<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Civil War #5 &#8211; A Slight Perforation of the Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:10:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael T Bradley</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-15619</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael T Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-15619</guid>
		<description>Hey, Omar, when did we start talking about Ellis&#039; &quot;Authority&quot; run ....?

Not that I disagree with what you&#039;re saying, but I always felt Ellis started that trend (or at least blew it into high gear) with &quot;Authority.&quot; Suddenly the tightly-plotted, character-driven &quot;Stormwatch&quot; became people punching bad guys and yelling snarky &quot;I&#039;m cooler than you&quot; one-liners.

And who took over after Ellis left? Oh, yeah ....

Anyway, I keep buying it because I and a friend are doing a podcast review of the entire thing. We&#039;re somewhat behind, but still, if you want a laugh, you could do worse than to check it out.

www.holynightmare.com/cwmenu.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Omar, when did we start talking about Ellis&#8217; &#8220;Authority&#8221; run &#8230;.?</p>
<p>Not that I disagree with what you&#8217;re saying, but I always felt Ellis started that trend (or at least blew it into high gear) with &#8220;Authority.&#8221; Suddenly the tightly-plotted, character-driven &#8220;Stormwatch&#8221; became people punching bad guys and yelling snarky &#8220;I&#8217;m cooler than you&#8221; one-liners.</p>
<p>And who took over after Ellis left? Oh, yeah &#8230;.</p>
<p>Anyway, I keep buying it because I and a friend are doing a podcast review of the entire thing. We&#8217;re somewhat behind, but still, if you want a laugh, you could do worse than to check it out.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.holynightmare.com/cwmenu.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.holynightmare.com/cwmenu.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plok</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-15618</link>
		<dc:creator>plok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-15618</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;ll certainly agree with your take on Millar&#039;s will-imposition, which as far as I can tell is always &lt;i&gt;extravagantly&lt;/i&gt; free of ethical considerations.  Damn good point.  But the radical-subjectivist recipe of &quot;everyone&#039;s a [blank];  everyone&#039;s [another blank]&quot; works just as well when the blanks are filled in with words other than &quot;hypocrite&quot; and &quot;compromised&quot;.  &quot;Everyone&#039;s a [hero in his own mind];  everyone&#039;s [point of view seems justified to him]&quot;, for example, in my opinion works just as well to express the Handicapper-General formulation of &quot;liberal relativism&quot;, if not better still.  But, it isn&#039;t a very Millarian thought if you switch these terms out, is it?  So I don&#039;t believe he&#039;s adhering to this relativism at all, but instead he&#039;s attacking it:  he&#039;s only interested in it as a prop for the juvenile cynicism Civil War stinks of, and I think he&#039;d be more than happy to toss the moral equivalence &lt;i&gt;out&lt;/i&gt;, if by doing so he could keep the moral compromise &lt;i&gt;in&lt;/i&gt;.

To me, that&#039;s no kind of liberalism.  No kind of conservativism, either.  Rather, it&#039;s just so much sneering at &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; sort of belief:  as though the idea of morality was vacuous to begin with, and everyone from relativist to absolutist exactly the same sort of deluded fool.

That&#039;s the feeling I get from it, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ll certainly agree with your take on Millar&#8217;s will-imposition, which as far as I can tell is always <i>extravagantly</i> free of ethical considerations.  Damn good point.  But the radical-subjectivist recipe of &#8220;everyone&#8217;s a [blank];  everyone&#8217;s [another blank]&#8221; works just as well when the blanks are filled in with words other than &#8220;hypocrite&#8221; and &#8220;compromised&#8221;.  &#8220;Everyone&#8217;s a [hero in his own mind];  everyone&#8217;s [point of view seems justified to him]&#8220;, for example, in my opinion works just as well to express the Handicapper-General formulation of &#8220;liberal relativism&#8221;, if not better still.  But, it isn&#8217;t a very Millarian thought if you switch these terms out, is it?  So I don&#8217;t believe he&#8217;s adhering to this relativism at all, but instead he&#8217;s attacking it:  he&#8217;s only interested in it as a prop for the juvenile cynicism Civil War stinks of, and I think he&#8217;d be more than happy to toss the moral equivalence <i>out</i>, if by doing so he could keep the moral compromise <i>in</i>.</p>
<p>To me, that&#8217;s no kind of liberalism.  No kind of conservativism, either.  Rather, it&#8217;s just so much sneering at <i>any</i> sort of belief:  as though the idea of morality was vacuous to begin with, and everyone from relativist to absolutist exactly the same sort of deluded fool.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the feeling I get from it, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Karindu</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-15453</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Karindu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-15453</guid>
		<description>Except that the &quot;everyone&#039;s compromised; everyone&#039;s a hypocrite&quot; argument amounts to an absolute version of relativism identified with a particular strain of liberal pseudo-politics.  It&#039;s the Handicapper General&#039;s approach to ethics, because when the limit of your insight is that every system is compromised you needn&#039;t make any sort of distinctions between any of them.  In effect, it&#039;s the suspension of moral choice, of even the possibility of ethics.  And so it&#039;s a very schoolboy sort of insight, yes.

Now, this isn&#039;t the breadth and scope of liberal politics, of course, because it is possible to make moral commitments in some -- I daresay most -- brands of liberalism.  But Millar&#039;s brand?  Not so much.  It borders on but isn&#039;t libertarianism, since Millar allows for the imposition of one&#039;s will by virtue of power.  It differs from leftism and right politics in that that imposition of will needn&#039;t have any particular ethos behind it in Millar&#039;s stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that the &#8220;everyone&#8217;s compromised; everyone&#8217;s a hypocrite&#8221; argument amounts to an absolute version of relativism identified with a particular strain of liberal pseudo-politics.  It&#8217;s the Handicapper General&#8217;s approach to ethics, because when the limit of your insight is that every system is compromised you needn&#8217;t make any sort of distinctions between any of them.  In effect, it&#8217;s the suspension of moral choice, of even the possibility of ethics.  And so it&#8217;s a very schoolboy sort of insight, yes.</p>
<p>Now, this isn&#8217;t the breadth and scope of liberal politics, of course, because it is possible to make moral commitments in some &#8212; I daresay most &#8212; brands of liberalism.  But Millar&#8217;s brand?  Not so much.  It borders on but isn&#8217;t libertarianism, since Millar allows for the imposition of one&#8217;s will by virtue of power.  It differs from leftism and right politics in that that imposition of will needn&#8217;t have any particular ethos behind it in Millar&#8217;s stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plok</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-15412</link>
		<dc:creator>plok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-15412</guid>
		<description>Omar, so right!  That&#039;s how I&#039;m going to describe Millar&#039;s writing from now on.

One quibble:  you think Millar loads up his comics with comfortably liberal politics?  I don&#039;t see any liberal politics here.  Seems to me part of the idea of telling the rubes that someone else is the rube is to emphasize that everyone, &lt;i&gt;everyone&lt;/i&gt;, is morally compromised and basically a hypocrite.  Whether or not they&#039;re on the right side.

A schoolboy&#039;s insight, that makes your rock criticism point even more cutting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omar, so right!  That&#8217;s how I&#8217;m going to describe Millar&#8217;s writing from now on.</p>
<p>One quibble:  you think Millar loads up his comics with comfortably liberal politics?  I don&#8217;t see any liberal politics here.  Seems to me part of the idea of telling the rubes that someone else is the rube is to emphasize that everyone, <i>everyone</i>, is morally compromised and basically a hypocrite.  Whether or not they&#8217;re on the right side.</p>
<p>A schoolboy&#8217;s insight, that makes your rock criticism point even more cutting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Karindu</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-15402</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Karindu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-15402</guid>
		<description>Short version of the above rant:

Mark Millar comics are to comics what rock criticism is to rock music.

or, alternatively,

Mark Millar comics are to comics what California ska-band covers of great rock songs are to rock songs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short version of the above rant:</p>
<p>Mark Millar comics are to comics what rock criticism is to rock music.</p>
<p>or, alternatively,</p>
<p>Mark Millar comics are to comics what California ska-band covers of great rock songs are to rock songs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Karindu</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-15393</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Karindu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-15393</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the point of killing off characters no one cares about?

It&#039;s become very clear to me that the appeal of Mark Millar&#039;s stories is that he loads up his fairly typical superhero battle scenes with ultraironic snark and comfortably liberal politics so that readers who want to be smarter than superhero nerds can pat themselves on the back while still indulging in superhero nerddom.

It&#039;s a 2-part truism expressed by a lot of lowbrow entertainment these days:

1) Give the rubes what they want.
2) What rubes want is to feel like they&#039;re on the inside and someone else is the rube.

All you have to do is deliver the same old crap, but with a wink and a sneer, and the rubes will mimic that sneer and declare themselves the kings of cool.  Mark Millar gave out an easy joke and a simple inversion of the usual, and everyone who spots it gets to give themselves a gold star and wear a smug grin.  Just like Mark does on his way to the bank.

It&#039;s a seven-issue exercise in genre in-jokes and backpatting, dressed up as a ludicrous allegory of...something, I&#039;m sure.  Abu Ghraib, maybe.  Or wiretapping.  Or, uhm, gun control.  Yeah, that&#039;s the ticket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the point of killing off characters no one cares about?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s become very clear to me that the appeal of Mark Millar&#8217;s stories is that he loads up his fairly typical superhero battle scenes with ultraironic snark and comfortably liberal politics so that readers who want to be smarter than superhero nerds can pat themselves on the back while still indulging in superhero nerddom.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a 2-part truism expressed by a lot of lowbrow entertainment these days:</p>
<p>1) Give the rubes what they want.<br />
2) What rubes want is to feel like they&#8217;re on the inside and someone else is the rube.</p>
<p>All you have to do is deliver the same old crap, but with a wink and a sneer, and the rubes will mimic that sneer and declare themselves the kings of cool.  Mark Millar gave out an easy joke and a simple inversion of the usual, and everyone who spots it gets to give themselves a gold star and wear a smug grin.  Just like Mark does on his way to the bank.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a seven-issue exercise in genre in-jokes and backpatting, dressed up as a ludicrous allegory of&#8230;something, I&#8217;m sure.  Abu Ghraib, maybe.  Or wiretapping.  Or, uhm, gun control.  Yeah, that&#8217;s the ticket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Seavey</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-15104</link>
		<dc:creator>John Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-15104</guid>
		<description>&quot;Black Goliath- when was the last time we cared about him. &quot;

Define &#039;we&#039;. I sure don&#039;t, but you know what? I don&#039;t care about the New Warriors either, but I&#039;ve got a room-mate who&#039;s absolutely furious because he loved that comic and is just sick with anger that Marvel killed off some of his favorite characters. I&#039;m sure there are people out there who have every appearance of Bill Foster, and were just hoping that his spotlight in Civil War, combined with Bendis&#039; affection for 70s Marvel, was a sign of an upcoming &#039;Black Goliath&#039; comic.

This is the problem with death in comics--everyone is somebody&#039;s favorite character, everyone has the potential to be revamped into a best-seller, and chucking things out like that just because you, as a writer, think they&#039;re &quot;lame&quot; is a huge mistake--not just creatively, but from a business stand-point. (I realize writers shouldn&#039;t think from a business stand-point...but editors-in-chief dang well should.)

And personally, I&#039;m buying &#039;Civil War&#039; strictly for business purposes (it&#039;s even tax-deductible)--once it&#039;s over, I will go back to not buying Marvel comics again. Except for the Marvel Adventures and Marvel Essentials lines, because those are the kinds of comics I want to read. The mainstream Marvel universe, though, lost me a looong time ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Black Goliath- when was the last time we cared about him. &#8221;</p>
<p>Define &#8216;we&#8217;. I sure don&#8217;t, but you know what? I don&#8217;t care about the New Warriors either, but I&#8217;ve got a room-mate who&#8217;s absolutely furious because he loved that comic and is just sick with anger that Marvel killed off some of his favorite characters. I&#8217;m sure there are people out there who have every appearance of Bill Foster, and were just hoping that his spotlight in Civil War, combined with Bendis&#8217; affection for 70s Marvel, was a sign of an upcoming &#8216;Black Goliath&#8217; comic.</p>
<p>This is the problem with death in comics&#8211;everyone is somebody&#8217;s favorite character, everyone has the potential to be revamped into a best-seller, and chucking things out like that just because you, as a writer, think they&#8217;re &#8220;lame&#8221; is a huge mistake&#8211;not just creatively, but from a business stand-point. (I realize writers shouldn&#8217;t think from a business stand-point&#8230;but editors-in-chief dang well should.)</p>
<p>And personally, I&#8217;m buying &#8216;Civil War&#8217; strictly for business purposes (it&#8217;s even tax-deductible)&#8211;once it&#8217;s over, I will go back to not buying Marvel comics again. Except for the Marvel Adventures and Marvel Essentials lines, because those are the kinds of comics I want to read. The mainstream Marvel universe, though, lost me a looong time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron C</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-15037</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-15037</guid>
		<description>I quite enjoyed it.  It did read a bit quickly, and not a lot happened, but overall I think the story is pretty cool.

Sheesh, half the comics today have not a lot happening and read quickly so this is no different in that regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite enjoyed it.  It did read a bit quickly, and not a lot happened, but overall I think the story is pretty cool.</p>
<p>Sheesh, half the comics today have not a lot happening and read quickly so this is no different in that regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feedbackjonze</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-15030</link>
		<dc:creator>feedbackjonze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-15030</guid>
		<description>I have been called on the carpet for my lack of nerdiness.  Although, by reading the comments I wonder if I possibly am the bigger nerd for buying and enjoying most of Civil War.      

CLOR -We&#039;ve seen Thor as a human man, a frog, a woman, and the power of Thor given to a horse looking dude.  Is a cyborg/clone really all that crazy?  

Black Goliath- when was the last time we cared about him.  

Spiderman&#039;s spider sense not warning him -I agree with the previous comment, there have been plenty of time he&#039;s gotten his ass kicked even with the spider sense. 

Imprisoning people in the negative zone -Where are they supposed to put these guys?  And if we&#039;re lucky we&#039;ll get an OZ style one shot written by Ed Brubaker, while we wait three months for issue six.  They could call it CIVIl WAR: SPEEDSHANK REDEMPTION where Speedball escapes through the negative zone and crawls through three football fields of human waste and somehow comes clean on the other side, and then meets up with Luke Cage on a beach in Mexico.   

The Punisher claiming he&#039;s been watching their backs the whole time even though he showed up in one issue wearing a ski mask.   I&#039;m sure a lot happened off panel that will be explained in an eight issue mini series by Bendis called CIVIL WAR: THE MASK  where over eight issues, the punisher talks to a sales clerk about buying the ski mask, and then talks to manager about the correct price for the ski mask, tries on the ski mask at home and then calls the store about their return policy, finds out the illuminati sent the hulk into space, returns the mask for another, decapitates a gangster, and then watches some heroes from fire escapes, and then talks to a little girl about the horrors of war, then decapitates her.   

Reed Richards and Tony Stark acting like douchebags- You see them acting out character.  That they WOULD never use villans to track down their friends.   Well they&#039;re the smartest people on the planet, why wouldn&#039;t they think the nannites or whatever they&#039;re controlling them with wouldn&#039;t work.  They see that things have been out of hand for awhile and that maybe the heroes should have more orginization and accountability.  Where you see them acting like villans I see an awesome one shot: CIVIL WAR  MR. FANTASTIC and IRON MAN:  Seriously, is it us? Are we really the douchebags here?  Maybe we&#039;re under the control of the Man Beast, or maybe Captain America&#039;s the dick.  It would be written by Grant Morrison where they would try to figure out if they&#039;re really douchebags without ever meeting each other.  

You see a raping of a Universe and its characters I see an oppritunity for awesome spin offs. Such as DAREDEVIL: THE BURN  where Daredevil spends a week fighting crime and coming up the thirty pieces of silver zinger before he gets captured.  It would be written by Kevin Smith look for it in 2018.    FROM THINGRISE TO THINGSET where we follow the Thing and Bartoc the Leaper as they walk around Paris, talking about their dreams and aspirations. In the last few pages they would clobber Fing Fang Foom, and then make a promise to meet again ten years later. It would be written by Dan Slott.  CIVIL WAR: ADAM WARLOCK: Hey I&#039;m not doing anythig.  Is someone going to pick me for a side?   I have a gem. Anybody? How about that Ahnillation?  That&#039;s crazy. I could help out with that.  No?  Okay.  I&#039;ll just be sitting here crucifying myself, and then making a cocoon.   

I guess I just like seeing the positive in things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been called on the carpet for my lack of nerdiness.  Although, by reading the comments I wonder if I possibly am the bigger nerd for buying and enjoying most of Civil War.      </p>
<p>CLOR -We&#8217;ve seen Thor as a human man, a frog, a woman, and the power of Thor given to a horse looking dude.  Is a cyborg/clone really all that crazy?  </p>
<p>Black Goliath- when was the last time we cared about him.  </p>
<p>Spiderman&#8217;s spider sense not warning him -I agree with the previous comment, there have been plenty of time he&#8217;s gotten his ass kicked even with the spider sense. </p>
<p>Imprisoning people in the negative zone -Where are they supposed to put these guys?  And if we&#8217;re lucky we&#8217;ll get an OZ style one shot written by Ed Brubaker, while we wait three months for issue six.  They could call it CIVIl WAR: SPEEDSHANK REDEMPTION where Speedball escapes through the negative zone and crawls through three football fields of human waste and somehow comes clean on the other side, and then meets up with Luke Cage on a beach in Mexico.   </p>
<p>The Punisher claiming he&#8217;s been watching their backs the whole time even though he showed up in one issue wearing a ski mask.   I&#8217;m sure a lot happened off panel that will be explained in an eight issue mini series by Bendis called CIVIL WAR: THE MASK  where over eight issues, the punisher talks to a sales clerk about buying the ski mask, and then talks to manager about the correct price for the ski mask, tries on the ski mask at home and then calls the store about their return policy, finds out the illuminati sent the hulk into space, returns the mask for another, decapitates a gangster, and then watches some heroes from fire escapes, and then talks to a little girl about the horrors of war, then decapitates her.   </p>
<p>Reed Richards and Tony Stark acting like douchebags- You see them acting out character.  That they WOULD never use villans to track down their friends.   Well they&#8217;re the smartest people on the planet, why wouldn&#8217;t they think the nannites or whatever they&#8217;re controlling them with wouldn&#8217;t work.  They see that things have been out of hand for awhile and that maybe the heroes should have more orginization and accountability.  Where you see them acting like villans I see an awesome one shot: CIVIL WAR  MR. FANTASTIC and IRON MAN:  Seriously, is it us? Are we really the douchebags here?  Maybe we&#8217;re under the control of the Man Beast, or maybe Captain America&#8217;s the dick.  It would be written by Grant Morrison where they would try to figure out if they&#8217;re really douchebags without ever meeting each other.  </p>
<p>You see a raping of a Universe and its characters I see an oppritunity for awesome spin offs. Such as DAREDEVIL: THE BURN  where Daredevil spends a week fighting crime and coming up the thirty pieces of silver zinger before he gets captured.  It would be written by Kevin Smith look for it in 2018.    FROM THINGRISE TO THINGSET where we follow the Thing and Bartoc the Leaper as they walk around Paris, talking about their dreams and aspirations. In the last few pages they would clobber Fing Fang Foom, and then make a promise to meet again ten years later. It would be written by Dan Slott.  CIVIL WAR: ADAM WARLOCK: Hey I&#8217;m not doing anythig.  Is someone going to pick me for a side?   I have a gem. Anybody? How about that Ahnillation?  That&#8217;s crazy. I could help out with that.  No?  Okay.  I&#8217;ll just be sitting here crucifying myself, and then making a cocoon.   </p>
<p>I guess I just like seeing the positive in things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Whitmore</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-14971</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Whitmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-14971</guid>
		<description>&quot;What about the â€˜my girlfriend died of a broken neckâ€™ line? (or whatever it was)I thought that was the cause of the internetâ€™s slight perforationâ€¦ Arenâ€™t we in fandom still arguing over that?&quot;


Not really. It&#039;s been stated in the comics more than once that it was the way Spider-Man caught Gwen that killed her. Most recently in &quot;Sins Past&quot; and Millar&#039;s MK story.


&quot;And am I the only one that wants to know why Spider- Manâ€™s spider sense didnâ€™t warn him of the Jester and Jackâ€™s upcoming attack? Why is this the first time in FIFTY YEARS the guyâ€™s been taken by surprise?&quot;


It&#039;s not. Not even close. Spider-Man has been nailed a zillion times in situations where his spider sense should have warned him. Writers ignore it or downplay it whenever they want Spidey to take a hit. That&#039;s all there is to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What about the â€˜my girlfriend died of a broken neckâ€™ line? (or whatever it was)I thought that was the cause of the internetâ€™s slight perforationâ€¦ Arenâ€™t we in fandom still arguing over that?&#8221;</p>
<p>Not really. It&#8217;s been stated in the comics more than once that it was the way Spider-Man caught Gwen that killed her. Most recently in &#8220;Sins Past&#8221; and Millar&#8217;s MK story.</p>
<p>&#8220;And am I the only one that wants to know why Spider- Manâ€™s spider sense didnâ€™t warn him of the Jester and Jackâ€™s upcoming attack? Why is this the first time in FIFTY YEARS the guyâ€™s been taken by surprise?&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not. Not even close. Spider-Man has been nailed a zillion times in situations where his spider sense should have warned him. Writers ignore it or downplay it whenever they want Spidey to take a hit. That&#8217;s all there is to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joffe</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-14878</link>
		<dc:creator>joffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-14878</guid>
		<description>I ain&#039;t buying it jonze. I&#039;m not sure if you&#039;re aware of this, but there are dedicated nerds who scan these things and distribute them online for free. I&#039;m not in the habit of buying things I don&#039;t actually enjoy reading. Why read it then? Because I enjoy COMPLAINING. Just not enough to pay for the privelage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ain&#8217;t buying it jonze. I&#8217;m not sure if you&#8217;re aware of this, but there are dedicated nerds who scan these things and distribute them online for free. I&#8217;m not in the habit of buying things I don&#8217;t actually enjoy reading. Why read it then? Because I enjoy COMPLAINING. Just not enough to pay for the privelage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feedbackjonze</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-14842</link>
		<dc:creator>feedbackjonze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-14842</guid>
		<description>My only complaint on the issue was I wanted to see bullseye, green goblin, and taskmaster but the beating down on spidey.   

I guess Taskmaster was too busy being a total pussy over in Moon Knight.   

Although, I have to admit that reading all your comments on how bad it sucks, and how stupid it is, and yet you&#039;re sitll buying it is fairly amusing.   

Thanks for the laughs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only complaint on the issue was I wanted to see bullseye, green goblin, and taskmaster but the beating down on spidey.   </p>
<p>I guess Taskmaster was too busy being a total pussy over in Moon Knight.   </p>
<p>Although, I have to admit that reading all your comments on how bad it sucks, and how stupid it is, and yet you&#8217;re sitll buying it is fairly amusing.   </p>
<p>Thanks for the laughs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oeirituhhsuurak</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-14618</link>
		<dc:creator>oeirituhhsuurak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 01:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-14618</guid>
		<description>The cover was completely misleading!  i wanted to see Bullseye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cover was completely misleading!  i wanted to see Bullseye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: res196e7</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-14439</link>
		<dc:creator>res196e7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-14439</guid>
		<description>Omar: That part of the year would still exist if these 7-issue event miniseries actually came out in 7 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omar: That part of the year would still exist if these 7-issue event miniseries actually came out in 7 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Karindu</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-14431</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Karindu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-14431</guid>
		<description>Remember when there was a small part of the year in which neither company was running a crossover or &quot;event&quot; miniseries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember when there was a small part of the year in which neither company was running a crossover or &#8220;event&#8221; miniseries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sausaletus Rex</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-14397</link>
		<dc:creator>Sausaletus Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-14397</guid>
		<description>Iâ€™m in agreement with some of the, no doubt, well considered sentiments on display here â€“ just yawn all around.

Not that this Civil War even is boring or lacking in â€œbigâ€ moments, far from it.  In fact, it seems as though the pages between the covers have been stuffed with one exciting twist or shocking revalation or anything else Mr. Millar seems to think will drum up yet more enthusiasm in his readers.  And, well, I guess Iâ€™ve just become numb to the whole thing by this point.  I suppose it could be the late shipping date but, well, I havenâ€™t enough money to follow all the books I want so the other day when my friend offer to loan me a few in exchange for a trade I had just sitting around he offered me the latest Civil War and I just said â€œCivil War?  That isnâ€™t over yet?  Hmm, yeah, Iâ€™d rather have something else, thanks.â€  So I wish I could say more about the actual issue at hand but, frankly, so to speak, Iâ€™m more than a little sick of the whole thing.

See, I think itâ€™s the relentless hype thatâ€™s driving me to apathy.  This isnâ€™t the first mega crossover lately.  Thereâ€™s Annihilation and Infinite Crisis and Countdown and Seven Soldiers and Identity Crisis and, bleh, it just seems like the bad old days of Atlantis Attacks and War of the Gods all over again.  Sure, thereâ€™s some interesting stuff being put out but thereâ€™s just an incessant effort to convince me, the reader, that this next crossover is going to be the best one yet.  Preaching to the faithful.  Just pounding the drum a little harder each and every time.  Whipping me into a frenzy of excitement that, yeah, Iâ€™ve been burned in the past but this time, this time, itâ€™s going to be different.  It usually isnâ€™t but next time, wellâ€¦

Just hype and more hype with nothing to back it up.  I canâ€™t say I have the kind of enthusiasm that moose n squirrel seems to have for using my dollars in protest.  That takes a bit more anger and energy than I can currently gather.  But, Iâ€™d think the companies that publish things like Civil War would worry much less about creating such passion than reinforcing my apathy by shouting at me harder.  I know I worry about my interest just fading away as I read less and less and lessâ€¦</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iâ€™m in agreement with some of the, no doubt, well considered sentiments on display here â€“ just yawn all around.</p>
<p>Not that this Civil War even is boring or lacking in â€œbigâ€ moments, far from it.  In fact, it seems as though the pages between the covers have been stuffed with one exciting twist or shocking revalation or anything else Mr. Millar seems to think will drum up yet more enthusiasm in his readers.  And, well, I guess Iâ€™ve just become numb to the whole thing by this point.  I suppose it could be the late shipping date but, well, I havenâ€™t enough money to follow all the books I want so the other day when my friend offer to loan me a few in exchange for a trade I had just sitting around he offered me the latest Civil War and I just said â€œCivil War?  That isnâ€™t over yet?  Hmm, yeah, Iâ€™d rather have something else, thanks.â€  So I wish I could say more about the actual issue at hand but, frankly, so to speak, Iâ€™m more than a little sick of the whole thing.</p>
<p>See, I think itâ€™s the relentless hype thatâ€™s driving me to apathy.  This isnâ€™t the first mega crossover lately.  Thereâ€™s Annihilation and Infinite Crisis and Countdown and Seven Soldiers and Identity Crisis and, bleh, it just seems like the bad old days of Atlantis Attacks and War of the Gods all over again.  Sure, thereâ€™s some interesting stuff being put out but thereâ€™s just an incessant effort to convince me, the reader, that this next crossover is going to be the best one yet.  Preaching to the faithful.  Just pounding the drum a little harder each and every time.  Whipping me into a frenzy of excitement that, yeah, Iâ€™ve been burned in the past but this time, this time, itâ€™s going to be different.  It usually isnâ€™t but next time, wellâ€¦</p>
<p>Just hype and more hype with nothing to back it up.  I canâ€™t say I have the kind of enthusiasm that moose n squirrel seems to have for using my dollars in protest.  That takes a bit more anger and energy than I can currently gather.  But, Iâ€™d think the companies that publish things like Civil War would worry much less about creating such passion than reinforcing my apathy by shouting at me harder.  I know I worry about my interest just fading away as I read less and less and lessâ€¦</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joffe</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-14349</link>
		<dc:creator>joffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-14349</guid>
		<description>Or maybe &quot;sell your Marvel stocks!&quot; Thank you and goodnight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe &#8220;sell your Marvel stocks!&#8221; Thank you and goodnight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mutt</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-14340</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-14340</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read any comics dealing with it, but I like the notion that revealling his identity turned Peter&#039;s Spider Sense into a low grade buzz. It&#039;s like his sub-concious is screaming, &quot;Get a new secret identity! Now!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read any comics dealing with it, but I like the notion that revealling his identity turned Peter&#8217;s Spider Sense into a low grade buzz. It&#8217;s like his sub-concious is screaming, &#8220;Get a new secret identity! Now!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-14334</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-14334</guid>
		<description>&quot;WAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!&quot;

Lol.  Thank you Howard the Duck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;WAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>Lol.  Thank you Howard the Duck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avery</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-14315</link>
		<dc:creator>avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/11/17/civil-war-5-a-slight-perforation-of-the-internet/#comment-14315</guid>
		<description>WAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

