CBR Live! Archive
How Civil War could have worked
- by Greg Burgas
- in General
Of course, some people think it worked just fine!
Anyway, I still haven't read Civil War beyond brief glimpses of it at the comic book shoppe (I did read the final issue completely, but none of the others), but I think I know how it could have been good. Other, smarter bloggers than I have reviewed the whole thing and some have even put forward proposals on how it could have worked, but I haven't seen my proposal mentioned, so if it has been, please let me know. I'm sure you will!
I thought of this a while ago, but was actually reminded of it after thinking about Operation: Zero Tolerance when I was reading Cable #40. Operation: Zero Tolerance was kind of a complete mess, but it started well and could have been saved if the people running Marvel back then hadn't completely cocked it up. But it gives us an interesting template on how something like this might be able to work.
Okay, Civil War. A mess of a crossover, for any number of reasons. One: lateness. McNiven's unbelievably detailed art takes forever, and the shipping schedule of the seven issues meant that all the tie-in issues were screwed up as well. Civil War sold by the boatloads, of course, so in the end it did well for Marvel, but I wonder how much ill will they created among retailers and among comics fans themselves who were not only waiting for the main story, but all the ancillary books too. The titles got a Civil War bump, to use the parlance, but I wonder if the fans will stick around because they're grumpy with the way Marvel strung them along. Marvel, elated by its success, has two big events coming up in 2007 alone, with the Hulk War and some Mutant Mess later on. I imagine that they will run those crossovers the same way they did Civil War, and I wonder how long it will take for diminishing returns to kick it. They ought to run the events my way!
So, what is my way?  Who the hell am I, to think I could run a crossover better than the All-Mighty Joey Q? Well, it just seems to me that there's a better way to involve the entire Marvel Universe in something and still keep the titles relatively independent. So bear with me, as I once again play Grand Poobah of a major comic book publishing company!
Civil War begins because of the Superhuman Registration Act, right (or whatever it's called)? The New Warriors fight Nitro, Nitro blows up a school, children die, outraged citizens demand that the government do something, the law goes into effect, Captain America gets peeved. It isn't that revelatory to mention that the government has been doing stuff like this with mutants for years, but now it's for reals! Mayhem and death follow, with Marvel using the crossover to cull some of its black characters (because who needs them, right?). And Tony and Reed become über-dicks.
The Act itself isn't the problem. Many people have ranted about keeping real-world politics out of superhero comics, because the two just don't go and it destroys our suspension of disbelief. I have no problem with it as long as it's done well (which should be the criterion for anything). The Act is introduced in a moment of hot tempers on both sides. I understand that it's supposed to be like the Patriot Act, and that Marvel is making some sort of statement about the country after 9/11. But let's consider the Patriot Act. Even a good solid liberal like me, who thinks the Patriot Act is one of the most odious pieces of legislation passed in this country in the past 50 years or so, has to admit that it doesn't affect everyone all that much. For all I know, the FBI could be tapping my phone, but they haven't broken down my door yet. The Superhero Registration Act would have an even smaller effect on the Marvel Universe. If I'm generous, I'd say there are no more than 1000 superpowered people in the Marvel U. - that we know about, of course (I don't own Marvel Handbooks, so I have no clue if this is correct, but I'd bet the number isn't much larger than 2000). Of those, half of them (it seems) live in New York City. So Roy in Dubuque doesn't really give a flying fuck if the government cracks down on superpowered people. "Let those assholes beat the shit out of each other," Roy says. "I'm just wondering what happened to my solid union manufacturing job and why no one speaks English anymore." Roy just doesn't care. The Superhuman Registration Act is a tiny piece of legislation that has no impact whatsoever on the vast majority of people in the Marvel Universe.
What's my point? My point is, legislation gets passed all the time in this country that no one knows about.  We have become much more secretive in government (due largely to the amorphous and politically handy threat of terrorists, but even before 9/11, we were moving that way) and our politicians have become much more separated from the regular folk. It costs over $10,000 to run for a simple Congressional seat, for crying out loud, and most people don't have that kind of dough lying around. So politicians, the ruling class, do whatever the hell they want, knowing that there will be few ramifications. With regard to the Superhuman Registration Act, here's how it could work:
The Act gets introduced by some ambitious young congressperson. Maybe, like Senator Kelly, his wife was killed in a superhuman brawl. Maybe he's jealous because he was next in line to get the super-soldier serum.  Maybe Elektra stole her boyfriend. I don't know - things get passed all the time for petty reasons. The point is, it doesn't have to be something as earth-shattering as a school blowing up. It can be, but it doesn't have to be. This would probably get big headlines, but all a congressperson would have to do is point out the horrific property damage and deaths that have resulted from previous superhuman fights without creating a new one. That way it ties into greater Marvel continuity. Depending on which hero this might affect the most (I would have said Captain America back in the day, but that's not how Brubaker is really writing him these days), have the announcement come in that book. Probably New Avengers, because the group has often been tied to the government.
The point is: the Superhuman Registration Act is now the law of the land, and it affects very few people. If Joey Q and Tom Brevoort and any other of the editors working at Marvel had any control over their creators, they could just send out a memo explaining the tenets of the law and tell their writers to keep it in mind. It's a fait accompli, and they just have to deal with it. Each writer could deal with it in their own way, keeping in mind that it's the law. Some of the best Civil War arguments one way or another have been in the ancillary titles - She-Hulk, X-Factor, Moon Knight. Instead of getting Clor and giant black men in chains and Captain America punking out, these books and others have actually had people debate the merits of the book and integrated them into the story that they are working on. A superhero in his own book - Spider-Man, for instance - could decide to reveal his identity. Another - She-Hulk, for instance - could argue cases about the ramifications of the law. Marc Spector and Frank Castle could ignore it. Other heroes could wrestle with their conscience over what they should do.
How is this any different from the actual mini-series and the connecting titles? One big difference: there is no big mini-series, at least not yet. And this stuff plays out over a while, say two years in real time. I'm thinking of the American Civil War as an analogy - we can argue causes all we want, but it really came down to slavery, and the government wrestled with the problem of slavery for decades, even back to the founding of the republic. This would be the same thing. I certainly wouldn't let it go too long - that's part of what killed Operation: Zero Tolerance - but I would let things simmer. One thing Zero Tolerance did right is keep Bastion in the shadows for a while, as various things happened to the X-Men that were inexplicable at that time but made sense once the scope of Bastion's plan was revealed. This would be right out in the open - there's a law against unregistered superhumans - but there are a lot of ways writers could go with it. In the mini-series, why is Tony such a tool? It seems to come out of nowhere (again, I haven't read it in any depth, so give me some slack) and I know he's a businessman, and all businessmen are pure evil, so of course he'd support it! Why does Reed support it? There's that junk about his uncle being wrong in the 1950s, but except for Ann Coulter, does anyone really think supporting Joe McCarthy was a good idea? If in Iron Man Tony's mindset was explored in more detail, and if in Fantastic Four Reed's thought process was made more clear, then we would understand them more instead of just thinking they're dicks.
This could also work to show the unintended consequences of the law. I'm a big fan of unintended consequences, because so often our legislators don't even consider them when passing laws. One of my favorites was actually passed by Arizonans in the form of a proposition on our ballot a few years ago. The writer of the proposition is a racist jerkwad who hates illegal immigrants and wanted to show them that they can't invade our country! But he couldn't appear to be a racist jerkwad, so he wrote a proposition denying state benefits to anyone - not just Mexican and other swarthy immigrants - without a valid ID. Everyone voted for it, because a lot of people in Arizona don't like swarthy people dating their white daughters. Of course, not long after the proposition was enshrined in law, we got a ton of Katrina refugees to Arizona, none of whom had - wait for it! - a valid ID. So technically, they couldn't receive any benefits while they were here. The writer of the law protested that that wasn't his intent, but still, he should have simply written something about denying benefits to anyone whose last name sounded Hispanic. The point is, this Superhuman Registration Act could have consequences beyond what the government expects. A writer in one of the books could have the star of the book not help someone because of the law, and that person could die. Yes, a "hero" wouldn't stand idly by and let someone die because of a stupid law, but it would make for an interesting story. Or maybe the hero doesn't even stand by, just hesitates enough so that someone is horribly crippled. Yes, I'm getting macabre, but these are the kinds of things that could come up. It would make people consider what kind of law has been passed, and whether they should have thought about it a bit more. Marvel could also do a story similar to the New Warriors thing - an unregistered superhero could cause major damage, which would lead a bunch of people to switch sides. Or maybe even a registered hero could cause damage, which would lead to a bunch of people questioning whether the law isn't severe enough.
This should go on for a few years. Not too long to make it boring, but not too short to make it come out of nowhere. Civil War as it stands now is just the beginning of the conflict, but, if we go back to the American Civil War, that was the end of long-running tension. One of the problems people had with the mini-series is that everything seemed to come out of nowhere. Well, if we did it my way, there would be context to the series. The editors could sit down with the writers and say, "Okay, we need people on both sides of this issue. Tony Stark is going to be on the government's side. Over the next year or two, you [whoever's writing the book] need to give him a good reason for being on the government's side." That person could still write the stories he wanted, but with the idea that eventually Tony would have to pick a side, and that side would be pro-registration. This takes some of the freedom out of the writer's hands, of course, but you know what? screw 'em. They're working for Marvel, so they have to play by Marvel's rules. If you don't like it, go create your own damned superheroes. So Joey Q and his merry band show us both sides of the story, with actual development of heroes' views. Yes, there would be editorial oversight, because when you think about it, I doubt if very few writers would want their particular hero to be pro-registration. But it's not that difficult to do. Robert E. Lee is a sympathetic character in the Civil War even though he was fighting for the wrong side. So Tony Stark could be a sympathetic character even though he supports the Act (that's if you believe it's the "wrong side").
After a year or two of this, then we could get the big event mini-series.  First of all, it could be longer and it could come out on time.  With the right editorial control, Millar and McNiven could have a much greater lead time to write and draw the damned thing, and they could make it a bit longer (anywhere from 1-3 issues longer, which is about the limit).  I don't have a big problem with the Stamford disaster being the casus belli, but if it happened after the long build-up, it would have more context. The law would already be in effect, and perhaps this could be the last straw for someone like Stark. Instead of using this to create the law, he could use it to strictly enforce the law. And maybe this gives Captain America pause, because it's obvious that, for the most part, the law is working. But he still has his reasons. Maybe someone close to him is jailed and killed while in prison. Maybe someone he knows is jailed even though they are registered. We certainly haven't seen anyone unjustly imprisoned in the United States ever, but it could happen, couldn't it? This adds a personal level to an abstract argument. To go back to the American Civil War, it's a cliché to speak of "brother fighting brother," but it happened. Sure, in Civil War, long-time friends fought each other, but it was more as a plot contrivance. All the moves the characters make would have a year or two of stories backing up why they did it. And it wouldn't be such a mess.
And the ending? I'm not sure how the "fix" the ending. Joey Q wants the Act to be the law of the Marvel land, obviously, but that doesn't change the fact that it's a lousy law. There is no reason for Captain America to quit the way he does right now. I look back on the parallel of Robert E. Lee, who simply ran out of money and didn't want anyone else to die. So Tony and his sadistic group of "heroes" would have to slaughter quite a good number of Marvel characters to make it believable that Cap would just quit like he does. I don't really have that big of a problem with Cap quitting, but the motivation doesn't seem to be there. The Marvel Universe has to be bled white for surrender to make much sense. I don't want to get bloodthirsty, but maybe unregistered superheroes are getting into too many situations where civilians get killed. I don't recall much in Civil War that gives us any clue as to how the "normal" people are reacting. I know that Jenkins wrote that Frontline thing, but did that show how Roy in Dubuque felt about the fisticuffs in New York? If it's becoming obvious that what Cap is doing is bad for the country (and let's not use people from 11 September, because that's the height of schlockiness, especially the way Giuliani treated them), then I don't have a problem with the surrender. Cap's decision comes out of nowhere, though - it should be something he's considering for a while. This is where having two years of stories about how the Marvel Universe reacts to the law and giving Millar a bit longer to tell the story of the final conflict comes into play. Millar has grown increasingly rockstar-esque in recent years, but the man can write a story when he wants to. So give him a few more issues, give him a bit more time (wasn't he deathly ill for a while recently?), and allow him to at least make an attempt at explaining Cap's surrender. As it stands, it's lame.
I realize that the book, with all its problems, still was like printing money for Joey Q and his unholy minions, but I very much doubt that, like some big "event" comics, this will stand the test of time, because despite a lot of "holyshitthat'sfuckingawesome!" moments, it really doesn't make a whole lot of sense. I very much doubt that, even with the "registration," Tony and Reed would suggest using a complete sociopath like Bullseye for their team. And I still don't get Clor. In twenty years, are we really going to speak of Civil War in the same reverential tones we speak of Crisis on Infinite Earths or Secret War? It's possible, but I think it's more highly likely it will be accorded X-Cutioner's Song status. Maybe Onslaught. Without much context for the entire series, and with Hulk's War and the next X-Men "event" coming up, I doubt if this will have a lot of long-term resonance. But it's still a great idea. Hell, it was a great idea when Senator Kelly came up with it twenty years ago and it only applied to mutants. As I've seen in the marginal titles, there is a lot of room for good debate over the issue. It would have been nice to see Joey Q take a longer view of the situation. I know he's desperate for money right now to support his baseball cap habit (those 1924 Senators caps don't come cheap, you know!), but it seems like this cash grab cost him a lot of goodwill among retailers and readers. We'll see.
Of course, this could all be moot. Some people don't give a rat's ass about the Marvel U. and think that each title should have its own continuity. I've written before that I have no strong feelings toward having a "universe" or not, and I would have no problem if Brubaker kills Professor Xavier off in Uncanny X-Men while Carey keeps him alive in X-Men ... as long as it's clear that they exist in two different realities, neither of which is the "true" Marvel U. However, that probably wouldn't work because of all the screaming from the fans, and Joey Q is not the maverick to try it. I just love that Joey Q tries to have it both ways - pandering to the continuity nerd in all of us but ignoring it when it suits him. Civil War demanded a tighter hold on the reins of the writers and artists of the Marvel stable, but it just didn't get it. I think it could have been an excellent examination of the superhero ethos and could have shed new light on what makes someone a hero. What did we get instead? Lloyd Bentsen references and Captain America acting surprised when Frank Castle acts like a psychopath. Good job, Marvel.
Maybe now that the big "war" is over, Marvel writers and editors will explore the ramifications of the law in greater detail. Or they could just forget it exists, because it's too much of a hassle. I wonder which option they'll pick.
- Posted on April 4, 2007 @ 01:56 PM






44 Comments
Michael
April 4, 2007 at 2:23 pm
The problem with your proposal, Greg, is that it's long-term and slow boil, and Marvel wants immediate and explosive. If they took this idea to the suits and said it was guaranteed to raise sales astronomically eight quarters from now, all they'd get back in return was "Fuck you, I've got stockholders breathing down my neck *now*."
I'm not saying you're wrong about it being a better idea artistically, but it'd never fly.
The Dane
April 4, 2007 at 2:26 pm
Wasn't Senator Kelly's wife actually killed in a superhuman brawl?
Matt Jackson
April 4, 2007 at 2:49 pm
really?
you know, I think you should go back and read some Marvel books from the years preceeding Civil War so you can see how it all panned out. I would suggest:
Fantastic Four - Authoritive Action
Avengers disassembled
Secret War
Young Avengers - Sidekicks
Captain America - Winter Solider 1
New Avengers - Breakout
New Avengers - Sentry
New Warriors - reality show (or whatever that newest NW series was called)
House of M
Road to Civil War
All in that order. That's a good two years of build-up to the environment that was at the begining of CW.
Also, you might want to try actually reading the story for yourself. It might help you from putting your foot in your mouth again.
Greg Burgas
April 4, 2007 at 2:50 pm
Yes, she was. Uncanny X-Men #281. Not a good thing, to be a female ancillary character in the Marvel U.
I know that the "suits" might not approve, Michael, but I wonder how much DC cut into Marvel's dominance in the market with Infinite Crisis, which Civil War was kind of a panicked reaction to (Joey Q has kind of admitted as much). Marvel still does better business, I think, so this seems just like a bit of freaking out. I could be wrong.
Matt Bird
April 4, 2007 at 3:01 pm
Actually, that was in UXM #147. And why write an epic post evaluating a comic you haven't read? How long does it take to read a comic book?
Matt Bird
April 4, 2007 at 3:02 pm
Whoops, make that UXM #247. Sorry.
Greg Burgas
April 4, 2007 at 3:06 pm
Thanks, Matt! I'm not really sure what the compulsion is for people to be such dicks when they disagree with someone, but whatever.
If you really think that Joey Q had it that together to plan that whole thing, be my guest. Yes, we could go back twenty-five years and "prove" that Marvel was leading up to this all along. As I mentioned repeatedly, Marvel did this with mutants in the 1980s. However, what I'm saying is that after Avengers: Disassembled, if the Act had been passed, that would have made much more sense. Then all that other stuff would have made more sense. I've read a good amount of what you listed, and most of it seems like ... superheroes punching bad guys! That's pretty revolutionary.
Marvel has always had superheroes causing major property damage. But I don't think it was part of any master plan. I was just suggesting something different. If you think Civil War is the greatest piece of comic book literature since Fantastic Four #1, that's fine. But there's no need to be an asshole about it.
veghead
April 4, 2007 at 3:40 pm
I've read many of those series/arcs that Matt J mentions and they don't even come close to the kind of build up that Burgas has suggested. They have little or nothing to do with the main (or even minor) plot points of CW.
Matt Jackson
April 4, 2007 at 3:43 pm
Listen Greg, I really didn't intend on coming across as an asshole, it just really gets me when fans make half baked claims without reading the books they're complaining about. Call it a pet peeve. Worse was your accusation that Civil War came out of nowhere, and didn't have any buildup. Allow me to explain my list, as to why they're more than just 'superheroes punching badguys'.
Fantastic Four - Authoritive Action And Hereafter
-Alright, so a added a book here to really solidify the point. AA was all about Reed going up against the gov't, and in doing so losing everything he cares deeply about. His best friend got killed, his wife left him and took the kids, and Reed was left a shell of a man. I would use this as a major reason for him going with the SHRA.
Avengers disassembled
- This one's pretty obvious. It's where the major seeds of discontent with the populace begin to be planted. But I disagree that it'd be enough to really get any kind of registration passed. Really, to use Roy, why would any care that much if a bunch of heroes fought each other and the only casualties are other heroes?
Secret War
- Honestly, I still haven't read this. I think it's important though because it starts the distrust in SHEILD, and is why Fury goes underground.
Young Avengers - Sidekicks
- Cap and Iron Man try to stop these kids from becoming heroes and doing something stupid. Tony's actions here are a reflection of what he says in both The Illuminati one shot and the Confession.
Captain America - Winter Solider 1
- Philly gets blown up in a super-terrorist attack. It's something they mention in CW1, and helps that seed of discontent grow. Suddenly it's not just NYC that gets massive property damage
New Avengers - Breakout
- Aside from the creation of a new team, the idea of a flawed SHEILD organization is furthered. Plus the break out itself probably adds to those seeds of discontent amongst the civilians.
New Avengers - Sentry
- Again, just to echo tony's statements later about keeping an eye on the young and inexperienced heroes. it shows that he's been thinking about it for a while.
New Warriors - reality show (or whatever that newest NW series was called)
- for obvious reasons. This is another I have yet to read, but I can see the importance of it.
House of M
- well, maybe not all of house of M, because it's terrible, but totally the fallout from it. The idea that all of a sudden thousands (millions?) of mutants suddenly lost their powers, kinda strikes home the point that no one is safe from these superheroes. Assuming our Roy isn't a bigot, that might be something to make him care.
Road to Civil War
- And the offical ramp up where the legislation is introduced and tries to go through, but ultimately stalls when no good admissable eviendence is presented for either side. That is, of course, until the start of CW1.
The reason why I appricate Civil War so much is because it doesn't seem like some premeditated ending point, but rather a natural progression of what has been happening. Further, your suggestions in your article seem to be wanting things that marvel already did, you just didn't read.
Todd
April 4, 2007 at 4:00 pm
Tried to write a comment three times and blithered on at excessive length, so bullet points:
1) I agree with most of what you're saying. I read CW and all the associated crossovers and I spent a lot of time having my disbelief unsuspended by characters acting without motivation or completely out of character.
2) Perhaps I'm being too nitpicky, but as someone that has worked in law and government, passage and enforcement was entirely unrealistic. Yeah, I know...capes, flying, etc., aren't necessarily associated with a high standard of realism. In the real world, though, there would have been court challenges and injunctions and all that stuff that keeps me in comic books. The way it was presented: law passed, for it/against it, government agent or fugitive.
3) One area of disagreement: in our world, the Patriot Act has a minimal daily effect for most. In the MU, with capes saving the world on a daily basis, I wonder if the guys in Des Moines would care. I get the impression that the sheer level of superhuman activity in the MU probably means it has more of an impact.
(Wow, I am such a nerd. Sorry to blather on).
DCD
April 4, 2007 at 4:07 pm
People speak in hushed tones about Secret War? The old one? I mean it was okay and all...
I might speak in hushed tones about Secret War II, e.g. "Joseph, don't you ever tell a soul I own this comic..."
Michael
April 4, 2007 at 4:15 pm
If you think Marvel was intentionally laying the seeds for Civil War as early as 2002, I've got a bridge in Asgard I'd like to sell you.
Omar Karindu
April 4, 2007 at 7:54 pm
My own retake on Civil War was aimed at keeping Mark Millar's idea that "the right side won" by actually, well, making them the right side at the finale.
It starts with the Stamford explosion, except that it's not the SHRA that passes...it's that the moral panic over superheroes that results has normal people trying to kill, say, Spider-Man whenever he stops a mugger and a domestic terrorist group setting off a bomb at Stark Enterprises. By the end of issue #1, Iron Man's worst fears are realized as the President declares martial law. Maria Hill, who's already jumped the gun trying to give Cap an ultimatum, issues a "draft-em-or-detain-em" policy and gives SHIELD officers a "necessary killing" waiver for field operations.
There's a massive summit at a secret Avengers hideaway, blocked entirely from scanners, and convened by Tony Stark and Reed Richards, the men who developed the technology to hide the supers. Tony and Reed advocate that everyone join up with Hill for the sake of avoiding battles with the public. Spider-Man protests that Hill is demanding full disclosure, and he's already had relatives in danger. SHIELD troops are seen rounding up and in some cases gunning down minor heroes who didn't or couldn't make it. The GLA are the first to be drafted, finally believing they can attain legitemacy despite Mr. Immortal's misgivings about hunting the Avengers. Captain America turns up late to the meeting to tell his story; then Tony drops the bomb -- he and Reed have already disclosed to SHIELD, and told them of this meeting. "It's for the best; go along with the madness for now or you'll be fighting the public." Naturally a brawl erupts, and SHIELD dives in as it does. Spider-Man escapes, but is horrified at the carnage and mistrust he sees, as well as by a little girl who shrieks and nearly dies trying to run from him as he flees. Cap naturally rallies the more ardent anti-drafters and flees, already planning his army. Reed and Tony get congrats from Hill, but they're clearly uneasy; both of them had hoped they could convince the super community.
And there the war begins in earnest; Iron Man commandeers SHIELD troops in the field, trying to limit the violence. Reed works ojn power nullification tech for the government. And Spider-Man, after talking to May and MJ, realizes that the people need to see that superheroes are just guys like him, regular joes who happen to have powers. He turns himself in, and Tony -- over Hill's more militarist plans -- convinces the President to let himself and Peter do a press conference aimed at convincing supers and calming the nation. Elsewhere, eager villains are turning themselves in so as to extract their own vengeances; the Kingpin fumes in his jail cell that his lack of powers means he can't take advantage of the draft.
In an intercut battle, Cap's guerilla tactics do surprisingly well against SHIELD, all while the press conference is going on and Peter, narrating, is having severe second thoughts. Reed is attempting to coordinate SHIELD alongside some other drafted heroes, but he's just not the tactician Cap is. Hill keeps asking for clearance to use something Reed and Tony developed, something behind a massive "do not open" door. Norman Osborn signs up with SHIELD, grinning as the President and Stark speak and having worked out already what's to come with Spider-Man. Hill finally gets her clearance, since Cap's army of anti-draft heroes is actually inflaming the situation nationwide, and the war is in the streets. Clor appears out of the blue, and murders Black Goliath in front of the crowds with SHIELD sanctions. And the news of this reaches Peter seconds after he's unmasked himself and walked off-stage.
Peter's turn is met with glee by Norman, anger by Hill and the President, and fear by Stark and Reed. Sue Storm and her brother also bail, and the Thing heads for France. Stark's efforts to use a secret channel he'd kept open for Cap meet with no success, since Cap is no longer listening. Cap's side starts to recruit villains so long as they've never murdered, but one of them, the Goldbug, is a mole for SHIELD. Clor is being "fixed" by Reed and Tony, and Hill is ashamed at having used him and wary of what he represents, but a rage-stoked public consensus over Cap's actions means that support for his deployment is at 90% approval ratings. Spider-Man makes a break for it, forcing a confrontation with Tony and Reed in the lab, where he's discovered Clor. The fight is brutal, and SHIELD techs unleash Osborn and the villains when it becomes clear that Tony won't use lethal force. Spidey is battered almost unto death, but saved by Cap in the sewers...at the cost of Cap himself, who takes a SHIELD bullet or two and is captured. And the Punisher, hearing this news, decides things aren't right...
Punisher turns up at anti-draft HQ and reveals that a corrupt Fed he'd killed told him about "42," the super-prison. He also guns down Goldbug and the other villains; he's taking command. Another brawl erupts over whether to follow Frank or not, with som wanting a war and others refusing. Hill has been informed by the president that her job is going to someone else as soon as the crisis settles, on the grounds that she's using villains and causing deaths. She tries to argue that she was following his directives, but he flatly tells her that "my directives changed when that Thor creature killed a man on national television." The non-Punisher rebels decide to storm 42 and get Cap out. Stark and Reed prepare to resist their jailbreak plan. And the Punisher lays low and tries to work out how to make it all work.
Spider-Man recovers, Stark plans, Reed grieves the loss of his family, and the drafted heroes have second and third thoughts but soldier on. Then there's a battle royale at 42 thanks to anti-draftee Cloak, as all sides converge. Feint and counterfeint occur, with scores being settled and new ones being developed. And just as the draftees and SHIELD are about to win, the Punisher turns up with his smaller force, having used a reprogrammed Super-Adaptoid (courtesy of the Young Avengers' Vision) to mimic Cloak and follow the heroes. The battle gets still wilder...and all combatants are dumped in Times Square by the unpredictable interaction of two sets of Cloak powers.
The war rages; Clor is unleashed by Hill, but he's even less in control, and starts randomly blitzing people until Hercules, incensed, pulps him. Stark and Spidey trade rhetoric and shots. A wounded Cap, horrified at the carnage, punks the Punisher and tries to charge in, but he's too weak. A mob turns up trying to join the fight, and some heroes try to avoid harming them while others don't care. A horrified Cap weeps and bleeds at the sideline, unable to stand. Finally, Iron Man receives word from Reed that "it worked" and makes an announcement that stops the fighting.
A deal has been brokered a registration act with full confidentiality, but also mandatory training, licensing, and deployment. It's a harder version of the SHRA he presented to the Illuminat before the Stamford crisis, and it's Cap's armed resistance that harshed the original deal Stark and Reed had been working on. Under the lousier deal, Stark gets SHIELD command from Hill as a gesture of trust to the hero community, but the government will keep a force of its own superhumans -- the Thunderbolts -- as a civilian-controlled force "just in case" with Norman Osborn heading it. A shamed Cap refuses the amnesty; most of the other heroes take it; the New Avengers characters refuse it because of the 'Bolts and because of sheer distrust and horror, and Iron Man lets them leave, promising that he'll "hunt you down and enforce the new law humanely." The Punisher slips away, vowing to do to villains what neither the heroes nor the government seem willing to do. And from there we basically have the same ending, except this time Stark and Reed actually look like relatively sane visionaries.
Huh?!
April 4, 2007 at 8:19 pm
How in the hell can you blog about something that you haven't read? For the people wondering why the mainstream population doesn't take "bloggers" seriously need to read no further than this tantrum given wasted bandwidth.
Joe Rice
April 4, 2007 at 8:58 pm
Dudes, you all have it totally wrong. Those are not how it should have gone. As a comic book blogger, it is my sacred and sworn duty to spend my time rewriting stories I didn't like and/or bother to read. This much we all know. But I bet you didn't know I was the best at it . . .ever.
It would all start out with something really awesome happening. I'm not sure what. But it would be huge and a lot of people would be, like, "WHOA" and "HOLY SHIT!!!" and that would be just page 2. Cap A would be pretty shook up about it. Oh, I know. Captain Marvel/Photon/black woman explodes. Completely explodes. Mainstream comics love killing women, but mainstream media love killing black folks first. So we've already got a crossover hit on our hands. Also I hate her.
So anyway Cap A is pretty shook up about this. He goes to Falcon's house so that Falcon can do him, like he always does when he's shook up. Falcon is a gentle lover with kisses like feathers. But then an evil Senator Villain leaks footage of the caresses and anal sex to the press. The press reports on it like crazy, trying to act like they think it's not a big deal that a black dude is doing Captain America in the butt but you can totally tell they really think it is a big deal. Nobody wants to say anything directly and be labelled a racist, so they decide to go for the homophobic angle. So Demon Slayer, that horrible Christian character that fought Dr. Strange is all pissed off! He's saying lots of bad things on TV about Cap and Falcon being gay and everything. And everyone else is super afraid to come on TV and fight him (verbally) because when they were growing up everyone thought they were gay, too. This is especially true for Peter Parker who decides to reveal his identity as a model-fucker.
Aquarian tries to say something nice but nobody cares because he's a hippie. Iron Man says that everyone should reveal if they are gay or not and tell the truth so that it will seem like a not big deal. But not everyone wants to do this! So they beat each other up and some more black folks die, maybe a white girl too. No Asians though, cause I'm not sure how that plays.
Near the end, everyone is super pissed off and about to hurt each other and Cap and Falcon broke up over the stress. And then there's a bright light and everyone looks real surprised and kind of happy but kind of scared.
And The Punisher's the first person to remember to speak and he says "POPEYE!" and sure enough it's Popeye. And Popeye just says "I yam what I yam," beats up some female villains and then walks off. Then everyone goes off to think about what they learned.
The end.
Greg Burgas
April 4, 2007 at 9:34 pm
I'm not sure if Marvel could get the rights to Popeye, Joe. Other than that, I like that scenario a lot.
Matt - Those are pretty good examples, although I still think it just happened to work out, because a lot of what is in those various stories is what we've seen from Marvel with regard to their superheroes for years. To use one of your examples, in Young Avengers, it's simply Cap and Iron Man expressing their fears about children being superheroes, not necessarily untrained people. I think that story would have worked better if the Act was already in place, but that's just me. Marvel HAS plenty of "distrust of superheroes" in their history to make it more likely that an Act would pass. But I still very much doubt if they were laying the groundwork for this for the past few years. I honestly can't remember where I read it, but Joey Q said he gave McNiven such a short lead time because of Infinite Crisis.
I wasn't really aware that this was a "tantrum." I thought it was pretty reasonable. And should I worry about the "mainstream" population taking bloggers seriously? The mainstream population has made American Idol the top-rated television show of the decade, so maybe they need to worry about themselves.
Joe Rice
April 4, 2007 at 9:38 pm
Popeye transcends copywrite. This would also set up the awesome Fantagraphics/Marvel crossover where Marvel donates all their profits for a year to support Fantagraphics in their fight to save the first amendment from Harlan Ellison.
Apodaca
April 5, 2007 at 12:27 am
Do people honestly wonder about that?
Zeb Aslam
April 5, 2007 at 12:30 am
Interesting post Greg. I agree that there should have been more 'simmering'. Which is why I'm actually looking forward to World War Hulk. This 'event' has been in the offing for over a year now. Greg Pak has slowly brought all the pieces into place so that if you've been reading Hulk you literally know that he is going to beat the living crap out of every single member of the Illuminati. And that is awesome.
Tyson
April 5, 2007 at 1:03 am
Great post, but one question. Why do I keep seeing references to how huge Civil War was for Marvel? I thought I saw somewhere (Wizard, maybe?) that they were selling 400,000 copies per issue. If that is considered huge, mainstream comics are dying. 20 years ago, if Marvel released a huge event that only sold 400,000 copies, people would getting canned, not congratulated.
J To The AAP
April 5, 2007 at 4:09 am
I'm always baffled by such comments. It isn't the point that they haven't done it yet, the point is that they could legally do it when they want to.
"Why should I care if they've created an atomic bomb, it's not like they're using it."
Boom.
J To The AAP
April 5, 2007 at 4:11 am
Greg, I haven't read Civil War yet but I think this is one long-ass post considering you haven't either.
John Seavey
April 5, 2007 at 6:50 am
It was actually under 300,000 copies, I heard (at least on a per issue basis...CW #7, IIRC, sold about 260,000.) And yes, two decades ago those would have been firing numbers. Now they're the best the industry can do.
My problem with Civil War can be summed up in Tony Stark's press conference. "Yes, everyone, I am really Iron Man! Now, I'll be in charge of super-hero registration, and--"
"Mister Stark, didn't you just say two months ago that you were giving up being Iron Man for good, because that was what made you get drunk and threaten to shoot the Latverian Ambassador?"
"Um, yes. I was lying. Now, super-hero registration is--"
"So have you been lying all those other times you've claimed someone else was Iron Man?"
"Most of them, yes. Now, Captain America is a very bad--"
"When Iron Man killed the criminal known as Spymaster, was that you?"
"Um......Registration is good."
"What about when you claimed that a 'malfunction' in Iron Man's armor caused him to kill another diplomat? Was that true? Or did you get drunk, kill a man, and lie about it?"
"No comment."
"And what about the CEO of Stane Industries? He 'committed suicide' by repulsor blast the day before you bought out his company."
"This press conference is over."
Chris
April 5, 2007 at 7:05 am
Good post with a lot of good points, although I'll argue against two things. You said you think a lot of people would have to die for Cap ot consider quiting. My own opinion of his character is that it would only take one of his friends dying by his action or inaction to really rattle him and at least make him consider quitting. But that's just my opinion, and you know what they say about opinions and ass-holes.
Also X-cutioners Song is one of my favorite cross-overs ever. It had a lot of great art and at the time, some very important plot points. My opinion may be biased, as it was also the first crossover I ever bought, so there's that. Civil war will probably be remembered on the internet as an Onslught level mistake, but fondly remembered by regular readers.
The point brought up earlier that Marvel would never do it because it's long-term and slow boil, and Marvel wants immediate and explosive I think is valid. I know personally I'm feeling the crossover burn out and plan to sit out World War Hulk, DC Countdown, and the X men event. Just take a year off, catch up on old stuff and indies and other decent Marvel and DC books. There's a lot of good stuff out there with out getting into the crossovers. Remember, if you don't like something, stop reading it.
Paul
April 5, 2007 at 8:53 am
Let me tell you how I would've done this post. I didn't read it, but here's how I would've done it:
I would've gone into the bathroom, careful to lock the door, lotioned up, and let loose into the turlet. After I got finished with that, I would've had my fill of sad masturbation and I would've saved myself a lot of time and typing.
Omar Karindu
April 5, 2007 at 9:19 am
I'd like to say that I don't deserve that burn that Joe Rice posted...but I really can't. So instead I'll just shout "BOSH!" really loudly and feel kind of embarrassed about my earlier post.
Mike McGee
April 5, 2007 at 10:55 am
And The Punisher’s the first person to remember to speak and he says “POPEYE!†and sure enough it’s Popeye.
Dude.
DUDE.
veghead
April 5, 2007 at 10:57 am
"mainstream comics are dying"
Duh?
This post seems to really have struck a nerve in some die hard Civil War fans. I didn't know that humorless fans of Civil War actually checked out this blog. Interesting.
Bully
April 5, 2007 at 11:14 am
How to fix Civil War?
More Godzilla.
Any Godzilla, as a matter of fact.
Bully
April 5, 2007 at 11:14 am
How to fix Civil War?
More Godzilla.
Any Godzilla, as a matter of fact.
Greg Burgas
April 5, 2007 at 11:16 am
Godzilla is so excellent he must be mentioned twice! Perhaps he'll show up in World War Hulk. On second thought, Joey Q couldn't be that awesome, could he?
L.P. Mandrake
April 5, 2007 at 12:34 pm
A little off topic, but it doesn't cost $10k to run for congress. Try $1m (if you want to win).
Andrew Collins
April 5, 2007 at 2:23 pm
"Let me tell you how I would’ve done this post. I didn’t read it, but here’s how I would’ve done it:
I would’ve gone into the bathroom, careful to lock the door, lotioned up, and let loose into the turlet. After I got finished with that, I would’ve had my fill of sad masturbation and I would’ve saved myself a lot of time and typing."
Yeah...nice post there Paul. Or should we call you by your real name... Mark Millar!!!!
Alan Coil
April 5, 2007 at 6:49 pm
Joe Rice said:
"...where Marvel donates all their profits for a year to support Fantagraphics in their fight to save the first amendment from Harlan Ellison."
-----
It's not a First Amendment lawsuit.
But you probably already knew that.
Tyson
April 5, 2007 at 8:18 pm
“mainstream comics are dyingâ€
Duh?
This post seems to really have struck a nerve in some die hard Civil War fans. I didn’t know that humorless fans of Civil War actually checked out this blog. Interesting.
So, veghead, did you actually have a point, or were you just trying to be a standard internet jackass?
The sentence you quoted from my was specifically addressing how darn low the sales numbers are - the big event of 2007 couldn't match the sales numbers for regular books from 20 years ago.
So, no nerve was struck with me in Greg's post, I'm not a Civil War fan (didn't read or buy any of it), I'm not particularly invested in it because I don't follow anything in the main Marvel Universe. My only point was that I just think it's sad that the comics market is shrinking so drastically.
John Cage
April 5, 2007 at 8:46 pm
I like your premise, but spending two years or so in the Marvel universe building up to the Civil War mini-series would've been boring as you detail, not to mention it would've been awful to hear all the folks complaining about the slow pace online after a while. As other posters have mentioned, the tracks were already laid down in other titles -- they just weren't connected well enough to achieve the impact you described.
That said, I think Marvel did a good enough job with Civil War's build-up and execution. It wasn't perfect, but darned if it wasn't entertaining.
By the way, this quote made me laugh out loud. "I think (Civil War) could have been an excellent examination of the superhero ethos and could have shed new light on what makes someone a hero. What did we get instead? Lloyd Bentsen references and Captain America acting surprised when Frank Castle acts like a psychopath. Good job, Marvel." Ha!
Have a good day.
John Cage
Bill Reed
April 5, 2007 at 9:17 pm
You didn't even read the post, did you?
Sometimes, I am depressed about the comics industry. This is one of those times. Not your fault, Greg or Omar... but some of these replies are disheartening.
Sigh.
Slay
April 5, 2007 at 11:41 pm
It would have been really cool if the Civil War had been planned long in advance and simmered for quite some time. I like those comments that hearkened back to the mutants in the 80s Marvel. Or, remember The Scourge of the Underworld? That story took a full year to resolve, and the build was just a few panels here and there in 12 different titles until it really took off in Captain America. That's the way to do things.
Joe Rice
April 5, 2007 at 11:43 pm
Well, there really isn't a "cranky old bitter hack trying to litigate his embarrassment" amendment.
MarkAndrew
April 6, 2007 at 12:08 am
More Godzilla's a good start.
Also less superheroes.
For instance no superheroes.
And more chickens.
Godzilla vs. 100,000,000 chickens.
I'd buy it.
veghead
April 6, 2007 at 6:23 am
"So, veghead, did you actually have a point, or were you just trying to be a standard internet jackass?
The sentence you quoted from my was specifically addressing how darn low the sales numbers are - the big event of 2007 couldn’t match the sales numbers for regular books from 20 years ago.
So, no nerve was struck with me in Greg’s post, I’m not a Civil War fan (didn’t read or buy any of it), I’m not particularly invested in it because I don’t follow anything in the main Marvel Universe. My only point was that I just think it’s sad that the comics market is shrinking so drastically. "
My first comment was aimed at you. I was agreeing with your statement, but in a jackasserly way to indicate that it's pretty well known already. My second comment was aimed at other commentors, not you. I tried to indicate that by skipping a line, but could've made it more clear, you're right. I prefer to think of myself as a standard internet jackass penguin. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackass_penguin
Matt
April 6, 2007 at 2:50 pm
For the folks (well, the one guy) claiming that there's evidence for long-term Civil War planning, I thought I would point out the fact that originally it was going to be the Marvel superheroes vs. SHIELD, primarily springing from the pages of New Avengers. So whatever possible long-term planning that was being done for *that* particular event was probably thrown out the window the second Mark Millar said, "Mm, y'know, it'd be cool if Iron Man and Captain America duked it out for realz!" Any other semblance of planning, I assume, is coincidental.
And man, I think some long-term planning would have done WONDERS for Civil War. But alas, it's more of a DC thing...
-M
zodberg
April 6, 2007 at 3:45 pm
I can't believe they never just outright published, for reader's benefit, the Superhero Registration Act.
Tyson
April 6, 2007 at 7:00 pm
"I prefer to think of myself as a standard internet jackass penguin."
Invoking the total awesomeness of penguins seems unfair - how can anyone maintain the proper degree of irritation required for Internet communication when you do that?