CBR Live! Archive
John Seavey's Storytelling Engines: Jonah Hex
Here's the latest Storytelling Engine from John Seavey. Check out more of them at his blog, Fraggmented.
Storytelling Engines: Jonah Hex
(or "All The Old Familiar Places")
The main thing to keep in mind when reading Jonah Hex, DC's classic Western comic, is that it came out in an era where Westerns were generally more popular than they are today. (Not to say that the Western has disappeared, but it's certainly not as common as the early 1970s, when Hollywood was still churning out Westerns relatively frequently, and when TV was syndicating re-runs of old Western series and old Western movies.) These films and TV shows (and books and comics) didn't just create a genre, they created an entire set of shared conventions, ideas that were so comfortable and familiar that they didn't need explaining to the average reader.
In Jonah Hex, this is a major element of the storytelling engine. The Old West isn't just a setting, it's an entire cast of characters in and of itself. You don't need a recurring cast when you can just bring in a Grizzled Prospector, a Noble But Savage Indian, or a Hellcat Widow With a Young Son and a Heart of Gold. Even Jonah himself, one of DC's finest creations, is something of a stock character (Grim Bounty Hunter Who's Secretly A Good Man).
This firmly-grounded setting and cast serves as a boon to a writer who's familiar with the tropes of the Old West, allowing them to generate stories quickly and easily. Jonah's profession always gives him a motivation to get into gunfights and trouble, and with so many characters, settings, and events to pull from, just finding new ways to combine them can lead to years of stories, even without introducing recurring characters or delving into the hero's backstory (although it should be noted that Hex did both.)
Interestingly enough, some years later Jonah Hex got another series, this one transporting him into a dystopian future. The setting was completely different (and some might claim a little too different, alienating some of his long-time fans who enjoyed the Western setting) but to the 1980s, a post-apocalyptic future with mutants and radiation was just as well-grounded and familiar as the Old West was a decade or so previous. In either case, the intent was the same--an intimately familiar setting took the place of a familiar cast, allowing the writer to use a rotating cast with all the benefits that a regular supporting crew gives to other characters.
- Posted on February 13, 2007 @ 03:40 PM






3 Comments
Matt D
February 14, 2007 at 7:29 am
The current Hex series isn't interesting me at all but man am I looking forward to the Bat Lash mini.
I guess i'm just more of a fan of the "Trickster rogue who begrudgingly does the right thing in the end."
Ted Watson
February 14, 2007 at 11:09 am
"...the early 70s, when Hollywood was still churning out Westerns relatively frequently...."
Actually, they were definitely dying then. Aside from John Wayne and Clint Eastwood vehicles, domestic oaters turned up on the big screen perhaps even less often than they do now. Europe, on the other hand, had a thriving horse opera industry going then, and their Westerns featured Hollywood has--beens, including Edd "Kookie" Byrnes and Gilbert Roland, as well as never--wases (at least until those flicks hit) such as Lee Van Cleef. So it IS true that the genre was less dead over all then than now, but not in USA films.
"...Jonah Hex got another series, this one transporting him to a dystopian future. The setting was completely different (and some might clsim a little too different, alienating some of his long--time fans...)...."
What really "alienated" us (yes, I was one of that series' regular readers/fans then) was that the change was obviously done at little more than a moment's notice, leaving a great many dangling plot threads, including a cliffhanger created by his being abruptly plucked out of his own time, abandoning a damsel in distress to her fate. THAT did not sit well with me at all, and I can't believe I was alone, though the new series' letter column reflected no such reaction, as I recall.
John Seavey
February 14, 2007 at 2:06 pm
OK, Hollywood wasn't churning them out. But somebody was.
I was using "Hollywood" there as a generic term for "the movie industry", not specifically referring to any studio or studios. Thanks for giving a more specific picture; it's always nice to get that stuff more firmly grounded in a frame of reference. (I'm a big fan of historical context.)