web stats

CSBG Archive

What I bought – 17 January 2007

This was a strange week in comics.  I think I must have been in a bad mood when I read my comics, because nothing really thrilled me, even though three books came out that I usually enjoy.  That’s weird.  Does your mood affect your enjoyment of comic-book reading?  Maybe I should have waited to read my purchases this week!

Catwoman #63 by Will Pfeifer, David López, and Alvaro López.  $2.99, DC.

01-18-2007 09;54;39AM.JPG

This is an example of what I’m talking about.  After getting progressively better over the last six months or so, this issue isn’t exactly a step back, but it’s a lot of setup to get to the point: the Calculator wants Selina to steal Lex Luthor’s snow globe.  Yes, he really does.  Now, of course, that’s not the whole point of the issue.  Selina wants him to erase records pertaining to Holly’s arrest when she was Catwoman, because of that murder thing and all that Selina has hanging over her.  So we go through why she needs the Calculator instead of going to Oracle.  There’s also the cop, Lenehan, who’s becoming dangerously obsessed with getting Selina.  In this issue he’s told to stay off the case.  Yeah, that’ll happen.

There’s action, of course, but it feels a bit perfunctory.  Boris and Natasha – Hammer and Sickle, who were last seen before OYL as part of the big gang that was trying to kill Selina – escape custody, and do general mayhem, with more gore than we usually see here.  When Selina visits the Calculator, she needs to fight three neophyte bad guys trying to earn their stripes, and she beats on them pretty easily.  It’s a pretty pointless fight in the final analysis.

It’s certainly not going to make me drop the book, because I have gained a lot of trust in Pfeifer over the course of the past year or so that he will write a good story.  This was just a dull beginning to what could be a hoot.  I mean, who doesn’t want to see Selina steal Lex’s stupid snow globe?

JLA Classified #32 by Dan Slott, Dan Jurgens, and Trevor Scott.  $3.99, DC.

01-18-2007 09;55;27AM.JPG

Here’s another book I was disappointed with, but the good news is, it’s the first part of an arc, and I don’t have to buy any more issues if I don’t want to!  Yes, as a functioning human being, I can make that choice!  Isn’t it grand?

I should like this more, shouldn’t I?  Slott is a fine writer, and She-Hulk (which also came out this week) is a fun book more often than not.  But in this book, he misses the mark, and I’m not sure why.  I read it, and just didn’t care.  That’s not a good sign for getting me to come back and find out how the Red King will be defeated.

The first reason I didn’t like it is because of my stupidity.  Yes, even though plenty of people around here accuse me of being stupid as if I’m not aware of it, I’m thoroughly acquainted with my lack of intelligence!  I just don’t get Darrin Profitt’s plan.  I mean, I understand that he goes through every scenario of something and then finds the one that’s the best and goes with it, so that’s how he’s so successful, but I don’t get how he creates all these possibilities and then merges them all into just himself.  And I don’t get how he keeps getting back into the Materioptikon.  The key, which Dr. Destiny calls a “reality-tether,” has something to do with it, but I’m still not sure about the whole thing.  I just don’t care about Darrin Profitt’s plans, so I don’t care when his possibilities dwindle to three, giving him three chances to destroy the JLA.  That’s just the way it is.

Jurgens’ art has never been my favorite, either.  It’s not bad here, but it’s not great.  Just like the rest of the story!  So it’s not like I’m going to stick around for the art.  It kept bugging me, though, for some reason that I can’t understand.  It looks like it always does, but for some reason I disliked it more.  Weird.

Finally, the shoddy spelling of Darrin’s name bothered me.  In the first panel where we see his name, it’s spelled two different ways (“Profit” and “Profitt”).  In the same panel!  On the next page, it’s spelled “Proffit.”  They finally settle on “Profitt,” but that bothered me the rest of the issue.  See what I mean about being in a bad mood?

So that’s that.  I thought I’d give it a try, but I have no interest in reading the rest.  Freedom!

She-Hulk #15 by Slott, Rick Burchett, and Cliff Rathburn.  $2.99, Marvel.

01-18-2007 09;58;42AM.JPG

Here’s another book that I usually like a lot more than I liked this issue.  The idea behind it is sound – Jen gets drafted by S.H.I.E.L.D. (She-Hulk Hits Idiotic Emil Low and Dirty is what it stands for in this issue) and starts hunting down Hulk foes while he’s off-planet, but the execution, at least in this issue, is lacking.  Because so much of it is a fight scene, we don’t get the usual witty repartee from Jen, and since she’s no longer at the law firm, she’s lost her interesting supporting cast.  I don’t know if Slott plans to return her to the firm, but for the moment, it’s a big loss (although, according to the letters page, it doesn’t look like they’re coming back).  Remember how stale those initial issues of Amazing Spider-Man were when Michilinie cut him off from all the supporting characters?  Don’t go down that road, Slott!

As I said, the issue is basically a fight, as Jen is pointed at the Abomination and told to bring him down.  It’s a good fight, and I like how she uses psychology to defeat him (and the idea that gamma-radiated beings reflect their self-image is a very neat idea, even if Slott didn’t come up with it – did he?) when she realizes she’s not as strong as he is.  It’s a good resolution to the battle.

However, the entire issue is lacking the spark we usually get from Slott’s writing.  There are traces of it while Jen is fighting the Abomination, but it feels less inspired than usual.  And Agent Cheesecake is funny, but less so than a lot of the ideas we get in this title.  Burchett’s art doesn’t help, either.  I don’t have a big issue with his art usually, but this issue seems to need some pizazz, and we don’t get that from Burchett’s art.  Greg Horn’s cover is, astonishingly enough, really nice (except for creepy Clay Quartermain in the background), and it would have been nice if the art inside matched it.  Since we’re in Steranko-land here, I would have liked to see the art inside be a little more manic.

Finally, I’m getting old when I’m bothered by Jen jumping into bed with Clay Quartermain at the end.  The first Slott series began with Jen in bed with a European model, and that didn’t bug me, but this does.  Why?  I’m not sure.  It would be nice to see Jen grow up a little bit – I thought that was the whole point of the series.  Yet she jumps into bed at the first opportunity.  She is, after all, still married.  I don’t know why it bothered me.  Like I said, I’m getting old.

Oh well.  I’ll have to see where Slott goes with this.  A disappointing beginning, however.

The Stardust Kid #1-5 by J. M. DeMatteis and Mike Ploog.  $3.50, Boom! Studios.

01-18-2007 09;59;37AM.JPG 01-18-2007 10;00;24AM.JPG 01-18-2007 10;01;12AM.JPG 01-18-2007 10;01;53AM.JPG

01-18-2007 10;02;36AM.JPG

Here’s another book that let me down, even though I liked reading it.  Yes, I’m conflicted.  First of all, it was just hard for me to muster up the necessary caring for it.  Why?  Let’s review: issue #1: June 2005.  Issue #2: September 2005.  Issue #3: October 2005.  Issue #4: June 2006, with a new publisher (the first three issues were from Image).  Yes, I wait to read mini-series for this very reason, so I can just sit down and read the whole thing, but it’s still a pain that these things happen.

Second, it’s a DeMatteis comic.  I happen to like DeMatteis a lot, but if you’ve read any DeMatteis comics, you can pretty much tell what’s going to happen in this book.  If this is your first DeMatteis comic, the only thing that might put you off is the verbosity of the narration, which is immense.  I didn’t mind it, but again, I’m used to it.  The story unfolds about how you’d expect from a DeMatteis comic – lots of talk about love conquering all and fear leading to hate, which corrupts the hatee and hater alike, kids learning lessons about family and life, scary monsters that turn out to be not so scary – it’s all here!  It’s done well, too, but I still have the feeling I’ve read it all before, and I have.  Like I said, if it’s your first DeMatteis comic and you can get past the excessive narration, it’s a very enjoyable book.  Ploog’s art and Nick Bell’s colors help a lot, of course.  Ploog does this kind of fantasy story very well, and the world that Cody and his friends navigate as they try to save the world is wonderfully rendered and beautiful to look at.  Just check out those covers – the interiors are just a nice.

So it’s a year-and-a-half wait for the whole thing to conclude.  It’s certainly worth checking out, because DeMatteis is one of those writers who could tell a decent story in his sleep.  But if you’ve read Dr. Fate, or Blood, or Seekers into the Mystery, or Moonshadow, or … - you get the idea – it might seem a bit familiar.

Ultimate X-Men #78 by Robert Kirkman and Ben Oliver.  $2.99, Marvel. 

01-18-2007 10;03;17AM.JPG

Finally, the last of the three books I usually enjoy that disappointed me this week.  This issue was so … well, boring, I guess, that I might have to drop the book.  Considering I’ve bought every issue of Ultimate X-Men, that’s saying something.

This was until recently my favorite X-book.  So what happened?  Well, Kirkman got off to a decent start on the book, but the recent stories just haven’t been up to snuff.  This Cable story has been dull from the beginning, and Oliver’s stiff art doesn’t help.  Maybe a more dynamic artist would have made what is basically four issues of fighting better, but Oliver’s not up to it.  This issue is so inconsequential that Jean, who started off pretty important in Cable’s plan, is reduced to a cameo appearance.  Even Xavier, who is the focus of Cable’s plan, doesn’t do much.  It’s just boring.  The last time Oliver drew a Kirkman story in Ultimate X-Men, I blamed the art for the story’s blandness.  Now, I have to conclude that the stories themselves are bland.  And that’s too bad.

I don’t know.  I’ll take a look at next issue, but I’m not committed to it.  We shall see.

Finally, the death of a character.  Please.  You notice how an explosion burns away all the flesh on the skull, so that we can’t identify the character just by looking at the corpse?  Explosions don’t do that!  Which leads me to believe the dead character isn’t who we think it is.  Kirkman wouldn’t deceive us like that, would he?  This little sleight of hand makes me like the issue even less.  I’m tired of characters “dying.”

MINI-SERIES I BOUGHT BUT DID NOT READ.

The Nightly News #3 (of 6) by Jonathan Hickman.  $2.99, Image.

01-18-2007 09;56;10AM.JPG

According to the back of this issue, 16 people bought issue #1.  I find that very difficult to believe, because three people at my little comic book store in Mesa, Arizona bought this.  That means almost 19% of the people who bought the book bought it at Greg’s Comics (sadly, I don’t own the store).  Again, I doubt it.

But let’s take Hickman at his word.  That’s just sad.  Come on, people, this is a very cool book.  Really wild stuff, unlike anything you can find on the shelves these days.  Check it out!

Omega Men #4 (of 6) by Andersen Gabrych and Henry Flint.  $2.99, DC.

01-18-2007 09;56;56AM.JPG

I try to avoid reading about mini-series while I’m waiting to read them to avoid coloring how I feel about it, but I’ve heard this isn’t as good as the first issue would indicate.  That would depress me.  Oh well.  I’ll see soon, I guess.  Gabrych, apparently, was named “Hottest Gay Comic Book Writer” by Out Magazine recently.  I didn’t read his work on Detective, but I guess he’s rising fast in the industry.

Phonogram #4 (of 6) by Kieron Gillen and Jamie McKelvie.  $3.50, Image.

01-18-2007 09;57;51AM.JPG

Apparently a lot of people got this and The Nightly News last week, yet somehow, they never showed up in the fifth-largest metropolitan area in the United States.  How the heck does that happen?

So a rather uninspiring week in comics (well, the mini-series I didn’t read might have been great, but I didn’t read them).  They come along every once in a while, but I have faith that they will get better!

Remember, there’s still time to enter my contest.  You have until Sunday night!  I have some good entries so far, but that doesn’t mean you can’t swoop in and win something! 

15 Comments

No Spirit #2? I’m disappointed in you, Burgas. Especially since it was a lot better than the first issue, I thought, even if I’m not entirely happy with the whole story.

Nightly News #1 sold about 5,567 to shops, according to the top 300. That’s a little bit less than Casanova #5 and more than, say, Noble Causes or Godland or Impaler.

(Casanova #6, rather.)

And yeah! Where’s Spirit #2? Or Marvel Adventures Avengers #9? Don’t forsake the MODOK, Greg!

I can’t fault you for not getting Wisdom #2. Yet, anyway. Honestly, I bought #1 and haven’t read it yet. But! I’m going to get around to it. Yes.

I just wasn’t all that impressed with the first issue of The Spirit. Not enough to make me jump up for #2. And I know the MODOK issue came out, but I swear I didn’t see it at the shop. That cover would have jumped out at me, I should think. I’ll have to go back and look for it. And if Wisdom is as good as the first issue apparently was, I’ll get it in trade. Everyone knows Hairsine couldn’t even finish it, right?????

Peter David firmly established the “gamma body, subconscious mind” link during his years on the Hulk book, though John Byrne and Al Milgrom probably deserve a bit of the credit for bringing up the Hulk’s psychic and physical change from the grey, articulate fellow in Hulk #1 to the lovable green lug we all dig so much (which we do, right?).

I’ll probably buy Spirit #2 despite not liking issue #1, since it was the cover to #2 that sold me on the series against by original, better judgment. But if P’Gell is played as an outright evildoer rather than an amoral hedonist, I’ll be disappointed with Cooke for the second issue running.

Wow. I never stop being amazed at how lame you are, Burgas.

You didn’t like SPIRIT 1.

Just another day at COMICS SHOULD BE SHITTY.

The “JLA Classified” story is a slight steal from a novel by Greg Egan called “Quarantine”. That’s a fine novel, though, so the steal is acceptable to me :)

~ Gil

SweetVampireBuddha

January 18, 2007 at 10:25 pm

You know, my comic shop didn’t get Marvel Adventures: The Avengers #9 either. But they did have Marvel Adventures: The Fantastic Four #20 which wasn’t supposed to be out until next week.

Did anyone actually get a copy of MA:Avengers #9?

I got MA Avengers 9. It was great! I’ll do a review on my blog sometime.

Wow, Greg, I don’t know what you did to piss off Alex. He got so mad at you he renamed the site!

Omar, you’ll be happy about P’Gell. She’s treated correctly in the issue. To tell the truth, I liked #1 better, but this was still a good one.

Thanks for looking that sales info up, Bill. That statement had been driving me crazy too. With Greg’s three buyers, myself, Kevin Church, and Cronin, that made up almost half of the supposed sales on the book. That seemed inconceivable to me. Why did Hickman say that? Weird.

Ultimate X-Men was genuinely awful this month, maybe the first issue that had me really wanting Kirkman off the book — up until now I’ve given him the benefit of the doubt.

But man, this last arc has sort of crystallized all the worst parts of Kirkman’s work on the book. For one thing, he seems unable to “get” some of the stuff that drives the Ultimate universe in the first place — notably, killing off a character that we all know is going to be back, which I’m sure is supposed to be very suspenseful but is in fact tremendously boring. Ultimizing characters that don’t work — without improving them to make them work, as Vaughan did — has been another problem. I mean, Ultimate Domino? Ultimate Kane? Really?

And he’s also carrying over the worst aspect of Invincible and The Walking Dead, which is having a zillion subplots going on at once, inching forwards ever-so-slowly, robbing the book of any momentum.

“Date Night” was a solid arc, and “Phoenix” was… well, not terrible, but the book is completely stalled. “Cable” was four months of nothing — we never find out a damn thing about the future, about why exactly Cable wanted to kill Bishop or why Bishop defected, none of the characters even bother to take the time to reflect on how weird this whole time travel thing is, etc. Christ, it’s just a messy, four-issue fight.

Loved Marvel Adventures Avengers, though, and I was quite happy with She-Hulk, particularly since that looooooong Thanos/Civil War/John Jameson/Starfox arc is finally over. I don’t think it’s fair to knock the book for not having a supporting cast just yet — this issue features one reappearing supporting cast member (Doc Samson), and introduces two newbies (Clay Quatermain and Agent Cheesecake), so there’s three support characters right there. And I’m sure Slott will be building it over time. No doubt SHIELD’s new director will be appearing just as soon as he/she can.

Good points about Ultimate X-Men, Patrick, and it’s why I’m thinking long and hard about dropping it. Maybe it will read better in trade – Invincible certainly does.

I have faith in Slott on She-Hulk to give us a good supporting cast, and I’m willing to be patient, but I remember the Michilinie disaster on Amazing Spider-Man, from which I don’t think the book ever fully recovered. by ditching the entire supporting cast, Michilinie made Peter’s life a lot more boring. I don’t want to see that happen with She-Hulk.

Considering how publicly Kirkman has voiced his nostalgic love for the comics of the nineties and the creators associated with them, it shouldn’t be the least bit surprising that he would write the X-Men as a meandering clusterfuck. It also explains why he would use ciphers like Domino and Kane.

Kirkman even had Ultimate Hammer get his back injured, which is what happened in the comic.

Yes, that’s right, he’s following the continuity of HAMMER!

HAMMER!

From the Six Pack!!!

HAMMER!

FunkyGreenJerusalem

January 22, 2007 at 2:39 am

So She-Hulk has changed it’s premise so that it ties into the Nu-Marvel Universe post-Civil War and Post-Planet Hulk?
Tying into not one, but two, crossovers to get more sales?
Yuck.

(Of course, never having brought an issue my opinion shouldn’t really count, but I was intending to pick up some of the trades).

FunkyGreenJerusalem

January 22, 2007 at 2:44 am

“Ultimizing characters that don’t work — without improving them to make them work, as Vaughan did — has been another problem. I mean, Ultimate Domino? Ultimate Kane? Really?”

I can’t think of too many charaters who have been ‘ultimised’ as much as they could have.
There seem to be too many direct ports or even worse, less intresting versions in the ultimate books.
Like the writers either aren’t thinking about them hard enough, or aren’t being allowed to make any changes too dramatic.

This problem has always been there with the Ultimate U, and has always bugged me (and I quite like most of the Ultimate books), going right back to Ultimate Spiderman – it shocked me that the webs weren’t organic.

Leave a Comment

 

Categories

Review Copies

Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.

Browse the Archives