suggesting that this kind of comic book just isn’t good enough. That was fun, wasn’t it? Now we come to the end, and I wonder if, when we have all 24 issues to peruse, it will hold up. In five years, will anyone still care about Whedon and Cassaday’s run? Oh, and Marvel? Don’t use text like “nothing will ever be the same” and then follow it up with “No, really, we mean it.” It smacks of condescension, because we know that you’re lying.

Take a look at Silvestri’s awful cover of X-Men: Phoenix - Warsong #3 (page 74). You know, there’s nothing better than underage girls dressed as whores. Sorry to be a prude, but that’s yucky.

The Grant Morrison X-Men run gets the hardcover monster-sized treatment (page 90). Ignore the naysayers - it’s very good. I do like, however, that Marvel mentions that he got rid of the “gaudy spandex costumes” - the last time I checked, “gaudy” was a pejorative word, yet Marvel had no problem bringing them back. Stuff like this makes me chuckle. Yes, I’m warped.

Shanna, the She-Devil is collected in a trade on page 104. I’m not buying this, but wasn’t there supposed to be an “X-rated” version as well? Wouldn’t that be cool if Marvel had the cajones to publish that?

On to the back of the book!

AiT/Planet Lar brings us First Moon on page 228, by the guys what brung you Continuity (which I liked and which is offered again on page 229). I want to get this, because it deals with the missing colonists on Roanoke Island, Virginia, in the sixteenth century, but there’s a catch … werewolves. Sigh. I’ll probably still get it.

Amaze Ink/Slave Labor has Rex Libris #6 on page 232. Good place to start if you’ve missed the first five issues, because it’s a new story!

If you’ve been waiting for the collected edition of Frank Miller’s original script to Robocop, Avatar has it on page 246. I’m not getting it, because I’m not that interested, but it might appeal to you. Steven Grant adapts it for comics and Juan Jose Ryp’s art is very nice.

Stardust Kid concludes on page 254 from Boom! Studios. I’ve been waiting for this to finish so I can read the damned thing, so it should be fun. Check out the trade if you haven’t been buying this, because the first two issues, at least, are good.

Speaking of Tarot: Witch of the Black Rose, #41 on page 258 is the Christmas issue. One of these days I have to get an issue, because it’s just so awful. Chris Sims used to rip these issues every so often, but not recently, and I’m sad.

Greg Hatcher, with his uncanny abilities, just wished for The Trouble With Girls to show up in a trade, and on page 260, his wish comes true! That’s just spooky. The text doesn’t really sell it well, though. Why would anyone buy it if they didn’t already want it?

On page 280, Content #1 and #2 are offered by DI. They both sound intriguing, especially #2, which apparently has much to do with cell phone sex. There’s nothing better! Did anyone get #1? Is it any good?

ICCC Media Inc. has Vatican City, Las Vegas on page 294 for 15 dollars. This sounds like an absolute wild book. I’d like to describe it, but I don’t think I can. It begins at a Las Vegas casino that looks like the Vatican. Isn’t that enough to convince you????

IDW has its usual assortment of television tie-ins and horror stuff, but Turistas: The Other Side of Paradise on page 306 intrigues me. It’s another tie-in to a movie, and the text reads that it “explores the dark, brutal, and bloody secrets that lurk behind the world’s most exotic travel destinations …” Does that mean it’s non-fiction? Like a twisted travelogue? Or is Fox and IDW just making stuff up to scare us? Either way, it sounds neat.

What happened to Local? Where is it? I miss it.

If you didn’t pre-order Empty Chamber #1, shame on you. Empty Chamber #2 is offered on page 323 from Silent Devil Productions. Get them both! Have faith that they will be good!

The King is offered again on page 348 from Top Shelf. This came out last year, and I, at least, thought it was really good. Well worth the 20 dollar price tag.

That’s it for this month. Well, by “it” I mean the things I am focusing on. There’s a lot more, of course. I hope this helped, and be sure to bug your local comic shoppe proprietor to let you have Previews for free! It will make him more money in the long run!

21 Comments

To be fair, Greg, it is a bi-monthly book, and I always give it a write-up when it comes out.

The issue solicited here, however… THAT’S a Christmas issue. And that means that it’s going to get the full treatment when it comes out, just like last year

Ah, I just haven’t seen one in a while. I guess I just lost track of time! Good to see the Christmas issue will get the patented Invincible Super Blog write-up.

Actually, I do believe Oracle pays her agents (though I don’t have every issue of BoP so we’ll have to defer to someone who does). Oracle’s arrangement frees up her operatives so they can be on call, instead of having to juggle the mudane details of running a flower shop or somesuch.

moose n squirrel

September 3, 2006 at 7:14 pm

why am I bothered by the fact that someone else is using the Spirit even though Eisner is dead? I don’t even own anything with the Spirit in it. Why does it bug me?

This bugs me too, to some extent, and I think what bugs me is the fact that it doesn’t really seem to bug anybody else - that it’s just assumed that because the character is a corporate-owned superhero that it’s expected for him to be passed on from creative team to creative team and get handled like any other corporate property.

Of course, I’m also pretty eager to see the Lethem/Dalrymple “Omega the Unknown” series, despite the fact that Steve Gerber is pissed about it, so I’m pretty much a giant hypocrite about all this.

I’ll seem like an idiot for saying this, but I didn’t realize The Spirit was corporate owned. I thought it was Eisner’s. …but even being corporate it just doesn’t feel right having someone else working with the character.

moose n squirrel

September 3, 2006 at 8:02 pm

Well, I’m assuming the character is corporate-owned, since he’s going to be published by DC - and since the character dates back to the days when everything was corporate-owned, and when there was no such thing as creator ownership. I could be wrong.

The Spirit is not creator-owned. DC is using him under license from Eisner’s estate (I think the deal was actually made before he died, but I might be wrong.)

And by that I mean that the Spirit IS (or rather WAS) creator-owned, and NOT corporate owned. Sorry.

The Spirit being owned by DC would sure be news to Kitchen Sink.

If they were still around, I mean.

Ah. Alright then.

So is The Spirit owned by the Eisner estate? Or by Kitchen Sink, or by whoever owns whatever Kitchen Sink turned into?

From what I can tell through a Google search, Eisner did indeed own The Spirit - so presumably his estate still owns the rights. Kitchen represents the estate, apparently. And all that I can find in the way of details about Eisner’s knowledge of/involvement in the new series is in the SDCC report here:
http://www.newsarama.com/SDCC05/DC/Spirit/cookespirit.html

To the best of my knowledge, The Spirit is wholly owned by the Eisner estate. When he first created the character before WWII, Eisner negotiated to keep all of the rights - an unheard-of deal at the time and for decades afterward. All of the character’s appearances have been under the strict control of Will Eisner, who carefully guarded his character. The current deal with DC was begun before his death, and came about after DC took over the reprinting of the Eisner library when Kitchen Sink ceased operations. Because Eisner had a hand in the current revival of The Spirit, I don’t have any problems with the crossover or further use of the character by DC, although I’ll be quite upset if the writers and artists don’t realize the gift that they’ve been given and treat the character properly!

Truthfully, the Spirit thing feels a bit wrong to me too, and that’s even knowing that Eisner had his studio guys working on it in its original incarnation.

But it doesn’t piss me off NEARLY as much as the Omega revival, since someone brought that up. Unlike Will Eisner, Steve Gerber’s not dead. He’s still writing comics — GOOD comics, Hard Time was just as fresh and current and interesting as anything out there — and if Marvel really wanted to revive Omega, especially given that nice trade edition that just came out, well, why not just go to him?

I think it’s probably because somebody walked in with a proposal and Marvel went for it, I doubt there was any malice involved; but still, when the original creator’s still around and working and has made it clear they object, it seems really crass for the company to take this screw-you-we-own-it-so-shut-up attitude. I didn’t like it with the way DC jerked Tony Isabella around on Black Lightning and I don’t like it with Omega.

The really depressing part is that this new Batman/Spirit thing is probably going to massively outsell anything Eisner ever did himself that DC has in print.

Incidentally, no one was more floored than me to find out about the new The Trouble With Girls trade. Pity they’re not marketing it better, but still, you should all buy it because it’s hilarious. I gotta get down to the shop and get a look at this Previews listing myself. This is something they’d really have to work at screwing up: you could reprint random panel gags from a couple of issues and THAT would sell it.

Honestly, I was just flailing around for a hook to hang a column on and Julie had noted how weird it was to get the new JSA book a few weeks after I’d mentioned it, which caused me to make a mental list and note how weird it was that so many things had actually showed up. Still, if I’d had to pick ONE to ring the bell from that particular column, I’d much rather have had Essential John Carter of Mars. But that’s the way it goes.

One that I appear to be JINXING every time I bring it up is Jim Steranko’s alleged revised edition of Chandler: Red Tide, which we’ve been awaiting patiently for about seven years now.

Greg - don’t bother, I’ll quote you the text:

“The Trouble with Girls is one of the longest running independent series of all time! Created by Will Jacobs and Eisner award-winning writer Gerard Jones, this groundbreaking series broke all the rules!”

Blech. Nothing to get anyone excited about.

The Spirit thing bothers me more than Omega the Unknown simply because Gerber was writing for Marvel, and that’s the way it is. Yes, they probably could have offered it to him and that would have been the nice thing to do, but that’s business. Stupid, perhaps, but still business. The Spirit meeting Batman just feels wrong.

On an artistic level, should DC be allowed to play with Eisner’s Spirit? Hmmmm, let’s look at their history.

*Plastic Man — wilty, limp and flacid.
*Captain Marvel, I mean Shazam — no electricity here (and they can’t even get the name right).
*The Freedom Fighters — Zzzzzz.
*Blue Beetle, Captain Atom and all of the other former Charlton characters — when their best scenes are their death scenes, you know somehting is wrong.

While it is true that Eisner allowed many other artists and writers to play with The Spirit over the years, they were usually kept within a self-contained universe. There is no good reason for a Batman/Spirit book or a table at the Justice League with The Spirit’s name on it. It’s kinda like inviting a young, goofy Jerry Lewis to play Hamlet — the people who came to see Jerry Lewis destroy Hamlet will love it, and everyone who came to see Hamlet proper will hate it.

Hold up — is that Renfield trade that old Caliber Press miniseries? Oh man, please say yes. I’m sure it’s terrible to read now, but I really dug it when I was younger and had all but one issue of it and it’s been driving me nuts for years what happened in that one issue.

Eisner did indeed allow others to write and draw “The Spirit” over his lifetime and IIRC he was in on the deal before he died *including* the information that Darwyn Cooke would be the writer and artist on the series.

I may not always trust DC but anyone who’s read any of Darwyne’s Cooke’s stuff should know that the guy would not do anything to shame Eisner’s memory.

And for the record, Cooke has said that his Spirit stories will *not* be set in the mainstream DCU — they will be occuring in the world Eisner created. The Batman/Spirit crossover is a one-shot designed to attract attention.

Yes, the Renfield trade is the old Caliber press series. Lots of old Caliber stuff is coming out in trade these days. Interesting to see.

Hi! Very nice site! Thanks you very much! 0kE60F7gzGIi

Leave a Comment

 

Subscribe to CSBG

Categories

Review Copies

Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.

Browse the Archives