CBR Live! Archive
Why I'm not the biggest fan of Darwyn Cooke's version of The Spirit
- by Greg Burgas
- in Comic Reviews
Of course, the latest issue was very good, so maybe this will be a moot point soon, but still.
I have not been the biggest fan of DC's latest incarnation of Will Eisner's seminal creation, despite the fact that it's being written and drawn by Darwyn Cooke, who is an immense talent. This has led people to comment that I am an idiot, have no taste, prefer having sex with goats rather than humans, worship at the altar of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin, and vote Republican. Who knew one little comic book could engender such passion? However, despite my dissatisfaction with the comic, I could never really pinpoint why I didn't take it home, slip under the covers of my bed, and do to it what I apparently do to goats, which is what fans of the book seemingly do. It just seemed like the first five issues were lacking the verve that Cooke has brought to other books he's done and what I heard the original stories were like. So I went out and bought The Best of The Spirit trade paperback, which is now available at fine bookstores everywhere. And lo, I was not unlike Paul on the road to Damascus - mine eyes were opened, and I understood all the mysteries of the universe. Well, maybe not the mysteries of the universe, but certainly the mysteries of the Spirit. You'll forgive me if many of you already knew these mysteries, but I'm going to inspect them to show why I have not been as jazzed with Cooke's version as, apparently, I ought to be if I want to call myself a comics nerd and an American.
Eisner and his collaborators (who were legion, apparently, but I don't know if they assisted on just the art or both art and story) understood something about good ol' Denny Colt: he's kind of boring. I mean, he's a guy who wears a suit and puts on a domino mask and fights crime. He's not exactly the most dynamic hero you can find. So Eisner simply used the Spirit to tell weird, noir tales about the city's criminal and not-always-criminal underbelly. The Spirit showed up, sure, but in an ancillary role. The stories in The Best of the Spirit are notable because often the Spirit isn't a big cast member in them. These short stories, usually seven or eight pages long, highlight strange goings-on in the world, tell morality tales, or toy with the format of comics storytelling. The Spirit is sometimes a major player in them, but very often he shows up in a few panels to wrap things up, or appears more often yet still away from the main action. This makes these stories fascinating slices of life that show humanity in all its madness, and it's something that, for the first five issues of Cooke's The Spirit, was missing.
Let's take a look at some of the better stories in the trade paperback. "The Last Trolley" (24 March 1946) tells the tale of Crauley, a bank teller who goes in on a heist but double-crosses his accomplices. He believes that he's killed the Spirit (he shot him in the back, but our intrepid hero survived), and now he's taking the trolley out to its last stop to find the loot he stashed before he called the cops on the robbers.  The thieves he betrayed show up on the trolley, and Crauley appears to go slowly mad when he thinks they're just toying with his thoughts by not responding to him. The story has a nice, "slow train to Hell" feel, as Raven's Point, the last trolley stop, is only 30 miles away from Central City but looks like it's a desolate swamp a thousand miles from civilization. The story is a nice psychological creep-out.
             Â
In "The Killer" (8 December 1946), we meet Henry, who looks like a respectable man but, we're told early on, is actually a murderer. We visit his depressing life before the war, in which he works a dead-end job and is married to woman who always complains. When he goes to war, however, he inadvertently becomes a hero, but when he comes back, he's still stuck in the same job. As he dreams about his war days, the perspective of the story shifts so we're looking through Henry's eyes and seeing what he sees. He goes deeper into dementia before he snaps. It's a brief tale, but one that encapsulates the experience of returning G.I.s very well. What do you do when you were a big shot in the army but can't hold a job as a civilian? Henry can't come back to a normal life, because his normal life is far worse than the one where people were trying to kill him.
             Â
"Wild Rice" (4 April 1948) tells the the disturbing story of Rice Wilder, a rich girl with some kinky tastes. It's fascinating reading a story in which a woman likes to get knocked around and realize it was published in the late 1940s as a comic book. Rice wants to escape the constraints of her wealthy life, and the only way she can is by turning to crime. Her criminal boyfriend turns against her, of course, and when the Spirit tries to "save" her, she asks him if he believes that just because she's rich she's truly free. Her father runs her life as surely as her punk boyfriend did. She gets the fate she wants, even if it's not exactly what she deserved. The Spirit is largely ineffectual.
             Â
There are lots of other fascinating stories in the collection, too. In "The Last Hand" (16 May 1948), a gambler and a killer seeks refuge as a lodger with an old woman, but it turns out things are not really as they seem inside the house, to his eternal regret. "The Story of Gerhard Shnobble" (5 September 1948) tells of a man who could fly ... but no one notices. "Two Lives" (12 December 1948) is a somewhat misogynistic tale about a man who is willing to do anything to escape his miserable marriage ... including going to jail after being mistaken for an escaped convict. This is a marvelously told story, as Eisner contrasts the convict, who wants to escape prison, with the schlub, who wants to escape is house. "The Story of Rat-Tat, the Toy Machine Gun" (4 September 1949) looks like a children's story but concerns gangsters and murder. "The Embezzler" (27 November 1949) is an interesting story of misdirection. In terms of structure, my favorite in the collection is "Ten Minutes" (11 September 1949), which attempts to tell a story in "real time." Eisner makes the point in the first panel that it will take us ten minutes to read the story, which might seem like a small amount of time, but they are the last ten minutes in his protagonist's life. This story stretches the concept a bit (the story takes less than ten minutes, and the events in the story seem to occur in greater than ten), but it's still a very nifty device that Eisner uses, and the Spirit, who shows up only on page 6 of a seven-page story, is nevertheless nicely omniscient about Freddy and his guilt. The final panel, with a man protesting that ten minutes late doesn't mean anything, is obvious but still a nice touch. This is a prototypical example of the kind of stories that we see throughout the book.
            Â
All of this is lacking in Cooke's version of the book, at least for the first five issues. Some people have defended Cooke by saying he needs to introduce all the major players of the Spirit's canon, namely P'Gell and Silk Satin, but why? P'Gell didn't show up until after the war in the original comic. Why the desperate need to bring her in? The only "essential" Spirit story that Cooke might have needed to tell is his origin. That I can buy. But there's no need to try to establish Denny Colt as an interesting character with a supporting cast. This isn't a normal masked hero book, and Cooke shouldn't try to make it one.
             Â
I am excited to see that he appears to have gotten it out of his system. In issue #5 he took a step in the right direction with a weird story about canned food. In issue #6 he ignored the Spirit almost completely and told a heart-wrenching story of a musical prodigy gone somewhat bad. That issue, more than the previous one, showed how good Cooke can be on this title and how interesting his writing can be. As I think about my reactions to the first four (and even the fifth) issues, I realize that the Spirit's inherent dullness was seeping into the other characters and even into Cooke's storytelling. He just wasn't enough to carry the stories, and his banter with Silk Satin in issue #3, while nicely written, came off stale when a cypher like Denny Colt was saying it. Imagine a miscast actor in a witty romantic comedy and that's what it felt like. In the original Silk Satin story, even Eisner can't really pull it off, and Cooke doesn't either. In later issues, after the Spirit had been around a while, the banter becomes a bit more convincing, but when it comes so early in the series, when we still know very little about the Spirit, it doesn't feel right. By writing stories that hardly feature the Spirit, Eisner embedded him in the world of Central City. He could get off a one-liner here and there, and it helped define him as a character. The stories where he takes front-and-center, while often not inventive in a storytelling way, often feature more realistic dialogue than the ones in which Eisner was trying something new, and the Spirit is more interesting. He's more interesting, however, because of all the stories in which he doesn't play a starring role. By making him the star of the first five issues of the new series (even though he's not really much of the star in issue #2), Cooke started off in a bit of a hole. Maybe he's gotten it out of his system and will concentrate more on telling good stories with the Spirit as a guest star.
             Â
The length of the stories hurts Cooke's version, too. Eisner could get away with one cool idea or one interesting way of telling the story and not worry too much about it because the stories were short. Cooke needs to fill an entire issue. That's not to say he couldn't tell stories in an unusual way, but he needs a bit more than just that small nugget. Something like "Ten Minutes" would probably not work in a standard-sized comic book (although Claremont tried something like it in Uncanny X-Men #467, which is a very good comic). This isn't an insurmountable problem, but it does mean that Cooke needs to work a bit harder. Eisner didn't have to give his characters too much personality, because he was simply using them for brief moments in time. Cooke needs to make them a bit more real, which is more difficult. Even after reading the three stories in the trade starring Silk Satin, Cooke's one issue gave her a more interesting personality than Eisner did. She just wasn't in that compelling a story in Cooke's series.
             Â
Obviously, the comparison between the two series is off-kilter. The trade paperback is a Greatest Hits compilation, while Cooke has written six issues. However, I'm not saying that Cooke's series is bad. Not at all. It just seems like the template for Spirit stories is a pretty good one, and so far (with the exception of #6), Cooke just seems to want to write simplistic adventure stories. There's nothing really wrong with that, but it doesn't make the series stand out in any way in the literary arena (the art is typically gorgeous). Cooke had a chance to hit the ground running, but the first five issues are simply concerned with trying to make the Spirit interesting. The audience for this kind of comic doesn't need a lot of introductions, and I think that hurts the early issues. Yes, you can accuse me of reviewing one book by comparing it to another book and not judging it on its merits, but I'm doing both. The first five issues of Cooke's The Spirit, despite their potential, aren't all that gripping. When you compare them to the Eisner stories, it becomes even clearer that Cooke could be doing a lot more. My hope is that Cooke has found his footing with issue #6 and will do some more interesting things with the comic. Issue #7 is a group of three short stories from different creators, which promises stories in the old-school vein, and I would love to see Cooke come back with stories about the weird and the lost and the darkly comic. This series has a great deal of potential. I just want to see it realized.
- Posted on June 5, 2007 @ 12:05 PM






22 Comments
stealthwise
June 5, 2007 at 12:12 pm
I have the Best of the Spirit, and it does nothing for me at all. This serires from Cooke has been great so far, especially the last two.
Jason
June 5, 2007 at 12:29 pm
I think part of it is that Cooke needs to establish The Spirit in the minds of new readers before he can branch off and start telling less Spirit-centric tales. Overall I've been very happy with Cooke's series, but #5 was a little iffy (especially with the bird, um, err....lovin' going on). Next month's issue will be interesting since it has three different short stories by different crreators (including Kyle Baker).
MarkAndrew
June 5, 2007 at 12:35 pm
It's worth pointing out that I didn't think "The Best of the Spirit" WAS the best of the Spirit.
Decent, but none of my favorite stories.
And, I dunno. I don't think it's really fair to compare poor Cooke to Eisner.
I really don't think that, in terms of... Um... not writing well, but utilizing narrative craft, ANYONE in periodical comics has come close to matching Eisner. (I think Alan Moore could. He just doesn't want too.)
Like I look at most of the Spirit comics with my critic goggles on and go "Shit. That was PERFECT."
I mean, Cooke's kind of asking for it writing the Spirit and all, but any comparison between the two is gonna put him up against a standard that's damn near impossible for him... or ANYONE... to uphold.
Matt Brady
June 5, 2007 at 12:48 pm
Good essay, Greg. I disagree with you about how boring the Spirit is as a character, but I understand what you're saying, and you make a really good point about him being made more interesting by fleshing out his surrroundings. But I think Cooke needed the first few issues to introduce readers to his version of that world, before he goes off doing other stuff. And I liked them, even if you didn't. Plus, while each issue has been self-contained, he is subtly building a subplot that's eventually going to pay off. I'm interested to see where he's going, and I hope he balance the more experimental stories like the ones you mention with the straight up Spirit-fights-crime adventures.
Lambo
June 5, 2007 at 1:43 pm
I agree Greg. While the art has been fantastic, as usual, I haven't really been able to get into any of the stories, but I don't think they've been bad. Just not very engaging, but maybe I'm missing the point on what is supposed to be a light adventure romp. I'm still sticking with the book because Cooke is close to making me care and I'm also interested in the building subplot.
Matthew E
June 5, 2007 at 2:03 pm
I don't know if I'm going to stick with Cooke's Spirit or not; I like it, but I don't know if I like it enough.
But my favourite parts of the series so far have mostly had to do with the Spirit himself: the expression on his face as he peeks out of the car upholstery, his relationship with Ebony, his reaction to being attacked by Julia ("Of all the insane--")... I like that he's stalwart and capable, but not too stalwart and capable. Which doesn't make me think that the book would be better if the Spirit appeared in it less.
Sure, Cooke isn't doing what Eisner did, but then nobody can do what Eisner did. Cooke has to do what Cooke does, and why wouldn't he? Cripes, if you start with the immense advantage of being Darwyn Cooke, why would you throw it away?
Steve Flanagan
June 5, 2007 at 2:28 pm
I made similar comments in a review of Cooke's first 4 issues. I have to disagree with MarkAndrew. Alan Moore did try to do the Spirit with Greyshirt, but it read too much like pastiche. It's the devil and the deep blue sea: too much like Eisner, and yo seem like a cheap copy; too little alike, why bother?
But I am still enjoying Cooke's work. I just have to remind myself not to expect Eisner before I crack open an issue.
Prankster
June 5, 2007 at 5:10 pm
I read a snippet of an interview with Darwyn Cooke where he said that he was "warming up" with the first issues and was going to gradually segue into Eisner-type narratively twisty stories, a transition which appears to be underway with the story of Almost Blue.
I agree that he didn't need to take so long to introduce us to the Spirit, and the lack of Eisnerian storytelling has hurt the book so far. But it's still a pretty fun, beautifully drawn book, and it sounds like it's heading in exactly the direction we've been wanting it to.
Aaron Kashtan
June 5, 2007 at 9:39 pm
It seems like all you're saying, Greg, is that Darwyn Cooke's Spirit is not the same as Will Eisner's Spirit.
Well, duh.
(I will agree with you that issues #2-4 were somewhat underwhelming, but the last two issues were exactly what they should have been.)
davidwynne
June 6, 2007 at 2:42 am
First off- I don't like Darwin Cooke's Spirit, Although I DO like that Cooke isn't trying to be Eisner. I think it takes guts to tackle a character like that and not ape the original style. The Spirit has been my first exposure to Cooke's work, and I@m sad to say, while I think his art is lovely, the writing leaves me cold. I put this down to taste, though.
Second- MarkAndrew, I'd like to reccomend a book: the Complete Alan Moore Future Shocks, published by Rebellion. It might be a little difficult to get hold of in the US, but it's well worth the trouble. In it you'll find some of Moore's earliest work (from just after he gave up strip-cartooning), and this is where you'll see the kind of formal play you seem to be looking for in his work. I think the reason we see so little of that kind of thing from him now is because he got it out of the way so early on. I particularly reccomend "Chronocops", which features superb Dave Gibbons art. You'll also find art by Bryan Talbot, Alan Davis, Brendan McCarthy, Steve Dillon and Jesus Redondo in there.
Now, to the point-
The problem with comparing the first 6 issues of a monthly book to a "best of" collection of a weekly comic that ran for over a decade should be immediatly obvious. Not to mention that it's the "best of" the best loved work of an artist who is considered by many to be the greatest single talent ever to work in the medium.
I think it may also be worth noting that the "best of" may not be the most representative sample in terms of story content. It stands to reason that in a run of literraly hundreds of stories, the ones that really stand out will be the ones that stray from the usual formula. I'm reminded of Judge Dredd- another long running weekly told in short episodes written almost exclusivly by the same writer (John Wagner) for it's whole run- whenever people talk about the best Dredd stories ever told, the same ones come up, and they're invariably stories that concentrate on supporting players, or more usually, random citizens from Dredd's world; stories where Dredd is in fact a minor character in his own strip. But these are not by any means representative of the majority of the strip's history... which is part of why they stand out.
MarkAndrew
June 6, 2007 at 3:00 am
Oh, I think there's plenty of formal play in Moore's work. I just think he keeps forgetting to tell a freakin' story and slips into lecture mode during most of his projects. He's not all story FIRST like Eisner.
ninjawookie
June 6, 2007 at 4:12 am
I'm enjoying the spirit for its modern/timeless approach for now, they are entertaining reads.
Cooke should be doing something creator owned however since I have no real attachment to the spirit.
Greg Hatcher
June 6, 2007 at 7:06 am
If I ever feel like being Designated Puppy Killer around here for a particular week, I'll do the sequel to this one that says, "Y'know, the ORIGINAL Spirit wasn't All That, either."
People always go back to it as being the Eisner template but really that strip was the Eisner PROTOTYPE. It was the place where he figured out what the hell he was doing. So Greg's point is especially valid because in order to be 'true to Eisner's version' Cooke should be using the Spirit as an experimental vehicle to figure out what HE wants to be doing.
Apart from all that, the new Spirit book is one more example of Marvel and DC turning into one giant snake that's eating itself. Their critical darlings of the last couple of years are all pretty much revamps and pastiches: All-Star Superman, New Frontier, etc. If DC really wanted to honor Will Eisner, they'd start some sort of graphic novel imprint in his name and use it to showcase books like Fun Home. The new Spirit book strikes me as a blatant example of milking Eisner's most famous property for a few more bucks, and the fact that the book is perfectly okay and readable strikes me as an unexpected bonus. The initial reaction to it seems mostly to be, "Wow, Darwyn Cooke took on an insanely difficult job and didn't actually suck at it! Whoa!" And, you know, more power to him. Well done, certainly. My grumble is more just that it's a stupid job for him to be doing, especially since as far as I know, the last thing Eisner himself was interested in doing was reviving the Spirit. It comes off like DC was just waiting for the old man to die so they could go ahead with the new pastiche project.
...I admit that was more of a snarl than usual, but I'm really getting TIRED of these revival books being treated like some kind of breakthrough project for essentially hitting the same "baseline okay" mark the original work did. It's not a breakthrough when Grant Morrison does a clever Superman story or Jeff Smith does a fun Captain Marvel pastiche or Darwyn Cooke dopes a Spirit comic that doesn't stink. It's the minimum we should expect. The criminal part is that we don't actually demand such and keep buying the crappy books.
davidwynne
June 6, 2007 at 7:46 am
Markandrew-
Fair enough. Although I wouldn't have said Eisner's Spirit work was "story first" at all- it was all about formal play, and seeing what he could get away with while still ostensibly making an adventure-hero strip. I'm guesing that's where our wires got crossed.
Now, Eisner's LATER stuff, yes, "story first" all the way.
MarkAndrew
June 6, 2007 at 7:56 am
Eisner was always insistent that his work was story first. I have no problem taking him at his word.
Greg Hatcher - Yep. I still agree completely.
Bradley Curry
June 6, 2007 at 9:11 am
I could not agree with Greg Hatcher more. Yay, Darwyn Cooke is doing a good version of The Spirit, but why? And, of all the critically acclaimed remake artsits of the moment, shouldn't Cooke be the most concerned about proving he can do incredible work with his own characters? Grant Morrison and Jeff Smith have already done that. Maybe he just wants to stay on that Mark Waid level though. And that's ok.
MarkAndrew-
You said "I really don’t think that, in terms of… Um… not writing well, but utilizing narrative craft, ANYONE in periodical comics has come close to matching Eisner. (I think Alan Moore could. He just doesn’t want too.)"
Where do you think Tezuka and Kirby stand with Eisner in terms of narrative craft?
Michael
June 6, 2007 at 1:31 pm
Saying nothing about the respective talents of Eisner and Cooke, just because Cooke is writing stories starring a character that Eisner created, why would he use the same storytelling style and techniques? That would be a catastrophically bad choice in my mind.
Gokitalo
June 6, 2007 at 3:51 pm
Yay, Darwyn Cooke is doing a good version of The Spirit, but why? And, of all the critically acclaimed remake artsits of the moment, shouldn’t Cooke be the most concerned about proving he can do incredible work with his own characters?
Actually, Darwyn Cooke had been planning to work on a creator-owned project before he was offered The Spirit.
Anyway, I think Cooke has done interesting things with the character of the Spirit and his supporting cast, particularly Ebony White (who seemed practically irredeemable). I think Cooke's set himself up so that he can alternate between doing stories where the Spirit is more of a background character to stories where he and his cast are the focus.
Johnny Bacardi
June 6, 2007 at 8:38 pm
Eisner's a hard act to follow, and I think Cooke is doing OK so far. Not transcendently OK, but OK. Expectations are difficult to live up to, no doubt about it.
But Greg, please please PLEASE never mention Chris Claremont and Eisner in the same paragraph, or even in the same page. You'll have my undying gratitude.
Johnny Bacardi
June 6, 2007 at 8:39 pm
...same paragraph AGAIN..., I meant to say.
Fingers, meet brain.
Greg Burgas
June 6, 2007 at 9:01 pm
Sorry, Mr. B. I didn't mean to cause you trauma!
Anonymous
June 7, 2007 at 11:48 am
You know, you'll need to run this article again in the near future when Frank Miller's movie version of the Spirit tanks at the box office -- I can envision that a lot of the same successes and failures of Cooke's effort on the Spirit happening to Miller in Hollywood.