<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comic Book Dictionary Help!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tori</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-704395</link>
		<dc:creator>tori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-704395</guid>
		<description>i loved reading all the i deas here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i loved reading all the i deas here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie Oakley</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-221239</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie Oakley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-221239</guid>
		<description>Hello, This is a pretty cool blog on Comic Book Dictionary Help!! Thanks a lot and have fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, This is a pretty cool blog on Comic Book Dictionary Help!! Thanks a lot and have fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gloria</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-186915</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-186915</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t take &quot;Annie Oakley&quot;. She was good at shooting, yes, but remember how she wailed &quot;you can&#039;t get a man with a gun&quot;... The type we are discussing always gets the girls or boys in awe.

I&#039;d go for &quot;Poochie&quot;... First, because it is born out of a corporate decision, not from the reader&#039;s own choice. Also, the name sounds ridiculous, and these characters look ridiculous to the average reader, who can&#039;t figure why the other characters think he /she is so &quot;cool&quot;

An example of this, for me, are Spielberg&#039;s &quot;Tiny Toons&quot; or &quot;Animaniacs&quot;, always in that &quot;hey! Ain&#039;t we funny and cool!&quot; pose which wasn&#039;t funny or cool at all: they just vampirized previous characters who had been tested and tried through the years and earned, bona-fide, the love of spectators</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t take &#8220;Annie Oakley&#8221;. She was good at shooting, yes, but remember how she wailed &#8220;you can&#8217;t get a man with a gun&#8221;&#8230; The type we are discussing always gets the girls or boys in awe.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d go for &#8220;Poochie&#8221;&#8230; First, because it is born out of a corporate decision, not from the reader&#8217;s own choice. Also, the name sounds ridiculous, and these characters look ridiculous to the average reader, who can&#8217;t figure why the other characters think he /she is so &#8220;cool&#8221;</p>
<p>An example of this, for me, are Spielberg&#8217;s &#8220;Tiny Toons&#8221; or &#8220;Animaniacs&#8221;, always in that &#8220;hey! Ain&#8217;t we funny and cool!&#8221; pose which wasn&#8217;t funny or cool at all: they just vampirized previous characters who had been tested and tried through the years and earned, bona-fide, the love of spectators</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebis</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-113761</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-113761</guid>
		<description>I actually think &quot;cuckoo&quot; works best, although &quot;Annie Oakley&quot; has its charms. (But you have to keep the &quot;Oakley,&quot; lest peoplel think you&#039;re talking about that obnoxious singing orphan.)  I also agree that, for maximum clarity, &quot;pet character&quot; is a good choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think &#8220;cuckoo&#8221; works best, although &#8220;Annie Oakley&#8221; has its charms. (But you have to keep the &#8220;Oakley,&#8221; lest peoplel think you&#8217;re talking about that obnoxious singing orphan.)  I also agree that, for maximum clarity, &#8220;pet character&#8221; is a good choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mantistotem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85906</link>
		<dc:creator>Mantistotem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 05:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85906</guid>
		<description>How about &quot;Earth Two Mary Sue&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about &#8220;Earth Two Mary Sue&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85501</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85501</guid>
		<description>Bendis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bendis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Bird</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85495</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85495</guid>
		<description>I was also reluctantly going for &quot;pet character&quot; until &quot;Annie Oakley&quot; came along.  That&#039;s perfect!  

(And there&#039;s no better example than Cable.  His powers, his background, his personality-- nothing was actually interesting about the guy except that suddenly all of the long-established characters in every x-book were in awe of him, so the fans were, too.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was also reluctantly going for &#8220;pet character&#8221; until &#8220;Annie Oakley&#8221; came along.  That&#8217;s perfect!  </p>
<p>(And there&#8217;s no better example than Cable.  His powers, his background, his personality&#8211; nothing was actually interesting about the guy except that suddenly all of the long-established characters in every x-book were in awe of him, so the fans were, too.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85459</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85459</guid>
		<description>Yeah, and if you look at the early Wolverine appearances beyond the first Hulk appearance, he really didn&#039;t do all that much and was just a crass loudmouth jerk.  He didn&#039;t really contribute all that much to battles and was nowhere near as insanely powerful and aged.  All that was added after he started getting popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, and if you look at the early Wolverine appearances beyond the first Hulk appearance, he really didn&#8217;t do all that much and was just a crass loudmouth jerk.  He didn&#8217;t really contribute all that much to battles and was nowhere near as insanely powerful and aged.  All that was added after he started getting popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan K</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85421</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85421</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wolvie went from being a guy with metal claws who could heal to being effectively immortal, super strong, and having the most precious and ubiquitious substance in the Marvel U (which became the benchmark for â€œunbreakableâ€ essentially) implanted in him. And when he lost that, they gave him bone claws that could carve up rock. His lifespan was extended so he could be born in a Victorian novela and live long enough to fight World War II, the Cold War and pretty much every other â€œgreatest generationâ€ event in the 20th century. Plus, heâ€™s had an affair with just about every â€œperfect womanâ€ archetype possible.&quot; 

Yeah, Wolverine has certainly been &#039;Jonathaned&#039; over the years, but I don&#039;t think that makes him a Mary Sue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wolvie went from being a guy with metal claws who could heal to being effectively immortal, super strong, and having the most precious and ubiquitious substance in the Marvel U (which became the benchmark for â€œunbreakableâ€ essentially) implanted in him. And when he lost that, they gave him bone claws that could carve up rock. His lifespan was extended so he could be born in a Victorian novela and live long enough to fight World War II, the Cold War and pretty much every other â€œgreatest generationâ€ event in the 20th century. Plus, heâ€™s had an affair with just about every â€œperfect womanâ€ archetype possible.&#8221; </p>
<p>Yeah, Wolverine has certainly been &#8216;Jonathaned&#8217; over the years, but I don&#8217;t think that makes him a Mary Sue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.C.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85410</link>
		<dc:creator>J.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85410</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not denying that Wolverine is popular and gets a lot of writing because he&#039;s a fan fave.  But you have to admit he&#039;s the perfect example of the character who was designed to be badass from the word go (his first appearance was going toe to toe with the Hulk, who if anything, was the benchmark for power in the Marvel U among lead characters) and has been expounded upon ever since to keep him &quot;perfect&quot; to the point that he eclipses other heroes in the Marvel U in any book he appears in.  

I mean, in his literary &quot;life&quot; Wolverine has been (and forgive me if I flub here) a spy, a super soldier, a victim of experimentation, a ninja, a samurai, an adventurer, a post apocalyptic hero, a hard core crime noir tough guy complete with eye patch, and a space hero.  He&#039;s been a gruff father figure and a berserker killing machine.  And for the ultimate anti-authoritarioan loner, he&#039;s been on at least 4 super teams that I can think of (compare to stiff boyscout Cyclops who&#039;s been on what one?  Two if you count X-factor and even then that was just the classic x-men rebranded).  

Wolvie went from being a guy with metal claws who could heal to being effectively immortal, super strong, and having the most precious and ubiquitious substance in the Marvel U (which became the benchmark for &quot;unbreakable&quot; essentially) implanted in him.  And when he lost that, they gave him bone claws that could carve up rock.  His lifespan was extended so he could be born in a Victorian novela and live long enough to fight World War II, the Cold War and pretty much every other &quot;greatest generation&quot; event in the 20th century.  Plus, he&#039;s had an affair with just about every &quot;perfect woman&quot; archetype possible.  

And to top it all off, he was the archetype for every &#039;90s badass &quot;post bronze age&quot; hero in look and attitude.

I mean check out this quote from his bio on Wikipedia (which I don&#039;t normally trust but this included a reference from Wolverine #51) that his physical and mental state was &quot;equivalent of an Olympic-level gymnast performing a gold medal routine while simultaneously beating four chess computers in his head.&quot;

Come on.  Popular icon or not, that&#039;s beyond a Mary Sue or a Marty Stu.  That&#039;s Wolvie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not denying that Wolverine is popular and gets a lot of writing because he&#8217;s a fan fave.  But you have to admit he&#8217;s the perfect example of the character who was designed to be badass from the word go (his first appearance was going toe to toe with the Hulk, who if anything, was the benchmark for power in the Marvel U among lead characters) and has been expounded upon ever since to keep him &#8220;perfect&#8221; to the point that he eclipses other heroes in the Marvel U in any book he appears in.  </p>
<p>I mean, in his literary &#8220;life&#8221; Wolverine has been (and forgive me if I flub here) a spy, a super soldier, a victim of experimentation, a ninja, a samurai, an adventurer, a post apocalyptic hero, a hard core crime noir tough guy complete with eye patch, and a space hero.  He&#8217;s been a gruff father figure and a berserker killing machine.  And for the ultimate anti-authoritarioan loner, he&#8217;s been on at least 4 super teams that I can think of (compare to stiff boyscout Cyclops who&#8217;s been on what one?  Two if you count X-factor and even then that was just the classic x-men rebranded).  </p>
<p>Wolvie went from being a guy with metal claws who could heal to being effectively immortal, super strong, and having the most precious and ubiquitious substance in the Marvel U (which became the benchmark for &#8220;unbreakable&#8221; essentially) implanted in him.  And when he lost that, they gave him bone claws that could carve up rock.  His lifespan was extended so he could be born in a Victorian novela and live long enough to fight World War II, the Cold War and pretty much every other &#8220;greatest generation&#8221; event in the 20th century.  Plus, he&#8217;s had an affair with just about every &#8220;perfect woman&#8221; archetype possible.  </p>
<p>And to top it all off, he was the archetype for every &#8217;90s badass &#8220;post bronze age&#8221; hero in look and attitude.</p>
<p>I mean check out this quote from his bio on Wikipedia (which I don&#8217;t normally trust but this included a reference from Wolverine #51) that his physical and mental state was &#8220;equivalent of an Olympic-level gymnast performing a gold medal routine while simultaneously beating four chess computers in his head.&#8221;</p>
<p>Come on.  Popular icon or not, that&#8217;s beyond a Mary Sue or a Marty Stu.  That&#8217;s Wolvie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85404</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85404</guid>
		<description>&quot;Annie Oakley.&quot;  Or &quot;Annie.&quot;  Or maybe an &quot;Annie-Hero.&quot;

Why?  &quot;Anything you can do I can do better; I can do anything better than you.&quot;  That&#039;s not too obscure a reference.

Plus, as a woman&#039;s name, it bears a general similarity to the &#039;Mary Sue&#039; phenomenon it&#039;s related to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Annie Oakley.&#8221;  Or &#8220;Annie.&#8221;  Or maybe an &#8220;Annie-Hero.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why?  &#8220;Anything you can do I can do better; I can do anything better than you.&#8221;  That&#8217;s not too obscure a reference.</p>
<p>Plus, as a woman&#8217;s name, it bears a general similarity to the &#8216;Mary Sue&#8217; phenomenon it&#8217;s related to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85402</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85402</guid>
		<description>Sean,

Great point.  They were trying to push Tim Drake as great from the get-go, and it worked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean,</p>
<p>Great point.  They were trying to push Tim Drake as great from the get-go, and it worked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Whitmore</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85395</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Whitmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85395</guid>
		<description>Tim Drake might be another example of a character who was highly exposed and succeeded in becoming popular. I remember him being everywhere around the time he debuted, including a series of mini series with various gaudy holograms and other cover enhancements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Drake might be another example of a character who was highly exposed and succeeded in becoming popular. I remember him being everywhere around the time he debuted, including a series of mini series with various gaudy holograms and other cover enhancements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David C</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85311</link>
		<dc:creator>David C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85311</guid>
		<description>&quot;Has this ever worked?&quot;

Might be hard to tell, because if it did work, people would tend to forget that the popular character was at first &quot;rammed down their throats.&quot;

To take one possible example, maybe Hawkeye?  From obscure Iron Man antagonist to fan-favorite Avenger?  (To this day, that *first* &quot;New Avengers&quot; team with Cap, Hawkeye, Quicksilver, and the Scarlet Witch, looks like a remarkably gutsy move by Marvel.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Has this ever worked?&#8221;</p>
<p>Might be hard to tell, because if it did work, people would tend to forget that the popular character was at first &#8220;rammed down their throats.&#8221;</p>
<p>To take one possible example, maybe Hawkeye?  From obscure Iron Man antagonist to fan-favorite Avenger?  (To this day, that *first* &#8220;New Avengers&#8221; team with Cap, Hawkeye, Quicksilver, and the Scarlet Witch, looks like a remarkably gutsy move by Marvel.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85296</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85296</guid>
		<description>Fonzie doesn&#039;t work because he wasn&#039;t created with the intention of being as cool and popular as he eventually became.  If you watch early Happy Days, he wasn&#039;t that prominent.  As he got insanely popular with viewers, his role on the show increased to satisfy those viewers.  This is like Wolverine in the X-men, minor at first and major later due to fan popularity.  Same goes for the Alex P. Keaton character on Family Ties, he ran away with the show and became the focus due to popularity, even though the writers originally intended other wise.

The Connor Hawkes and Drakkons of the world though are the guys who are the reverse, the writers push the exposure first in hopes that fan popularity comes later.  (Has this ever worked?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fonzie doesn&#8217;t work because he wasn&#8217;t created with the intention of being as cool and popular as he eventually became.  If you watch early Happy Days, he wasn&#8217;t that prominent.  As he got insanely popular with viewers, his role on the show increased to satisfy those viewers.  This is like Wolverine in the X-men, minor at first and major later due to fan popularity.  Same goes for the Alex P. Keaton character on Family Ties, he ran away with the show and became the focus due to popularity, even though the writers originally intended other wise.</p>
<p>The Connor Hawkes and Drakkons of the world though are the guys who are the reverse, the writers push the exposure first in hopes that fan popularity comes later.  (Has this ever worked?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David C</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85263</link>
		<dc:creator>David C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85263</guid>
		<description>I made a little Venn diagram of how my personal definitions of Pet Character, Mary Sue, and Self-Insertion overlap (hope this is the right way to actually get a link to work):

&quot;http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/3234/marysueft9.gif&quot;

Not all self-insertions are necessarily Mary Sues, or even Pet Characters.  For example, the &quot;Grant Morrison&quot; character in Animal Man is a self-insertion, but neither of the other things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a little Venn diagram of how my personal definitions of Pet Character, Mary Sue, and Self-Insertion overlap (hope this is the right way to actually get a link to work):</p>
<p>&#8220;http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/3234/marysueft9.gif&#8221;</p>
<p>Not all self-insertions are necessarily Mary Sues, or even Pet Characters.  For example, the &#8220;Grant Morrison&#8221; character in Animal Man is a self-insertion, but neither of the other things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan K</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85254</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85254</guid>
		<description>&quot;Fonzies.

The Fonz was a supporting character on Happy Days who:

-overtook the main characters.
- the writers favored.
- was defined as being â€œthe coolest.â€
- jumped the shark.

I realize Fonzie was legitimately popular, but the term could fit. Comic book (and other serial media) writers try and make their favorite character a Fonzie.&quot; 

Your right that Fonzie was overused, but he was actually cool.

Poochie is to Fonzie what Daken is to Wolverine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fonzies.</p>
<p>The Fonz was a supporting character on Happy Days who:</p>
<p>-overtook the main characters.<br />
- the writers favored.<br />
- was defined as being â€œthe coolest.â€<br />
- jumped the shark.</p>
<p>I realize Fonzie was legitimately popular, but the term could fit. Comic book (and other serial media) writers try and make their favorite character a Fonzie.&#8221; </p>
<p>Your right that Fonzie was overused, but he was actually cool.</p>
<p>Poochie is to Fonzie what Daken is to Wolverine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85250</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85250</guid>
		<description>Well, I certainly don&#039;t care for &quot;Jonathans.&quot; :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I certainly don&#8217;t care for &#8220;Jonathans.&#8221; <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Loughlin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85243</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Loughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85243</guid>
		<description>Fonzies.

The Fonz was a supporting character on Happy Days who:

-overtook the main characters.
- the writers favored.
- was defined as being &quot;the coolest.&quot;
- jumped the shark.

I realize Fonzie was legitimately popular, but the term could fit. Comic book (and other serial media) writers try and make their favorite character a Fonzie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fonzies.</p>
<p>The Fonz was a supporting character on Happy Days who:</p>
<p>-overtook the main characters.<br />
- the writers favored.<br />
- was defined as being &#8220;the coolest.&#8221;<br />
- jumped the shark.</p>
<p>I realize Fonzie was legitimately popular, but the term could fit. Comic book (and other serial media) writers try and make their favorite character a Fonzie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/comment-page-2/#comment-85231</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/26/comic-book-dictionary-help/#comment-85231</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This is what Iâ€™m talking about. Wolverine isnâ€™t forced in peopleâ€™s faces in a desperate attempt to make him popular. He IS popular and heâ€™s in a lot of books because it makes them sell more.

Heâ€™s the anti-Poochie. Heâ€™s the character people try to emulate when they create a Poochie. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Got it right.  Wolvie is popular so he gets ridiculously preferential writing treatment.  What Brian&#039;s talking about are characters that get the ridiculously preferential writing treatment first because the writer desperately WANTS to make the characters popular. I think &quot;Trophy Wife&quot; is the best term I&#039;ve heard so far.  I&#039;d also like to nominate such characters be called &quot;Hard Sells&quot; as the writers are pulling out all the stops to get you to buy in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This is what Iâ€™m talking about. Wolverine isnâ€™t forced in peopleâ€™s faces in a desperate attempt to make him popular. He IS popular and heâ€™s in a lot of books because it makes them sell more.</p>
<p>Heâ€™s the anti-Poochie. Heâ€™s the character people try to emulate when they create a Poochie. </p></blockquote>
<p>Got it right.  Wolvie is popular so he gets ridiculously preferential writing treatment.  What Brian&#8217;s talking about are characters that get the ridiculously preferential writing treatment first because the writer desperately WANTS to make the characters popular. I think &#8220;Trophy Wife&#8221; is the best term I&#8217;ve heard so far.  I&#8217;d also like to nominate such characters be called &#8220;Hard Sells&#8221; as the writers are pulling out all the stops to get you to buy in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

