web stats

CSBG Archive

Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed #91

1 2 3
Next »

This is the ninety-first in a series of examinations of comic book urban legends and whether they are true or false. Click here for an archive of the previous ninety. Click here for a similar archive, only arranged by subject.

Let’s begin!

COMIC URBAN LEGEND: DC gave Superman new powers to aid them in a legal struggle.

STATUS: False

In the late 90s, DC had a storyline where Superman gains new electric powers.

3386_4_0000000123.jpg

At the same time, DC was (and still is) involved in a legal dispute with the heirs of Jerry Siegel, co-creator of Superman, over the copyright to Superman.

Therefore, the timing of the events led some people to believe that perhaps there was something tying the two events together.

At the official Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed Suggestion Thread on the Comics Should Be Good forum, reader Stressfactor states:

1) I remember hearing someone claim that at least *one* reason behind the “Electric Blue” Superman of the 1990’s was an attempt by DC to circumnavigate a lawsuit by the family of either Seigel or Schuster. That, at the time, one of the family were trying to get the rights to the character back and DC changed Superman’s powers and looks in an attempt to either A) Establish something new and thereby keep fans just in case they lost the rights to the “old” Superman or B) Try to establish a preceident that Seigel and Schuster’s creation was not “unique” and “distinctive” and to prove it DC was going to change Superman and prove to the courts that even a drastically changed character with the same name would still sell just as well.

I figured I would go straight to the source, specifically the man who came up with the idea to give Superman new powers, former Superman scribe Karl Kesel.

Here is what Karl had to say:

I was the one who put the “give Superman new powers” idea on the table, and it had nothing to do with any legal maneuverings whatsoever. The only thing I had in mind was creating a situation where for the first time (in a long, long time, at least) we would see Superman uncertain of his own limitations and abilities, and watch him learn how to use his powers and become a hero all over again. Nothing more conspiratorial or devious than that.

Well, that explains that.

Thanks, Karl!

1 2 3
Next »

24 Comments

Given that apparently everyone at DC loved Identity Crisis and Infinite Crisis, I think I’d rather see the story that no one loved…

Talking about Kingdom Come urban legends, there’s one i’ve heard from years back in Wizard. Alex Ross mentioned that he hid a sex scene in the book somewhere. Not sounding like a complete perve, is this true?

I’m pretty sure that the lore is the Goodman found out about the success of DC’s superhero line–most especially Justice League of America from one of his golfing buddies, who was a muckety-muck at DC.

I think I am the only comic reader I know who enjoyed the Electric Supes storyline. I thought it was a pretty bold change, even if I knew it wouldn’t last forever. And they wen’t all out on it, too. I remember even non-traditional merchandise branded with the Electric S logo, including a really nice wristwatch I had my eye on.

Good article, very enjoyable!

Thats the story I recall too Derek. The story is of particular note because transfering such information to a major rival is actually considered a crime.

The information about the Kingdom being the “probable” future is really something. It looks like the people at DC are still going with that idea.

“Alex Ross mentioned that he hid a sex scene in the book somewhere. Not sounding like a complete perve, is this true?”

IIRC, Ross pointed this out in one of the Wizard pieces that went through Kingdom Come page by page pointing out all of the easter eggs and inside jokes. I think it’s in a corner of one of the bar scenes.

Here’s a link to that Easter egg and a few more that Dial B for Blog collected:

http://www.dialbforblog.com/archives/266/

Thanks for clearing up the “Electric Blue” Superman rumor!

The first urban legend listed doesn’t refer to the ‘Superman’ legend that follows, it refers to the ‘Fantastic Force’ truth from last week. I thought it was a joke because it’s vaguely worded, but the ‘Superman’ legend is false.

I’m pretty sure that the lore is the Goodman found out about the success of DC’s superhero line–most especially Justice League of America from one of his golfing buddies, who was a muckety-muck at DC.

Yeah, I should have mentioned that that was the most prominent version of that story. I’ll go edit that in now. Thanks, Derek!

Neat, sterg! Maybe I’ll mention that in the future. :)

The first urban legend listed doesn’t refer to the ‘Superman’ legend that follows, it refers to the ‘Fantastic Force’ truth from last week. I thought it was a joke because it’s vaguely worded, but the ‘Superman’ legend is false.

Thanks, Sean! Silly mistake! Corrected now.

SanctumSanctorumComix

February 23, 2007 at 9:41 am

I’d posit that it’s an Urban Legend that Stan Lee has got some ballz, with that bit of hubris on the cover to FF # 3 (“The Greatest Comic Magazine in the World”)…
but, both those statements are true (at least at the time).

Stan had some SERIOUS ballz
&
F.F., for the longest time, was indeed the Greatest comic around (with HUGE ThanX to King Kirby)!

;-)

~P~
P-TOR

[quote]COMIC URBAN LEGEND: DC gave Superman new powers to aid them in a legal struggle.

STATUS: True.[/quote]

That should be “False”, right?

I totally bounced off the Kingdom, and still say that Magog would be a hell of alot more interesting if he was an identity that Deathstroke became

Ha, slam! I fixed one thing but forgot to fix the other! Thanks for the pickup!

Hello again, great column; and thanks for answering my Batman’s brother question. Here’s another: back when DC relaunched Superman in 86 I read that Byrne’s proposal won, is there any way to know what the other proposal were? Who presented them and what they were? Thas an interesting what if?, other possible Superman relaunches.
Thanks again.

[blockquote]However, they did not want everyone to KNOW they were publishing a superhero comic yet.[/blockquote]

Seriously?

[blockquote]Not MUCH of a difference, is there?[/blockquote]

Well one has a monster attacking a man, the others have superheroes fighting monsters.

[blockquote]The second is that Marvel just plain ol’ wasn’t sure that superheroes would sell, so they decided to hedge their bets by keeping a monster presence on the covers[/blockquote]

That sounds more likely to me.

Did the FF actually fight monsters in those issues? If not then I can see how that would be a case of “false pretenses”. I haven’t read those comics, someone elaborate please.

Well one has a monster attacking a man, the others have superheroes fighting monsters.

No they don’t – the others have weird people fighting mosters. Superheroes wear costumes, which is why the FF was in street clothes on those first two covers. However, they did wear uniforms (another concession to the limitation: if they’re all dressed the same, they’re “uniforms,” not “costumes) inside the book, and that’s the mislead: the covers promise plain monster stories, the interiors have superhero monster stories. It’s a small thing, but gave them the legal wiggle room to get the book run under the terms of their existing distribution contract…

I have that horrible glow in the dark issue of Superman. Karl, you were an amazing and witty when it came to writing Superman. Heck, I remembered back when you came aboard to the Superman team at the start of the Reign of thw Supermen storyline. You, and Jurgens, saved that whole death of superman fiasco.
But seriously dude. Superman Red and Blue sucked. And superman contiued sucking harder and harder as the years went by until Jeph Loeb and the rest of the gang jumped up on board and, in a rare moment, saved Superman’s ass.

Alex Ross’ version of “The Kingdom” was far superior, although one could judge for themselves by picking up Wizard Magazine’s “Alex Ross Millennium Edition.” There’s a lengthy article where he describes his pitch, with many of the concepts popping up since in the DCU (especially JSA.)

Crud… I just looked, and that wasn’t the book after all. Maybe a Wizard regular issue? Anyway, some points from memory…

Introducing a new Wildcat, as seen in recent issues of “JSofA,” but the original concept wasn’t a were-panther so much as a young godling who remained in the single anthropmorphic form.

A focus on the relationship and investigations between Clark Kent, Bruce Wayne, Diana Prince, and Billy Batson.

Clark would begin having prophetic dreams about the events of Kingdom Come, serving someone in the original’s Norman McKay role.

Another being empowered by the wizard Shazam from the days of ancient Egypt was exiled into the far reaches of space by his benefactor. It took millenia, but he’s flown back home in our present.

I wish I could remember more…

Hey Brian,

I just encountered this one and would like to here more:

Did Jim Shooter get the idea for Spider-Man’s Black Constume from a fanfiction?

http://www.spideykicksbutt.com/DarkSideoftheSpider/DarkSideoftheSpiderPart1.html

Timothy Markin

July 31, 2012 at 12:31 pm

I still have all the electric blue Supes issues and kind of like them. It was an interesting experiment. And this is where I first discovered the great Stuart Imonen.
As for FF #3, the original version of the cover is downright ugly and poorly composed. The published cover is a much better piece of art. What I’ll never understand is why Ditko’s original cover to Spidey #10 (The Enforcers) was vetoed over the much less attractive published version. Anyone have the answer?

Leave a Comment

 

Categories

Review Copies

Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.

Browse the Archives