<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I bought - 24 January 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:37:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ST Smith</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-46113</link>
		<dc:creator>ST Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/#comment-46113</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with John on Moon Knight. This new run can be murky and incoherent in both writing and art while its loving debt to the original series isn&#039;t nearly as fun as it could be. Yes, MK has &quot;problems&quot; ... multiple personality, strained personal relationships, a broken body. But the painfully slow pace of the story and its clumsy violence doesn&#039;t deal with those problems in an interesting way. I loved the first Moon Knight series and enjoyed revisiting it in the Essential trade, but this new book isn&#039;t doing the character any favors. Seems to be a general problem at Marvel these days: great characters and supporting cast squandered on ridiculous &quot;events.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with John on Moon Knight. This new run can be murky and incoherent in both writing and art while its loving debt to the original series isn't nearly as fun as it could be. Yes, MK has "problems" ... multiple personality, strained personal relationships, a broken body. But the painfully slow pace of the story and its clumsy violence doesn't deal with those problems in an interesting way. I loved the first Moon Knight series and enjoyed revisiting it in the Essential trade, but this new book isn't doing the character any favors. Seems to be a general problem at Marvel these days: great characters and supporting cast squandered on ridiculous "events."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-45688</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/#comment-45688</guid>
		<description>I would enjoy Moon Knight a lot more if I wasn&#039;t always getting stumped wondering what the heck Frenchie is saying. That&#039;s not French, it&#039;s a jumble of typically English phrases fed through a bad automatic translator.

&quot;Entretien moi&quot; ? I assume Huston means &quot;Entertain me&quot;, but in French this translates as something like &quot;maintain me&quot;, with a grammar error to boot. And this is one of the rare cases where I can deduce the original English phrase ; most of the time I have no idea what Frenchie&#039;s dialogue is supposed to mean.

I used to think Gambit was bad, but this is worse : Huston is trying to be clever and use non-trivial expressions, but fails abysmally.

And that&#039;s a shame, because I like Huston&#039;s take on Spector&#039;s insanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would enjoy Moon Knight a lot more if I wasn't always getting stumped wondering what the heck Frenchie is saying. That's not French, it's a jumble of typically English phrases fed through a bad automatic translator.</p>
<p>"Entretien moi" ? I assume Huston means "Entertain me", but in French this translates as something like "maintain me", with a grammar error to boot. And this is one of the rare cases where I can deduce the original English phrase ; most of the time I have no idea what Frenchie's dialogue is supposed to mean.</p>
<p>I used to think Gambit was bad, but this is worse : Huston is trying to be clever and use non-trivial expressions, but fails abysmally.</p>
<p>And that's a shame, because I like Huston's take on Spector's insanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mutt</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-45547</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 01:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/#comment-45547</guid>
		<description>The Eternals cover shouts, &quot;No Newbies Allowed!&quot;

A fan might dig it, but I can&#039;t imagine someone being drawn to the book by the cover alone.

Any comic cover could be improved by a big arrow saying, &quot;Check out Hawkeye&#039;s groovy new threads!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Eternals cover shouts, "No Newbies Allowed!"</p>
<p>A fan might dig it, but I can't imagine someone being drawn to the book by the cover alone.</p>
<p>Any comic cover could be improved by a big arrow saying, "Check out Hawkeye's groovy new threads!"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-45473</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/#comment-45473</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s cool, Stephen.  Glad to see you getting sucked in.  I just don&#039;t like the murkiness of the covers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's cool, Stephen.  Glad to see you getting sucked in.  I just don't like the murkiness of the covers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan Schroeder</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-45471</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Schroeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/#comment-45471</guid>
		<description>I was intrigued by the cover of Eternals # 6 enough to look through the insides and eventually buy even though I hadn&#039;t bought any of the previous ones.  The cover had more characters pictured and depth than the earlier issues, and it was different from everything else on the stands this week.  I liked the positioning and glowing eyes of the two characters in the background and the coppery color tones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was intrigued by the cover of Eternals # 6 enough to look through the insides and eventually buy even though I hadn't bought any of the previous ones.  The cover had more characters pictured and depth than the earlier issues, and it was different from everything else on the stands this week.  I liked the positioning and glowing eyes of the two characters in the background and the coppery color tones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan young</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-45426</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/#comment-45426</guid>
		<description>Anyone who isn&#039;t reading the Legion of Super-Heroes is missing out on one of the best superhero team books out there.  The current story arc has moved beyond the teen rebelion thing that so many people seemed to hate (mostly grumpy old people I suspect!) and moved to a great story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who isn't reading the Legion of Super-Heroes is missing out on one of the best superhero team books out there.  The current story arc has moved beyond the teen rebelion thing that so many people seemed to hate (mostly grumpy old people I suspect!) and moved to a great story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeb Aslam</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-44993</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeb Aslam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/#comment-44993</guid>
		<description>Sadly I bought a lot of these too. Although I hated a lot more as well and am rapidly heading towards a new &#039;purge&#039; wherein my comics will (hopefully) be pared down to a more manageable number. 

Doctor Strange: The Oath is awesome. I love this series to the point where if Marvel announced BKV was writing a regular Strange book I would buy two copies just to support it. Hate Eternals though; Gaiman just isn&#039;t accomplishing everything I want him to with this; plus the civil war crossover makes me want to claw my eyes out. 

Checkmate is a good book. No arguments there, but it&#039;s too...large. I got turned off the book when after 6 issues I still didn&#039;t know about half the people in the cast. I know Rucka is going for a slow burn...but I want something much better...Still it&#039;s the best we&#039;re probably gonna get from DC so that&#039;s someting huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly I bought a lot of these too. Although I hated a lot more as well and am rapidly heading towards a new 'purge' wherein my comics will (hopefully) be pared down to a more manageable number. </p>
<p>Doctor Strange: The Oath is awesome. I love this series to the point where if Marvel announced BKV was writing a regular Strange book I would buy two copies just to support it. Hate Eternals though; Gaiman just isn't accomplishing everything I want him to with this; plus the civil war crossover makes me want to claw my eyes out. </p>
<p>Checkmate is a good book. No arguments there, but it's too...large. I got turned off the book when after 6 issues I still didn't know about half the people in the cast. I know Rucka is going for a slow burn...but I want something much better...Still it's the best we're probably gonna get from DC so that's someting huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-44992</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/#comment-44992</guid>
		<description>I know you have, John, and I&#039;m glad to see your vitriol not just reserved for Moon Knight.  Expository writing is a lost art, and it&#039;s frustrating.  I guess Marvel and DC have just given up trying to lure new readers who don&#039;t have the necessary 30+ years of backstory to appreciate the comics!

I think you&#039;re right about what Huston is doing with the character and hoping we have some sympathy for him from previous incarnations.  I hadn&#039;t thought of that.  I hope it doesn&#039;t kill the book, but it might.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you have, John, and I'm glad to see your vitriol not just reserved for Moon Knight.  Expository writing is a lost art, and it's frustrating.  I guess Marvel and DC have just given up trying to lure new readers who don't have the necessary 30+ years of backstory to appreciate the comics!</p>
<p>I think you're right about what Huston is doing with the character and hoping we have some sympathy for him from previous incarnations.  I hadn't thought of that.  I hope it doesn't kill the book, but it might.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Seavey</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-44988</link>
		<dc:creator>John Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/#comment-44988</guid>
		<description>Um...I don&#039;t know if you&#039;ve noticed, Greg, but I have been bitching about every comic mainstream Marvel and DC publishes. Remember that &#039;Punk Comics Manifesto&#039; thing? That&#039;s me. :) Seriously, looking back, I was more than a little cranky in my complaints about Moon Knight, but it really was boiling over of a frustration I&#039;ve had about a lot of mainstream comics, and Moon Knight seemed to be the apotheosis of it: Expository writing is a lost art.

It was, I think (and you said as much yourself) more frustrating for me with MK than with other crossovers I read, because I&#039;m a little less familiar with Moon Knight than I am about other Marvel comics (but only a little: I know Frenchie, I got the reference to him thinking about throwing away his Egyptian-themed weapons, I know he&#039;s had the whole &quot;three personalities&quot; thing, and I can even name them--Steven Grant, Jake Lockley, and Marc Spector)...but yeah, this isn&#039;t just a trend I&#039;ve bitched about with &#039;Moon Knight&#039;. Comic writers in general need to learn how to fit in their exposition, because right now it&#039;s just being left out.

And the whole &quot;beating a guy to a bloody pulp with a stick&quot; thing...this is one of those things I actually have wanted to bitch about more, the idea that in an open-ended series, your lead character has to be sympathetic. This doesn&#039;t mean he can&#039;t have flaws, but there has to be something that makes you like the guy, makes you want to root for him and care about what&#039;s happening to him, and I think Huston is kind of relying on that already having been established in past MK series so that he can take the character out to the edges. And again, that&#039;s great if you are a hardcore Moon Knight fan, but if this is your first issue, he beats a man with a stick until bits fall off, then disses Spidey. Not a way to win friends. (Maybe it&#039;s not that I was cranky earlier. Maybe I just always sound this way. :) )

So in sum, yeah, I was probably making an example of Moon Knight #7 because I&#039;m heartily sick of a lot of trends it exemplifies more than because it&#039;s got some unique flaw, but you did ask what a &quot;new reader&quot; would think of the issue, so I felt the need to pipe up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um...I don't know if you've noticed, Greg, but I have been bitching about every comic mainstream Marvel and DC publishes. Remember that 'Punk Comics Manifesto' thing? That's me. <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Seriously, looking back, I was more than a little cranky in my complaints about Moon Knight, but it really was boiling over of a frustration I've had about a lot of mainstream comics, and Moon Knight seemed to be the apotheosis of it: Expository writing is a lost art.</p>
<p>It was, I think (and you said as much yourself) more frustrating for me with MK than with other crossovers I read, because I'm a little less familiar with Moon Knight than I am about other Marvel comics (but only a little: I know Frenchie, I got the reference to him thinking about throwing away his Egyptian-themed weapons, I know he's had the whole "three personalities" thing, and I can even name them--Steven Grant, Jake Lockley, and Marc Spector)...but yeah, this isn't just a trend I've bitched about with 'Moon Knight'. Comic writers in general need to learn how to fit in their exposition, because right now it's just being left out.</p>
<p>And the whole "beating a guy to a bloody pulp with a stick" thing...this is one of those things I actually have wanted to bitch about more, the idea that in an open-ended series, your lead character has to be sympathetic. This doesn't mean he can't have flaws, but there has to be something that makes you like the guy, makes you want to root for him and care about what's happening to him, and I think Huston is kind of relying on that already having been established in past MK series so that he can take the character out to the edges. And again, that's great if you are a hardcore Moon Knight fan, but if this is your first issue, he beats a man with a stick until bits fall off, then disses Spidey. Not a way to win friends. (Maybe it's not that I was cranky earlier. Maybe I just always sound this way. <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<p>So in sum, yeah, I was probably making an example of Moon Knight #7 because I'm heartily sick of a lot of trends it exemplifies more than because it's got some unique flaw, but you did ask what a "new reader" would think of the issue, so I felt the need to pipe up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apathy Boy</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-44888</link>
		<dc:creator>Apathy Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 06:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/#comment-44888</guid>
		<description>THE DAMNED is freakin&#039; good. Probably my favourite book right now. It has an inspired premise and Bunn and Hurtt are hitting every cylinder. Works as a gangster piece. Works as a story about demons. Works as a period piece. Works as a mystery. Good stuff.

I like the look of A DUMMY&#039;S GUIDE TO DANGER. Going to have to see if I can find that one somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE DAMNED is freakin' good. Probably my favourite book right now. It has an inspired premise and Bunn and Hurtt are hitting every cylinder. Works as a gangster piece. Works as a story about demons. Works as a period piece. Works as a mystery. Good stuff.</p>
<p>I like the look of A DUMMY'S GUIDE TO DANGER. Going to have to see if I can find that one somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-44807</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 01:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/#comment-44807</guid>
		<description>Well, that&#039;s just harsh, John.:)  You&#039;re absolutely right on a lot of points, and I have said many times before (to the point where I didn&#039;t this time, but maybe I should have) that I like this book inordinately more a lot of people because I love the character.  That being said, the only problem with the diner scene is the lack of context - the issue of how Spector&#039;s violent life impacts those around him is handled pretty well, I thought.  And honestly, if you&#039;re going to complain about writers using arcane knowledge from characters&#039; pasts without clueing in new readers, you&#039;re going to have to bitch about pretty much every mainstream comic Marvel and DC publish these days.  A lot of the books assume we all know everything about the characters, and it takes away from the reading experience.  It&#039;s a little more annoying with Moon Knight for new readers because he&#039;s not as well known, but it happens with all of them.

The scene with the two people talking to each other is supposed to be mysterious, as it&#039;s the first issue of a new arc and they&#039;re the bad guys.  I understand if you didn&#039;t like it, but it&#039;s supposed to be incoherent.  As for the scene with Spider-Man ... yes, it&#039;s brutal, and that&#039;s the point.  One thing I like about the series, as I mentioned, is that Huston is trying to show that Moon Knight is more than a bit crazy and that his violent ways have a greater impact than he&#039;s willing to admit.  I think he&#039;s doing a good job.

That&#039;s cool that you didn&#039;t like it, though.  To each his own, after all.  I&#039;m glad you tried it out, because we should always try new things.  Some things aren&#039;t for some people.  Nothing wrong with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that's just harsh, John.:)  You're absolutely right on a lot of points, and I have said many times before (to the point where I didn't this time, but maybe I should have) that I like this book inordinately more a lot of people because I love the character.  That being said, the only problem with the diner scene is the lack of context - the issue of how Spector's violent life impacts those around him is handled pretty well, I thought.  And honestly, if you're going to complain about writers using arcane knowledge from characters' pasts without clueing in new readers, you're going to have to bitch about pretty much every mainstream comic Marvel and DC publish these days.  A lot of the books assume we all know everything about the characters, and it takes away from the reading experience.  It's a little more annoying with Moon Knight for new readers because he's not as well known, but it happens with all of them.</p>
<p>The scene with the two people talking to each other is supposed to be mysterious, as it's the first issue of a new arc and they're the bad guys.  I understand if you didn't like it, but it's supposed to be incoherent.  As for the scene with Spider-Man ... yes, it's brutal, and that's the point.  One thing I like about the series, as I mentioned, is that Huston is trying to show that Moon Knight is more than a bit crazy and that his violent ways have a greater impact than he's willing to admit.  I think he's doing a good job.</p>
<p>That's cool that you didn't like it, though.  To each his own, after all.  I'm glad you tried it out, because we should always try new things.  Some things aren't for some people.  Nothing wrong with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Seavey</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-44800</link>
		<dc:creator>John Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 01:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/#comment-44800</guid>
		<description>I bought &#039;Moon Knight&#039; #7, as part of my professional duty to follow &#039;Civil War&#039;, and, um...

Look, I&#039;ll be honest with you. I know you love the title, and you&#039;ve been pimping it for a while, but this was the first issue I read, and honestly? If you told me there was an accident at the printing plant, and some of those pages were from another comic, published by another company, whose chief experience was in publishing the work of head trauma patients, I wouldn&#039;t be a bit surprised.

The opening sequence, where Spider-Man watches Moon Knight beat a man to a bloody pulp with a stick? Not actually incoherent, but certainly not something that makes me say, &quot;Ooh, I like this series!&quot; Then we follow with Moon Knight talking to himself in a car, then several pages of sexual innuendo between two characters we don&#039;t know, can&#039;t see, don&#039;t recognize, and by the way they keep throwing body-parts on panel. Whose body parts? Theirs? Each other&#039;s? Someone else&#039;s? Dunno. This entire sequence was pure gibberish to a new reader (and as a new reader, I&#039;d know.) And it wasn&#039;t even interesting gibberish, which is what you need to drag in new readers.

Then Moon Knight goes and talks Frenchie into hanging out with him, which was about the first thing I really understood in the whole issue--OK, Frenchie, I remember him from the old series, sure, I get this. Then they go to a diner and get in an argument with an angry black woman about someone who died somewhere at some point in the past. Everyone treats this as though it&#039;s incredibly significant, but there&#039;s NO EXPOSITION ANYWHERE. For all I freaking know, they&#039;re still upset about Reagan kicking off. To people who are hardcore MK fans, this might have been the bestest scene ever, but to someone picking up their first issue? This was, &quot;Run screaming away from the title and never look back&quot; territory.

So, yeah. Sorry to hate on something you love, I&#039;m glad you like the book, but...no, based on my experience, the &#039;Civil War&#039; crossover isn&#039;t going to be drawing in a lot of new readers, because the writer showed absolutely no interest in making the book accessible to new readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought 'Moon Knight' #7, as part of my professional duty to follow 'Civil War', and, um...</p>
<p>Look, I'll be honest with you. I know you love the title, and you've been pimping it for a while, but this was the first issue I read, and honestly? If you told me there was an accident at the printing plant, and some of those pages were from another comic, published by another company, whose chief experience was in publishing the work of head trauma patients, I wouldn't be a bit surprised.</p>
<p>The opening sequence, where Spider-Man watches Moon Knight beat a man to a bloody pulp with a stick? Not actually incoherent, but certainly not something that makes me say, "Ooh, I like this series!" Then we follow with Moon Knight talking to himself in a car, then several pages of sexual innuendo between two characters we don't know, can't see, don't recognize, and by the way they keep throwing body-parts on panel. Whose body parts? Theirs? Each other's? Someone else's? Dunno. This entire sequence was pure gibberish to a new reader (and as a new reader, I'd know.) And it wasn't even interesting gibberish, which is what you need to drag in new readers.</p>
<p>Then Moon Knight goes and talks Frenchie into hanging out with him, which was about the first thing I really understood in the whole issue--OK, Frenchie, I remember him from the old series, sure, I get this. Then they go to a diner and get in an argument with an angry black woman about someone who died somewhere at some point in the past. Everyone treats this as though it's incredibly significant, but there's NO EXPOSITION ANYWHERE. For all I freaking know, they're still upset about Reagan kicking off. To people who are hardcore MK fans, this might have been the bestest scene ever, but to someone picking up their first issue? This was, "Run screaming away from the title and never look back" territory.</p>
<p>So, yeah. Sorry to hate on something you love, I'm glad you like the book, but...no, based on my experience, the 'Civil War' crossover isn't going to be drawing in a lot of new readers, because the writer showed absolutely no interest in making the book accessible to new readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-44794</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 01:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/#comment-44794</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s quite the indictment of people who like Finch, Dan!  I don&#039;t love his art, but I don&#039;t hate it, either.  The new guy looks pretty decent, and I hope the &quot;name&quot; artist leaving the book doesn&#039;t kill it.

I can&#039;t imagine the crap I would have to put up with if I was buying Civil War, Joe.  Or Teen Titans.  At least I&#039;m skipping those!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's quite the indictment of people who like Finch, Dan!  I don't love his art, but I don't hate it, either.  The new guy looks pretty decent, and I hope the "name" artist leaving the book doesn't kill it.</p>
<p>I can't imagine the crap I would have to put up with if I was buying Civil War, Joe.  Or Teen Titans.  At least I'm skipping those!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apodaca</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-44788</link>
		<dc:creator>Apodaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 01:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/#comment-44788</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe that anyone would not be happy about David Finch leaving Moon Knight and also not be a hommosexual. His figures look like crappy male porn, rendered to the point of obsession.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't believe that anyone would not be happy about David Finch leaving Moon Knight and also not be a hommosexual. His figures look like crappy male porn, rendered to the point of obsession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Rice</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-44773</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 01:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/01/25/what-i-bought-24-january-2007/#comment-44773</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not that you don&#039;t buy any good books, Greg.  You totally do.  But you buy this staggering amount of terrible books and like them, too!  It blows my mind!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's not that you don't buy any good books, Greg.  You totally do.  But you buy this staggering amount of terrible books and like them, too!  It blows my mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
