<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Into the back issue box #27</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:12:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucion</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-87059</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 23:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-87059</guid>
		<description>Now this is what I expect in a Superman comic.  I haven&#039;t read a lot of Superman comics, but I&#039;m not really sure I even want to.  Even as a cynical late-twentysomething I still look at Superman as some kind of perfect ideal and don&#039;t think I want to read him as anything less.  This looked like a fun series.  A lighter read to remind me of a simpler time.  Plus, that panel with the kid getting his dog back makes me smile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is what I expect in a Superman comic.  I haven&#8217;t read a lot of Superman comics, but I&#8217;m not really sure I even want to.  Even as a cynical late-twentysomething I still look at Superman as some kind of perfect ideal and don&#8217;t think I want to read him as anything less.  This looked like a fun series.  A lighter read to remind me of a simpler time.  Plus, that panel with the kid getting his dog back makes me smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtdeeley</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86959</link>
		<dc:creator>mtdeeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 16:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86959</guid>
		<description>I usualy avoid Millar&#039;s work because I don&#039;t think it&#039;s very good.  It lacks depth, emotion, and especially character.  Wanted was a good opprutnity to show how an &quot;average guy&quot; becomes a killer.  Instead it&#039;s one big DC villain fan fic, with the message, &quot;If you&#039;re not a criminal you&#039;re a pussy.&quot;  &quot;The Ultimates&quot; seems so preoccupied with being cool it leaves me cold.  And &quot;Civil War&quot;?  Just about everything was wrong with that from Day 0.

I can&#039;t recall any Millar comic that I actually liked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usualy avoid Millar&#8217;s work because I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s very good.  It lacks depth, emotion, and especially character.  Wanted was a good opprutnity to show how an &#8220;average guy&#8221; becomes a killer.  Instead it&#8217;s one big DC villain fan fic, with the message, &#8220;If you&#8217;re not a criminal you&#8217;re a pussy.&#8221;  &#8220;The Ultimates&#8221; seems so preoccupied with being cool it leaves me cold.  And &#8220;Civil War&#8221;?  Just about everything was wrong with that from Day 0.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t recall any Millar comic that I actually liked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knox</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86914</link>
		<dc:creator>Knox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 14:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86914</guid>
		<description>Can anybody link to a scan of that last page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anybody link to a scan of that last page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86909</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 13:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86909</guid>
		<description>the first paragraph of that last post(31) should have quotes on it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the first paragraph of that last post(31) should have quotes on it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86908</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 13:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86908</guid>
		<description>At the end of Wanted, the main character talks about how everyone who reads comics are complete losers and how heâ€™s so much cooler than all of those people. The final page is a big â€œfuck youâ€ to everyone who has read the entire six issues, and although people have pointed out that itâ€™s the character talking, not Millar, I just got the feeling that it was Millar laughing at me, the person who supports his chosen line of work.

   I don&#039;t own a copy of Wanted but I read it and I remember the last page rant being aimed not at comic readers in general but instead at readers who had had come to see the main character as sympathetic( or heroic ) as I had. Since I never re-read the book it&#039;s possible that I misinterpreted and supplied my own more effective meaning but it worked for me. The main character was pretty disgusting and I had slowly forgotten that by the last chapter so it was a shock to be reminded of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of Wanted, the main character talks about how everyone who reads comics are complete losers and how heâ€™s so much cooler than all of those people. The final page is a big â€œfuck youâ€ to everyone who has read the entire six issues, and although people have pointed out that itâ€™s the character talking, not Millar, I just got the feeling that it was Millar laughing at me, the person who supports his chosen line of work.</p>
<p>   I don&#8217;t own a copy of Wanted but I read it and I remember the last page rant being aimed not at comic readers in general but instead at readers who had had come to see the main character as sympathetic( or heroic ) as I had. Since I never re-read the book it&#8217;s possible that I misinterpreted and supplied my own more effective meaning but it worked for me. The main character was pretty disgusting and I had slowly forgotten that by the last chapter so it was a shock to be reminded of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ditko Hands</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86809</link>
		<dc:creator>Ditko Hands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 07:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86809</guid>
		<description>Surprised nobody&#039;s mentioned that Superman prevents an execution in Action Comics #1 as well as this book.  He was a real mean guy overall in a comic that dealt with some strange topics, but that didn&#039;t stop kids from reading him anyway. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprised nobody&#8217;s mentioned that Superman prevents an execution in Action Comics #1 as well as this book.  He was a real mean guy overall in a comic that dealt with some strange topics, but that didn&#8217;t stop kids from reading him anyway. <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apodaca</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86801</link>
		<dc:creator>Apodaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 07:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86801</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What would you want in a Superman comic thatâ€™s not too scary for the kiddies?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

An alien robot genius, a bald crooked CEO, and a man who attacks you with murderous toys, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What would you want in a Superman comic thatâ€™s not too scary for the kiddies?</p></blockquote>
<p>An alien robot genius, a bald crooked CEO, and a man who attacks you with murderous toys, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunkyGreenJerusalem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86699</link>
		<dc:creator>FunkyGreenJerusalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 01:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86699</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wasnâ€™t this comic book suppose to be aimed at children? I donâ€™t think I would want my 7 year old nieces and nephew read this comic because I think some of the issues in it arenâ€™t approriate for children. Suicide? Terrorists? Someone about to be executed by electric chair? As far as Iâ€™m concerned, not stuff I would them exposed to at that age or anywhere up to maybe ten or twelve. Iâ€™d hate to have to explain suicide to them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You&#039;re either something of a hypocrite, or you had THE most protected childhood in the world.
Lots of kids books, films and comics deal with such issues (or at least they USED to)- actually hell, they may not &#039;deal&#039; with them as such, but they are certainly there.
I mean Bambi&#039;s mother got shot, and Scar killed Simba&#039;s father and then set up an evil dictatorship (instead of a &#039;good monarchy&#039; but still)... are these too much for kids to deal with?

What would you want in a Superman comic that&#039;s not too scary for the kiddies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wasnâ€™t this comic book suppose to be aimed at children? I donâ€™t think I would want my 7 year old nieces and nephew read this comic because I think some of the issues in it arenâ€™t approriate for children. Suicide? Terrorists? Someone about to be executed by electric chair? As far as Iâ€™m concerned, not stuff I would them exposed to at that age or anywhere up to maybe ten or twelve. Iâ€™d hate to have to explain suicide to them.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re either something of a hypocrite, or you had THE most protected childhood in the world.<br />
Lots of kids books, films and comics deal with such issues (or at least they USED to)- actually hell, they may not &#8216;deal&#8217; with them as such, but they are certainly there.<br />
I mean Bambi&#8217;s mother got shot, and Scar killed Simba&#8217;s father and then set up an evil dictatorship (instead of a &#8216;good monarchy&#8217; but still)&#8230; are these too much for kids to deal with?</p>
<p>What would you want in a Superman comic that&#8217;s not too scary for the kiddies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael John McGee</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86640</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael John McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86640</guid>
		<description>Millar has said, explicitly, that Wesley is meant to be an evil, sadistic monster, because &quot;Wanted&quot; is the reverse of a superhero origin story, and that he&#039;s not supposed to be admirable or likable just because he&#039;s the protagonist.  It&#039;s the story of the villain, in a world where there&#039;s no hope left.  So when people say that Millar &quot;obviously&quot; sees Wesley and his deeds as admirable, I just shake my head.  People will think what they wanna.  They&#039;ll project their own biases onto a person they&#039;ve never even met because he committed the cardinal sin of writing a comic book they happened not to like.  If they were rational, they wouldn&#039;t be fans.

This is, to get back on topic, one of my favorite Superman stories, and Superman is my favorite fictional character.  It&#039;s elegantly paced, plotted and executed.  Whenever someone says that a hero is defined by their villains, I think back to this issue and how it proves that old maxim of writing: for every rule of writing, the opposite is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Millar has said, explicitly, that Wesley is meant to be an evil, sadistic monster, because &#8220;Wanted&#8221; is the reverse of a superhero origin story, and that he&#8217;s not supposed to be admirable or likable just because he&#8217;s the protagonist.  It&#8217;s the story of the villain, in a world where there&#8217;s no hope left.  So when people say that Millar &#8220;obviously&#8221; sees Wesley and his deeds as admirable, I just shake my head.  People will think what they wanna.  They&#8217;ll project their own biases onto a person they&#8217;ve never even met because he committed the cardinal sin of writing a comic book they happened not to like.  If they were rational, they wouldn&#8217;t be fans.</p>
<p>This is, to get back on topic, one of my favorite Superman stories, and Superman is my favorite fictional character.  It&#8217;s elegantly paced, plotted and executed.  Whenever someone says that a hero is defined by their villains, I think back to this issue and how it proves that old maxim of writing: for every rule of writing, the opposite is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86633</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86633</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t think that Millar was advocating rape and murder, but there&#039;s no way you can say he wasn&#039;t glorifying it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t think that Millar was advocating rape and murder, but there&#8217;s no way you can say he wasn&#8217;t glorifying it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knox</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86617</link>
		<dc:creator>Knox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86617</guid>
		<description>I do aims to please.

Seriously though-  i&#039;ve spent a lot of time at Millar&#039;s messageboard, and it&#039;s pretty obvious (to me) that he&#039;s a big fanboy, especially when it comes to the DC characters.   I don&#039;t think it&#039;s that far-out an idea that Deadshot Jr would hate comicbook fans (AND people with large DVD collections and boring desk jobs, not just comic fans).   It&#039;s totally in keeping with the way the character was presented at the beginning of the story- in essence the character is mocking people who were the way he used to be before he embraced his evil destiny.

I don&#039;t think that Mark Millar, writer, is mocking the readers any more than I think Mark Millar is advocating rape and murder and the other 99 atrocities the character committed in the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do aims to please.</p>
<p>Seriously though-  i&#8217;ve spent a lot of time at Millar&#8217;s messageboard, and it&#8217;s pretty obvious (to me) that he&#8217;s a big fanboy, especially when it comes to the DC characters.   I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s that far-out an idea that Deadshot Jr would hate comicbook fans (AND people with large DVD collections and boring desk jobs, not just comic fans).   It&#8217;s totally in keeping with the way the character was presented at the beginning of the story- in essence the character is mocking people who were the way he used to be before he embraced his evil destiny.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that Mark Millar, writer, is mocking the readers any more than I think Mark Millar is advocating rape and murder and the other 99 atrocities the character committed in the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bry Kotyk</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86616</link>
		<dc:creator>Bry Kotyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86616</guid>
		<description>Who says which, or &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt;, of the stories he&#039;s written represent where he &quot;stands&quot;, though?

I haven&#039;t read Wanted, but based on the descriptions here I can see why some would find it offensive.  However, I also think that it&#039;s a fair bit of an overreaction to automatically assume the beliefs and actions of a fictional character he wrote accurately represent how Millar himself feels.  For all you know, he was writing the character from a perspective the complete opposite of his own.  

(Just playing &quot;devil&#039;s advocate&quot; here.  It&#039;s been said before, but I think bears repeating.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who says which, or <i>any</i>, of the stories he&#8217;s written represent where he &#8220;stands&#8221;, though?</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read Wanted, but based on the descriptions here I can see why some would find it offensive.  However, I also think that it&#8217;s a fair bit of an overreaction to automatically assume the beliefs and actions of a fictional character he wrote accurately represent how Millar himself feels.  For all you know, he was writing the character from a perspective the complete opposite of his own.  </p>
<p>(Just playing &#8220;devil&#8217;s advocate&#8221; here.  It&#8217;s been said before, but I think bears repeating.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apodaca</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86615</link>
		<dc:creator>Apodaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86615</guid>
		<description>Hey, don&#039;t get me wrong, you&#039;re totally entitled to spend your money on what you like. I would be a pretty big hypocrite if I argued otherwise.

I also don&#039;t disagree with your assesment of his personality. I&#039;ve come to the same conclusion, really, it&#039;s just that I HAVE enjoyed things he&#039;s written. And no, they&#039;re never perfect, or even the best, but sometimes they&#039;re pretty good.

If the last issue of Ultimates Vol. 2 ever comes out, for example, I&#039;ll be buying it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, don&#8217;t get me wrong, you&#8217;re totally entitled to spend your money on what you like. I would be a pretty big hypocrite if I argued otherwise.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t disagree with your assesment of his personality. I&#8217;ve come to the same conclusion, really, it&#8217;s just that I HAVE enjoyed things he&#8217;s written. And no, they&#8217;re never perfect, or even the best, but sometimes they&#8217;re pretty good.</p>
<p>If the last issue of Ultimates Vol. 2 ever comes out, for example, I&#8217;ll be buying it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86613</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86613</guid>
		<description>I know, Dan, that there are better reasons to boycott Millar.  You make very good points.  I understand that Wesley is kind of a tool, but it seems obvious to me, at least, that he&#039;s the kind of person Millar seems to admire, and therefore reflects his point of view pretty well.  And yes, it&#039;s possible that it was completely temporary and Millar thinks comics readers are the greatest people in the world these days.  I have admitted more than once that my boycott is rather pathetic.  But it&#039;s mine.  I just don&#039;t see the point of giving my money to the man.  Other reasons might be better, but it comes down to not wanting to read anything he&#039;s written.  It&#039;s not that I&#039;m insulted, it&#039;s just that those few pages in Wanted made me realize that Millar is far less concerned with telling a story and far more concerned with being a rock star.  From what I&#039;ve read and from what others have said about Civil War, it seems like he&#039;s still that way.  So I just don&#039;t waste my time.

And Knox, that&#039;s very funny, but unless the clown in It (which I haven&#039;t read) tells fans of horror that they&#039;re complete dickheads for enjoying the genre, then it&#039;s not really an apt comparison, is it?  Again, my reasons may be stupid, but they&#039;re mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, Dan, that there are better reasons to boycott Millar.  You make very good points.  I understand that Wesley is kind of a tool, but it seems obvious to me, at least, that he&#8217;s the kind of person Millar seems to admire, and therefore reflects his point of view pretty well.  And yes, it&#8217;s possible that it was completely temporary and Millar thinks comics readers are the greatest people in the world these days.  I have admitted more than once that my boycott is rather pathetic.  But it&#8217;s mine.  I just don&#8217;t see the point of giving my money to the man.  Other reasons might be better, but it comes down to not wanting to read anything he&#8217;s written.  It&#8217;s not that I&#8217;m insulted, it&#8217;s just that those few pages in Wanted made me realize that Millar is far less concerned with telling a story and far more concerned with being a rock star.  From what I&#8217;ve read and from what others have said about Civil War, it seems like he&#8217;s still that way.  So I just don&#8217;t waste my time.</p>
<p>And Knox, that&#8217;s very funny, but unless the clown in It (which I haven&#8217;t read) tells fans of horror that they&#8217;re complete dickheads for enjoying the genre, then it&#8217;s not really an apt comparison, is it?  Again, my reasons may be stupid, but they&#8217;re mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apodaca</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86609</link>
		<dc:creator>Apodaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86609</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I wept, Dan. No, I boycott Millar because he has no respect for the people who read his books. So why should I buy them?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You misunderstand, Greg. I&#039;m not saying you should be buying Millar&#039;s books, I&#039;m saying that your reason for NOT is silly.

1. It&#039;s fiction, and therefore, totally possible for the character to believe and represent something that is not congruous with the writer&#039;s position. The ending is totally consistent with what was established of Wesley&#039;s character previously in the series.

2. Even if it was a direct representation of MIllar&#039;s P.O.V, it&#039;s quite possible that it was a temporary fit, and not a manifesto for his life.

3. There are other, better reasons to dislike Wanted! The story was SOOOO predictable, the pacing was uneven, and the release schedule was slow and inconsistent. You can even criticize the sudden breaking of the fourth wall in the last issue.

But to me, being insulted by something that a stranger wrote to be seen by thousands of people across the world, seems like a colossal waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I wept, Dan. No, I boycott Millar because he has no respect for the people who read his books. So why should I buy them?</p></blockquote>
<p>You misunderstand, Greg. I&#8217;m not saying you should be buying Millar&#8217;s books, I&#8217;m saying that your reason for NOT is silly.</p>
<p>1. It&#8217;s fiction, and therefore, totally possible for the character to believe and represent something that is not congruous with the writer&#8217;s position. The ending is totally consistent with what was established of Wesley&#8217;s character previously in the series.</p>
<p>2. Even if it was a direct representation of MIllar&#8217;s P.O.V, it&#8217;s quite possible that it was a temporary fit, and not a manifesto for his life.</p>
<p>3. There are other, better reasons to dislike Wanted! The story was SOOOO predictable, the pacing was uneven, and the release schedule was slow and inconsistent. You can even criticize the sudden breaking of the fourth wall in the last issue.</p>
<p>But to me, being insulted by something that a stranger wrote to be seen by thousands of people across the world, seems like a colossal waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Waters</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86594</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86594</guid>
		<description>Millar I just don&#039;t get. On the one hand, he writes something like WANTED, and CIVIL WAR, which seems to explicitly reject the idealism and individualism of the superhero genre, but then he&#039;s written something like this, which is a total affirmation of superheroic tropes. 

I have no clue where he stands on anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Millar I just don&#8217;t get. On the one hand, he writes something like WANTED, and CIVIL WAR, which seems to explicitly reject the idealism and individualism of the superhero genre, but then he&#8217;s written something like this, which is a total affirmation of superheroic tropes. </p>
<p>I have no clue where he stands on anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkAndrew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86589</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkAndrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86589</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
I boycott Stephen King for much the same reason. People say that Pennywise is just a character, but deep down I know that Stephen King is an evil clown who kills children, and â€œItâ€ was just Kingâ€™s way of rubbing it in our face.
I just canâ€™t support anyone with that kind of contempt for his audience.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, I totally laughed at this.  LOLed, even.  

Sorry, Greg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
I boycott Stephen King for much the same reason. People say that Pennywise is just a character, but deep down I know that Stephen King is an evil clown who kills children, and â€œItâ€ was just Kingâ€™s way of rubbing it in our face.<br />
I just canâ€™t support anyone with that kind of contempt for his audience.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, I totally laughed at this.  LOLed, even.  </p>
<p>Sorry, Greg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knox</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86585</link>
		<dc:creator>Knox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86585</guid>
		<description>I boycott Stephen King for much the same reason.  People say that Pennywise is just a character, but deep down I know that Stephen King is an evil clown who kills children, and &quot;It&quot; was just King&#039;s way of rubbing it in our face.
I just can&#039;t support anyone with that kind of contempt for his audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I boycott Stephen King for much the same reason.  People say that Pennywise is just a character, but deep down I know that Stephen King is an evil clown who kills children, and &#8220;It&#8221; was just King&#8217;s way of rubbing it in our face.<br />
I just can&#8217;t support anyone with that kind of contempt for his audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkAndrew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86582</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkAndrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86582</guid>
		<description>Not that I, y&#039;know, remember any details* but I think I liked Wanted.  I wasn&#039;t offended, and I don&#039;t remember thinking &quot;This is going to be really offensive to some people.&quot;  

* No... wait.  Here&#039;s the deal:  The main characters in the book are all DC Villain analouges.  I remember the Toyman-variant got killed and I remember thinking &quot;Wow.  That was a REALLY well executed piece of writing.&quot;  

But that&#039;s all I remember.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I, y&#8217;know, remember any details* but I think I liked Wanted.  I wasn&#8217;t offended, and I don&#8217;t remember thinking &#8220;This is going to be really offensive to some people.&#8221;  </p>
<p>* No&#8230; wait.  Here&#8217;s the deal:  The main characters in the book are all DC Villain analouges.  I remember the Toyman-variant got killed and I remember thinking &#8220;Wow.  That was a REALLY well executed piece of writing.&#8221;  </p>
<p>But that&#8217;s all I remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean S.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/comment-page-1/#comment-86547</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/04/29/into-the-back-issue-box-27/#comment-86547</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t this comic book suppose to be aimed at children?  I don&#039;t think I would want my 7 year old nieces and nephew read this comic because I think some of the issues in it aren&#039;t approriate for children.  Suicide? Terrorists? Someone about to be executed by electric chair?  As far as I&#039;m concerned, not stuff I would them exposed to at that age or anywhere up to maybe ten or twelve.  I&#039;d hate to have to explain suicide to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t this comic book suppose to be aimed at children?  I don&#8217;t think I would want my 7 year old nieces and nephew read this comic because I think some of the issues in it aren&#8217;t approriate for children.  Suicide? Terrorists? Someone about to be executed by electric chair?  As far as I&#8217;m concerned, not stuff I would them exposed to at that age or anywhere up to maybe ten or twelve.  I&#8217;d hate to have to explain suicide to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

