<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed #96</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:44:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ParanoidObsessive</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-2/#comment-692710</link>
		<dc:creator>ParanoidObsessive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-692710</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt; I can understand Marvelâ€™s decision to sue. When I was younger, I remarked to one of my friends how stupid â€œPlasmâ€ looked. And he replied, â€œThat comic with the trannie dressed like Cher on the cover?â€

I distinctly recall when I first heard about the Marvel lawsuit, which was also the first time I even remotely heard about Plasmer, and which then led me to actually look into the premise of the Plasmer comic (mainly, to see if it was just the NAME Marvel was objecting to, or if it seemed like the Defiant comic could be confused based on the content as well).

My reaction was basically along the lines of &quot;Jesus, Defiant should sue Marvel for having such a crappy comic and then connecting the two in the minds of the public.&quot;

Of course, my second thought was that Defiant was utterly screwed, since there was no way they were going to survive a legal war with Marvel, whether or not they were in the right.  And between the lawsuit costs and the losses they suffered from the Warriors of Plasm #0 trading card fiasco, it&#039;s so not surprising that the whole thing tanked.

It&#039;s a shame, since I was hoping that the Shooter/Lapham team could help recapture some of the magic of the early Valiant run, but it was not to be.



&gt;&gt;&gt; I get a tingle of perverse glee every time I remember that Cyborg Superman is Reed Richards.

I love the fact that HE actually noticed the parallels between him and Reed in one of the Marvel/DC crossovers.



&gt;&gt;&gt; Just the one. When they took Cyborg Superman to STAR labs for testing, they found that his metal parts were indeed Kryptonian in origin - it turned out that was became heâ€™d constructed his body using some bit of Krypton tech that heâ€™d lucked into finding. Baby Kalâ€™s rocket, maybe?

Yes, he basically found the &quot;birthing matrix&quot; that Superman came to Earth in (a sort of artificial womb that was basically the Byrne version of the rocketship that brought the baby, which got retconned back out by Waid), and used its technology to alter himself so he&#039;d have the same DNA as Superman and the cyborg parts would register as Kryptonian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; I can understand Marvelâ€™s decision to sue. When I was younger, I remarked to one of my friends how stupid â€œPlasmâ€ looked. And he replied, â€œThat comic with the trannie dressed like Cher on the cover?â€</p>
<p>I distinctly recall when I first heard about the Marvel lawsuit, which was also the first time I even remotely heard about Plasmer, and which then led me to actually look into the premise of the Plasmer comic (mainly, to see if it was just the NAME Marvel was objecting to, or if it seemed like the Defiant comic could be confused based on the content as well).</p>
<p>My reaction was basically along the lines of "Jesus, Defiant should sue Marvel for having such a crappy comic and then connecting the two in the minds of the public."</p>
<p>Of course, my second thought was that Defiant was utterly screwed, since there was no way they were going to survive a legal war with Marvel, whether or not they were in the right.  And between the lawsuit costs and the losses they suffered from the Warriors of Plasm #0 trading card fiasco, it's so not surprising that the whole thing tanked.</p>
<p>It's a shame, since I was hoping that the Shooter/Lapham team could help recapture some of the magic of the early Valiant run, but it was not to be.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; I get a tingle of perverse glee every time I remember that Cyborg Superman is Reed Richards.</p>
<p>I love the fact that HE actually noticed the parallels between him and Reed in one of the Marvel/DC crossovers.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; Just the one. When they took Cyborg Superman to STAR labs for testing, they found that his metal parts were indeed Kryptonian in origin - it turned out that was became heâ€™d constructed his body using some bit of Krypton tech that heâ€™d lucked into finding. Baby Kalâ€™s rocket, maybe?</p>
<p>Yes, he basically found the "birthing matrix" that Superman came to Earth in (a sort of artificial womb that was basically the Byrne version of the rocketship that brought the baby, which got retconned back out by Waid), and used its technology to alter himself so he'd have the same DNA as Superman and the cyborg parts would register as Kryptonian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-2/#comment-675455</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-675455</guid>
		<description>Also I recently reread the Funeral/Reign deal, and yes, they do hold up remarkably well. I was surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also I recently reread the Funeral/Reign deal, and yes, they do hold up remarkably well. I was surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-2/#comment-675452</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-675452</guid>
		<description>I am evidently in the minority here but I didn&#039;t find the bone claws &#039;lame&#039; (in fact I didn&#039;t really think about them- at 12 or 13 I wasn&#039;t looking at it as a savvy comics fan, but was simply enjoying the story), and in fact the story arc from issues 75-83 or so is one of my all time favorites in comics. I loved Larry Hama&#039;s take on the character, he knew him, he knew how to write him. Besides perhaps Claremont, no one else has understood the character that well. Also, that run was when Adam Kubert joined the book, and he did really, really great work. And the stories were good, and the covers were good. I stopped reading Wolverine, and comics, at about issue 117 or so (Zero Tolerance crossover, I think), but not because it was lame, but because I&#039;d just grown out of comics at that time and lost interest. But I don&#039;t recall the character getting lame, to me. I think, looking at it now knowing how comics traditionally work, that it was really ballsy to have one of their most popular characters changed so radically, for so long. That&#039;s one of the weaknesses of superhero comics- the characters are static, certain properties are untouchable (in regular continuity in least). But with Wolverine for a while there they changed things up. I&#039;m sure he&#039;s back on track now, what with the movies having been such hits. But my two eras I like of him- by Claremont first, then by Hama- are done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am evidently in the minority here but I didn't find the bone claws 'lame' (in fact I didn't really think about them- at 12 or 13 I wasn't looking at it as a savvy comics fan, but was simply enjoying the story), and in fact the story arc from issues 75-83 or so is one of my all time favorites in comics. I loved Larry Hama's take on the character, he knew him, he knew how to write him. Besides perhaps Claremont, no one else has understood the character that well. Also, that run was when Adam Kubert joined the book, and he did really, really great work. And the stories were good, and the covers were good. I stopped reading Wolverine, and comics, at about issue 117 or so (Zero Tolerance crossover, I think), but not because it was lame, but because I'd just grown out of comics at that time and lost interest. But I don't recall the character getting lame, to me. I think, looking at it now knowing how comics traditionally work, that it was really ballsy to have one of their most popular characters changed so radically, for so long. That's one of the weaknesses of superhero comics- the characters are static, certain properties are untouchable (in regular continuity in least). But with Wolverine for a while there they changed things up. I'm sure he's back on track now, what with the movies having been such hits. But my two eras I like of him- by Claremont first, then by Hama- are done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donkykong</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-2/#comment-83569</link>
		<dc:creator>donkykong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-83569</guid>
		<description>that x factor issue was very pretty,
and cable was actually funny in it.

jae lee, before he became tim bradstreet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that x factor issue was very pretty,<br />
and cable was actually funny in it.</p>
<p>jae lee, before he became tim bradstreet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynxara</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-2/#comment-78981</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynxara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 06:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-78981</guid>
		<description>I would think the real world Katrina experience would make much of the poor writing evident in No Man&#039;s Land all the more obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think the real world Katrina experience would make much of the poor writing evident in No Man's Land all the more obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-2/#comment-78955</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 03:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-78955</guid>
		<description>On a related note to the Plasm/Plasmer story, wasn&#039;t Gen 13 originally going to be called Gen X, but Marvel&#039;s Generation X put an end to it? How did that all come about?

Craig Folsom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a related note to the Plasm/Plasmer story, wasn't Gen 13 originally going to be called Gen X, but Marvel's Generation X put an end to it? How did that all come about?</p>
<p>Craig Folsom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NS</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-2/#comment-78374</link>
		<dc:creator>NS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 06:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-78374</guid>
		<description>But, of course, with Katrina, there were television camera all over the place.   And it actually woke some people up to the fatal incompetence of the Bush Administration.

No Mans Land would have a similar political fallout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, of course, with Katrina, there were television camera all over the place.   And it actually woke some people up to the fatal incompetence of the Bush Administration.</p>
<p>No Mans Land would have a similar political fallout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Herman</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-2/#comment-78140</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 16:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-78140</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;My problem with â€˜No Manâ€™s Landâ€™ was that I just couldnâ€™t get past the cognitive dissonance of trying to believe this story was really happening in anything like reality. &lt;/I&gt;

Yeah, that was my number one problem with the entire premise of the storyline... then a few years later we had the whole Hurricane Katrina debacle, and suddenly &quot;No Man&#039;s Land&quot; seemed a hell of a lot more plausible, sad to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>My problem with â€˜No Manâ€™s Landâ€™ was that I just couldnâ€™t get past the cognitive dissonance of trying to believe this story was really happening in anything like reality. </i></p>
<p>Yeah, that was my number one problem with the entire premise of the storyline... then a few years later we had the whole Hurricane Katrina debacle, and suddenly "No Man's Land" seemed a hell of a lot more plausible, sad to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-2/#comment-76500</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 23:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-76500</guid>
		<description>Reign of the Supermen was actually the first Superman story I enjoyed. I know i&#039;m probably getting dirty looks from people right now but it was the one thing that I&#039;d been waiting to happen... someone needed to beat Superman. why read a comic where the main character is so powerful that there is no one who can possibly beat him. even when they got the guts to kill him they just put him back in like nothing had happened. some of the best Superman stories were told in that short time where he was out of the picture.

Marvel still has had some of the best multi-issue plots. Fatal Attractions was badass, Age of Apocolypse was badass and the Grant Morrison New X-Men was badass. Sadly they follow those plots with lots of really bad story arcs. 


I just wish the big 2 would stop trying to re-create those types of events. ie: House of M. I think titles like X-Men would have kept making great stories if writer&#039;s didn&#039;t have to work within the constraints of movie properties and licensing. Bravo to Marvel if they actually keep Captain America dead for more then 12 issues..... if they make a movie they have to bring him back to not confuse things of course. Sadly I was starting to like Captain America for the first time ever.

cool urban legend stuff though.

-michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reign of the Supermen was actually the first Superman story I enjoyed. I know i'm probably getting dirty looks from people right now but it was the one thing that I'd been waiting to happen... someone needed to beat Superman. why read a comic where the main character is so powerful that there is no one who can possibly beat him. even when they got the guts to kill him they just put him back in like nothing had happened. some of the best Superman stories were told in that short time where he was out of the picture.</p>
<p>Marvel still has had some of the best multi-issue plots. Fatal Attractions was badass, Age of Apocolypse was badass and the Grant Morrison New X-Men was badass. Sadly they follow those plots with lots of really bad story arcs. </p>
<p>I just wish the big 2 would stop trying to re-create those types of events. ie: House of M. I think titles like X-Men would have kept making great stories if writer's didn't have to work within the constraints of movie properties and licensing. Bravo to Marvel if they actually keep Captain America dead for more then 12 issues..... if they make a movie they have to bring him back to not confuse things of course. Sadly I was starting to like Captain America for the first time ever.</p>
<p>cool urban legend stuff though.</p>
<p>-michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monel</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-2/#comment-76393</link>
		<dc:creator>monel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-76393</guid>
		<description>I remember hearing that the Superman who died was supposed to be the Sand Superman too, and that was in California.  Strange that the same rumor was on both coasts.  The retailers out here were also jacking up the prices on that Simonson book and the fate of that Sand Superman was never explained.  It did seem to be setting up a larger storyline.  That might be an Urban Legend to follow up on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember hearing that the Superman who died was supposed to be the Sand Superman too, and that was in California.  Strange that the same rumor was on both coasts.  The retailers out here were also jacking up the prices on that Simonson book and the fate of that Sand Superman was never explained.  It did seem to be setting up a larger storyline.  That might be an Urban Legend to follow up on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Rogers</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-2/#comment-75775</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 11:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-75775</guid>
		<description>That was the first time I ever read Superman and he was a corpse in the story. I missed the party, but I thought it was a well concieved story.

I missed out on the Collosus turning towards Magneto bit as I had gotten burned out on the X-men for while (not for long). I bought X-men 25 and Wolverine 75 from a friend of mine along with the first 3 issues of Gen 13. I know have the other two of that series just recently. Come to think of it.... where is J Scott Campbell? Did he fall off the Earth or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was the first time I ever read Superman and he was a corpse in the story. I missed the party, but I thought it was a well concieved story.</p>
<p>I missed out on the Collosus turning towards Magneto bit as I had gotten burned out on the X-men for while (not for long). I bought X-men 25 and Wolverine 75 from a friend of mine along with the first 3 issues of Gen 13. I know have the other two of that series just recently. Come to think of it.... where is J Scott Campbell? Did he fall off the Earth or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-2/#comment-75751</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-75751</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Re: Azrael as a deliberately unlikable character: Iâ€™m pretty sure that was explicity stated in letter columns at the time. Peterson or Gorfinkel or somebody said- in response to complaints about Azrael- that the character was intended as a warning to those who were demanding a grimmer, grittier Batman, and as a reminder of the things that make Batman a great character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Re: Azrael as a deliberately unlikable character: Iâ€™m pretty sure that was explicity stated in letter columns at the time. Peterson or Gorfinkel or somebody said- in response to complaints about Azrael- that the character was intended as a warning to those who were demanding a grimmer, grittier Batman, and as a reminder of the things that make Batman a great character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apodaca</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-2/#comment-75733</link>
		<dc:creator>Apodaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 07:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-75733</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Speaking as someone who read that story as a kid, I didnâ€™t find it hard to understand at all. Everything remotely important was explained. And besides, â€œcontinutyâ€ wasnâ€™t the dirty word back then that it apparantly is now. People expected comics to have a history.&lt;blockquote&gt;

We&#039;re both speaking as someone who read that story as a kid, so that&#039;s a moot point.

I don&#039;t know what your continuity remark is in reference to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Speaking as someone who read that story as a kid, I didnâ€™t find it hard to understand at all. Everything remotely important was explained. And besides, â€œcontinutyâ€ wasnâ€™t the dirty word back then that it apparantly is now. People expected comics to have a history.<br />
<blockquote>
<p>We're both speaking as someone who read that story as a kid, so that's a moot point.</p>
<p>I don't know what your continuity remark is in reference to.</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohan Williams</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-2/#comment-75728</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 06:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-75728</guid>
		<description>Re: Azrael as a deliberately unlikable character: I&#039;m pretty sure that was explicity stated in letter columns at the time. Peterson or Gorfinkel or somebody said- in response to complaints about Azrael- that the character was intended as a warning to those who were demanding a grimmer, grittier Batman, and as a reminder of the things that make Batman a great character.

As far as whether or not the whole Death/Funeral/Return thing was difficult to understand, it never bothered me. There was a lot of exposition, so you didn&#039;t have to be a particularly smart kid to follow it, even if you were only buying select parts of the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Azrael as a deliberately unlikable character: I'm pretty sure that was explicity stated in letter columns at the time. Peterson or Gorfinkel or somebody said- in response to complaints about Azrael- that the character was intended as a warning to those who were demanding a grimmer, grittier Batman, and as a reminder of the things that make Batman a great character.</p>
<p>As far as whether or not the whole Death/Funeral/Return thing was difficult to understand, it never bothered me. There was a lot of exposition, so you didn't have to be a particularly smart kid to follow it, even if you were only buying select parts of the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussiefan</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-2/#comment-75629</link>
		<dc:creator>Aussiefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 00:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-75629</guid>
		<description>&quot;No, thatâ€™s not it. I remember reading those comics as a young Marvel Zombie and there was tons of shit that didnâ€™t make sense.&quot;

Speaking as someone who read that story as a kid, I didn&#039;t find it hard to understand at all. Everything remotely important was explained. And besides, &quot;continuty&quot; wasn&#039;t the dirty word back then that it apparantly is now. People expected comics to have a history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"No, thatâ€™s not it. I remember reading those comics as a young Marvel Zombie and there was tons of shit that didnâ€™t make sense."</p>
<p>Speaking as someone who read that story as a kid, I didn't find it hard to understand at all. Everything remotely important was explained. And besides, "continuty" wasn't the dirty word back then that it apparantly is now. People expected comics to have a history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDM</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-1/#comment-75610</link>
		<dc:creator>CDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 23:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-75610</guid>
		<description>&quot;Speaking of the Fatal Attractions storyline coming from a joke, does anyone remember something about the Age of Apocalypse storyline originally being a story for the 90s X-Men cartoon that the Marvel teams caught wind of and wanted to do their take on it?&quot;

I&#039;m all but certain that&#039;s true, Harras mentioning it in several interviews, saying he was sitting in on a writer&#039;s meeting for the cartoon, someone pitched having a time-travller kill Xavier, and he asked thme to hold off on it so the book could do it first.

&quot;Man, Marvel UK sucked, didnâ€™t it?&quot;

I&#039;ll second that, and not just for it&#039;s roots in the Doctor Who comic.  Pendragon was decent as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Speaking of the Fatal Attractions storyline coming from a joke, does anyone remember something about the Age of Apocalypse storyline originally being a story for the 90s X-Men cartoon that the Marvel teams caught wind of and wanted to do their take on it?"</p>
<p>I'm all but certain that's true, Harras mentioning it in several interviews, saying he was sitting in on a writer's meeting for the cartoon, someone pitched having a time-travller kill Xavier, and he asked thme to hold off on it so the book could do it first.</p>
<p>"Man, Marvel UK sucked, didnâ€™t it?"</p>
<p>I'll second that, and not just for it's roots in the Doctor Who comic.  Pendragon was decent as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-1/#comment-75576</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 20:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-75576</guid>
		<description>&quot;Which one blew up Gateway City at the climax of the epic?&quot;

Actually, it was Coast City.  This helped lead to Hal Jordan going nuts and killing the Green Lantern Corps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Which one blew up Gateway City at the climax of the epic?"</p>
<p>Actually, it was Coast City.  This helped lead to Hal Jordan going nuts and killing the Green Lantern Corps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Byrns</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-1/#comment-75546</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Byrns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 18:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-75546</guid>
		<description>&quot;My problem with â€˜No Manâ€™s Landâ€™ was that I just couldnâ€™t get past the cognitive dissonance of trying to believe this story was really happening in anything like reality. Every two pages, I found myself saying, â€œBut-but-butâ€“if a soldier really turned away a priest carrying humanitarian aid to starving people, thereâ€™d be six dozen reporters there, and in less than a day, this would be a massive international scandal! This is just not the way the human race works!â€


Unless you were trying to get into New Orleans in the first days after Katrina...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"My problem with â€˜No Manâ€™s Landâ€™ was that I just couldnâ€™t get past the cognitive dissonance of trying to believe this story was really happening in anything like reality. Every two pages, I found myself saying, â€œBut-but-butâ€“if a soldier really turned away a priest carrying humanitarian aid to starving people, thereâ€™d be six dozen reporters there, and in less than a day, this would be a massive international scandal! This is just not the way the human race works!â€</p>
<p>Unless you were trying to get into New Orleans in the first days after Katrina...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sleestak</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-1/#comment-75541</link>
		<dc:creator>Sleestak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 17:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-75541</guid>
		<description>Bone claws were as awful as Teen tony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bone claws were as awful as Teen tony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/comment-page-1/#comment-75483</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 15:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/29/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-96/#comment-75483</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Peter. I&#039;ll edit it in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Peter. I'll edit it in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
