<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday&#8217;s (and Saturday&#8217;s) Annual Inventory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:42:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry Holley</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/comment-page-1/#comment-37379</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry Holley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/#comment-37379</guid>
		<description>&quot;Never have I been so close to dropping the main Batman books as I was in 2006 â€” not even when Jim Starlin was doing them.&quot;

Ouch...!

&quot;Say it with me, OCD fans â€” itâ€™s okay to NOT know whatâ€™s going on in books you donâ€™t like. Let it go.&quot;

Greg, I think I have a new sigfile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Never have I been so close to dropping the main Batman books as I was in 2006 â€” not even when Jim Starlin was doing them.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ouch&#8230;!</p>
<p>&#8220;Say it with me, OCD fans â€” itâ€™s okay to NOT know whatâ€™s going on in books you donâ€™t like. Let it go.&#8221;</p>
<p>Greg, I think I have a new sigfile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Waters</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/comment-page-1/#comment-37076</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/#comment-37076</guid>
		<description>My pull-list is pretty damn short anyway- usually stuff that I might have a problem getting and really want to get (or, like THE THING, explicitly want to make a show of supporting.) So, THE GOON&#039;s on there to make sure the comic shop remembers to order it (this hasn&#039;t worked very well on HERO SQUARED for some reason- I keep getting every other issue), I might add GODLAND, ALL-STAR SUPERMAN sells well so I might as well be safe, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pull-list is pretty damn short anyway- usually stuff that I might have a problem getting and really want to get (or, like THE THING, explicitly want to make a show of supporting.) So, THE GOON&#8217;s on there to make sure the comic shop remembers to order it (this hasn&#8217;t worked very well on HERO SQUARED for some reason- I keep getting every other issue), I might add GODLAND, ALL-STAR SUPERMAN sells well so I might as well be safe, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Hatcher</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/comment-page-1/#comment-37026</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Hatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/#comment-37026</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So, youâ€™re dropping FF and Amazing now, when they have only one Civil War tie-in issue left apiece? Okay. But Iâ€™ll bet money Dwayne McDuffieâ€™s FF will bring you back.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, no, I dropped them a couple of months back. I just wrote the column this week. But I&#039;m not interested in stories about whatever the post-Civil War status quo&#039;s going to be, or alternatively, whatever the post-Civil War DAMAGE-CONTROL-CONTINUITY-FIX stories are going to be. The whole event has annoyed me to the point where I&#039;m dropping the books, probably for years. That&#039;s my pocketbook vote. 

Although one of the irksome things about the process is that it takes a couple of months to kick in because I have to do it via Previews. So I have to deal with a month or two of being committed to purchase comics I don&#039;t want because they were ordered out of Previews SPECIFICALLY FOR ME a couple of months before. And believe it or not, this is one of the LEAST regimented pull-list systems in my area -- most of the other shops I checked into were more draconian about it.

There&#039;s a whole other column (well, more of a screed, really) about how nutty the whole Diamond/Previews three-months-ahead, retailers-must-be-psychic system is and how ridiculous we are for supporting it as blindly as we do. The last time I took a swing at it I got more than double the usual comments, most of them yelling at me for daring to question the system, with a rider that it&#039;s really all on Diamond and the retailers and not us, WE have no choice. 

Well, we do. This is one of the things that led me to resolve to cut the list, a lot. If somebody collects Dwayne McDuffie&#039;s FF stories in a book and it&#039;s a fun self-contained FF story, I might pick it up THEN. But my New Year&#039;s resolution is that I am only buying books I enjoy and I am only pull-listing books I enjoy enough that I don&#039;t want to miss them. Of the current list, &lt;I&gt;Action&lt;/i&gt; from Johns and Donner is the only one I have doubts about; and I still might take it off. 

Also, people were telling me LAST year that &lt;i&gt;Legends of the Dark Knight&lt;/i&gt; was getting canceled. It chugged along like there was no problem all year long. If &lt;i&gt;Batman Confidential&lt;/i&gt; is the new LOTDK that&#039;s fine but that will be read in trade too, if it gets any. I prefer my superheroes in book form, any more. Pacing is too annoyingly slow and the price is too high for most comics from the big two. The stuff that got left on the list tends to be a denser reading experience, overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So, youâ€™re dropping FF and Amazing now, when they have only one Civil War tie-in issue left apiece? Okay. But Iâ€™ll bet money Dwayne McDuffieâ€™s FF will bring you back.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, no, I dropped them a couple of months back. I just wrote the column this week. But I&#8217;m not interested in stories about whatever the post-Civil War status quo&#8217;s going to be, or alternatively, whatever the post-Civil War DAMAGE-CONTROL-CONTINUITY-FIX stories are going to be. The whole event has annoyed me to the point where I&#8217;m dropping the books, probably for years. That&#8217;s my pocketbook vote. </p>
<p>Although one of the irksome things about the process is that it takes a couple of months to kick in because I have to do it via Previews. So I have to deal with a month or two of being committed to purchase comics I don&#8217;t want because they were ordered out of Previews SPECIFICALLY FOR ME a couple of months before. And believe it or not, this is one of the LEAST regimented pull-list systems in my area &#8212; most of the other shops I checked into were more draconian about it.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a whole other column (well, more of a screed, really) about how nutty the whole Diamond/Previews three-months-ahead, retailers-must-be-psychic system is and how ridiculous we are for supporting it as blindly as we do. The last time I took a swing at it I got more than double the usual comments, most of them yelling at me for daring to question the system, with a rider that it&#8217;s really all on Diamond and the retailers and not us, WE have no choice. </p>
<p>Well, we do. This is one of the things that led me to resolve to cut the list, a lot. If somebody collects Dwayne McDuffie&#8217;s FF stories in a book and it&#8217;s a fun self-contained FF story, I might pick it up THEN. But my New Year&#8217;s resolution is that I am only buying books I enjoy and I am only pull-listing books I enjoy enough that I don&#8217;t want to miss them. Of the current list, <i>Action</i> from Johns and Donner is the only one I have doubts about; and I still might take it off. </p>
<p>Also, people were telling me LAST year that <i>Legends of the Dark Knight</i> was getting canceled. It chugged along like there was no problem all year long. If <i>Batman Confidential</i> is the new LOTDK that&#8217;s fine but that will be read in trade too, if it gets any. I prefer my superheroes in book form, any more. Pacing is too annoyingly slow and the price is too high for most comics from the big two. The stuff that got left on the list tends to be a denser reading experience, overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/comment-page-1/#comment-37024</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/#comment-37024</guid>
		<description>&quot;There does seem to me this tone in Johnsâ€™ work- and in much of the Big Twoâ€™s output overall- that heâ€™d LIKE to do bright shiny adventure, but feels that he canâ€™t justify it, that the characters have too much weighing them down or that good storytelling requires internal turmoil. Thereâ€™s a certain â€œyes, things were fun back then, but WE CAN NEVER GO BACKâ€ attitude.&quot;

I agree, and I can&#039;t help but feel this is all tied somehow to 9/11. We know it affected Didio and Quesada a great deal, and I can&#039;t help but get the feeling that they&#039;re trying to justify putting out &quot;funny books&quot; in a world that doesn&#039;t seem very funny to them anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There does seem to me this tone in Johnsâ€™ work- and in much of the Big Twoâ€™s output overall- that heâ€™d LIKE to do bright shiny adventure, but feels that he canâ€™t justify it, that the characters have too much weighing them down or that good storytelling requires internal turmoil. Thereâ€™s a certain â€œyes, things were fun back then, but WE CAN NEVER GO BACKâ€ attitude.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree, and I can&#8217;t help but feel this is all tied somehow to 9/11. We know it affected Didio and Quesada a great deal, and I can&#8217;t help but get the feeling that they&#8217;re trying to justify putting out &#8220;funny books&#8221; in a world that doesn&#8217;t seem very funny to them anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Collins</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/comment-page-1/#comment-36725</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 05:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/#comment-36725</guid>
		<description>&quot;There does seem to me this tone in Johnsâ€™ work- and in much of the Big Twoâ€™s output overall- that heâ€™d LIKE to do bright shiny adventure, but feels that he canâ€™t justify it, that the characters have too much weighing them down or that good storytelling requires internal turmoil. Thereâ€™s a certain â€œyes, things were fun back then, but WE CAN NEVER GO BACKâ€ attitude.&quot;

Very well said. I agree with that completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There does seem to me this tone in Johnsâ€™ work- and in much of the Big Twoâ€™s output overall- that heâ€™d LIKE to do bright shiny adventure, but feels that he canâ€™t justify it, that the characters have too much weighing them down or that good storytelling requires internal turmoil. Thereâ€™s a certain â€œyes, things were fun back then, but WE CAN NEVER GO BACKâ€ attitude.&#8221;</p>
<p>Very well said. I agree with that completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Curran</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/comment-page-1/#comment-36718</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Curran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/#comment-36718</guid>
		<description>&quot;Lots of cuts here, sorry to say. But Iâ€™m just not going to keep buying books that I only kind of like, or that seem like theyâ€™re on the verge of getting better. Thatâ€™s inertia buying and itâ€™s probably the worst habit comics fans have, because it sends publishers the message that you like something when you donâ€™t.&quot;

This is an excellent point, and one that I would stamp on the forehead of everyone buying comics even if they hate them if weren&#039;t so lazy and that also wasn&#039;t likely illegal.

&quot;Say it with me, OCD fans â€” itâ€™s okay to NOT know whatâ€™s going on in books you donâ€™t like. Let it go.&quot;

With the advent of the internet and spoilers and what not, you don&#039;t even have to buy books to follow them, so I really don&#039;t get this. I have kept up with Civil War and Infinite Crisis while actively trying to ignore them via message boards and blogs, for crying out loud! I can&#039;t fathom buying comics you don&#039;t like because I never have enough money to buy all the stuff I like, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lots of cuts here, sorry to say. But Iâ€™m just not going to keep buying books that I only kind of like, or that seem like theyâ€™re on the verge of getting better. Thatâ€™s inertia buying and itâ€™s probably the worst habit comics fans have, because it sends publishers the message that you like something when you donâ€™t.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is an excellent point, and one that I would stamp on the forehead of everyone buying comics even if they hate them if weren&#8217;t so lazy and that also wasn&#8217;t likely illegal.</p>
<p>&#8220;Say it with me, OCD fans â€” itâ€™s okay to NOT know whatâ€™s going on in books you donâ€™t like. Let it go.&#8221;</p>
<p>With the advent of the internet and spoilers and what not, you don&#8217;t even have to buy books to follow them, so I really don&#8217;t get this. I have kept up with Civil War and Infinite Crisis while actively trying to ignore them via message boards and blogs, for crying out loud! I can&#8217;t fathom buying comics you don&#8217;t like because I never have enough money to buy all the stuff I like, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/comment-page-1/#comment-36710</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 03:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/#comment-36710</guid>
		<description>&quot;I buy Astonishing for Whedon and Cassaday but even that oneâ€™s kind of tottering on the brink â€” they have this outer-space arc to finish and then itâ€™s make or break time for keeping it on the list.&quot;
Well, the series is essentially over at that point anyway.  I mean, Whedon&#039;s leaving to write Runaways, and Cassaday&#039;s going off to draw book 2 and direct the movie of I Am Legion, and Marvel still hasn&#039;t announced a replacement team.

Personally, I&#039;ve never been a fan of Astonishing, but I&#039;m enjoying the hell out of Mike Carey&#039;s run on X-Men, and I haven&#039;t been this psyched about the franchise in years.  I&#039;ve been hearing great stuff about Carey&#039;s work on UF4 too, so if he can make me excited about that book again like he did with X-Men, I&#039;ll probably have another title to start picking up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I buy Astonishing for Whedon and Cassaday but even that oneâ€™s kind of tottering on the brink â€” they have this outer-space arc to finish and then itâ€™s make or break time for keeping it on the list.&#8221;<br />
Well, the series is essentially over at that point anyway.  I mean, Whedon&#8217;s leaving to write Runaways, and Cassaday&#8217;s going off to draw book 2 and direct the movie of I Am Legion, and Marvel still hasn&#8217;t announced a replacement team.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;ve never been a fan of Astonishing, but I&#8217;m enjoying the hell out of Mike Carey&#8217;s run on X-Men, and I haven&#8217;t been this psyched about the franchise in years.  I&#8217;ve been hearing great stuff about Carey&#8217;s work on UF4 too, so if he can make me excited about that book again like he did with X-Men, I&#8217;ll probably have another title to start picking up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Waters</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/comment-page-1/#comment-36695</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 01:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/#comment-36695</guid>
		<description>AMAZING SPIDER-MAN, like a lot of the Marvel CW tie-ins, has carried the burden of making the events of CIVIL WAR slightly more not-insane and exploring motivations and so on. It doesn&#039;t always work- my brain just refuses to parse Reed&#039;s &quot;Uncle&quot; story as a motivation for anything other than becoming a dyed-in-the-wool anarchist- but this title&#039;s been solid. 

This is the first time I&#039;ve even bothered to follow the two main Bat-books. He was at a stage where he needed to be dragged back to the fundamentals. Wear Bat Suit, fight crime, occasionally romance very dangerous women. 

There does seem to me this tone in Johns&#039; work- and in much of the Big Two&#039;s output overall- that he&#039;d LIKE to do bright shiny adventure, but feels that he can&#039;t justify it, that the characters have too much weighing them down or that good storytelling requires internal turmoil. There&#039;s a certain &quot;yes, things were fun back then, but WE CAN NEVER GO BACK&quot; attitude.

I haven&#039;t actually read JLA CLASSIFIED in a bit, since for me its interest value is entirely determined by what it&#039;s doing this arc- who&#039;s writing, what era it is, etc. I bought the ICBINTJL &quot;arc&quot; aka miniseries, Simone&#039;s run, Morrison&#039;s when I heard about the &quot;jet powered apes&quot; line, and a bit of the Detroit arc, but nothing since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMAZING SPIDER-MAN, like a lot of the Marvel CW tie-ins, has carried the burden of making the events of CIVIL WAR slightly more not-insane and exploring motivations and so on. It doesn&#8217;t always work- my brain just refuses to parse Reed&#8217;s &#8220;Uncle&#8221; story as a motivation for anything other than becoming a dyed-in-the-wool anarchist- but this title&#8217;s been solid. </p>
<p>This is the first time I&#8217;ve even bothered to follow the two main Bat-books. He was at a stage where he needed to be dragged back to the fundamentals. Wear Bat Suit, fight crime, occasionally romance very dangerous women. </p>
<p>There does seem to me this tone in Johns&#8217; work- and in much of the Big Two&#8217;s output overall- that he&#8217;d LIKE to do bright shiny adventure, but feels that he can&#8217;t justify it, that the characters have too much weighing them down or that good storytelling requires internal turmoil. There&#8217;s a certain &#8220;yes, things were fun back then, but WE CAN NEVER GO BACK&#8221; attitude.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t actually read JLA CLASSIFIED in a bit, since for me its interest value is entirely determined by what it&#8217;s doing this arc- who&#8217;s writing, what era it is, etc. I bought the ICBINTJL &#8220;arc&#8221; aka miniseries, Simone&#8217;s run, Morrison&#8217;s when I heard about the &#8220;jet powered apes&#8221; line, and a bit of the Detroit arc, but nothing since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/comment-page-1/#comment-36669</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 23:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/#comment-36669</guid>
		<description>So, you&#039;re dropping FF and Amazing now, when they have only one Civil War tie-in issue left apiece? Okay. But I&#039;ll bet money Dwayne McDuffie&#039;s FF will bring you back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, you&#8217;re dropping FF and Amazing now, when they have only one Civil War tie-in issue left apiece? Okay. But I&#8217;ll bet money Dwayne McDuffie&#8217;s FF will bring you back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David C</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/comment-page-1/#comment-36659</link>
		<dc:creator>David C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/#comment-36659</guid>
		<description>I need to do this, too, specifically, trying to shift more of my spending to &quot;waiting for the trade,&quot; especially when I&#039;ve got a big stack of unread stuff that probably *is* in trades by now....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to do this, too, specifically, trying to shift more of my spending to &#8220;waiting for the trade,&#8221; especially when I&#8217;ve got a big stack of unread stuff that probably *is* in trades by now&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Reed</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/comment-page-1/#comment-36658</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/#comment-36658</guid>
		<description>I think it has one to go. But Batman Confidential is pretty much the same book, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it has one to go. But Batman Confidential is pretty much the same book, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/comment-page-1/#comment-36655</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/#comment-36655</guid>
		<description>Legends of the Dark Knight has been canceled, though.  Hasn&#039;t the last issue come out yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legends of the Dark Knight has been canceled, though.  Hasn&#8217;t the last issue come out yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Collins</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/comment-page-1/#comment-36649</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 21:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/#comment-36649</guid>
		<description>&quot;I notice, scrolling up, that I keep coming back to the idea of fun books that donâ€™t have to tie in to a bunch of other crap. Well, thatâ€™s the way Iâ€™m voting with my wallet, comics industry.&quot;

Amen, brother. DC and Marvel are already starting to hyper their next big crossovers and I find myself tired of the thought of having to follow another 40-part, 20-title crossover. Oh well, plenty of other things to read...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I notice, scrolling up, that I keep coming back to the idea of fun books that donâ€™t have to tie in to a bunch of other crap. Well, thatâ€™s the way Iâ€™m voting with my wallet, comics industry.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amen, brother. DC and Marvel are already starting to hyper their next big crossovers and I find myself tired of the thought of having to follow another 40-part, 20-title crossover. Oh well, plenty of other things to read&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Reed</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/comment-page-1/#comment-36633</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 20:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/06/fridays-and-saturdays-annual-inventory/#comment-36633</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I notice, scrolling up, that I keep coming back to the idea of fun books that donâ€™t have to tie in to a bunch of other crap. Well, thatâ€™s the way Iâ€™m voting with my wallet, comics industry.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Me too, Greg. Me too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I notice, scrolling up, that I keep coming back to the idea of fun books that donâ€™t have to tie in to a bunch of other crap. Well, thatâ€™s the way Iâ€™m voting with my wallet, comics industry.</p></blockquote>
<p>Me too, Greg. Me too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

