<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wow, people put a lot of effort into this stuff...</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:40:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richie</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-81056</link>
		<dc:creator>Richie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-81056</guid>
		<description>Personally I hope that They do bring both a new and an old earth back. Perhaps the Earth-2 so that we could enjoy heroes that simply disappeared in the original &quot;Crisis&quot; ie; Earth-2 Robin and Huntress,and maybe an&quot;Ultimates &quot; style Earth for DC. Its not that far of a stretch to say that All Star Batman And Robin are the &quot;new&quot; Earth versions,allowing DC to bring completely fresh versions of their Icons in the 2000&#039;s. It certainley worked for the Ultimates line at marvel ,and the differences between the new versions stories and the old versions are refreshing without losing creativity to the new versions or continuity for the old versions. I for one hope that they do this as a creative way to tell the characters stories with a new outlook,with new twists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I hope that They do bring both a new and an old earth back. Perhaps the Earth-2 so that we could enjoy heroes that simply disappeared in the original "Crisis" ie; Earth-2 Robin and Huntress,and maybe an"Ultimates " style Earth for DC. Its not that far of a stretch to say that All Star Batman And Robin are the "new" Earth versions,allowing DC to bring completely fresh versions of their Icons in the 2000's. It certainley worked for the Ultimates line at marvel ,and the differences between the new versions stories and the old versions are refreshing without losing creativity to the new versions or continuity for the old versions. I for one hope that they do this as a creative way to tell the characters stories with a new outlook,with new twists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron Dunn</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-44271</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-44271</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s a lot of back and forth with all the comic book companies but bringing back the crazy multiverse is a good...no...a GREAT thing.  While I hope it is only used sparingly and not with any intention of bringing characters back from the dead, I see it as another tool in DC&#039;s storytelling.  When they got rid of the Multiverse in the original, far crazier, Crisis, they killed off too many story possibilities.  At least in this way, if they need to, they can move characters from other titles and times,etc, to the DC mainstream for a brief--or permanent--stay.  However, The real potential, in my opinon, lies in that they can take things out of the main DCU and put them in their own realities that free writers from heavy handed event comics.

That said, I prefer DC&#039;s current events to Marvel&#039;s by far.  DC&#039;s make more sense, feel less cheap, and are more fun.  When Marvel has a big event it&#039;s usually late to arrive in stores, screws up all of the other comics (which events do, of course) and kills off the Avengers and 99% of the mutant population...who will come back to life because some writer didn&#039;t like it or realized it was a really stupid thing to do.

Yes, I could go on with this forever but I&#039;ll stop.

Now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it's a lot of back and forth with all the comic book companies but bringing back the crazy multiverse is a good...no...a GREAT thing.  While I hope it is only used sparingly and not with any intention of bringing characters back from the dead, I see it as another tool in DC's storytelling.  When they got rid of the Multiverse in the original, far crazier, Crisis, they killed off too many story possibilities.  At least in this way, if they need to, they can move characters from other titles and times,etc, to the DC mainstream for a brief--or permanent--stay.  However, The real potential, in my opinon, lies in that they can take things out of the main DCU and put them in their own realities that free writers from heavy handed event comics.</p>
<p>That said, I prefer DC's current events to Marvel's by far.  DC's make more sense, feel less cheap, and are more fun.  When Marvel has a big event it's usually late to arrive in stores, screws up all of the other comics (which events do, of course) and kills off the Avengers and 99% of the mutant population...who will come back to life because some writer didn't like it or realized it was a really stupid thing to do.</p>
<p>Yes, I could go on with this forever but I'll stop.</p>
<p>Now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanCJ</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-43801</link>
		<dc:creator>DanCJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43801</guid>
		<description>Hooray!!! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hooray!!! <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanCJ</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-43800</link>
		<dc:creator>DanCJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43800</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;SO close, Dan! :)

Next time, use  instead of []. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Thanks for that.  Hopefully this post will look right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>SO close, Dan! <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Next time, use  instead of []. </p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks for that.  Hopefully this post will look right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunkyGreenJerusalem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-43791</link>
		<dc:creator>FunkyGreenJerusalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43791</guid>
		<description>&quot;Thatâ€™s the exact sentiment that this blog was started to denounce. Itâ€™s really sad that a comic being â€œdecentâ€ or â€œnot great, but goodâ€ is seen as some sort of accolade. I will not settle for mediocrity, and I will not settle for comics that are â€œokayâ€.&quot;

Actually Dan, the site&#039;s title would lead one to believe that good is fine.
You may want to fight for great, but the blogs title, at least, seems to say that they are okay with good.
I&#039;m happy with good. 
I wouldn&#039;t call the latest Blue Beetle series &#039;great&#039;, but dammit, I had good fun reading the trade, and can&#039;t wait to get the next one.
It hasn&#039;t set any new benchmarks, or re-invented the wheel, but it did entertain the hell out of me.
What&#039;s wrong with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Thatâ€™s the exact sentiment that this blog was started to denounce. Itâ€™s really sad that a comic being â€œdecentâ€ or â€œnot great, but goodâ€ is seen as some sort of accolade. I will not settle for mediocrity, and I will not settle for comics that are â€œokayâ€."</p>
<p>Actually Dan, the site's title would lead one to believe that good is fine.<br />
You may want to fight for great, but the blogs title, at least, seems to say that they are okay with good.<br />
I'm happy with good.<br />
I wouldn't call the latest Blue Beetle series 'great', but dammit, I had good fun reading the trade, and can't wait to get the next one.<br />
It hasn't set any new benchmarks, or re-invented the wheel, but it did entertain the hell out of me.<br />
What's wrong with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-43775</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43775</guid>
		<description>SO close, Dan! :)

Next time, use &lt;&gt; instead of [].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO close, Dan! <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Next time, use <> instead of [].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanCJ</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-43773</link>
		<dc:creator>DanCJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43773</guid>
		<description>Damn - I thought I had the quotey thing sussed this time :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn - I thought I had the quotey thing sussed this time <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanCJ</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-43771</link>
		<dc:creator>DanCJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43771</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
The multiverse was always a Cool Comic Concept. Getting rid of it was just a Cool Series Concept. Returning it is once again a Cool Comic Concept.

And this means that Earth-2 Supes may still be alive out there. The worldâ€™s First Super-hero!

Embrace your inner child and enjoy this for the fun thing it is.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Damn straight.  All change is good!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
The multiverse was always a Cool Comic Concept. Getting rid of it was just a Cool Series Concept. Returning it is once again a Cool Comic Concept.</p>
<p>And this means that Earth-2 Supes may still be alive out there. The worldâ€™s First Super-hero!</p>
<p>Embrace your inner child and enjoy this for the fun thing it is.</p></blockquote>
<p>Damn straight.  All change is good!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkAndrew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-43651</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkAndrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43651</guid>
		<description>Interesting side-tidbit:

I believe the first Marvel &quot;alternate dimension&quot; showed up in Avengers Annual # 2.  (I THINK this was pre-Squadron Supreme.)  It wasn&#039;t the start of the Multi-verse, but it was the debut of the Marvel duo-verse.

The Avengers fight their otherworldly counterparts who&#039;ve taken over their planet &#039;cause, y&#039;know, governments were screwing up and wars and pollution and stuff.

Which is, come to think of it, the plot of every single superhero comic from the last 10-15 years. But you&#039;ve already heard my &quot;get some new ideas you bums&quot; spiel once in this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting side-tidbit:</p>
<p>I believe the first Marvel "alternate dimension" showed up in Avengers Annual # 2.  (I THINK this was pre-Squadron Supreme.)  It wasn't the start of the Multi-verse, but it was the debut of the Marvel duo-verse.</p>
<p>The Avengers fight their otherworldly counterparts who've taken over their planet 'cause, y'know, governments were screwing up and wars and pollution and stuff.</p>
<p>Which is, come to think of it, the plot of every single superhero comic from the last 10-15 years. But you've already heard my "get some new ideas you bums" spiel once in this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Frankel</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-43615</link>
		<dc:creator>David Frankel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43615</guid>
		<description>John Seavey said, &quot;Certainly the whole codification of it all is a recent development, mostly coming out of Exiles (which is where I think the Earth-616 stuff came out of.)&quot;

Fortunately, the Marvel multiverse goes much further back than that.  We have early issues of Avengers, etc. talking about other dimensions, whether it be Dr. Strange, the Squadron Sinister or Thundra; but I think a true multiverse started with the mostly unknown Captain Britain titles by Alan Moore, et al., some of the best Marvel stories, ever. That&#039;s where the Earth -616 desisgnation arises.  Here&#039;s a wink: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth-616.

If you get a chance, check out part of this great story in the Capain Britain tradepaperback (1995) (reprinted 2005), and the X-Men Archives featuring Captain Britain (7 issue limited series) (1995).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Seavey said, "Certainly the whole codification of it all is a recent development, mostly coming out of Exiles (which is where I think the Earth-616 stuff came out of.)"</p>
<p>Fortunately, the Marvel multiverse goes much further back than that.  We have early issues of Avengers, etc. talking about other dimensions, whether it be Dr. Strange, the Squadron Sinister or Thundra; but I think a true multiverse started with the mostly unknown Captain Britain titles by Alan Moore, et al., some of the best Marvel stories, ever. That's where the Earth -616 desisgnation arises.  Here's a wink: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth-616" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth-616</a>.</p>
<p>If you get a chance, check out part of this great story in the Capain Britain tradepaperback (1995) (reprinted 2005), and the X-Men Archives featuring Captain Britain (7 issue limited series) (1995).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apodaca</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-43482</link>
		<dc:creator>Apodaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43482</guid>
		<description>&quot;Geez, some of you CSBG folks are soooo snarky. Overall I love this blog but sometimes I worry that Iâ€™m not elitist enough for the rest of you. I mean, Iâ€™m not about to claim â€œ52â€³ is â€œAll-Star Supermanâ€ or anything, but damn Iâ€™ve been enjoying it nonetheless. Itâ€™s not great, but it is good.&quot;

That&#039;s the exact sentiment that this blog was started to denounce. It&#039;s really sad that a comic being &quot;decent&quot; or &quot;not great, but good&quot; is seen as some sort of accolade. I will not settle for mediocrity, and I will not settle for comics that are &quot;okay&quot;.

Also, your phrasing&#039;s a bit off. It should be &quot;It&#039;s not great, but I like it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Geez, some of you CSBG folks are soooo snarky. Overall I love this blog but sometimes I worry that Iâ€™m not elitist enough for the rest of you. I mean, Iâ€™m not about to claim â€œ52â€³ is â€œAll-Star Supermanâ€ or anything, but damn Iâ€™ve been enjoying it nonetheless. Itâ€™s not great, but it is good."</p>
<p>That's the exact sentiment that this blog was started to denounce. It's really sad that a comic being "decent" or "not great, but good" is seen as some sort of accolade. I will not settle for mediocrity, and I will not settle for comics that are "okay".</p>
<p>Also, your phrasing's a bit off. It should be "It's not great, but I like it."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebis</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-43412</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 17:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43412</guid>
		<description>&quot;The real question (and one I wouldnâ€™t be the least bit suprised if they never really answer) is what is the significance of *52*.&quot;

Well, I don&#039;t know if anyone will be satisified with the answer, but I&#039;m sure there is one. Or, I guess I should say, at this point there better be, because they&#039;ve been claiming there is a significance to &quot;52&quot; beyond just 52 weeks. And it&#039;s become a plot point, of course. (Though not one that much concerns me or affects my enjoyment of the series.*)  I oughtta know better than to believe either of the Big Two publishers when they say something. (&quot;Oh, absolutely, Civil War is a stand-alone story.&quot;)

The best theory I read â€” and this was many weeks ago â€” is that Red Tornado (et al) isn&#039;t really saying &quot;52&quot; (meaning a single number, &quot;fifty-two&quot;) but a ratio, &quot;5:2&quot; (&quot;five to two&quot;) ... The idea being: From the five earths that endured (and sort-of survived) the original &quot;Crisis,&quot; we now have two (not just one) left. In other words, Earth-2 is back (which I&#039;d be fine with). Does that mean we get Helena Wayne and company back too?

On the other hand, if DiDio is writing that the &quot;multiverse&quot; is back, well, that suggests they&#039;re gonna end up adding countless earths back on. Which could be fun, it could be dreadful. It&#039;s all a matter of how they handle it. [shrug] We&#039;ll see soon enough, won&#039;t we? 

* Personally, I&#039;m not too invested in exactly what &quot;52&quot; means. It&#039;s fine for me as a name for a comic that&#039;s running weekly for a year â€” a comic that comes out [i]on time[/i] every week and gives me some fun serialized storytelling featuring C-list characters who never (or too rarely) get the spotlight, along with some interesting new ones too. I mean, Doc Magnus &amp; T.O. Morrow! THe Question! Buddy Baker!  ... I&#039;m really enjoying the development of Black Adam and Isis, and Steel, and Ralph too, and I&#039;m happy to see them used here. Steel as Luthor&#039;s main nemesis, while Clark is out of action? Perfect. And, though I too roll my eyes at Identity Crisis, they might as well finally follow up on how Ralph moves on with his life. I&#039;ve actually been quite moved by certain moments with Ralph in this series, like when the Spectre gave him the chance to have Sue back if only he would extract a wicked vengeance on Jean Loring, and he couldn&#039;t do it â€” he couldn&#039;t be that cold, not even to attain his heart&#039;s desire. Beautiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The real question (and one I wouldnâ€™t be the least bit suprised if they never really answer) is what is the significance of *52*."</p>
<p>Well, I don't know if anyone will be satisified with the answer, but I'm sure there is one. Or, I guess I should say, at this point there better be, because they've been claiming there is a significance to "52" beyond just 52 weeks. And it's become a plot point, of course. (Though not one that much concerns me or affects my enjoyment of the series.*)  I oughtta know better than to believe either of the Big Two publishers when they say something. ("Oh, absolutely, Civil War is a stand-alone story.")</p>
<p>The best theory I read â€” and this was many weeks ago â€” is that Red Tornado (et al) isn't really saying "52" (meaning a single number, "fifty-two") but a ratio, "5:2" ("five to two") ... The idea being: From the five earths that endured (and sort-of survived) the original "Crisis," we now have two (not just one) left. In other words, Earth-2 is back (which I'd be fine with). Does that mean we get Helena Wayne and company back too?</p>
<p>On the other hand, if DiDio is writing that the "multiverse" is back, well, that suggests they're gonna end up adding countless earths back on. Which could be fun, it could be dreadful. It's all a matter of how they handle it. [shrug] We'll see soon enough, won't we? </p>
<p>* Personally, I'm not too invested in exactly what "52" means. It's fine for me as a name for a comic that's running weekly for a year â€” a comic that comes out [i]on time[/i] every week and gives me some fun serialized storytelling featuring C-list characters who never (or too rarely) get the spotlight, along with some interesting new ones too. I mean, Doc Magnus &amp; T.O. Morrow! THe Question! Buddy Baker!  ... I'm really enjoying the development of Black Adam and Isis, and Steel, and Ralph too, and I'm happy to see them used here. Steel as Luthor's main nemesis, while Clark is out of action? Perfect. And, though I too roll my eyes at Identity Crisis, they might as well finally follow up on how Ralph moves on with his life. I've actually been quite moved by certain moments with Ralph in this series, like when the Spectre gave him the chance to have Sue back if only he would extract a wicked vengeance on Jean Loring, and he couldn't do it â€” he couldn't be that cold, not even to attain his heart's desire. Beautiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucion</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-43321</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 08:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43321</guid>
		<description>And here I thought Batman fought crime in Gotham, while up the turnpike Superman does the same in Metropolis.  If it had an Elseworld logo on it then it wasn&#039;t &quot;real.&quot;

I had no idea it was so confusing.  After reading all the posts I&#039;m not even sure if there are multiple universes converging or separating.

Batman fights crime.  Personally I don&#039;t care if he is wearing the original cowl or dressed up as the Egyptian God of the Dead as long as he is punching people and detecting.

So now we can have Batman fight the Bat-god in the same universe?  As long as I can be reasonably sure that the book titled &quot;Batman&quot; has somebody dressed in a costume somewhat resembling a winged mammal I will be satisfied.

I&#039;m thrilled for those of you that follow and understand this stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here I thought Batman fought crime in Gotham, while up the turnpike Superman does the same in Metropolis.  If it had an Elseworld logo on it then it wasn't "real."</p>
<p>I had no idea it was so confusing.  After reading all the posts I'm not even sure if there are multiple universes converging or separating.</p>
<p>Batman fights crime.  Personally I don't care if he is wearing the original cowl or dressed up as the Egyptian God of the Dead as long as he is punching people and detecting.</p>
<p>So now we can have Batman fight the Bat-god in the same universe?  As long as I can be reasonably sure that the book titled "Batman" has somebody dressed in a costume somewhat resembling a winged mammal I will be satisfied.</p>
<p>I'm thrilled for those of you that follow and understand this stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Seavey</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-43217</link>
		<dc:creator>John Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43217</guid>
		<description>Ooh, don&#039;t get me started on legacy heroes. :) I think it can work, but I do wish DC would get out of the mentality of &quot;rotate your heroes every five years or 100 issues&quot;. Legacy is a trick that works when there&#039;s no strong, current fanbase for the character, or when there&#039;s a strong core concept that wasn&#039;t used well. DC overuses it, because they had such strong initial success with it (ie, the Silver Age.)

As to the multiverse, I think what we should all remember is that the original explanation was that different universes vibrated at different speeds. Which means that we should always, always, always remember that in the first JLA/JSA crossover, the villains traveled between Earths with the aid of &quot;personal vibrators&quot;.

Now that&#039;s a concept they should give to Warren Ellis to handle. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, don't get me started on legacy heroes. <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I think it can work, but I do wish DC would get out of the mentality of "rotate your heroes every five years or 100 issues". Legacy is a trick that works when there's no strong, current fanbase for the character, or when there's a strong core concept that wasn't used well. DC overuses it, because they had such strong initial success with it (ie, the Silver Age.)</p>
<p>As to the multiverse, I think what we should all remember is that the original explanation was that different universes vibrated at different speeds. Which means that we should always, always, always remember that in the first JLA/JSA crossover, the villains traveled between Earths with the aid of "personal vibrators".</p>
<p>Now that's a concept they should give to Warren Ellis to handle. <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkAndrew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-43203</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkAndrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43203</guid>
		<description>I say this a lot.

But, as far as forty plus year old ideas dreamed up by Fox and Schwartz go, the idea of the multiverse is more interseting to me than the idea of the legacy hero.

But a lot of that interest came from context;  F &amp; S were trying to teach their audience, who were like eight year old kids at the time, some very adveanced theoretical physics.  I like that.  I like that they were trying to make their comics, like, beneficial to their audience, and to really make &#039;em think.  Pretty coo.

That said, I&#039;d rather the DC talent come up with some NEW ideas instead of endlessly recycling old ones.  

ALTHOUGH the Marvel family need their own earth.  &quot;World&#039;s Mightiest Mortal&quot; has a conceptual strength that &quot;in a nine way tie for the world&#039;s third mightiest mortal (give or take)-&quot; just doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say this a lot.</p>
<p>But, as far as forty plus year old ideas dreamed up by Fox and Schwartz go, the idea of the multiverse is more interseting to me than the idea of the legacy hero.</p>
<p>But a lot of that interest came from context;  F &amp; S were trying to teach their audience, who were like eight year old kids at the time, some very adveanced theoretical physics.  I like that.  I like that they were trying to make their comics, like, beneficial to their audience, and to really make 'em think.  Pretty coo.</p>
<p>That said, I'd rather the DC talent come up with some NEW ideas instead of endlessly recycling old ones.  </p>
<p>ALTHOUGH the Marvel family need their own earth.  "World's Mightiest Mortal" has a conceptual strength that "in a nine way tie for the world's third mightiest mortal (give or take)-" just doesn't.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bry</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-43196</link>
		<dc:creator>Bry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43196</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But I do think Marvelâ€™s is a more â€œtake it or leave itâ€ thing, whereas DCâ€™s was required knowledge.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Exactly.  I can get behind the former, but I have a problem with the latter.  

Alternate realities and timelines can be a lot of fun, I agree.  But it only works for me if they exist independently from one another, without the reader needing a scorecard to keep track of where everything &quot;fits&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But I do think Marvelâ€™s is a more â€œtake it or leave itâ€ thing, whereas DCâ€™s was required knowledge.</p></blockquote>
<p>Exactly.  I can get behind the former, but I have a problem with the latter.  </p>
<p>Alternate realities and timelines can be a lot of fun, I agree.  But it only works for me if they exist independently from one another, without the reader needing a scorecard to keep track of where everything "fits".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-43192</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43192</guid>
		<description>I agree, John, that since the multiverse is only addressed in a handful of comics, it is a lot easier to take it as a &quot;refer to it if you want, don&#039;t refer to it if you don&#039;t want&quot; thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, John, that since the multiverse is only addressed in a handful of comics, it is a lot easier to take it as a "refer to it if you want, don't refer to it if you don't want" thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paperghost</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-43190</link>
		<dc:creator>Paperghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43190</guid>
		<description>What annoys me is when people get all antsy over Batman when I dare to insinuate that for all the &quot;worlds greatest detective&quot; stuff, most of the worlds greatest detective gimmick revolves around

a) extremely obvious and basic cod-detective work and
b) punching people in the face

I&#039;m not sure how its directly related to the &quot;sucking the fun out of comics&quot; thing mentioned above, but it sucks the fun out of it for me when I feel like I&#039;m not allowed to appreciate people being punched in the face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What annoys me is when people get all antsy over Batman when I dare to insinuate that for all the "worlds greatest detective" stuff, most of the worlds greatest detective gimmick revolves around</p>
<p>a) extremely obvious and basic cod-detective work and<br />
b) punching people in the face</p>
<p>I'm not sure how its directly related to the "sucking the fun out of comics" thing mentioned above, but it sucks the fun out of it for me when I feel like I'm not allowed to appreciate people being punched in the face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffreyWKramer</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-43161</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffreyWKramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43161</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m definitely on the same wavelength as Joe and Greg on this matter.  

At one time, I&#039;d have been thrilled by this news.    These days, I don&#039;t care.   I simply don&#039;t have any faith DC will do anything cool and fun with the concepts any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm definitely on the same wavelength as Joe and Greg on this matter.  </p>
<p>At one time, I'd have been thrilled by this news.    These days, I don't care.   I simply don't have any faith DC will do anything cool and fun with the concepts any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-43115</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/17/wow-people-put-a-lot-of-effort-into-this-stuff/#comment-43115</guid>
		<description>quote/&quot;on 18 Jan 2007 at 12:46 pm  33.Jordan D. White said â€¦


Soâ€¦ what is the 52 part of 52? Is this Earth-52? Are there a total of 52 universes?&quot; \quote

 
What he said! We all knew the multiverse was back the second they made the changes to the IC hardcover.  The real question (and one I wouldn&#039;t be the least bit suprised if they never really answer) is what is the significance of *52*.  It&#039;s been popping up all over and I bet they never give any kind of answer that makes sense on any real level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quote/"on 18 Jan 2007 at 12:46 pm  33.Jordan D. White said â€¦</p>
<p>Soâ€¦ what is the 52 part of 52? Is this Earth-52? Are there a total of 52 universes?" \quote</p>
<p>What he said! We all knew the multiverse was back the second they made the changes to the IC hardcover.  The real question (and one I wouldn't be the least bit suprised if they never really answer) is what is the significance of *52*.  It's been popping up all over and I bet they never give any kind of answer that makes sense on any real level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
