CSBG Archive
Jumping On Points: A New (Certainly Sporadic) Column Series That Already Debuted!
- by Brad Curran
- in General
- 2 Comments
I’m going to try my hand at a regular themed column. It probably won’t work, especially as I will soon be working five days a week for the first time in my life, but I’ll try it anyway. And guess what, my review of the latest 52 was the first installment; that’s right, I’m doing what I can only assume is CBSG’s third retcon*.
The first comic I’m going to look at it is one that’s near and dear to one of our contributors named Greg’s heart; I’m going to see how coherent the latest issue of Rex Mundi is for new readers.
It’s only fitting, since I sort of ripped this whole idea off from one of his column serieses. Even if mine is going to be about new comics. Also, it wasn’t inspired by a manifesto of any kind**. Anyway, on to the judgment!
Rex Mundi by Arvid Nelson and Juan Ferreyra, Dark Horse Comics, $2.99
This comic went almost too far in its effort to promote accessibility. There’s a whole page of Story So Far recap that I swear almost put me in to a coma. I appreciate the attention to detail, but it did come across a bit as overkill. I’m guess I’m used to comics that can be summed up in a couple smart ass paragraphs (Casanova) or just open in media res and fill you in as they go (Ellis and Morrison), or comics where all the backstory work was done 40 years ago and all you need is a plot synopsis to get running(any long running superhero comic).
Since this book involves a lot of world building and alternative history, it’s a bit more complicated than that. More successful in recapping the story, for those of us prone to spontaneous comas when they deal with information overloads, were four short character profiles in the form of classified documents on the four main characters. That’s two pages of recap; like I said, it seemed that maybe Nelson and Ferreyra went a little too far with the new reader friendliness, although it’s probably better that there was TMI than not enough.Â
Was all of this back story really neccesary to follow the issue? Not really. You can figure it out for yourself pretty easily. Everything’s on the page. It’s an alternative history story (although the amount of alternative history you’re not going to appreciate unless you a) read all of that story so far recap) and b) really like history, so I can see why Greg likes this so much), there’s a war on, and in the middle of that, one man is searching for the truth about the grail.
There’s not a lot going on, plotwise, but just enough to keep the issue humming along. There’s a history lecture toward the end of the issue, but I was a history minor, so I have a tolerance for that sort of thing, and since it’s about the Holy Grail, I found it pretty interesting anyway, even if it could all be conspiracy mumbo jumbo for all I know. There’s also a menacing Albino lurking about, so I guess if you were so inclined you could make Da Vinci Code references. I won’t, because I avoided the damn thing like a plague in two mediums.
There are a lot of references to previous chapters of the story as the issue goes on. It’s almost nostalgic, really, as it takes me back to the time when superhero comics were filled with footnotes that breathlessly told you about when the last time Spider-Man fought the Vulture. These footnotes don’t mention either of those characters, and they do give a little background information, but mostly are just references to previous chapters in the story; in case you just want to read specific chapters instead of the whole story, I guess.
The art is solid. It tells the story well. It’s a little too shiny for my tastes; it sort of resembles the digital paint technique used in Origin in 1602 and John Cassday’s work on Astonishing X-Men. I can’t heap superlatives on it, but it does the job the script asks of it. It’s basically a talking heads issue, so it’s not like there are any real chances for Ferreyra has any chances to show off, but he does his job well, and if nothing else, should be commended for drawing and coloring his own work here. Don’t see that too often in a mainstream comic.
This comic is wholly accessible. Almost too much so, but you could follow it perfectly well if this were your first issue. Taken on its own merits, it was perfectly good, but I’m not nearly as enamored with it as the Esteemed Mr. Burgas. It’s just not my cup of tea; I find alternative history’s more interesting in the theory than practice (hell, I find real history more interesting that way, too). I’m not sure I’ll ever read another one of these comics, but the one I did read was perfectly coherent, and I’d certainly reccomend picking it up if this sort of thing is something you really enjoy.Â
Next time- My first issue of Usagi Yojimbo! Or maybe I make fun of Alex Ross’s new Justice League series. We’ll see.
*- The first two being retconning Joe Rice out of being a founding member of the blog and replacing him with Black Canary and making Hatcher a clone of Burgas, even though that doesn’t make any sense. At one point, Cronin was going to be a Skrull, but I think Geoff Johns retconned that retcon, so I don’t know what the hell you call that.
**- Except the Communist Manifesto, of course. That inspires everything I do, even if I’ve made it through college without ever actually reading it.






2 Comments
Greg Burgas
January 2, 2007 at 1:31 pm
Boy, first you steal my idea, then you pick on one of my favorite comics!!!! The nerve!
This is a good idea, because people should branch out and try new things, and this will give them an idea about whether it’s worth buying a single issue or not. Rex Mundi DEFINITELY reads better in chunks, however, and although the recap at the beginning is kind of overkill, they’re overcompensating for the early issues, which came out very slowly and erratically and had NO recaps, which really hurt the overall flow of the book.
And Ferreyra is great, even though he doesn’t get to do much this issue. I wonder when DC or Marvel will come calling.
Chris Richards
January 3, 2007 at 6:28 am
Rex Mundi is probably my favorite book in comics right now. I want to agree that it definitely reads best in chunks, though. I haven’t tried reading the trades, though I imagine it reads best that way, but I’ve found the way I enjoy reading it the most is sitting down and reading the individual issues several at a time. The storytelling is definitely intricate and the plot borders on the decompressed more often than not, but unlike some of the more infamous ‘decompression’ writers out there I think Arvid does a good job of keeping the books ‘full’. I love the alternate history angles too, being as big (or bigger) a history geek as a comic book geek. And being a nitpicker I enjoy spotting Arvid’s little mistakes (be they with real history versus alternate history or with his own continuity) quite a bit too. But all such nitpicking aside, his books is amazing and it’s also a pretty /different/ sort of story as comic books go.
Because I hated ‘The Da Vinci Code’ and because I know from the letters pages and some conversation at WizardWorld Chicago ’05 that Arvid doesn’t love it either, I’m going to make it clear that the bad guy stalking the main characters is /not/ an albino. Everyone just looks pale-ish with Juan Ferreya’s pallet, which is more ‘washed out’ looking than the previous pallet used by former colorist Jeromy Cox. He wears a white suit, but his skin tones aren’t any paler than any other of the characters (and this is France in the 30s, so they’re all mostly really white guys and girls)and he’s never been referred to in the story as an albino at any time. Nitpicky of me, true, but the ‘man in white’ has always been referred to as such and never as an albino.
Some notes on art: I find Juan Ferreyra’s art to be very good, but his details (especially facial details) sometimes lacking. I used to think that I liked EricJ’s art better than Mr. Ferreyra’s, but while his faces had more detail the details were not always as sharp as they could have been. I think the biggest difference between the old art and the new art is Jeromy Cox’s coloring. His palette was very bright and rich while Juan Ferreyra’s tends toward more pastel-ish shades and a sort of soft ‘glare’ effect that makes everything ‘lighter’ and, though this might be a strange word to use to describe coloring, ‘airy’. I think I preferred Mr. Cox’s coloring and that the book might be very different (perhaps stronger) if he came back to color it.
That said, I’m pretty much done. I just can’t not shoot off my mouth when Rex Mundi comes up in any sort of discussion, I love it too much. In many ways, Arvid Nelson is more responsible than anyone else for the depth of my renewed interest in comics as I head toward my thirties.