<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Into the back issue box #7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Seavey</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-16425</link>
		<dc:creator>John Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 06:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-16425</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d just have to point out to all the people complaining that the review is flawed because it reviews the sixth issue of a seven-issue mini-series...

That&#039;s the point of the entire exercise.

If this is something that you have to read the whole thing for it to be comprehensible, then why is it published as a seven-issue mini-series? Why not publish it as a book? If it&#039;s not divisible into seven readable portions, aren&#039;t you cheating your readers by selling it to them in seven installments? If you&#039;re not intended to start at part six, why make the reader work to find parts one through five if six was the first issue they found?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just have to point out to all the people complaining that the review is flawed because it reviews the sixth issue of a seven-issue mini-series&#8230;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the point of the entire exercise.</p>
<p>If this is something that you have to read the whole thing for it to be comprehensible, then why is it published as a seven-issue mini-series? Why not publish it as a book? If it&#8217;s not divisible into seven readable portions, aren&#8217;t you cheating your readers by selling it to them in seven installments? If you&#8217;re not intended to start at part six, why make the reader work to find parts one through five if six was the first issue they found?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustReadIt</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-12534</link>
		<dc:creator>JustReadIt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 22:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-12534</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are some things I know about this comic book.  First, Peter Milligan is a weird dude.  Second, itâ€™s the sixth book in a seven-issue mini-series, so the obvious assumption is that you will buy every issue and judge the book based on the entire series.  Third, Peter Milligan is a really weird dude.

But, as a first-time comic book reader, Egypt #6 presents some problems.&quot;

This alone makes the review much flawed, like Funkygreenjerusalem said.

It&#039;s like reading one late chapter in a complex book, and not appreciating the characters, the plot elements, or any nuances or build-ups, or even getting lost about the whole thing.

The reviewer would have done a much better, more objective review if the only issue he read was at the first issue instead of the 6th in a 7-issue mini.

I read this miniseries lately, and found it to be pretty good.  Fortunately for me, I didn&#039;t hear all the hype beforehand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are some things I know about this comic book.  First, Peter Milligan is a weird dude.  Second, itâ€™s the sixth book in a seven-issue mini-series, so the obvious assumption is that you will buy every issue and judge the book based on the entire series.  Third, Peter Milligan is a really weird dude.</p>
<p>But, as a first-time comic book reader, Egypt #6 presents some problems.&#8221;</p>
<p>This alone makes the review much flawed, like Funkygreenjerusalem said.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like reading one late chapter in a complex book, and not appreciating the characters, the plot elements, or any nuances or build-ups, or even getting lost about the whole thing.</p>
<p>The reviewer would have done a much better, more objective review if the only issue he read was at the first issue instead of the 6th in a 7-issue mini.</p>
<p>I read this miniseries lately, and found it to be pretty good.  Fortunately for me, I didn&#8217;t hear all the hype beforehand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yo go re</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-12129</link>
		<dc:creator>yo go re</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-12129</guid>
		<description>If I recall correctly, Egypt was originally a 6-issue mini - and then &quot;#3 of 6&quot; changed to &quot;#4 of 7.&quot; I&#039;m not sure on the actual issues, but I&#039;m fairly certain there was a change at some point...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I recall correctly, Egypt was originally a 6-issue mini &#8211; and then &#8220;#3 of 6&#8243; changed to &#8220;#4 of 7.&#8221; I&#8217;m not sure on the actual issues, but I&#8217;m fairly certain there was a change at some point&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-12124</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-12124</guid>
		<description>Scene of the Crime is out in trade.  I know, because I own the trade!!!  It&#039;s quite good, you&#039;re right.

Flex Mentallo has always been caught in the Charles Atlas mess that DC got into with the character.  Now that they&#039;ve published his origin in trade, I&#039;m hoping they manage to get the mini-series out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scene of the Crime is out in trade.  I know, because I own the trade!!!  It&#8217;s quite good, you&#8217;re right.</p>
<p>Flex Mentallo has always been caught in the Charles Atlas mess that DC got into with the character.  Now that they&#8217;ve published his origin in trade, I&#8217;m hoping they manage to get the mini-series out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Raining</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-12120</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Raining</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-12120</guid>
		<description>Well Greg, Flex Mentallo certainly will be the winner, since you write the lists!

I thought that was collected, though... perhaps it&#039;s out of print? Shocking, considering the people involved.  I&#039;m sure I have a few nominations, but one that pops immediately to mind is Scene of the Crime, a Vertigo detective story that Ed Brubabker and Michael Lark did a few years ago.  Well worth picking up, even for a dollar (rather than a quarter)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Greg, Flex Mentallo certainly will be the winner, since you write the lists!</p>
<p>I thought that was collected, though&#8230; perhaps it&#8217;s out of print? Shocking, considering the people involved.  I&#8217;m sure I have a few nominations, but one that pops immediately to mind is Scene of the Crime, a Vertigo detective story that Ed Brubabker and Michael Lark did a few years ago.  Well worth picking up, even for a dollar (rather than a quarter)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Curran</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-12059</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Curran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 02:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-12059</guid>
		<description>I read this series not too long ago and dug it, although I am a Milligan fan and have no problem with weird shit that don&#039;t seem to make sense. Those two things kind of go hand in hand. One of us really ought to review Skreemer one of these days; it&#039;s my favorite Milligan work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this series not too long ago and dug it, although I am a Milligan fan and have no problem with weird shit that don&#8217;t seem to make sense. Those two things kind of go hand in hand. One of us really ought to review Skreemer one of these days; it&#8217;s my favorite Milligan work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-12008</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-12008</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good idea, Ken.  I will bet the hands-down winner will be Flex Mentallo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good idea, Ken.  I will bet the hands-down winner will be Flex Mentallo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Raining</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-11997</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Raining</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-11997</guid>
		<description>I bought the first couple issues of this when it came out, then somehow lost track of it and, years later, picked up the remaining issues from, yes, the quarter bin.  I read the new ones without going back to read the ones I already have (a bad habit of mine-- I don&#039;t like to read comics I&#039;ve already read when I have something new to read, even if that means the comic I read makes no sense), so I can kind of relate to you, Greg.  The issue does not make a lot of sense individually.Vertigo has always &quot;written for the trade&quot;, even before they were at the point of collecting everything in a trade.  I&#039;ve bought a lot of pieces to mini- series, not just vertigo, that don&#039;t make a lot of sense on their own.  Still, each issue should do enough to make you want to see how the characters ended up in the situration that they did, which it sounds like &quot;Egypt&quot; did for you.

I&#039;m going to go to the CBR forum and suggest a new top five topic-- mini series most deserving of a collection!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought the first couple issues of this when it came out, then somehow lost track of it and, years later, picked up the remaining issues from, yes, the quarter bin.  I read the new ones without going back to read the ones I already have (a bad habit of mine&#8211; I don&#8217;t like to read comics I&#8217;ve already read when I have something new to read, even if that means the comic I read makes no sense), so I can kind of relate to you, Greg.  The issue does not make a lot of sense individually.Vertigo has always &#8220;written for the trade&#8221;, even before they were at the point of collecting everything in a trade.  I&#8217;ve bought a lot of pieces to mini- series, not just vertigo, that don&#8217;t make a lot of sense on their own.  Still, each issue should do enough to make you want to see how the characters ended up in the situration that they did, which it sounds like &#8220;Egypt&#8221; did for you.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to go to the CBR forum and suggest a new top five topic&#8211; mini series most deserving of a collection!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunkyGreenJerusalem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-11939</link>
		<dc:creator>FunkyGreenJerusalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-11939</guid>
		<description>&quot;They might get drawn in by the cover (thatâ€™s what covers are for, after all) and thereâ€™s no indication that this is a mini-series beside the small numbers tucked away in the upper left corner of the cover and in the preview section in the back.&quot;

Well, those numbers are above the price tag, so I assume the person would have to be pretty absent minded not to notice.
(then again, I brought two copies of American Century #2 once, because #3 had just came out, and I paid no attention at all to what I had in my hand.)

&quot;Surround the words you want to quote with and , just without the xâ€™s. &quot;

Is that explanation missing somthing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They might get drawn in by the cover (thatâ€™s what covers are for, after all) and thereâ€™s no indication that this is a mini-series beside the small numbers tucked away in the upper left corner of the cover and in the preview section in the back.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, those numbers are above the price tag, so I assume the person would have to be pretty absent minded not to notice.<br />
(then again, I brought two copies of American Century #2 once, because #3 had just came out, and I paid no attention at all to what I had in my hand.)</p>
<p>&#8220;Surround the words you want to quote with and , just without the xâ€™s. &#8221;</p>
<p>Is that explanation missing somthing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-11874</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 19:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-11874</guid>
		<description>No problem, Matt.  And remember, moose - it&#039;s totally random!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem, Matt.  And remember, moose &#8211; it&#8217;s totally random!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moose n squirrel</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-11862</link>
		<dc:creator>moose n squirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-11862</guid>
		<description>I dimly remember reading this series. I think I thought it was a little weak but still pretty interesting, but that was ages ago, and I&#039;ve no idea how much I&#039;d like it if I picked it up today; my tastes have changed a bit.

That said, issue 6 of a 7 issue miniseries probably isn&#039;t the greatest candidate for a &quot;how would it read to a first-time reader?&quot; column.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dimly remember reading this series. I think I thought it was a little weak but still pretty interesting, but that was ages ago, and I&#8217;ve no idea how much I&#8217;d like it if I picked it up today; my tastes have changed a bit.</p>
<p>That said, issue 6 of a 7 issue miniseries probably isn&#8217;t the greatest candidate for a &#8220;how would it read to a first-time reader?&#8221; column.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Brady</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-11859</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-11859</guid>
		<description>Damn, I&#039;ve never even heard of this, and this recap sold me on it!  I&#039;m going to have to look for it now!  Thanks, Greg!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, I&#8217;ve never even heard of this, and this recap sold me on it!  I&#8217;m going to have to look for it now!  Thanks, Greg!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-11849</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-11849</guid>
		<description>Gus - I&#039;ve read Enigma, and liked it a lot.  I should go back and select a random issue of that (not the first or last) and see how much sense it makes.  It seems like each issue, although weird, made a bit more sense than this.

FGJ - I tried to keep that in mind when I read it.  I didn&#039;t really want a two-page recap, which would drag down the story, just a bit more.  I didn&#039;t hate the book at all.  It didn&#039;t grab me, but I was intrigued by it.  The reaction from the comments makes me think I SHOULD go get the rest of it.  It&#039;s always going to be flawed, to a certain degree, because, for instance, I LOVE Peter Milligan and know that if I buy one of his books I&#039;ll probably enjoy it.  A new comic reader, however, might not notice that it&#039;s a sixth out of seven in a series.  They might get drawn in by the cover (that&#039;s what covers are for, after all) and there&#039;s no indication that this is a mini-series beside the small numbers tucked away in the upper left corner of the cover and in the preview section in the back.  It&#039;s just tough to get into this if you buy it with no foreknowledge.  It&#039;s a fantasy, of course, because Vertigo is sold to a very specialized audience and the casual reader probably won&#039;t pick this up, so you&#039;re right about that.  It&#039;s still fun to read this as if you&#039;ve never read a comic before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gus &#8211; I&#8217;ve read Enigma, and liked it a lot.  I should go back and select a random issue of that (not the first or last) and see how much sense it makes.  It seems like each issue, although weird, made a bit more sense than this.</p>
<p>FGJ &#8211; I tried to keep that in mind when I read it.  I didn&#8217;t really want a two-page recap, which would drag down the story, just a bit more.  I didn&#8217;t hate the book at all.  It didn&#8217;t grab me, but I was intrigued by it.  The reaction from the comments makes me think I SHOULD go get the rest of it.  It&#8217;s always going to be flawed, to a certain degree, because, for instance, I LOVE Peter Milligan and know that if I buy one of his books I&#8217;ll probably enjoy it.  A new comic reader, however, might not notice that it&#8217;s a sixth out of seven in a series.  They might get drawn in by the cover (that&#8217;s what covers are for, after all) and there&#8217;s no indication that this is a mini-series beside the small numbers tucked away in the upper left corner of the cover and in the preview section in the back.  It&#8217;s just tough to get into this if you buy it with no foreknowledge.  It&#8217;s a fantasy, of course, because Vertigo is sold to a very specialized audience and the casual reader probably won&#8217;t pick this up, so you&#8217;re right about that.  It&#8217;s still fun to read this as if you&#8217;ve never read a comic before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-11848</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-11848</guid>
		<description>Surround the words you want to quote with &lt;Xblockquote&gt; and &lt;X/blockquote&gt;, just without the x&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surround the words you want to quote with <xblockquote> and <x /blockquote>, just without the x&#8217;s.</x></xblockquote></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunkyGreenJerusalem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-11832</link>
		<dc:creator>FunkyGreenJerusalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-11832</guid>
		<description>How does one do the quote thing Brian?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does one do the quote thing Brian?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunkyGreenJerusalem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-11831</link>
		<dc:creator>FunkyGreenJerusalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-11831</guid>
		<description>&quot;Frankly, a lot of books that are critical hits at the time end up as laughingstocks in five or ten years, because the material of the book has aged poorly or because of a shift in critical tastes. A lot of the 90â€™s material that people like to rag on now was critically acclaimed when it was new, too. This sort of thing is why I donâ€™t take critical reading lists too seriously; often only about a third or a fourth of what a lot of reviewers like strikes me as actually any good at all. This may sound weird, given how so many comics fans complain about the rampant negativity among comics fans, but I really think over-praising material for being merely competent or different is a more severe problem with comics criticism than it is even with other niche mediums.&quot;

In the case of Egypt though, for a bout 3-4 months, when it was coming out, every respectable pro interviewd in Wizard mentioned it when asked what their favourite current books were - and for about a year it was held up as an example of books that fall through the cracks.

Now I know Wizard ain&#039;t a good measure, but there was no CBR back then!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Frankly, a lot of books that are critical hits at the time end up as laughingstocks in five or ten years, because the material of the book has aged poorly or because of a shift in critical tastes. A lot of the 90â€™s material that people like to rag on now was critically acclaimed when it was new, too. This sort of thing is why I donâ€™t take critical reading lists too seriously; often only about a third or a fourth of what a lot of reviewers like strikes me as actually any good at all. This may sound weird, given how so many comics fans complain about the rampant negativity among comics fans, but I really think over-praising material for being merely competent or different is a more severe problem with comics criticism than it is even with other niche mediums.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the case of Egypt though, for a bout 3-4 months, when it was coming out, every respectable pro interviewd in Wizard mentioned it when asked what their favourite current books were &#8211; and for about a year it was held up as an example of books that fall through the cracks.</p>
<p>Now I know Wizard ain&#8217;t a good measure, but there was no CBR back then!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-11823</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-11823</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This may sound weird, given how so many comics fans complain about the rampant negativity among comics fans, but I really think over-praising material for being merely competent or different is a more severe problem with comics criticism than it is even with other niche mediums.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, yes, a thousand times yes.

Heck, that is practically the founding principle of this blog. Only praise the comics that are GOOD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This may sound weird, given how so many comics fans complain about the rampant negativity among comics fans, but I really think over-praising material for being merely competent or different is a more severe problem with comics criticism than it is even with other niche mediums.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, yes, a thousand times yes.</p>
<p>Heck, that is practically the founding principle of this blog. Only praise the comics that are GOOD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-11821</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-11821</guid>
		<description>I was puzzled throughout my reading experience with Egypt as well, but there&#039;s a moment near the end that pulled it all together for me. It&#039;s quite a redemptive story that I return to every once in a while. It&#039;s the kind of story that rewards rereading.

I love this series alongside his earlier Enigma. At the time, Milligan wasn&#039;t as splashy as his Vertigo peers, but he seemed sincere, and that comes through in his writing at the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was puzzled throughout my reading experience with Egypt as well, but there&#8217;s a moment near the end that pulled it all together for me. It&#8217;s quite a redemptive story that I return to every once in a while. It&#8217;s the kind of story that rewards rereading.</p>
<p>I love this series alongside his earlier Enigma. At the time, Milligan wasn&#8217;t as splashy as his Vertigo peers, but he seemed sincere, and that comes through in his writing at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynxara</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-11820</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynxara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-11820</guid>
		<description>Frankly, a lot of books that are critical hits at the time end up as laughingstocks in five or ten years, because the material of the book has aged poorly or because of a shift in critical tastes. A lot of the 90&#039;s material that people like to rag on now was critically acclaimed when it was new, too. This sort of thing is why I don&#039;t take critical reading lists too seriously; often only about a third or a fourth of what a lot of reviewers like strikes me as actually any good at all. This may sound weird, given how so many comics fans complain about the rampant negativity among comics fans, but I really think over-praising material for being merely competent or different is a more severe problem with comics criticism than it is even with other niche mediums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, a lot of books that are critical hits at the time end up as laughingstocks in five or ten years, because the material of the book has aged poorly or because of a shift in critical tastes. A lot of the 90&#8242;s material that people like to rag on now was critically acclaimed when it was new, too. This sort of thing is why I don&#8217;t take critical reading lists too seriously; often only about a third or a fourth of what a lot of reviewers like strikes me as actually any good at all. This may sound weird, given how so many comics fans complain about the rampant negativity among comics fans, but I really think over-praising material for being merely competent or different is a more severe problem with comics criticism than it is even with other niche mediums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunkyGreenJerusalem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/comment-page-1/#comment-11810</link>
		<dc:creator>FunkyGreenJerusalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 07:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/10/28/into-the-back-issue-box-7/#comment-11810</guid>
		<description>Eygpt was a critical hit when it was released.
I&#039;ve never read it, but it was a regular &#039;Book you should be reading&#039; and on several pro&#039;s fave book lists at the time.

I think this column is a bit flawed Greg, as I can&#039;t imagine anyone buying #6 of 7, even someone new to comics, and then complaining about it not making sense.
It&#039;s a mini, so it can&#039;t be judged by the same criteria as an ongoing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eygpt was a critical hit when it was released.<br />
I&#8217;ve never read it, but it was a regular &#8216;Book you should be reading&#8217; and on several pro&#8217;s fave book lists at the time.</p>
<p>I think this column is a bit flawed Greg, as I can&#8217;t imagine anyone buying #6 of 7, even someone new to comics, and then complaining about it not making sense.<br />
It&#8217;s a mini, so it can&#8217;t be judged by the same criteria as an ongoing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

