<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judging (Marvel&#8217;s June) Books By Their Covers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:44:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank castle fan</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-2/#comment-741611</link>
		<dc:creator>frank castle fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-741611</guid>
		<description>I dont know who runs this site... the person giving comments to these covers is a bit of an ass. You sure take it to a whole new level of cock suckery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know who runs this site&#8230; the person giving comments to these covers is a bit of an ass. You sure take it to a whole new level of cock suckery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-2/#comment-681666</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-681666</guid>
		<description>cielos, no se como describir con palabras el arte que yace en cada uno de las obras maestras de esta pagina, simplemente maravillosas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cielos, no se como describir con palabras el arte que yace en cada uno de las obras maestras de esta pagina, simplemente maravillosas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-2/#comment-358688</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-358688</guid>
		<description>Blimey!  What a strong month!

Honourable mentions:

Dark Tower: The Gunslinger Born 5 - like the composition here, slightly off centre and the unlikely choice of cover star adds to the pleasure
Legion of Monsters: Satana - she looks hot, do I need another reason?
Loners 3 - another great movie homage
Ms Marvel 16 - unusual angles ahoy!  But it works.
New Warriors 1 - I think it&#039;s funny. I like it.
Omega Flight 3 - another strong Omega Flight cover, moody and sensitive
X-Men 200 - what a month when Finch&#039;s superb X-Men wraparound doesn&#039;t make the top five but what an effort.
Last of the Mohicans 2 - gosh, I miss Maleev
Punisher 48 - when Bradstreet moves away from chunky Frank Castle portraiture, he can create a stunning cover.

Top Five

5 Exiles 95 - brilliant and idiosyncratic and very, very simple

4 Uncanny X-Men 487 - I think Larocca has done a stunning job here with Storm, captures her grace and power

3 Iron Man 19 - great, funny, simple and the head coming clean off makes it top drawer

2 Runaways 27 - gorgeous groupshot in a pioneer style by the irrepressable Jo Chen

1 New Avengers 31 - because you can barely believe it.  That&#039;s two in a row for Yu - whattaguy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blimey!  What a strong month!</p>
<p>Honourable mentions:</p>
<p>Dark Tower: The Gunslinger Born 5 &#8211; like the composition here, slightly off centre and the unlikely choice of cover star adds to the pleasure<br />
Legion of Monsters: Satana &#8211; she looks hot, do I need another reason?<br />
Loners 3 &#8211; another great movie homage<br />
Ms Marvel 16 &#8211; unusual angles ahoy!  But it works.<br />
New Warriors 1 &#8211; I think it&#8217;s funny. I like it.<br />
Omega Flight 3 &#8211; another strong Omega Flight cover, moody and sensitive<br />
X-Men 200 &#8211; what a month when Finch&#8217;s superb X-Men wraparound doesn&#8217;t make the top five but what an effort.<br />
Last of the Mohicans 2 &#8211; gosh, I miss Maleev<br />
Punisher 48 &#8211; when Bradstreet moves away from chunky Frank Castle portraiture, he can create a stunning cover.</p>
<p>Top Five</p>
<p>5 Exiles 95 &#8211; brilliant and idiosyncratic and very, very simple</p>
<p>4 Uncanny X-Men 487 &#8211; I think Larocca has done a stunning job here with Storm, captures her grace and power</p>
<p>3 Iron Man 19 &#8211; great, funny, simple and the head coming clean off makes it top drawer</p>
<p>2 Runaways 27 &#8211; gorgeous groupshot in a pioneer style by the irrepressable Jo Chen</p>
<p>1 New Avengers 31 &#8211; because you can barely believe it.  That&#8217;s two in a row for Yu &#8211; whattaguy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-2/#comment-256391</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-256391</guid>
		<description>extremely fantastic the x-men!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>extremely fantastic the x-men!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "O" the Humanatee!</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-73490</link>
		<dc:creator>"O" the Humanatee!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-73490</guid>
		<description>&quot;Just take another look at itâ€¦Hulk and Hercules are poised for battle, but not actually IN battle - that is the key thing for most â€œfight sceneâ€ covers (you can see a whole pile of them most any given month - this month, thereâ€™s at least a dozen - like Novaâ€™s cover, Bladeâ€™s cover and Wolverineâ€™s cover). The reason you show them just ABOUT to punch is because the actual fight itself is INSIDE, and thatâ€™s what the cover is trying to draw you into.

&quot;Where inside a comic would you find a full page panel devoted to two guys ABOUT to punch?

&quot;Would almost never happen (tossed in an â€œalmost,â€ because you should never ever use absolutesâ€¦hehe).&quot;

Thanks for clarifying, Brian. I&#039;m not as sure of your generalization about inside/outside moments as you are (even with your qualifying &quot;almost&quot;) - I can imagine the Hulk cover as a panel following, for example, a panel in which the Hulk and Hercules are in a not-yet-violent standoff, and then Hercules says something that sets the Hulk off. In other words, this &quot;panel&quot; would depict the action not of the Hulk being &quot;about to punch&quot; Hercules, but the action of the Hulk charging into Hercules starting from a standstill. (If people still wrote narrative captions, it might carry the words, &quot;And with that remark, the Hulk has had enough!&quot; or some such.) But at least I now understand the distinction you see between the two covers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Just take another look at itâ€¦Hulk and Hercules are poised for battle, but not actually IN battle &#8211; that is the key thing for most â€œfight sceneâ€ covers (you can see a whole pile of them most any given month &#8211; this month, thereâ€™s at least a dozen &#8211; like Novaâ€™s cover, Bladeâ€™s cover and Wolverineâ€™s cover). The reason you show them just ABOUT to punch is because the actual fight itself is INSIDE, and thatâ€™s what the cover is trying to draw you into.</p>
<p>&#8220;Where inside a comic would you find a full page panel devoted to two guys ABOUT to punch?</p>
<p>&#8220;Would almost never happen (tossed in an â€œalmost,â€ because you should never ever use absolutesâ€¦hehe).&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for clarifying, Brian. I&#8217;m not as sure of your generalization about inside/outside moments as you are (even with your qualifying &#8220;almost&#8221;) &#8211; I can imagine the Hulk cover as a panel following, for example, a panel in which the Hulk and Hercules are in a not-yet-violent standoff, and then Hercules says something that sets the Hulk off. In other words, this &#8220;panel&#8221; would depict the action not of the Hulk being &#8220;about to punch&#8221; Hercules, but the action of the Hulk charging into Hercules starting from a standstill. (If people still wrote narrative captions, it might carry the words, &#8220;And with that remark, the Hulk has had enough!&#8221; or some such.) But at least I now understand the distinction you see between the two covers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-73310</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-73310</guid>
		<description>Why does everyone seem to hate Turner so much? I really like his work, especially on that FF cover. The Sub-Mariner cover has a bit too much going on in it for me and I&#039;ve never been a fan of the character, so it doesn&#039;t do much for me.

But seriously, every time I read one of these things there&#039;s someone bashing Turner and/or Ramos. I understand people have opinions, but can anyone explain to me why it seems (at least to me) that these two artists are so universally reviled?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does everyone seem to hate Turner so much? I really like his work, especially on that FF cover. The Sub-Mariner cover has a bit too much going on in it for me and I&#8217;ve never been a fan of the character, so it doesn&#8217;t do much for me.</p>
<p>But seriously, every time I read one of these things there&#8217;s someone bashing Turner and/or Ramos. I understand people have opinions, but can anyone explain to me why it seems (at least to me) that these two artists are so universally reviled?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Nichols</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-72812</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Nichols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-72812</guid>
		<description>The X-Factor 20 cover is an homage to the Lost Boys movie poster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The X-Factor 20 cover is an homage to the Lost Boys movie poster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-72615</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 05:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-72615</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sorry, I donâ€™t know if youâ€™re being serious, being difficult (presumably because you thought I was being obnoxious - which I can somewhat understand), or what. But personally, I can imagine that Hulk cover as a panel, whereas thatâ€™s not true of the vast majority of the other covers. So your description just seems very subjective to me.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nah, it&#039;s cool. I guess I can see the confusion. I just don&#039;t think that cover looks like  a panel from a comic. 

Just take another look at it...Hulk and Hercules are poised for battle, but not actually IN battle - that is the key thing for most &quot;fight scene&quot; covers (you can see a whole pile of them most any given month - this month, there&#039;s at least a dozen - like Nova&#039;s cover, Blade&#039;s cover and Wolverine&#039;s cover). The reason you show them just ABOUT to punch is because the actual fight itself is INSIDE, and that&#039;s what the cover is trying to draw you into.

Where inside a comic would you find a full page panel devoted to two guys ABOUT to punch?

Would almost never happen (tossed in an &quot;almost,&quot; because you should never ever use absolutes...hehe).

A full page panel with someone stabbing Elektra?

Clearly (as it HAS happened before) you &lt;em&gt;would&lt;/em&gt; see that happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sorry, I donâ€™t know if youâ€™re being serious, being difficult (presumably because you thought I was being obnoxious &#8211; which I can somewhat understand), or what. But personally, I can imagine that Hulk cover as a panel, whereas thatâ€™s not true of the vast majority of the other covers. So your description just seems very subjective to me.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nah, it&#8217;s cool. I guess I can see the confusion. I just don&#8217;t think that cover looks like  a panel from a comic. </p>
<p>Just take another look at it&#8230;Hulk and Hercules are poised for battle, but not actually IN battle &#8211; that is the key thing for most &#8220;fight scene&#8221; covers (you can see a whole pile of them most any given month &#8211; this month, there&#8217;s at least a dozen &#8211; like Nova&#8217;s cover, Blade&#8217;s cover and Wolverine&#8217;s cover). The reason you show them just ABOUT to punch is because the actual fight itself is INSIDE, and that&#8217;s what the cover is trying to draw you into.</p>
<p>Where inside a comic would you find a full page panel devoted to two guys ABOUT to punch?</p>
<p>Would almost never happen (tossed in an &#8220;almost,&#8221; because you should never ever use absolutes&#8230;hehe).</p>
<p>A full page panel with someone stabbing Elektra?</p>
<p>Clearly (as it HAS happened before) you <em>would</em> see that happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veghead</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-72579</link>
		<dc:creator>veghead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 04:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-72579</guid>
		<description>Rock &#039;em Sock &#039;em Iron Man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rock &#8216;em Sock &#8216;em Iron Man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "O" the Humanatee!</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-72568</link>
		<dc:creator>"O" the Humanatee!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-72568</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why is Frankâ€™s Hulk cover a â€œnice fight scene,â€ while the New Avengers cover is â€œlooks like a panel from the comicâ€ cover (and you donâ€™t like those)?&quot;

&quot;Because it doesnâ€™t look like a panel from the comic.&quot;

Sorry, I don&#039;t know if you&#039;re being serious, being difficult (presumably because you thought I was being obnoxious - which I can somewhat understand), or what. But personally, I can imagine that Hulk cover as a panel, whereas that&#039;s not true of the vast majority of the other covers. So your description just seems very subjective to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why is Frankâ€™s Hulk cover a â€œnice fight scene,â€ while the New Avengers cover is â€œlooks like a panel from the comicâ€ cover (and you donâ€™t like those)?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Because it doesnâ€™t look like a panel from the comic.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry, I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;re being serious, being difficult (presumably because you thought I was being obnoxious &#8211; which I can somewhat understand), or what. But personally, I can imagine that Hulk cover as a panel, whereas that&#8217;s not true of the vast majority of the other covers. So your description just seems very subjective to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sleeper</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-72567</link>
		<dc:creator>sleeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-72567</guid>
		<description>My thoughts on a few covers:

LONERS #3: Very clever. We would&#039;ve gotten it even if you hadn&#039;t mentioned PRETTY IN PINK.  I think most people remember that movie, but it&#039;s still a cool choice for a parody cover.

IRON FIST #7: Possibly the best monthly Marvel is putting out these days, and great covers to match.  Everbody should buy this book.

PUNISHER WAR JOURNAL #8: A lot of people seem to be lamenting the choice of Frank Castle as the new Cap.  Don&#039;t you get it?  It&#039;s all being done for a laugh.  Fraction is too creative/zany/funny not to see the comedic opportunites available in that.  The character design and this cover are hilarious and I simply refuse to believe that concept is anything but a joke.  I mean, look at it!

LEGION OF MONSTERS: SATANA: That&#039;s a damn hot cover.  I don&#039;t know why you complained about proportion, anatomy, and perspective.  It&#039;s downright realistic, especially compared to the artwork of guys like Liefeld and Turner.  It&#039;s just hot.  Plus it involves Satan worship, and that&#039;s just wholesome fun.

NOVA #3: Adi Granov is one of the best cover guys in the business.  I&#039;ve been a fan of his since the &quot;Extremis&quot; run on IRON MAN.  Outstanding as always.

LAST OF THE MOHICANS #2: I&#039;m shocked you picked this ultra-cheesy cover as one of your Top 5.  It looks like a particularly bad Choose Your Own Adventure book that you might have read in second grade.  Marvel should have gone with a classier approach, instead of a cut-rate Drew Struzan-knockoff.  I also expect better from Maleev, who is one of my favorite artists.

MYTHOS: SPIDER-MAN: I feel like a dork for caring, but I hate it when you can see Spider-Man&#039;s feet.  He should be wearing boots, not socks.  Every time he has visible toes, it makes it look like he has footy pajamas.  If not heavy construction-work style boots, then at least soled bottoms for his feet... I just can&#039;t picture fighting people in my socks.

NEW WARRIORS #1: PERFECT image.  It properly conveys the core theme of the book, looks great, and makes a statement all in a single snapshot.  This idea behind this new version of the New Warriors sounds awesome, and this cover makes that case.  Quesada has said that this team is supposed to completely embody the spirit of rebellion in the new post-CW Marvel Universe.  Very cool concept.  That being the idea, this is actually the best cover for a number 1 issue I could imagine.

DAREDEVIL #98: This would have been my choice for the best cover of the lot.  It&#039;s intense, ferocious facial expression, the image isn&#039;t cluttered, the simplicity belies the power behind it, well-conceived physics and anatomy, great background, and outstanding coloring.  I would buy this if they offered it as a poster.  I don&#039;t mind the Affleck-costume.  The movie wasn&#039;t horrible (it wasn&#039;t great, either) and the costume was one of the least offensive aspects of the film.  I think the fact that it&#039;s reddish-brown leather instead of the standard aerobics-instructor spandex is really cool and fits the character well (no pun intended), given his personality and the atmosphere and world he inhabits.  This is, in my opinion, one of the more definitive Daredevil shots in recent history (certainly better than anything Quesada drew).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts on a few covers:</p>
<p>LONERS #3: Very clever. We would&#8217;ve gotten it even if you hadn&#8217;t mentioned PRETTY IN PINK.  I think most people remember that movie, but it&#8217;s still a cool choice for a parody cover.</p>
<p>IRON FIST #7: Possibly the best monthly Marvel is putting out these days, and great covers to match.  Everbody should buy this book.</p>
<p>PUNISHER WAR JOURNAL #8: A lot of people seem to be lamenting the choice of Frank Castle as the new Cap.  Don&#8217;t you get it?  It&#8217;s all being done for a laugh.  Fraction is too creative/zany/funny not to see the comedic opportunites available in that.  The character design and this cover are hilarious and I simply refuse to believe that concept is anything but a joke.  I mean, look at it!</p>
<p>LEGION OF MONSTERS: SATANA: That&#8217;s a damn hot cover.  I don&#8217;t know why you complained about proportion, anatomy, and perspective.  It&#8217;s downright realistic, especially compared to the artwork of guys like Liefeld and Turner.  It&#8217;s just hot.  Plus it involves Satan worship, and that&#8217;s just wholesome fun.</p>
<p>NOVA #3: Adi Granov is one of the best cover guys in the business.  I&#8217;ve been a fan of his since the &#8220;Extremis&#8221; run on IRON MAN.  Outstanding as always.</p>
<p>LAST OF THE MOHICANS #2: I&#8217;m shocked you picked this ultra-cheesy cover as one of your Top 5.  It looks like a particularly bad Choose Your Own Adventure book that you might have read in second grade.  Marvel should have gone with a classier approach, instead of a cut-rate Drew Struzan-knockoff.  I also expect better from Maleev, who is one of my favorite artists.</p>
<p>MYTHOS: SPIDER-MAN: I feel like a dork for caring, but I hate it when you can see Spider-Man&#8217;s feet.  He should be wearing boots, not socks.  Every time he has visible toes, it makes it look like he has footy pajamas.  If not heavy construction-work style boots, then at least soled bottoms for his feet&#8230; I just can&#8217;t picture fighting people in my socks.</p>
<p>NEW WARRIORS #1: PERFECT image.  It properly conveys the core theme of the book, looks great, and makes a statement all in a single snapshot.  This idea behind this new version of the New Warriors sounds awesome, and this cover makes that case.  Quesada has said that this team is supposed to completely embody the spirit of rebellion in the new post-CW Marvel Universe.  Very cool concept.  That being the idea, this is actually the best cover for a number 1 issue I could imagine.</p>
<p>DAREDEVIL #98: This would have been my choice for the best cover of the lot.  It&#8217;s intense, ferocious facial expression, the image isn&#8217;t cluttered, the simplicity belies the power behind it, well-conceived physics and anatomy, great background, and outstanding coloring.  I would buy this if they offered it as a poster.  I don&#8217;t mind the Affleck-costume.  The movie wasn&#8217;t horrible (it wasn&#8217;t great, either) and the costume was one of the least offensive aspects of the film.  I think the fact that it&#8217;s reddish-brown leather instead of the standard aerobics-instructor spandex is really cool and fits the character well (no pun intended), given his personality and the atmosphere and world he inhabits.  This is, in my opinion, one of the more definitive Daredevil shots in recent history (certainly better than anything Quesada drew).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Collins</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-72481</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-72481</guid>
		<description>Anonymous said:
&quot;John Hughs is still as popular as he ever was&quot;

letting the days go by, water flowing underground...

Sorry, for some reason that quote got Once In A Lifetime stuck in my head...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous said:<br />
&#8220;John Hughs is still as popular as he ever was&#8221;</p>
<p>letting the days go by, water flowing underground&#8230;</p>
<p>Sorry, for some reason that quote got Once In A Lifetime stuck in my head&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanLarkin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-72347</link>
		<dc:creator>DanLarkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-72347</guid>
		<description>That New Warriors cover would work as one of those full page house ads that Marvel used to run in their books.  But I agree that it&#039;s not a particularly effective cover for a first issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That New Warriors cover would work as one of those full page house ads that Marvel used to run in their books.  But I agree that it&#8217;s not a particularly effective cover for a first issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-72244</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-72244</guid>
		<description>John Hughs is still as popular as he ever was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Hughs is still as popular as he ever was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Punch</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-72165</link>
		<dc:creator>Punch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-72165</guid>
		<description>-New Avengers-When is Elektra going to stop falling for that move?

-Nice Jae Lee Dark Tower cover 

-Horrible Magik cover. Does she play poker now?

-the Pretty In Pink thing. Yeah I recognize it, but do these things ever mean anything in regards to the story?

weak crop of covers this time around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-New Avengers-When is Elektra going to stop falling for that move?</p>
<p>-Nice Jae Lee Dark Tower cover </p>
<p>-Horrible Magik cover. Does she play poker now?</p>
<p>-the Pretty In Pink thing. Yeah I recognize it, but do these things ever mean anything in regards to the story?</p>
<p>weak crop of covers this time around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-72118</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 06:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-72118</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why is Frankâ€™s Hulk cover a â€œnice fight scene,â€ while the New Avengers cover is â€œlooks like a panel from the comicâ€ cover (and you donâ€™t like those)? &lt;/blockquote&gt; Because it doesn&#039;t look like a panel from the comic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why is Frankâ€™s Hulk cover a â€œnice fight scene,â€ while the New Avengers cover is â€œlooks like a panel from the comicâ€ cover (and you donâ€™t like those)? </p></blockquote>
<p> Because it doesn&#8217;t look like a panel from the comic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-72117</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 06:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-72117</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, yeah, Brian Denham did indeed work from my breakdowns for the cover, but he did a damned fine job on the finished piece, so what does it matter? &lt;/blockquote&gt; No judgments there, just a question of curiosity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well, yeah, Brian Denham did indeed work from my breakdowns for the cover, but he did a damned fine job on the finished piece, so what does it matter? </p></blockquote>
<p> No judgments there, just a question of curiosity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "O" the Humanatee!</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-72115</link>
		<dc:creator>"O" the Humanatee!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 06:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-72115</guid>
		<description>Why is Frank&#039;s Hulk cover a &quot;nice fight scene,&quot; while the New Avengers cover is &quot;looks like a panel from the comic&quot; cover (and you don&#039;t like those)? Sometimes I really don&#039;t understand your critical terminology, Brian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Frank&#8217;s Hulk cover a &#8220;nice fight scene,&#8221; while the New Avengers cover is &#8220;looks like a panel from the comic&#8221; cover (and you don&#8217;t like those)? Sometimes I really don&#8217;t understand your critical terminology, Brian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-72043</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-72043</guid>
		<description>Count me in among those who don&#039;t think that FF cover is too cartoony.  It&#039;s quite brilliant actually, and belongs among the top 5.  Now that McGuiness Hulk cover?  THAT&#039;S too cartoony.  And how big is the Hulk these days, he isn&#039;t still 7 feet tall anymore I guess?  In that picture by McGuiness, he looks like he must be 15 feet tall just based on the size of his heads and hands</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Count me in among those who don&#8217;t think that FF cover is too cartoony.  It&#8217;s quite brilliant actually, and belongs among the top 5.  Now that McGuiness Hulk cover?  THAT&#8217;S too cartoony.  And how big is the Hulk these days, he isn&#8217;t still 7 feet tall anymore I guess?  In that picture by McGuiness, he looks like he must be 15 feet tall just based on the size of his heads and hands</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McGee</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-71951</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 22:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/22/judging-marvels-june-books-by-their-covers/#comment-71951</guid>
		<description>That Runaways cover really is gorgeous. I&#039;d also defend the Larocca Storm cover for Uncanny (even though the composition means the logo almost has to be at the bottom of the sheet, which is...an interesting choice, considering that means it&#039;ll essentially be displaying without any visible title at all in many shops, which may be a little counter-productive, but...hey, I&#039;m no marketing guy, what do I know?), as well as the New Warriors cover (for the reasons stated). I&#039;m liking Maleev&#039;s Last of the Mohicans cover, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Runaways cover really is gorgeous. I&#8217;d also defend the Larocca Storm cover for Uncanny (even though the composition means the logo almost has to be at the bottom of the sheet, which is&#8230;an interesting choice, considering that means it&#8217;ll essentially be displaying without any visible title at all in many shops, which may be a little counter-productive, but&#8230;hey, I&#8217;m no marketing guy, what do I know?), as well as the New Warriors cover (for the reasons stated). I&#8217;m liking Maleev&#8217;s Last of the Mohicans cover, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

