web stats

CSBG Archive

What I bought – 28 March 2007

A good chunk of books this week, including a mediocre offering from one of the best titles out there (surprisingly enough), plus the comic I bought based on what you guys told me.  And Dean Motter and Michael Lark have a comic this week!  Uh, except they’re not working on the same one together.  That would have been cool.  But let’s dig in!

Batman #664 by Grant “The Ladies Like It Smooth” Morrison, Andy Kubert, and Jesse Delperdang.  $2.99, DC.

03-29-2007 09;53;03PM.JPG

I enjoyed Morrison’s first arc on Batman, even though I was a bit disappointed in it.  Then that prose monstrosity came out, and I faltered in my devotion to the The God of All Comics.  This issue is much more promising, however, in his quest to make Batman the hairy-chested love god of the early 1970s.  The first 9 pages are devoted entirely to Bruce Wayne puttin’ the moves on a chick!  Very cool.

I think the problem with the first arc was that Morrison was trying too hard.  O’Neil and Adams, after all, probably didn’t sit down to turn Bruce Wayne into a playboy.  Morrison was forcing the issue, and unlike All Star Superman, which is all schtick (very well done schtick, before you rain profanities down on me) , his first arc on Batman was played totally straight.  It didn’t work as well as TGoAC wanted it to, even though it was a very fun comic book to read.

With this issue, it feels like Morrison has a better grasp on the character, even though once again it’s a weirdly disjointed story.  I presume his date with Jezebel Jet (still hate the name!) in the Alps somehow will connect with the “cop” who is slaughtering prostitutes, but with Morrison, who the hell knows.  But I’m not worried about the stories connecting up right now - Morrison’s Bruce is ridiculously cool in this issue, but unlike the earlier story, it doesn’t feel like Morrison is trying to convince us of the fact.  That’s not to say the whole thing isn’t a bit silly – Bruce parachutes onto a ski slope, after all – but it feels more like Bruce is playing a role, rather than Morrison forcing him to play a role.  The suaveness (suavity?) of Bruce is more relaxed this time, and the first part of the book is very nice to read.  Plus, there’s the point that Jezebel’s father was assassinated.  Just who the hell is she?

The “Batman” section of the book is handled nicely, too, once again because Morrison doesn’t feel like he’s forcing things.  His interaction with the prostitutes on the street reminded me instantly of Mike W. Barr and Alan Davis’ classic Detective run, when Batman spoke to the hookers in a kindly manner and tried to help them.  Here he gives a Waynetech card to one of the younger hookers and tells her to get a job there.  With few exceptions, we rarely see a compassionate Batman and a human Bruce Wayne anymore, so it’s nice to see here.

The issue isn’t perfect, as Morrison introduces the villain, a Bane knock-off who wears a pseudo-Bat cowl and is supposedly a cop.  He might be an interesting villain, but so far, that’s kind of lame.  Batman’s internal monologue as he’s tracking this villain is pretty inane, too, but interestingly enough, one thing Morrison has never done really well is internal monologues.  Check it out if you don’t believe me!  But as a first issue of an arc, goes, it’s intriguing, so we’ll see where it goes.

As for Kubert, it’s Kubert.  It would be nice if someone could explain to me why Kubert stinks, because I like both Kuberts (and their father).  It’s actually a bit reminiscent of (blasphemy!) Neal Adams, which is, I assume, my Morrison is working with him.  But as I have no eye for art, I’m sure someone can tell me why Kubert stinks.  (And on cue, Dick explains why he doesn’t like the art, but he doesn’t do a very good job of it.  Anyone else?)

Now, if only Morrison would get his scripts in on time, this could be a good little Batman run.  Wouldn’t that be nice?

Catwoman #65 by Will Pfeifer, David López, and Alvaro López.  $2.99, DC.

03-29-2007 09;53;49PM.JPG

This is the third part of the Great Snowglobe Heist, but if you haven’t read an issue of Catwoman before, you could easily pick this up and understand what’s going on, and that’s pretty cool.  At the end of last issue, Selina was confronted by Lex Luthor just as she procured the snowglobe, but in this issue, she quickly learns it’s a Luthor robot.  So, basically, this entire issue is a cat-and-mouse game (forgive the pun) as Selina tries to escape a robot that is far more powerful than she is in a place that has no exit.  Oh dear.

It’s a simple idea, but Pfeifer and López pull it off with ease.  The art, as usual, is nice and clean, with a good sense of both the space in which the battle takes place and the “toybox” feel to Luthor’s underground lair.  As the robot Luthor gradually loses its skin, he becomes more and more frightening.  Pfeifer never lets us think that Selina is in any real danger, and the way she escapes is telegraphed early on, but it’s still kind of clever, and the way it all works out makes this a pleasant comic book to read.  There’s still a sense of danger – Luthor muses that he might pay her daughter a visit, and the idea of Luthor the god is frankly, unpleasant – but the issue works more because we’re just wondering how Selina is going to survive long enough to figure out a way to escape.  Pfeifer does a nice job with it.

Superman makes an obligatory cameo, and it goes as you might expect, and then Pfeifer easily leads us into the next storyline.  Both he and Peter David on X-Factor (among others) have been doing a nice job with complete stories that don’t fit easily into trade paperback format, and it’s good to see that the craft of constructing a good solid short story in comics hasn’t been lost.  This issue is fun to read, fun to look at, and requires very little prior knowledge (some is good, like who Holly is).  It’s another example why Catwoman is such an entertaining book.

Daredevil #95 by Ed Brubaker, Michael Lark, and Stefano Gaudiano.  $2.99, Marvel.

03-29-2007 09;54;33PM.JPG

Well, at least that costume on the cover isn’t the one on the inside.

I’m a bit torn over Daredevil.  On the one hand, Brubaker knows how to write, and I have confidence that the stories will be good.  On the other hand, he just spent a year undoing everything Bendis did on the title, so now we’re back to Matt Murdock with a secret identity protecting Hell’s Kitchen, which is fine as things go, but it lacks the dynamism of the best Bendis stuff (or even Brubaker’s first arc).  I like this issue, but I’m wary about where the book is going.

There are several intriguing things in this issue.  A couple of hoods that Daredevil runs off the road commit suicide right in front of him, much to his consternation.  Melvin Potter acts the same way in prison, apparently killing two inmates but having no recollection of it.  These two incidents, with characters acting, well, out of character, have to be connected, right?  Plus, the law firm is a big part of the issue, which, like focusing a bit on Bruce Wayne, is always a good thing.  I like Matt Murdock the lawyer, and hope to see more of him.  Oh, and someone is following Milla.  That can’t be good.

It’s a nice set-up issue, even though it feels a bit stretched out.  The car chase at the beginning is a good excuse for Lark to show off, as this issue highlights his skills very well.  He does a fine job with the action sequences, something that Maleev always struggled with, and his style is gritty without being drenched in darkness and lines.

I’m curious to see what’s going on in this particular story, as well as where Brubaker is going with the title.  Despite my disappointment at the return of the status quo, there’s no reason why Daredevil can’t be a good crime comic.  And that’s what it is.

Fables #59 by Bill Willingham, M. K. Perker, Jim Rugg, Mark Buckingham, Andrew Pepoy, Joëlle Jones, D’Israeli, Jill Thompson, David Lapham, John K. Snyder III, Eric Shanower, and Barry Kitson (phew!).  $2.99, DC/Vertigo.

03-29-2007 09;55;15PM.JPG

For all those people out there who inexplicably don’t like Fables … well, this issue isn’t for you, because I can say, without equivocation, that this is the worst issue of the series yet.  So if you’re a Fables-hater (shame on you!), at least you have some ammunition!

So what’s the deal?  Well, this is a series of one- or two-page “jokes” about various Fables based on questions by readers dealing with ancillary stuff that only comic book geeks would obsess over.  The kind of person who would ask “Did Hakim ever manage to get a  regular job?” is the same kind of person who would write a sestina to Sandman.  You remember those, right?  I am not that kind of person, and therefore I recognize Hakim for what he is: a plot device, who, you know, doesn’t exist.  So I don’t really care if he found a regular job or not.

For those of you who think I have no sense of whimsy and no soul, well, that’s probably true, but I do like a lot of whimsical comic books.  I just don’t see the point of a bunch of one-note jokes, many of which aren’t terribly clever.  And I certainly don’t see the point of charging 3 dollars for it.  This might be a good thing to have on a Fables message board, where Willingham can upload drawings to answer the questions of fans, but it’s annoying as an issue of the monthly comic.  The only saving grace is seeing the various artists try their hand at the characters, but that’s what those “gallery” comics that Vertigo used to put out are for.

I wonder if Willingham is going to use any of these “answers” in the real story.  Probably, because he seems to be doing that with some other throwaway stuff.  So this might be redeemed by future stories, but as a single issue, it’s kind of blah.  So yeah, I won’t be using this to convince Fables-haters that they’re missing one of the best comics on the market.  Maybe they won’t notice the skip from issue #58 to 60!

Gamekeeper #1 by Andy Diggle and Mukesh Singh.  $2.99, Virgin Comics.

03-29-2007 09;55;58PM.JPG

While we’re waiting for Guy Ritchie and Madonna to tire of each other so Ritchie can go back to making fun movies instead of Madonna movies, we can at least take some solace in the fact that he actually has some good ideas still, but he’s taking them to Virgin Comics instead of making movies about them.  So there’s that.

Of course, given that Virgin is simply a dumping ground for movie ideas anyway, of course he’d take his ideas to them!  Should I be more offended that Virgin seems to view comics simply as pitches for movies?  I’m not, for a couple of reasons: they produce very nice-looking comics with good talent on them; Marvel is doing the same thing these days, and at least Virgin is up front about it while Joey Q pretends to care about the printed stuff.  So I can live with the fact that whenever I read a Virgin comic, I feel like it was made for a Hollywood executive and not me.  Oh well.

Oh, the book?  Yeah, I guess I can rant about the actual comic.  Diggle has this whole “soldier with a past” thing down cold, and here he gives us a Chechen at a large estate in Scotland, who works as the gamekeeper.  The owner of the estate takes in all sorts of loners and runaways with no questions asked, which is probably not a smart thing to do.  One night a bunch of soldiers break into his house and force him to get something from the safe.  Our gamekeeper (who has the un-Chechen name of Brock) is of course some kind of super-ex-soldier, and he decides to take them down.  We already have some mayhem, but presumably the next issues will offer more, plus revelations from the past!

It’s that sort of comic.  Robert Ludlum would be proud.  It’s beautiful to look at, with Singh doing very well with the landscapes and nice work with the violence, and Diggle’s script hums along, setting up the characters well and keeping it intriguing enough to push us along.  It’s a quick but fun read.

Now, if only Guy Ritchie would remember that he has talent.  That would be nice.

Gødland #17 by Joe Casey and Tom Scioli.  $2.99, Image.

03-29-2007 09;56;41PM.JPG

Well, it’s another issue, and once again I can’t really say much about one of my favorite comics, unless it has an awful misstep (see Fables above).  If you don’t like Gødland, I’m not going to convince you otherwise, and if you haven’t read it yet, pick up issue #16 (for 60 cents!) and get a nice recap.  It’s such a fun comic to read, and I get sad when I finish one, even though I get to anticipate the next one!  I mean, in this issue we get the government making its move on Adam, using an unusual tool; the return of an old friend; Neela appearing to Angie at Battery Park in a cloud of energy, which leads Angie to realize that Adam isn’t crazy; the Tormentor, Basil Discordia, and that weird insect lady making plans to do horrible things; and Ed, Supra, and Eeg-oh continuing their plans to destroy the planet.  It’s packed, and very cool.

You know, like every other issue!

Sam Noir: Ronin Holiday #3 (of 3) by Eric A. Anderson and Manny Trembley.  $2.99, Image/Shadowline.

03-29-2007 09;57;20PM.JPG

Two weeks ago, when the second issue of this mini-series came out, I wrote: “So this becomes a noir samurai detective book with pirates (and an angry rhino) with a voodoo priest (he’s no mime!).  That sound you hear is the rest of your body exploding from so much joy.”  Well, with voodoo, you get zombies!  I’m not the biggest fan of zombies, but when you add it to a book with a noir samurai detective and a pirate, an angry rhino, and a voodoo priest, it’s awesome.  And this book has all that!

There’s not much to say about this book.  There’s mayhem, slaughter, a killer parrot with a fondness for eyeballs, and some depth for our hero.  Anderson and Trembley don’t linger on too much, giving us a bloody two-fisted tale that never allows us to catch our breath.  It’s very fun to read, and Trembley’s moody art fits the pulpy roots of the book perfectly.  I like the idea of releasing these stories as three-issue mini-series (the next one is due in June).  It allows the creative team to make sure they have time to get them done, and it allows quick fun stories even though certain threads continue through the book (Sam’s hunt for the guy who set him up in this series will apparently be the plot of the next one).  This is a kooky and fun comic, and it doesn’t pretend to be anything else.

Here’s a sample: Sam narrates: “I wish I could say that was the first time I’d ever been buried alive.”  First of all, whichever creator came up with that is a genius, and if you chuckled at that line, this book is probably for you.

Unique #1 (of 3) by Dean Motter and Dennis Calero.  $2.99, Platinum Studios Comics.

03-29-2007 09;58;00PM.JPG

This is a not-quite-original idea from Motter (actually, it was created by some dude named Scott Mitchell Rosenberg, who’s the chairman of this new company, but I guess he can’t write) that could make for a very neat mini-series.  Jon Geoffries suffers from insomnia and, when he does sleep, weird dreams.  These dreams start to intrude further into his life when he seemingly at random shifts to what appears to be a different reality.  In his “own” world, he’s being framed by his boss for embezzlement, while in the “new” world, he’s breaking curfew by being out on the street in the middle of the day.  He discovers that it’s one of those quantum physics things, where a new reality splits off every time someone makes a choice, and this is just one other reality, which is similar to his reality except that people sleep during the day and go out at night.  He can shift to the other reality because he has no counterpart in it, which makes him a “unique.”  Usually these people shift during sleep, which is why he has weird dreams, but for some reason, he’s been able to do it consciously.  Before this can be explored, bad guys show up and chase him.  That’s where the book ends.

Motter does a nice job with the whole “weird paranoia” thing that this kind of book relies on, with Jon not understanding the new reality and therefore having bizarre conversations with the people he meets, while back in his reality, the cops are after him for the embezzlement thing.  It’s not really clear what the point of this book is going to be – will it be some external threat to both realities, or will it be something more personal to Jon? – but in this issue, Motter is obviously concerned with two things: setting the mood, and explaining the parallel reality thing.  He does both pretty well.

Calero’s art looks more stylized than it was when he was doing X-Factor, presumably because he had more time for it.  He helps set the mood nicely, with strange dreamscapes and a nice sense of the strange in the other reality (which is called Penumbra, by the way).  The art is slightly Art Deco in the surroundings (not in the people), which lends a nice off-kilter feel to it.  Calero, however, has some problems with movement, as whenever his figures are drawn moving, they look very stilted and uncomfortable.  It’s a very “posed” kind of book (which makes me think it was photo-referenced, although I can’t “place” any of the characters, so maybe they’re nobodies), and like all of those kinds of artists, the fluidity of moving characters is the worst part of the book.  A lot of the book looks very nice, so when it does occur, it’s jarring.  Of course, there aren’t any giant wolf heads in the book, either, so that’s a plus!

This is a pretty neat book with some intriguing possibilities.  Motter seems to do well with this kind of thing, so it will be interesting to see where he goes with it.  It’s 3 dollars for 48 pages, which is a selling point, so if it sounds like your thing, hunt it down and check it out.

Usagi Yojimbo #101 by Stan Sakai.  $2.99, Dark Horse.

03-29-2007 09;58;42PM.JPG

The choice for what the commenters would pick for me came down to this and Blue Beetle, and I chose this, mainly because I didn’t simply want to read another superhero comic.  Blue Beetle will have to wait!

I have always heard good things about Usagi Yojimbo, and so I thought it would be neat to read.  Now that I have, I’m kind of on the fence about it.  I enjoyed it, but I’m not unequivocal about my enjoyment.  It has a strange charm to it, probably because these are rabbits and other animals as samurai in medieval Japan, which is weird enough to work.  Sakai’s art is very cartoonish but very detailed and intricate, and it’s actually quite beautiful in some places, especially when Demon Usagi and Lady Tomoe fight to the death.  It’s strange looking at the book, because you don’t expect something that often looks silly (mainly in the characters’ faces, and not even all the time) to be so well composed and interesting.  Sakai obviously is a master of the cartooning form, which is good to see.

The story is slight, as Usagi defends Chizu, the leader of a ninja clan, who is being attacked by her own men.  As he defends her, he’s poisoned and has to be dragged away by Chizu.  She gets him to a hut and tends to his wounds, and he has a dream in which he is a demon killing his way through a castle, and only Lady Tomoe stands in his way.  This leads to a marvelous sword fight that is the highlight of the book (moreso than when Usagi fights the ninja earlier) and which helps break Usagi’s fever.  Chizu leaves him to lead the bad ninja away, and when Usagi wakes up, he hears the voice of Mayumi, a girl he left behind because being around him was too dangerous.  He’s glad to hear her, but he probably shouldn’t be, as Mayumi isn’t there by choice!

I’m sure I’d understand more about what was going on if I had read the earlier issues, but it’s not that hard to figure out.  It’s a charming book, but I’m not sure what the significance of the dream is, and it feels significant.  Like a lot of long-running series, however, beyond a certain point it feels impenetrable.  I’m just wondering how much I’d have to know to fully enjoy the book, or if we’ve never seen any of these people before and it doesn’t matter.

I can’t completely say it’s a success.  I enjoyed it, and I might pick up the next issue to see what’s going on more fully, but it also didn’t make a ton of sense to a neophyte like me.  Perhaps in the context of the larger story, it does.  We’ll see next time, because I’ll probably check it out, which is all you can ask of a comic: does it make you want to come back?  This one does, although I can’t guarantee I’ll stay.

Virulents by Shamik Dasgupta and Dean Ruben Hyrapiet.  $4.99, Virgin Comics.

03-29-2007 09;59;23PM.JPG

Here’s another comic that reads like a movie pitch, but unfortunately, it doesn’t work quite as well as Gamekeeper.  As a comic, it’s perfectly fine as a low-rent action movie, one that might show up on the Sci-Fi Channel and star Kevin Dillon and Grant Heslov in the main Indian role.  Unfortunately, that doesn’t make it terribly good.

The underlying story is fine, but the execution is lacking.  A joint American/Indian patrol is in Afghanistan, looking for a group of American soldiers who have disappeared.  The Indian contingent has an ulterior motive, too, but it’s not important to divulge it.  They stumble across something horrific, and in true action movie fashion, their numbers are pared down quickly.  It’s bloody and horrible, but Dasgupta doesn’t really give us much beyond people getting slaughtered.  And that’s a shame, because there are two interesting ideas in this book: the American commanding officer is horribly racist, and treats the Indian commanding officer with no respect (so of course they end up the last survivors).  The cultural and religious divide is touched on, but not in any meaningful way.  And the things that attack the soldiers are sort-of vampires.  I’m not a huge fan of vampire stories, but these creatures are linked to the Hindu myth of Raktaveej, a “blood demon” whose most impressive ability was that when his blood was spilled, each drop became a “clone” and took on his aspect.  It makes them somewhat hard to kill, and an extreme solution (which is presented early in the book, so there’s little suspense) is called for.  The idea of the blood demons isn’t really fully realized, either, and that’s disappointing.  One of the coolest things about the first 12 issues of Matt Wagner’s Grendel series was that the vampire was Japanese, and therefore exhibited some differences from what we think of vampires.  Dasgupta has a great chance to do the same thing here, but because this is a short action-movie pitch, it never goes beyond that.  There’s an interesting and possibly relevant four-issue mini-series lurking within this one-shot, but it’s not going to get a chance to come out.

So it’s a shoot-’em-up with monsters.  If that’s your thing, you might try it, but it never goes beyond that, and that weakens it and it never rises to the level of good.  Too bad.

Well, that’s another week of comic goodness.  Thanks for your suggestions.  They’re always appreciated!

32 Comments

Guy Ritchie ISN’T making Madonna movies anymore- last I heard she’d given up the screen. Ritchie came out with REVOLVER in 2005. (And on the subject of Miss M: I’d still hit it.)

I thought that actually WAS Bane. Didn’t look quite the same, but coulda been a redesign. Then again, I don’t suppose he was ever a cop.

Hey Greg,

Manny here again.
Glad you liked it. Eric and I are having a lot of fun making these.

Just a heads up for ya. And all those who read this.
The Sam Noir coming in June is the collected 6 issues. With some bonus stuff.
We will have a new Sam series coming Fallish.

We also have an OGN (not Sam Noir) coming out in Aug. and I have a 2 issue series (two 48 page books)coming out in Sept/Oct. The ad on the back of Ronin Holiday issue 3. :)

Just thought I’d clarify that June thing for ya.

Thanks again for picking up our book.

-Manny

You generally have to stick with Usagi stories from beginning to end (they usually only last a couple issues). Sakai tends to start off simply and start building on the plot as they progress. You do appreciate the characters more when you follow them for the beginning but most of the stories are pretty easy to understand. Wouldn’t hurt to pick up a trade or two (be nice to get them in order but not necessary). Grasscutter is my favotite. “Travels with Jotaro” and “Fathers and Son” are really strong as well.

I kind of feel like Dark Horse needs to do some Usagi Omnibus editions like they are doing with Star Wars, Aliens and Buffy to get the large back catalog. 500 page Usagi books would help maange that large back catalog. Something like that big Bone book.

Well, Grant pretty much summed up what I was gonna say. I don’t think it’s impenetrable but I understand you’d get that idea. If after the story you still think you’re missing something than you could pick up one or two trades and you’ll be going along fine.

Greg! I agree with almost everything you said this week! Nice.

But, even though I was equivocal about my Blue Beetle recommendation, it turned out to be a good issue this week. I think you would have enjoyed it more than Usagi Yojimbo.

I might be so bold as to say Blue Beetle was BEST OF THE WEEK (beating out Morrison’s Batman, if you can believe I’d say that).

My one disagreement: That Brubaker somehow did wrong by returning to the status quo in Daredevil. There’s a reason that these stati quo last so long; because you can tell a lot of stories about DD with a secret identity, and very few without. (As you all roll your eyes and say, “Oh, Lord, he’s off on this again…”)

Without the secret identity, you don’t have the lawyer thing, which takes out most of your supporting cast, which leaves you with…powers, crime-fighting, and very little else. All the things that you use to get Daredevil into stories get slash-and-burned without the secret identity. (Sort of like taking away the photographer thing from Peter Parker…or the supporting cast…or the secret identity…or Aunt May…)

Changed my mind. Don’t want to talk about Marvel’s current comics anymore. It just depresses and irritates me. So, have you read ‘Essential Iron Fist’? It’s freaking awesome. Vintage Claremont/Byrne comics from the same time as they were doing X-Men, only it’s got kung fu. (And Captain America, Iron Man, and yes, a great X-Men guest spot that continuity wonks could probably pin-point where it fit into…oh, and the first appearance of Sabretooth. Even back then, they were laying the groundwork for the Sabretooth/Wolverine thing.)

It always tickles me when Mr. Seavey shows up all excited about a new Essential. It’s NOT just me being a geezer, you guys. A lot of that stuff really WAS better-constructed than this decompressed padded-for-the-trade crap.

I didn’t realize Ritchie had made another movie. This is what happens when you have a couple of small children and your social life revolves around Sesame Street.

Bane is running Santa Prisca, not that Morrison would care, but I don’t think he’d use such a lame villain. He’d make up his own lame villain!

Sorry, Manny – I saw the ad in the back of the book and didn’t realize it was the collected edition. I hope it sells well.

I don’t have that big of a problem with returning Daredevil to his status quo, John, if Brubaker writes good stories, which he’s certainly capable of doing. The Bendis run was so interesting, though, with how he managed everything, and I was kind of hoping Brubaker would continue with that. I understand the pseudo-reset, but whenever the status quo is restored after a good change (which I would argue Bendis’ was), it’s a bit disappointing.

Except that Bendis left DD hanging at the end of a tragedy, really — outed, with exactly two supporting cast members of note (Foggy and Milla), disbarred as an attorney (again), in jail awaiting a rigged trial, stuck with his greatest enemies, and nearly insane. That pretty much begs for some sort of rebuilding by the next writer.

If nothing else, you have to get him out of jail…and once he’s out, he’s a publicly exposed vigilante, perhaps a fugitive, with no even remotely logical reason to continue wearing Daredevil’s costume, since he can only get himself in more trouble. So you might lose Hell’s Kitchen and, other than makiing Matt outright delusional, you definitely lose Daredevil as well.

Alternately, I suppose we could’ve gotten Matt winning his trial, but that’s as much a reversion from the final status in Bendis’s run as having him escape was. And even so, the entire “law-justice” dichotomy is lost, since Matt is quite literally now stuck on the vigilante side of the equation if he’s to function as Daredevil, the Codename that Titles the Comic…I mean, Daredevil, the Man Without Fear.

Bendis’s overarching story of Matt Murdock’s fall was quite good, despite some very slapdash arcs in the second half, but it ended with…well, the sort of definitive The End that didn’t really set up much in the way of future stories. A reversion of some sort or another was simply necessary for anyone writing the comic after Bendis.

Virulents was a disappointing mess of a story, full of half-cocked stereotypes, the slightest of connections to the underlying Raktaveej myth, and clearly meant to be a movie pitch aimed at the likes of Brian Bosworth. Dark Horse’s Damn Nation covered similar ground in much better fashion a couple of years back.

You missed out on a solid issue of Blue Beetle this week, BTW, as Rogers offered up a perfect entry for new readers, and I highly encourage you to pick it up next Wednesday.

“A lot of that stuff really WAS better-constructed than this decompressed padded-for-the-trade crap.”

Very true. I was just reading some old Stern stuff in Essential Spectacular Spider-Man and was struck how dense (in the good way) the stories were. Each single issue would probably be stretched over three these days.

[Bruce] gives a Waynetech card to one of the younger hookers

Well, I look forward to that turning up again when the young lady in question is mangled by the Fantom Flan-Flinger, or whatever.

Dude! You were JUST in JAIL for KILLING your GIRLFRIEND. Quit handing out your MSN handle to hookers!

//\Oo/\\

Glad someone else appreciates Catwoman. It’s (very) quietly one of the most consistently entertaining books produced by the Big Two. Fun, generally self-contained story arcs that still contain an overall line of compelling character development and drama. And the best execution of the one year later concept that was fumbled by 95% of DC writers. Folks who are afraid of getting sucked into a “Bat-book” needn’t worry and should check it out. Those that left with Cooke, Stewart or Bru should come on back. Please? I like this book too much to see it canceled, or worse, “re-imagined”.

I did a great job of explaining what was wrong with Kubert’s work–the problem is on your end. I think it basically comes down to composition and perspective. He draws objects out of proportion and his figures appear in panels at really odd angles. It gives his art a sense of weightlessness, made all the more apparent by his heavily rendered style (which somehow still seems unconvincing in its details).

Agreed on Fables.

Actually, Dick, that’s much better than your other explanation. As far as I can see, the bottom half of his figures are all there in the action scenes, and other than the weirdly poor table manners of the couple in the foreground in one panel, his restaurant looks fine, as does his Alpine panorama. This brief explanation is much better!

That’s basically what I said, if you read very closely and use your imagination.

Further clarification: Andy Kubert tends to compose panels from really funky angles, and then places objects within the panels at odd and seemingly incorrect angles. Take a look at the splash page or the restaurant scene or the tied up body in the shower. None of this seems to sync up. I suspect it’s a problem of perspective combined with a poor sense of mise-en-scene, but I’m sure someone who knows more about art and film would have a better answer.

Furthermore: his faces are really terrible (especially the pimp, who bizarre, quasi-golfing attire also makes me question Kubert’s sense of clothing design) and his storytelling is a confusing (it’s hard to follow the scene where Batman is using the pimp’s own switchblade to pin him to a wall). And the panel where the lower half of the body disappears is the first one below the double page splash where Batman swings in and kicks someone in the face. I suppose that the figure in the foreground could be blocking out the background character’s legs, but that would mean the latter is flying toward the ground at a pretty severe angle, which would necessitate his standing on a garbage can when Batman kicked him.

The whole thing is baffling given that Kubert is a trained artist. I mean, he teaches at his father’s school, right? I really get the idea that Andy Kubert uses limited photo reference and doesn’t spend much time composing his pages before he starts drawing on the Bristol board. The whole thing really kind of puts the lie to Christopher Butcher’s recent spiel about aspiring artists needing to learn their craft. I mean, this guy TEACHES OTHER PEOPLE HOW TO MAKE COMICS, for Chrissakes.

I never thought I’d see the day where I was truly disappointed with an issue of Fables. The Burning Questions story was such a good idea, and could have done so much, but instead it reads like a bunch of scenes where Bill Willingham jumps out and says “Gotcha!” at the end. I felt like I’d learned nothing and I didn’t even find the gags very funny. Now I’m about the biggest Fables fan around, so it pains me to say that. Ah well. At least the next arc should be great.

Glad you went with Usagi Yojimbo, even if it didn’t completely grab you. After reading the issue, I can sorta see why – the story probably would have worked better if you knew Usagi’s history with Chizu and Tomoe. I really enjoyed the issue (as I usually do), but I can see why it wasn’t exactly the series’ best “jumping on point” for new readers.

I do hope you give it another shot in the future, though! I fully agree with Grant’s suggestions for trade paperbacks, should you want to go that route at some point.

FunkyGreenJerusalem

March 30, 2007 at 3:56 pm

“The choice for what the commenters would pick for me came down to this and Blue Beetle, and I chose this, mainly because I didn’t simply want to read another superhero comic. Blue Beetle will have to wait!”

Grab the first trade man, it’s good fun.

“I didn’t realize Ritchie had made another movie. This is what happens when you have a couple of small children and your social life revolves around Sesame Street.”

I don’t think anyone knew – me and my mates were huge Ritchie fans after Lock, Stock but I’ve never heard mention of this film being released. I thought it was forthcoming.

” So, have you read ‘Essential Iron Fist’? It’s freaking awesome. Vintage Claremont/Byrne comics from the same time as they were doing X-Men, only it’s got kung fu. (And Captain America, Iron Man, and yes, a great X-Men guest spot that continuity wonks could probably pin-point where it fit into…oh, and the first appearance of Sabretooth. Even back then, they were laying the groundwork for the Sabretooth/Wolverine thing.)”

I remember as a young lad in the 90′s really digging the book ‘Sabretooth Classic’ which reprinted Sabretooths appearences in order of release. I liked it less for Sabretooth and more for the Powerman/Iron Fist stuff.

Hilariously, when I first an issue, in a newsagent, I brought X-men Unlimited #4 instead.
And some random guy, who was also looking at comics, told me that I should get Sabretooth Classic #1 instead because it was a #1, and was cheaper, so it would go up in value quicker.
That’s right, some idiot decided to tell a 12 year old to pick comics based on the potential to go up in price value.
I nodded, waited for him to leave, and brought the X-men book (I got the Sabretooth a few weeks later when there wasn’t much else going).
Ironically enough, according to Wizard that X-men issue did go up in value by a few bucks, because of the story that happend within.
The Sabretooth REPRINT book did not (but that wasn’t why I’d brought it anyway).
So kids, don’t listen to strangers hanging by the comic book stand.
They’re probably a moron.

Revolver came out in the UK some time last year, I believe, I just think it’s taking so long to come over to America because I believe I heard that the Brits gave it an even worse reception than they did the Swept Away remake.

My defense, by the way, whenever anyone says I’m being “nostalgic” when I wax rhapsodic about these old comics and their storytelling virtues as opposed to modern books (and I’m not saying modern books are bad–just that the past has much to teach the present, just as the present has much to teach the past)…

…anyway, my defense is that it can’t be nostalgia, because I didn’t read this stuff as a kid. This is the first time I’m reading Power Man, Iron Fist, Marvel Team-Up (which I wouldn’t have been caught dead reading as a kid–at the time, I thought it was lame that it was always Spider-Man and someone else.) And as for ‘Showcase Presents’…every single one of those, that’s me reading it for the first time. If I like it, it’s because it’s good.

(Or because it’s so bad it’s funny. “Duck Decoy Arrow”? “Fake Uranium Arrow”? “Cat Arrow”? “Mascara Arrow”? And don’t get me started on Aquaman…although I was surprised at how much I liked Quisp. Grant Morrison has much to answer for.)

FunkyGreenJerusalem

March 30, 2007 at 5:29 pm

“And don’t get me started on Aquaman…although I was surprised at how much I liked Quisp.”

Is that one actually readable? Even just for laughs?

I flicked through it and the stories didn’t seem all that great, and I didn’t spot any laugh out funny moments (even so bad it’s funny type one’s), like I get when I read Elongated Man or Haunted Tank.

I actually picked up Unique being an old school Mister X fan and I didn’t find the artwork stiff at all. Maybe your’e just used to cartoon movement, but to my eye, it looked normal.

“Glad someone else appreciates Catwoman. It’s (very) quietly one of the most consistently entertaining books produced by the Big Two. … And the best execution of the one year later concept that was fumbled by 95% of DC writers.”

Yes! What he said.

Also, Pfiefer’s skill on Catwoman is why I’ll be buying Amazons Attack, although DC seems to have mucked up everything else about Wonder Woman in the past two years — a shame, since I think Rucka had done a really great job with her book, better than we’ve seen in years. But Amazons will be a shot for Will Pfiefer (did I spell that right?) to really run with a (potentially) high-profile title. It will be fascinating to see if he can still pull off such an ace comic when handling a much more corporate-directed storyline.

You’re rather correct about Daredevil being long and drawn out, it’s just building up to something better, hopefully.

and maybe, just maybe it’ll be more exciting than its predecessors.

Even though I don’t think Batman #664 is the best of the week, I gave it a bit of an analysis today:

http://geniusboyfiremelon.blogspot.com

Morrison must have something up his sleeve with this “Black Casebook” storyline, and as a first issue of a new arc, it certainly poses some interesting questions.

Oh, and I don’t hate Kubert’s art either. I think it’s perfectly good in this issue, but I don’t talk about the art at all in my pseudo-analysis.

“Revolver came out in the UK some time last year, I believe, I just think it’s taking so long to come over to America because I believe I heard that the Brits gave it an even worse reception than they did the Swept Away remake. ”

It has no american distributor and from what I understand is unlike to get a theatrical one. It was more or less unanimous hated by everyone when it played in the festival circuit and not only by critics. After that it sort of disappeared, I guess it will show up on DVD one day, but I got the feeling that by this point even Ritchie is trying to distance himself from it and yes it got a lot of reviews like “it’s actually worse than Swept Away!”.

As for giving the hooker a card, I think Dr. Mid-Nite pulled that one in one of the later issues of Johns’ JSA, when the team was in St. Roch. Come to think of it, he spent a lot of time in the first issue of the Dr. Mid-Nite mini distributing condoms and health advice to the hookers of Portsmouth.

Hmmm…. no wonder that thing with Black Canary didn’t work out.

“As for giving the hooker a card, I think Dr. Mid-Nite pulled that one in one of the later issues of Johns’ JSA, when the team was in St. Roch.”

First part of Black Reign, as I recall.

Makes me wonder if that’s prevalent enough to be a cliche. The superhero showing his compassionate side by telling a hooker to clean up her life, I mean.

In a way, I kind of preferred Cross’ “Midnight Doctor” shtick from the mini, in that it showed a much more pragmatic, “harms-reduction” approach to the issue that you don’t see that often in superhero comics.

I remember bat woman and super girl from the past wasn’t she ,supermans cousin ,or something so they won’t have been able to marry . They both had quiet a few really neat adventures . I also remember Archie with Betty and Verinico I haven’t seen the Archie comics in years .Was batwoman related to batman I cannot remember .I also remember the superwomen comics which were quiet good if I remember.

Nice post. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m impressed!
Very useful information particularly the last part :
) I care for such information a lot. I was looking for this certain information for a very
long time. Thank you and good luck.

Leave a Comment

 

Categories

Review Copies

Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.

Browse the Archives