<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 365 Reasons to Love Comics #72</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:44:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blues</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-132625</link>
		<dc:creator>Blues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-132625</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m Glad the Kirbydotter wrote all about the suit. I love his design(not really the character). I hate it when people harp on his head wings. Ultimate cap&#039;s head looks stupid, and big! I like namor&#039;s wings too, maybe they should make them grow when he flies or something. Pirate boots, wings on the head, chain mail(kinda looks like dragon scales), all look cool. But no one&#039;s written cap all that excitingly. I doubt he should care about drugs, but he&#039;s still written blandly. oh yeah, Ultimate cap is just as often a tarnish of ideal then a heroic representation of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm Glad the Kirbydotter wrote all about the suit. I love his design(not really the character). I hate it when people harp on his head wings. Ultimate cap's head looks stupid, and big! I like namor's wings too, maybe they should make them grow when he flies or something. Pirate boots, wings on the head, chain mail(kinda looks like dragon scales), all look cool. But no one's written cap all that excitingly. I doubt he should care about drugs, but he's still written blandly. oh yeah, Ultimate cap is just as often a tarnish of ideal then a heroic representation of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-69976</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-69976</guid>
		<description>Kirbydotter said: &quot;None! There would be barely enough material for a hatch door maybe?&quot;

There&#039;d be EXACTLY enough for a hatch door - the mould for the shield, IIRC, was made from a tank&#039;s hatch mould.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirbydotter said: "None! There would be barely enough material for a hatch door maybe?"</p>
<p>There'd be EXACTLY enough for a hatch door - the mould for the shield, IIRC, was made from a tank's hatch mould.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Kirbydotter</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-68605</link>
		<dc:creator>The Kirbydotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 16:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-68605</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry dwight r. vlahos...
But I&#039;m not sure I understand what you are talking about...
I fail to comprehend your humor.
Then again&#039; i&#039;m just a canadian and english is not my first language.
And I never liked apple pie.
Everyone knows the best pie is Mapple sugar!
Heh? 
(that last 3-letter line is to prove I&#039;m canadian)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm sorry dwight r. vlahos...<br />
But I'm not sure I understand what you are talking about...<br />
I fail to comprehend your humor.<br />
Then again' i'm just a canadian and english is not my first language.<br />
And I never liked apple pie.<br />
Everyone knows the best pie is Mapple sugar!<br />
Heh?<br />
(that last 3-letter line is to prove I'm canadian)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Seavey</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-67992</link>
		<dc:creator>John Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-67992</guid>
		<description>What I will always remember about Cap...

...is that the man practically invented trash-talk. Seriously, go back and read the old &#039;Tales of Suspense&#039; Captain America. You had to have super-powers before he&#039;d start taking you seriously. And I don&#039;t mean, &quot;before he&#039;d start fighting hard.&quot; I mean, &quot;before he would stop openly mocking you WHILE beating the crap out of you.&quot;

One of the two best was the one where he was locked in a prison with rioting inmates--twenty-to-one odds, and he&#039;s smack-talking while he kicks twenty kinds of hell out of them. (Yes, one for each guy.) It&#039;s a real eye-opener of an issue for people who think of Cap as a nice-but-boring super-hero.

The other best was the first appearance of the Adaptoid (this was before he became the Super-Adaptoid, even.) The Adaptoid poses as Jarvis to infiltrate Avengers Mansion, drugs Cap and steals his form, and gloats about how it&#039;s got the &quot;pinnacle of human perfection&quot; now...then gets beaten up by literally the first super-villain to walk through the door, a walking footnote to comics history called &#039;The Tumbler&#039; whose acrobatic prowess stuns the Cadaptoid. The Tumbler sends him flying out of the room, unconscious...only to have the real Cap, who&#039;s woken up and freed himself, walk in. The Tumbler thinks this is just Round Two at first, but Captain America beats him back to obscurity, openly laughing at his pathetic lack of combat skills all the while.

So remember, folks...Captain America. He&#039;ll beat evil, then crack jokes about its momma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I will always remember about Cap...</p>
<p>...is that the man practically invented trash-talk. Seriously, go back and read the old 'Tales of Suspense' Captain America. You had to have super-powers before he'd start taking you seriously. And I don't mean, "before he'd start fighting hard." I mean, "before he would stop openly mocking you WHILE beating the crap out of you."</p>
<p>One of the two best was the one where he was locked in a prison with rioting inmates--twenty-to-one odds, and he's smack-talking while he kicks twenty kinds of hell out of them. (Yes, one for each guy.) It's a real eye-opener of an issue for people who think of Cap as a nice-but-boring super-hero.</p>
<p>The other best was the first appearance of the Adaptoid (this was before he became the Super-Adaptoid, even.) The Adaptoid poses as Jarvis to infiltrate Avengers Mansion, drugs Cap and steals his form, and gloats about how it's got the "pinnacle of human perfection" now...then gets beaten up by literally the first super-villain to walk through the door, a walking footnote to comics history called 'The Tumbler' whose acrobatic prowess stuns the Cadaptoid. The Tumbler sends him flying out of the room, unconscious...only to have the real Cap, who's woken up and freed himself, walk in. The Tumbler thinks this is just Round Two at first, but Captain America beats him back to obscurity, openly laughing at his pathetic lack of combat skills all the while.</p>
<p>So remember, folks...Captain America. He'll beat evil, then crack jokes about its momma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwight R. Vlahos</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-67840</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwight R. Vlahos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-67840</guid>
		<description>SIGH DOUBLE SIGH

It is a symptonm of everyday liberalvania (aka, the awful world of now) that people mix up reality with nonreality. LIke everyone is always treating what I say as a kind of joke or haha because they, in the immortal words of Colonel Jessup (NOT JACK NICHOLSON YOU MORON THAT WAS THE ACTOR WHO PLAYED HIM), &quot;YOU CANNOT HANDLE THE TRUTHS!&quot; Is it any coincidence that computers ruin peoples lives and that they are nicknamed p.c.--just like the other p.c. that makes for people have to &#039;be nice&#039; and &#039;not insult people&#039; and keep sus ruining America! Grow a thicker skin american and learn to take it! Unless you are from a foreign place like France and want to insult Americans, in which case--hey, shut up and talk about your own problems Frenchy! Some people say double-standard, I say, screw you and have some apple-pie!

Anyway Ilsa (aka the ball-and-wife) is saying that I am screaming at the computer and need to stop spitting. She is always saying to be on topic and also not act like a jerk to womenpeople or men. So Kirbydotter if I was not nice then I apologize NOT because I am p.c. (either a computer or the other kind) and NOT because my wife told me to but because it is not nice and I am American and therefore nice. 

Even if I hate commmies and think they should all explode spontaneously, that doesn&#039;t mean I should not get along with people. And noen of this is about Captain American (stupid or unstupid). The non-morons know which type of character he is, and there is no need for more insults of someone who is dead, even if that dead person is fictional and a girly communist.

zoombaboom babies!

dwight r. vlahos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SIGH DOUBLE SIGH</p>
<p>It is a symptonm of everyday liberalvania (aka, the awful world of now) that people mix up reality with nonreality. LIke everyone is always treating what I say as a kind of joke or haha because they, in the immortal words of Colonel Jessup (NOT JACK NICHOLSON YOU MORON THAT WAS THE ACTOR WHO PLAYED HIM), "YOU CANNOT HANDLE THE TRUTHS!" Is it any coincidence that computers ruin peoples lives and that they are nicknamed p.c.--just like the other p.c. that makes for people have to 'be nice' and 'not insult people' and keep sus ruining America! Grow a thicker skin american and learn to take it! Unless you are from a foreign place like France and want to insult Americans, in which case--hey, shut up and talk about your own problems Frenchy! Some people say double-standard, I say, screw you and have some apple-pie!</p>
<p>Anyway Ilsa (aka the ball-and-wife) is saying that I am screaming at the computer and need to stop spitting. She is always saying to be on topic and also not act like a jerk to womenpeople or men. So Kirbydotter if I was not nice then I apologize NOT because I am p.c. (either a computer or the other kind) and NOT because my wife told me to but because it is not nice and I am American and therefore nice. </p>
<p>Even if I hate commmies and think they should all explode spontaneously, that doesn't mean I should not get along with people. And noen of this is about Captain American (stupid or unstupid). The non-morons know which type of character he is, and there is no need for more insults of someone who is dead, even if that dead person is fictional and a girly communist.</p>
<p>zoombaboom babies!</p>
<p>dwight r. vlahos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-67536</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-67536</guid>
		<description>Uhhh...Kirbydotter?  I think Dwight is spoofing rightwingers, not being serious.  I gotta admit, it was actually funny.  I got a chuckle out of it!

Goof stuff, Dwight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhhh...Kirbydotter?  I think Dwight is spoofing rightwingers, not being serious.  I gotta admit, it was actually funny.  I got a chuckle out of it!</p>
<p>Goof stuff, Dwight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apodaca</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-67495</link>
		<dc:creator>Apodaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 04:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-67495</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t let Dwight get you too riled up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't let Dwight get you too riled up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Kirbydotter</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-67457</link>
		<dc:creator>The Kirbydotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 02:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-67457</guid>
		<description>Dwight R. Vlahos: 
&quot;How many tanks could yoj make out of an indestructible shield?&quot;
Huun...
The Shield is not that big you know.
How many tanks?
None!  There would be barely enough material for a hatch door maybe?

You know it&#039;s only a comic book do you Dwight?

And that, when it was produced in 1941 (!), it was material intended for kids?  

Should have Captain America go down on a caricature of Hitler (who wasn&#039;t know as a mass-murderer at the time) with a chainsaw?  

It&#039;s a comic book for Godsake!  Even in the movies of the time, the violence was very toned down.

And later, in the 50&#039;s, violence in the movies and comic books was even more censored, not by liberals and &quot;communist presidents&quot; but by the right wing nuts you seem to elevate above the President who won WWII.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dwight R. Vlahos:<br />
"How many tanks could yoj make out of an indestructible shield?"<br />
Huun...<br />
The Shield is not that big you know.<br />
How many tanks?<br />
None!  There would be barely enough material for a hatch door maybe?</p>
<p>You know it's only a comic book do you Dwight?</p>
<p>And that, when it was produced in 1941 (!), it was material intended for kids?  </p>
<p>Should have Captain America go down on a caricature of Hitler (who wasn't know as a mass-murderer at the time) with a chainsaw?  </p>
<p>It's a comic book for Godsake!  Even in the movies of the time, the violence was very toned down.</p>
<p>And later, in the 50's, violence in the movies and comic books was even more censored, not by liberals and "communist presidents" but by the right wing nuts you seem to elevate above the President who won WWII.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwight R. Vlahos</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-67420</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwight R. Vlahos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-67420</guid>
		<description>I agree to a T with T (but not Mister T because the A-Team is not an accurate portrayal of American fighting men from the military) except that I think (and by think I mean a mind-thought that is FACT!) that Captain Americans represents more of liberal-welfare-communist america than actual, conservative, real America. He&#039;s an example of government spending gone all wrong. In fact if you were to look in fact that the real world it would make perfect sense for Roosevelt (a known communist!) to come up with something like him! Wasteful spending! How many tanks could yoj make out of an indestructible shield? Oh, wait, we are the government, let&#039;s give the indestructivble metal to some nut case instead! PERFECT SENSE in liberalvania! 

I mean how upset would you be to find out that your taxes were going to some guy in a fruity outfit that doesn&#039;t use a gun? He&#039;s puncihing Hitler instead of SHOOTING Hitler because he is completely a non-real concept of ridiculousness--just like anything liberals come up with! I can see the politically correct dialogue coming from him now, &quot;Hmm, hello Hitler, you are a mass-murderer, I am going to punch you in the face instead of shoot you because my flying-horsey-wing-head sense tells me that killing you is wrong. Oh wait Mass Murderererr Hitler, I am going to hold hands with you and sing koombieyah while we go skipping aruond a tea-set made of cookies because I don&#039;t want to punch you with my liberal Captain American fists! Oh wait Hitler, I would like to use my liberal Captain American mouth that is open to kiss you now Hitler! MUAH MUAH MUAH!&quot; 

Captain American is a government man who acts in a way that doesn&#039;t make any sense at all to people who know how to think in the real world, which is now. The only thing that is accurate is that as a military man he doesn&#039;t swear because that is not what real officers would or should do. 

I cannot be more clear than this on this (and these) point(s). 

Zoombaboom Babies!
Dwight R. Vlahos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree to a T with T (but not Mister T because the A-Team is not an accurate portrayal of American fighting men from the military) except that I think (and by think I mean a mind-thought that is FACT!) that Captain Americans represents more of liberal-welfare-communist america than actual, conservative, real America. He's an example of government spending gone all wrong. In fact if you were to look in fact that the real world it would make perfect sense for Roosevelt (a known communist!) to come up with something like him! Wasteful spending! How many tanks could yoj make out of an indestructible shield? Oh, wait, we are the government, let's give the indestructivble metal to some nut case instead! PERFECT SENSE in liberalvania! </p>
<p>I mean how upset would you be to find out that your taxes were going to some guy in a fruity outfit that doesn't use a gun? He's puncihing Hitler instead of SHOOTING Hitler because he is completely a non-real concept of ridiculousness--just like anything liberals come up with! I can see the politically correct dialogue coming from him now, "Hmm, hello Hitler, you are a mass-murderer, I am going to punch you in the face instead of shoot you because my flying-horsey-wing-head sense tells me that killing you is wrong. Oh wait Mass Murderererr Hitler, I am going to hold hands with you and sing koombieyah while we go skipping aruond a tea-set made of cookies because I don't want to punch you with my liberal Captain American fists! Oh wait Hitler, I would like to use my liberal Captain American mouth that is open to kiss you now Hitler! MUAH MUAH MUAH!" </p>
<p>Captain American is a government man who acts in a way that doesn't make any sense at all to people who know how to think in the real world, which is now. The only thing that is accurate is that as a military man he doesn't swear because that is not what real officers would or should do. </p>
<p>I cannot be more clear than this on this (and these) point(s). </p>
<p>Zoombaboom Babies!<br />
Dwight R. Vlahos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Kirbydotter</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-67374</link>
		<dc:creator>The Kirbydotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 22:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-67374</guid>
		<description>Regarding Captain America&#039;s uniform:

Boy are some people completely blind to symbolism or what?!?!

Captain America is a basically a knight.
Like a knight, he tries to live up to the best virtues of his country (liberty, freedom of opinion and speech, etc.)
Like a knight he wears the colors of what he defends. America is the good Captain&#039;s lady.

Yup! he&#039;s a knight.
So that&#039;s why he fights with a shield.
(He is not an agressor, he defends!)
That&#039;s why a chain mail shirt!
The wings of his mask are like the decorative wings some knights of old would wear on their helms.  It&#039;s a show of very little culture to call them &quot;girly&quot; (Namor&#039;s wing refer more to the god Hermes/Mercury; comic books are not the only reading material available you know!)
And the boots are of the swashbuckler type.

It is actually a very good design, a proof of Kirby and Simon&#039;s genius.  Like all iconic character, it has barely changed at all since it&#039;s creation more than 65 years ago!

Meanwhile, mutants and other x-stars seem to change uniform every few months.

Ironic that it takes a Canadian to defend USA&#039;s Flagbearer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Captain America's uniform:</p>
<p>Boy are some people completely blind to symbolism or what?!?!</p>
<p>Captain America is a basically a knight.<br />
Like a knight, he tries to live up to the best virtues of his country (liberty, freedom of opinion and speech, etc.)<br />
Like a knight he wears the colors of what he defends. America is the good Captain's lady.</p>
<p>Yup! he's a knight.<br />
So that's why he fights with a shield.<br />
(He is not an agressor, he defends!)<br />
That's why a chain mail shirt!<br />
The wings of his mask are like the decorative wings some knights of old would wear on their helms.  It's a show of very little culture to call them "girly" (Namor's wing refer more to the god Hermes/Mercury; comic books are not the only reading material available you know!)<br />
And the boots are of the swashbuckler type.</p>
<p>It is actually a very good design, a proof of Kirby and Simon's genius.  Like all iconic character, it has barely changed at all since it's creation more than 65 years ago!</p>
<p>Meanwhile, mutants and other x-stars seem to change uniform every few months.</p>
<p>Ironic that it takes a Canadian to defend USA's Flagbearer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red-Ricky</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-67312</link>
		<dc:creator>red-Ricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-67312</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dave!  I&#039;m glad you liked it!

Although, in the interest of clarity, I must say... it wasn&#039;t so much a Reign of Superman joke, as it was a Mullett joke.  And I would like to think that I was original and clever enough to say &quot;I&quot; would start growing one, as oppossed to CAP.

But you know what?  Curiosity got the better of me, and so I googled it!  Turns out I&#039;m the 44,800th person to make a death of Captain America mullett joke. That&#039;s not good; but then again that&#039;s not bad either considering I googled the words Dave plus tool and got 22,100,000 hits.  So there you have it.  I may not be as funny, or original, as you are a tool.  But who&#039;s to say... with a lot of practice, and the continous support of guys like yourself, maybe I&#039;ll get there.  Just make sure you don&#039;t continue setting the bar too high!  Know what I mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dave!  I'm glad you liked it!</p>
<p>Although, in the interest of clarity, I must say... it wasn't so much a Reign of Superman joke, as it was a Mullett joke.  And I would like to think that I was original and clever enough to say "I" would start growing one, as oppossed to CAP.</p>
<p>But you know what?  Curiosity got the better of me, and so I googled it!  Turns out I'm the 44,800th person to make a death of Captain America mullett joke. That's not good; but then again that's not bad either considering I googled the words Dave plus tool and got 22,100,000 hits.  So there you have it.  I may not be as funny, or original, as you are a tool.  But who's to say... with a lot of practice, and the continous support of guys like yourself, maybe I'll get there.  Just make sure you don't continue setting the bar too high!  Know what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-67284</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-67284</guid>
		<description>Sean, I&#039;m not saying that Cap isn&#039;t that way TODAY.  Post-Vietnam and Post-Nixon, he&#039;s gradually been written more and more in that vein.  You can definitely describe him that way now.  I just disagree about saying that even from his first appearance he would go against the government on the behalf of the people.  He was totally an agent of the government in the beginning as imagined by Kirby and Simon, and given that a sizable segment of the population wasn&#039;t supportive of entry into WW2 before Pearl Harbor happened, his going over to fight Hitler early was more an instance of his choosing the governmnt over the people, not the other way around     What I&#039;m simply saying is this: you don&#039;t have to retroactively turn Cap into a screw-the-man, speak-truth-to-power populist from his first appearance in order to enjoy those 1940s adventures.  He was a government agent that followed orders just like all good soldiers did back then, and that&#039;s good enough.

Englehart did it differently.  He had Cap be his usual pro-establishment self, then when his moral code came into conflict with the current establishment, he had a crisis of faith and changed considerably.  That&#039;s fine.  But to claim Cap was that populist, anti-establishment guy from the beginning is a history rewrite that I think a lot of fans unconsciously do that I think is wrong.

I think the fact that Cap goes and fights Hitler early supports that he&#039;s a government guy first and a populist second.  Remember, like Siegel and Shuster, who also had their hero go abroad to fight Nazis, Simon and Kirby were Jewish.  I think that plays a big reason as to why they were gung ho to fight Hitler before Pearl Harbor happened.  But pre-Pearl Harbor, it wasn&#039;t a popular decision among the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, I'm not saying that Cap isn't that way TODAY.  Post-Vietnam and Post-Nixon, he's gradually been written more and more in that vein.  You can definitely describe him that way now.  I just disagree about saying that even from his first appearance he would go against the government on the behalf of the people.  He was totally an agent of the government in the beginning as imagined by Kirby and Simon, and given that a sizable segment of the population wasn't supportive of entry into WW2 before Pearl Harbor happened, his going over to fight Hitler early was more an instance of his choosing the governmnt over the people, not the other way around     What I'm simply saying is this: you don't have to retroactively turn Cap into a screw-the-man, speak-truth-to-power populist from his first appearance in order to enjoy those 1940s adventures.  He was a government agent that followed orders just like all good soldiers did back then, and that's good enough.</p>
<p>Englehart did it differently.  He had Cap be his usual pro-establishment self, then when his moral code came into conflict with the current establishment, he had a crisis of faith and changed considerably.  That's fine.  But to claim Cap was that populist, anti-establishment guy from the beginning is a history rewrite that I think a lot of fans unconsciously do that I think is wrong.</p>
<p>I think the fact that Cap goes and fights Hitler early supports that he's a government guy first and a populist second.  Remember, like Siegel and Shuster, who also had their hero go abroad to fight Nazis, Simon and Kirby were Jewish.  I think that plays a big reason as to why they were gung ho to fight Hitler before Pearl Harbor happened.  But pre-Pearl Harbor, it wasn't a popular decision among the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-67271</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-67271</guid>
		<description>Wow, that Reign of the Supermen joke is COMPLETELY original.  You must be the first person to ever think up something that clever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that Reign of the Supermen joke is COMPLETELY original.  You must be the first person to ever think up something that clever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-67269</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-67269</guid>
		<description>Cap has the amazing ability to be both the lamest character and the most awesome at the same time.  

Think about all the really weird things associated to him:
-he was an artist
- he had that hotline
- the wings on his head
- the constant need of writers to remind us that he was a living ideal

But then, he would actually step up and be awesome.  What is not cool about him ricocheting his shield off four things to brain some guy in the nogging?  Its like when he appears towards the end of Miller&#039;s Daredevil reborn: totally in control of Thor and that tool Iron Man, and then absolutely wailing on the anti-Cap, Nuke.

Oh, and the boots: how can anyone disparage his pimpin pirate boots?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cap has the amazing ability to be both the lamest character and the most awesome at the same time.  </p>
<p>Think about all the really weird things associated to him:<br />
-he was an artist<br />
- he had that hotline<br />
- the wings on his head<br />
- the constant need of writers to remind us that he was a living ideal</p>
<p>But then, he would actually step up and be awesome.  What is not cool about him ricocheting his shield off four things to brain some guy in the nogging?  Its like when he appears towards the end of Miller's Daredevil reborn: totally in control of Thor and that tool Iron Man, and then absolutely wailing on the anti-Cap, Nuke.</p>
<p>Oh, and the boots: how can anyone disparage his pimpin pirate boots?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red-Ricky</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-67229</link>
		<dc:creator>red-Ricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-67229</guid>
		<description>Alls I know is that if the Bucky dons the Cap Mantle, I&#039;ll finally get my half-man half-machine bionic Captain America!

And then you add the Eradicating Captain Punisher!!!

Oh,OH, OOOHHHHH!!!!!!! DON&#039;T FORGET THE AFRICAN AMERICAN CAPTAIN AMERICA WE HAVE LYING AROUND FROM THE TRUTH MINI-SERIES!!!!!

OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-
GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH
-MY-GOD!!!!!!!!!!!

All we need is a Captain America Clone, and its 1993 all over!!!

You know what that means????

DAMN Right!!!!!  THE MULLET IS COMING BACK!!!

(I&#039;m growing mine... today!!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alls I know is that if the Bucky dons the Cap Mantle, I'll finally get my half-man half-machine bionic Captain America!</p>
<p>And then you add the Eradicating Captain Punisher!!!</p>
<p>Oh,OH, OOOHHHHH!!!!!!! DON'T FORGET THE AFRICAN AMERICAN CAPTAIN AMERICA WE HAVE LYING AROUND FROM THE TRUTH MINI-SERIES!!!!!</p>
<p>OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-<br />
GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH-MY-GOD-OH<br />
-MY-GOD!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>All we need is a Captain America Clone, and its 1993 all over!!!</p>
<p>You know what that means????</p>
<p>DAMN Right!!!!!  THE MULLET IS COMING BACK!!!</p>
<p>(I'm growing mine... today!!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-67209</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-67209</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t know why modern fans believe that the only way to enjoy the Cap character is to retroactively make him into a anti-government populist. I agree that heâ€™s moved in this direction since the 70s, I just disagree that he started that way.&quot;

A lot of people think that, in the wake of Nixon, the federal government is less trustworthy than it was in the days of FDR, so it makes sense that Cap would become more vocally defiant (if neccessary).  It&#039;s really not a contradiction to say that Captain America goes against the government if he thinks it&#039;s wrong, because he obviously didn&#039;t think they were wrong for wanting to fight Hitler (though I thought that was just a cover image, not the actual story in the issue).  If you can show me an instance where the government orders to do something against his later-established moral code, and he does it, you might have a point, otherwise, it becomes a political debate which is entirely predicated upon the biases of the people talking, which means it&#039;s not about Cap anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I donâ€™t know why modern fans believe that the only way to enjoy the Cap character is to retroactively make him into a anti-government populist. I agree that heâ€™s moved in this direction since the 70s, I just disagree that he started that way."</p>
<p>A lot of people think that, in the wake of Nixon, the federal government is less trustworthy than it was in the days of FDR, so it makes sense that Cap would become more vocally defiant (if neccessary).  It's really not a contradiction to say that Captain America goes against the government if he thinks it's wrong, because he obviously didn't think they were wrong for wanting to fight Hitler (though I thought that was just a cover image, not the actual story in the issue).  If you can show me an instance where the government orders to do something against his later-established moral code, and he does it, you might have a point, otherwise, it becomes a political debate which is entirely predicated upon the biases of the people talking, which means it's not about Cap anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-66842</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 06:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-66842</guid>
		<description>Greg, FDR and many members of the government actually were more gung ho about getting involved in WWII than the people were.  That&#039;s one of the reasons why FDR in order to get reelected had to keep insisting to the general public that he wasn&#039;t planning on entering the war, even though much evidence has arisen later on to show that he actually did plan to get involved all along: entering the war was not a very popular decision among the people.  If Steve Rogers signs up to work for the government, use the name the government gives him, join the government&#039;s military, accept their training and wear the propaganda uniform they give him, then proceed to fight an enemy that FDR&#039;s administration is more gung ho about fighting than the general public is, there&#039;s not much there to back up Bill&#039;s point that from his first appearance he was the kind of guy that would go against the government in order to enforce the will of the people.

I don&#039;t know why modern fans believe that the only way to enjoy the Cap character is to retroactively make him into a anti-government populist.  I agree that he&#039;s moved in this direction since the 70s, I just disagree that he started that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, FDR and many members of the government actually were more gung ho about getting involved in WWII than the people were.  That's one of the reasons why FDR in order to get reelected had to keep insisting to the general public that he wasn't planning on entering the war, even though much evidence has arisen later on to show that he actually did plan to get involved all along: entering the war was not a very popular decision among the people.  If Steve Rogers signs up to work for the government, use the name the government gives him, join the government's military, accept their training and wear the propaganda uniform they give him, then proceed to fight an enemy that FDR's administration is more gung ho about fighting than the general public is, there's not much there to back up Bill's point that from his first appearance he was the kind of guy that would go against the government in order to enforce the will of the people.</p>
<p>I don't know why modern fans believe that the only way to enjoy the Cap character is to retroactively make him into a anti-government populist.  I agree that he's moved in this direction since the 70s, I just disagree that he started that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-66822</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-66822</guid>
		<description>&quot;Second is the undisputable fact that â€˜Captain Americaâ€™ does not use guns, which does not make sense! Hello, why are you throwing a big metal disk at the Hulk Captain America? Why arenâ€™t you TRYING TO SHOOT HIM LIKE A NORMAL PERSON WOULD?&quot;

It&#039;s symbolism. 

I&#039;m not as good with words as some, so I&#039;ll turn it over to Scott Tipton, who wrote a column on ol&#039; Cap way back when:

&lt;b&gt;&quot;Whether it was intentional or not, the Captain America costume, designed by Joe Simon, made the perfect statement about America&#039;s role in the upcoming war, or at least how most Americans preferred to think it. Aside from the obvious notion of a man wrapped in the flag, it&#039;s important to note that Captain America has no offensive weapons: no gun nor sword. Instead, Captain America has a shield, which is purely a defensive weapon, just as the U.S was moving in to protect the peoples of Europe from fascism. And the shield is unbreakable, representing the strength of America&#039;s intentions. Even when Cap throws the shield offensively, the analogy holds, as Cap is extending the strength and protection of the United States to defend the weak and helpless.&quot;&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Second is the undisputable fact that â€˜Captain Americaâ€™ does not use guns, which does not make sense! Hello, why are you throwing a big metal disk at the Hulk Captain America? Why arenâ€™t you TRYING TO SHOOT HIM LIKE A NORMAL PERSON WOULD?"</p>
<p>It's symbolism. </p>
<p>I'm not as good with words as some, so I'll turn it over to Scott Tipton, who wrote a column on ol' Cap way back when:</p>
<p><b>"Whether it was intentional or not, the Captain America costume, designed by Joe Simon, made the perfect statement about America's role in the upcoming war, or at least how most Americans preferred to think it. Aside from the obvious notion of a man wrapped in the flag, it's important to note that Captain America has no offensive weapons: no gun nor sword. Instead, Captain America has a shield, which is purely a defensive weapon, just as the U.S was moving in to protect the peoples of Europe from fascism. And the shield is unbreakable, representing the strength of America's intentions. Even when Cap throws the shield offensively, the analogy holds, as Cap is extending the strength and protection of the United States to defend the weak and helpless."</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-66818</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-66818</guid>
		<description>&quot;I think the issue of Steve Rogerâ€™s vague(bland) characterization is what made Ultimate Cap so interesting. We finally got a Captain America that had a personality, outside of the suit.&quot;

Yeah, but Ultimate Cap can be kind of a jerk, though. He&#039;s a good guy but he&#039;s definitely a soldier...but then again, Cap is tecnically a soldier. I guess maybe something about Ultimate Cap seems off to me...maybe because he really is little more than a government puppet (at least what I&#039;ve seen, and I&#039;ve read the Ultimate line extensively), but Cap seems to transcend that.

Also, the picture on that last cover is a shirt at my local Target. I want it so bad. 

-M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I think the issue of Steve Rogerâ€™s vague(bland) characterization is what made Ultimate Cap so interesting. We finally got a Captain America that had a personality, outside of the suit."</p>
<p>Yeah, but Ultimate Cap can be kind of a jerk, though. He's a good guy but he's definitely a soldier...but then again, Cap is tecnically a soldier. I guess maybe something about Ultimate Cap seems off to me...maybe because he really is little more than a government puppet (at least what I've seen, and I've read the Ultimate line extensively), but Cap seems to transcend that.</p>
<p>Also, the picture on that last cover is a shirt at my local Target. I want it so bad. </p>
<p>-M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/comment-page-1/#comment-66807</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/13/365-reasons-to-love-comics-72/#comment-66807</guid>
		<description>America wasn&#039;t at war with Germany when Captain America appeared, T., and a lot of elements in the government would just as soon not fought in World War II.  Maybe that&#039;s what Bill&#039;s getting at.  Cap assaulting an actual foreign leader of a country with whom we were not at war might be seen as not doing what the government wants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America wasn't at war with Germany when Captain America appeared, T., and a lot of elements in the government would just as soon not fought in World War II.  Maybe that's what Bill's getting at.  Cap assaulting an actual foreign leader of a country with whom we were not at war might be seen as not doing what the government wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
