web stats

CSBG Archive

What I bought – 27 June 2007

Ah, comics.  Is there anything they can’t do?

Blue Beetle #16 by John Rogers and Rafael Albuquerque.  $2.99, DC.

06-28-2007 04;54;21PM.JPG

You know, I was going to write that if you’re going to put that on your cover, you might as well go all the way at put “Total Eclipso of the Heart,” but then I noticed that the story inside is actually called “Total Eclipso: The Heart.”  Very clever, Mr. Rogers! 

I guess this is supposed to be a crossover with Countdown, but it’s also a complete story, so I don’t really mind if it is.  DC certainly isn’t advertising it as such.  I mean, you have to know that Eclipso is Jean Loring, but other than that, this is just a story of an evil aspect of God trying to kill a baby and Jaime and some hot chick stopping her.  It’s nothing fancy, which means it’s a good comic book that very few people will buy, even though it has everything you might want in a comic book.  I know, I’m sorry for bringing it up every time there’s a decent comic with no audience (and yes, I know I am late to the party with this comic), but still.

For the most part, Rogers hits all the right notes in this issue.  Traci 13 (who I’m going to assume is Dr. Thirteen’s daughter, and why is her last name lettered as a number?) enlists Jaime to stop Eclipso from possessing a baby who is not only innocent, but has the potential to be super-powerful.  Paco rescues the baby but is forced to fight the Blue Beetle for some reason (I’ll get to it) and what ensues is hilarious and nicely appropriate.  Their brief battle weakens Eclipso to the point where Traci, who was raised by the Dibnys, to blast her into oblivion (but not killing her, as she points out – Eclipso is not easily destroyed).  And then Jaime gets to make out with her.  Isn’t that nice?

There are a few strange problems with the issue.  Traci and the baby’s parents appear to get the kid out of harm’s way, but then Eclipso blows up their apartment building and somehow gets the kid.  We can assume that she gets the kid when she blows up the building, but it’s kind of unclear.  In fact, Traci even tells Jaime that they got the kid away from Eclipso, but somehow she grabbed it anyway.  And then, when Paco grabs the kid out of the magic circle (that keeps Traci out, ’cause she’s all magic and stuff), somehow Blue Beetle becomes her champion.  Um, why, exactly?  How does Eclipso have influence over Jaime at this moment?  I’m not sure.

Those are relatively minor points, however.  For the most part, this is a fine comic.  Albuquerque’s art is very nice, and his Eclipso is both sexy and scary.  It’s an adventurous comic where good triumphs over evil and the characters are well developed.  I know – DC does publish comics like that!

Criminal #7 by Ed Brubaker and Sean Phillips.  $2.99, Marvel/Icon.

06-28-2007 04;55;06PM.JPG

There’s really not much to say about this issue.  If you liked the first six issues, you’ll like this one.  Brubaker and Phillips know what they’re doing, after all, and with these kinds of stories, it’s all about the resolution and who gets revenge and who gets screwed by whom.  So far, it’s shaping up to be far better than the first arc, and that’s a good thing.  The only thing that bugs me is the omniscient narrator, because it’s a bit strange to read what’s happening in the third person, especially when so much of it could be in the first person.  It’s a weird choice on Brubaker’s part, and if it doesn’t mean something, I think it will be a poor one.  We’ll see.

Also, Brubaker writes that death didn’t “phase” Tracy.  “Phase” means “a distinct stage of development,” among other things.  He meant “faze,” which means “to disrupt the composure of, bother, disconcert.”  If everyone else can nitpick over the fact that “Dreamgirl” should be two words, I can nitpick over the use of homonyms!

Daredevil #98 by Ed Brubaker, Michael Lark, and Stefano Gaudiano.  $2.99, Marvel.

06-28-2007 04;55;49PM.JPG

It’s weird that you can pretty much expect what you’re going to get from a lot of comic book writers these days, and Brubaker is no exception.  As this is Part Four of Five, we can expect a lot more to happen than Part Three, which is the “padded” issue for most five- or six-parters (for six-parters, issues 3 and 4 are often the padded ones, which is annoying).  Brubaker, not unlike many writers, has difficulty with endings, so this issue promises to be the best chapter of the story.  And it works very well, from the action to Milla’s intervention because she knows Melvin Potter is still a good man, to the final “cliffhanger.”  Lark draws the fight scenes excellently, and although I always get a bit bothered when action movie clichés filter into comics by good writers (Milla crashes through a window and isn’t bleeding from several hundred cuts), it’s just something we all have to accept.  Another solid issue of Daredevil in a story that will probably end slightly off.  Maybe it won’t, and I’ll be pleasantly surprised next time!

Elephantmen Pilot by Richard Starkings, Moritat, and a bunch of other people.  $2.99, Image.

06-28-2007 04;56;43PM.JPG

This came out a few weeks ago (or was it last week?), but I just received it in the mail, and as usual, I’d like to thank Richard Starkings for sending it my way.  This is an issue that collects a bunch of stuff from way back when, when Starkings was just formulating the characters and a bunch of comics creators wrote stories featuring Hip Flask.  There’s also a bunch of pinups from the late 1990s, and the barest semblance of a framing story that is really unnecessary if you’ve been following the series.  In fact, this isn’t really a necessary issue, although it’s full of interesting stuff.  We get a Busiek/Immonen story before Immonen changed his style (I don’t know when he drew it, but it resembles the look he used in Superman: Secret Identity).  We also have a Joe Kelly/Peter Gross/Ryan Kelly story (Gross breaks it down, Kelly finishes) of Hip Flask on another planet, which has a nice unexpected ending.  Finally, there’s a Loeb/Churchill story that’s exactly what you would expect from a Loeb/Churchill story – you must decide if that’s a good thing or not!  There are plenty of pinups, too, some good, some bad.

It’s a nice comic, to be sure, but it’s something more for completists than anything else.  What we really need is a new issue of the regular series!

Fallen Angel #17 by Peter David, Joe Corroney, and Billy Tucci.  $3.99, IDW.

06-28-2007 04;57;26PM.JPG 06-28-2007 04;58;04PM.JPG

The weakest issues of Fallen Angel are those that guest-star characters from other comic books, like the Sachs and Violens two-parter from the old DC series, and now this one, with Shi.  I have no experience with Shi at all, except that her face is included with every package of comic bags I buy – what’s up with that?  Anyway, David tries to make this work, and he does a decent job, but it’s still a pretty dull issue.  It’s basically a story about Lee and Shi showing up in a strange, dream-like Japanese city at the same time, and facing each other as the issue ends.  We get half the story from Lee’s point of view, and half the story (the part drawn by Tucci) from Shi’s point of view.  In both instances, it appears the Christian God is forcing them to that point.  With Shi, Jesus actually shows up and sends her on her mission, which includes slaughtering a bunch of guards (good to know Jesus approves of that sort of thing).  I’m not really sure what the point of the whole thing is, unless David really, really, really wanted to write a Shi story and Tucci thought it was a great idea.  Because it’s Fallen Angel and because it’s David, I’m sure somehow it will make sense in the end, but this is an uninspired set-up issue.

The Nightly News #1-6 by Jonathan Hickman.  $2.99, Image.

06-28-2007 04;58;45PM.JPG 06-28-2007 04;59;29PM.JPG 06-28-2007 05;00;11PM.JPG

06-28-2007 05;00;50PM.JPG 06-28-2007 05;01;34PM.JPG 06-28-2007 05;02;15PM.JPG

In case you were foolish enough to skip this mini-series, Hickman has a back-up story in Marvel’s Legion of Monsters: Satana issue that came out this week.  I didn’t read it, but it looks gorgeous.  But you really should get this series.

This is Hickman’s first comic work, and let’s hope he has a bright future.  The biggest draw of this series is the distinctive look of the art, which Hickman has explained elsewhere so I’m not going into it (and, you know, I’m too stupid).  The art is wonderful to behold, because Hickman does excellent stuff with not only his figures (who are all photo referenced) but with the mix of media in the book, with various charts and graphs, plus all the circles that help with transitions between different sections of the page, as Hickman eschews panels altogether.  It’s a fantastic book to just look at and let wash over you, and it’s cool to see someone trying to do something different with comic-book art.

The story is perfectly fine, except for the ending, which Hickman botches to a certain degree, although I’m not terribly sure how he could have ended it.  The series is about how the media lies to the common people, and a group of terrorists who go out and start killing reporters to make a point.  This sends the media and the politicians with whom they conspire into a panic, and they try to fight back.  Hickman isn’t telling a story as much as grinding an axe about how people in this country have been lied to but they don’t really care, as long as they’re entertained.  The problem with doing something like this is that ultimately, Hickman himself is part of the machinery, as are we all, and we know that this will end poorly for the “star” of the book, John Guyton (he even narrates at one point: “Exactly how did you think this was going to end for me?”), and that the status quo really won’t change all that much.  The book certainly gets us to think, but we should already be aware of the problems of the mass media and how very few companies own everything and how they’re in bed with Washington.  The very end, where the mastermind is revealed, is fine, but hollow, as Hickman simply implies that it’s a “meet the old boss, same as the old boss” kind of thing, which fails to follow through on the promise of the book’s premise.  But, as I said, I’m not sure how you can end something like this, which posits a bleak world and offers nothing to change it except through assassination.

This is a tough series to consider, because we’re all complicit in some way in the conglomerates that control what we see on television and hear on the radio.  But then there’s something like the Internet, which is largely anarchic.  Unless it isn’t!!!!!  Hickman’s claims that violent overthrow is the only answer sounds good, but then we replace the power structure we have with a different power structure, because there’s something I once heard about a vacuum and something abhorring it.  If I say, well, I’m not being indoctrinated because I get my news from The Daily Show, someone will come along (you know who you are!) and say that Jon Stewart is indoctrinating me just as surely as the networks are.  So Hickman can’t end his comic satisfactorily, because no ending will be satisfactory.  And although the narrative of the book is rather compelling, we don’t really get a solid discussion of exactly what a viable solution to the problem – and it is a problem – is.  Hickman, presumably, just wants to write a good story and not worry about the implications of what he’s writing, but he’s the one who brought it up in the first place, so he ought to put some more thought into it.

That’s not to say this isn’t worth the money.  As I mentioned, it’s beautiful, and the story is interesting, even if it lacks the depth that Hickman seems to be aiming at.  I look forward to his work in the future (and he has some adverts in the back of issue #6 of upcoming work, which is neat).

She-Hulk #19 by Dan Slott, Ty Templeton, Rick Burchett, and Cliff Rathburn.  $2.99, Marvel.

06-28-2007 05;02;56PM.JPG

Yay!  The lawyering is back, and all is right in the world as Slott finishes up his run on the title!  That means, of course, that this issue is pretty damned awesome after the tedious “Agent of S.H.I.E.L.D.” storyline.

Slott returns Jen to her law firm and gives us a doozy of a case: Mallory Book defends the Leader (I guess you could probably tell that from the cover).  This allows Slott to come to terms with one of the less savory aspects of the book: She-Hulk’s skankiness.  Now, he’s still a bit flippant about it, but at least he addresses it in a convincing manner.  Add that to finding out that Stu Cicero isn’t dead, he’s just … elsewhere (I don’t want to ruin it) and that the Leader doesn’t escape when he can because he thinks he’s going to win his case (after Mallory proves that She-Hulk is a skank while Jen isn’t, so her personality is different when she’s big and green), and we have a pretty darned decent comic book.  I just figure Slott was bound by the dictates of a big crossover to hand Jen over to S.H.I.E.L.D. for a little while and didn’t really care about the book that much, because it wasn’t what he wanted to do.  I could be wrong, but then why were those issues so dreary, and this issue is nothing but zip?

One thing bugs me.  In Incredible Hulk #106, which came out before but occurs after Tony Stark injected Jen with the nanobots that suppress her powers, She-Hulk appears.  Slott even references it in this comic, but we still don’t know how she showed up and why everyone is acting like now she can’t change to She-Hulk.  What the hell?

Also, I know Slott is promising to fix Marvel continuity forever soon, but this issue did make me think about Marvel continuity: how can the law firm use old comics to prove cases when old comics often contradict each other?  That would be a cool case in this book, where one side proves one thing, but the other side uses a different comic to prove another.  Oh, the chaos!!!!

Back on form is She-Hulk.  It should make everyone happy!

Streets of Glory Preview by Garth Ennis and Mike Wolfer.  $1.99, Avatar.

06-28-2007 05;03;38PM.JPG

Like they did with Black Summer, Avatar gives us a preview issue of Ennis’ new western.  That’s awfully nice of them.  The guy at my comic book shoppe said I was one of three people at the store who bought Garth Ennis’ “indie press crap,” as he put it (I may be paraphrasing, but he was still dismissive).  I laughed it off, but it ticked me off a bit.  I get that Avatar used to only publish soft-core porn, but they have also published some very good comics by Ennis and Warren Ellis.  If you don’t like them, that’s fine, but why is something like Scars (which is brilliant) worse than something like Desolation Jones?  Just because it’s published by Avatar instead of DC?  Ennis’ 303 and Chronicles of Wormwood are both excellent and both published by Avatar, and, according to me, far better than, say, The Boys (which, as we all know, was published by DC for a while).  Sure, Wolfskin wasn’t that good, but it wasn’t absolutely horrible, either, like Jack Cross was.  Even people who should know better seem to think that Avatar is nothing but a place for Brian Pulido to publish twenty Lady Death comics a month.  Well, tarring Avatar with the soft-porn brush is akin to saying all DC comics suck because they publish comics with Michael Turner covers.  Or all Marvel comics suck because they allow tentacle rape on their covers.  Nobody does that (well, some people do, but they’re idiots), yet people refuse to check out some really good work by two very good writers because Avatar likes to publish Al Rio comics.  It’s just stupid.  If you want to be that way, be my guest.  You’re missing out on the Strange Killings books, which are far superior to, I don’t know, newuniversal.

As for this comic, well, it’s not very good.  Hah!  I mean, it’s a western with a lot of people getting shot.  Ennis does westerns and war comics very well, but as even he points out, he’s done westerns before, just not a “straight” western – no supernatural stuff.  That’s fine, but it just doesn’t look all that interesting.  And Wolfer’s art, when it’s not bloody, is kind of dull and too clean, when a western demands grit.  Oh well.

But see?  I only paid 2 dollars for the preview, and it was at least something a bit different.  Just because I don’t like it doesn’t mean I’m going to shun the next thing Ennis writes for Avatar.  I’m just saying.

Supergirl and the Legion of Super-Heroes #31 by Tony Bedard, Kevin Sharpe, and Robin Riggs.  $2.99, DC.

06-28-2007 05;04;19PM.JPG

I don’t really mean to beat a dead horse, but did everyone notice what was on the front page of this issue?  That’s right – a roll call!  And did the world end because Bedard and Sharpe let us know who the principals of the issue were?  No, it did not.  How shocking!

This is the comic I picked up based on your comments, and it’s not bad.  It’s the first solo Bedard issue, and it’s also a prologue to a story arc in which the Legion looks for Cosmic Boy, who’s gone missing.  Bedard does a decent job keeping the story going from the previous issues, as we get a bit of information about how the Legion defeated the Dominators (with extreme prejudice, it seems) and we lead into the election of Supergirl as the new leader of the Legion, which seems to piss a lot of people off.  But why?  Look at her – she’s cute as a button!  Brainiac 5 tells Supergirl he knows three locations where they might find Cosmic Boy, and she splits the Legion into three groups to scope them out.  There is, as you might expect, trouble at all three locations.  Boy, that’s surprising.

Bedard does a reasonably good job with setting up the story, and the interplay between the members is well done.  I will point out that in one panel, Lightning Lad and Mekt Ranzz are arguing because the second-place finisher in the election is a sore loser.  I don’t identify him because on one page, it’s Lightning Lad, but when they’re arguing, it appears Mekt is the sore loser.  Lightning Lad even calls him the sore loser, but then he calls Lightning Lad “Mekt.”  What the hell is going on, Legion fans?????  Does Tony Bedard even get the characters mixed up?  I know they look alike and have similar powers, so what’s the deal?  See how I do research – I ask you good people!

Anyway, like a lot of books out there, this is a perfectly competent superhero comic, but it doesn’t really grab me.  I don’t know if it’s the fact that I really have never been into the Legion, or if the fact that not a lot happens (yes, I know it’s a prologue, so I’m forgiving it a bit, but still) or if the fact that the Wolverine knockoff shows up (and yes, I’m saying that just to piss you Legion fans off, so chill).  I’d recommend the book so you can decide for yourself, because it’s not a bad comic, it’s just not really my thing.  But at least I knew who the characters were!

X-Factor #20 by Peter David, Khoi Pham, and Sandu Florea.  $2.99, Marvel.

06-28-2007 05;04;59PM.JPG

Brian made an offhanded remark that Khoi Pham’s art really “dragged the book down” for him, and you know what?  He’s right.  Pham has done four issues of this comic (right?) and each issue has been worse than the last.  This issue features really scratchy and vague art, poorly drawn figures, a ridiculous shot of Rahne as a wolf (it’s not even the head, which is the joke ’round these parts, but the whole thing) and no sense of motion or fluidity.  It’s an ugly book.

Of course, it’s not helped by the story, which finishes the promising X-Cell storyline on a poor note, as things just happen that feel like David was just tired of writing about it and wrapped things up.  I’m sure it’s something that has already been established, because David isn’t a sloppy writer, but since when can Quicksilver pull future versions of himself into the present?  That’s weird.  Again, I’m sure I missed the issue where this is explained, but it’s very weird when it happens.  And the way Elijah Cross is dispatched with was annoying, because he seemed like a character with some potential, but it was never realized and he was just useless.  I also, unfortunately, have a question about Marrow (“unfortunately” because I loathe the character): she has lost her mutant power, right?  Her power was to force bones out of her body and use them as weapons, right?  Don’t ask me how that didn’t kill her, but I assume it had something to do with her power.  So if she lost her power, wouldn’t all those bones on the outside of her body kill her now?  Or should I not ask too many questions because I won’t like the answers?

Well, we got that crappy issue out of the way and a bunch of utterly useless mutants gone (Abyss? really?).  Let’s just all move on and we’ll be much happier.

X-Men #200 by Mike Carey, Humberto Ramos, Chris Bachalo, Carlos Cuevas, and Tim Townsend.  $3.99, Marvel.

06-28-2007 05;05;43PM.JPG06-28-2007 05;06;29PM.JPG

The most bizarre comic of the week goes to X-Men #200, which is a fairly straight-forward superhero epic.  So why is it bizarre?  Well, when it’s good, it’s very good.  But when it’s bad, it’s horrible.  It’s a strange experience reading this comic and lurching from thinking “Wow, how cool” to “Dear Lord, that didn’t just happen, did it?” and “Man, more Humberto Ramos art????”  But I’d say it balances out on the good side, and is another example of Mike Carey really “getting” the X-Men.

Let’s look at this.  Good: the “prelude,” in which a dude in New Orleans calls someone in the guild (which put a sinking feeling in my stomach, because it means someone I hate is showing up later) because something important is happening.  He gets on an elevator and is killed by some freaky-looking dude.  Bachalo’s art is nice.  Bad: the X-Men arrive at Rogue’s childhood home and Rogue blasts the hell out of it.  Why?  Plus, Ramos art.  Yuck.  More bad: in the middle of this mission, in the middle of Rogue’s house, Mystique and Bobby have sex.  What the hell?  Good: something happens to Omega Sentinel when she boots up to a computer to make repairs.  If you notice the final panel of her after the computer explodes, you’ll understand what just happened.  Nice touch by Carey and Ramos.  Good and Bad: Cable on Providence is attacked by someone, and Bachalo’s art is very nice.  However, he is attacked by … Gambit.  Oh shit.  I hate Gambit.  Bad: More Ramos art.  Good: Rogue and Sam talk about what has happened to her.  Gambit fights Cable, and Sunfire shows up.  Again, nice art.  Then Ramos is back, but Emma going inside Rogue’s head is pretty cool.  Cable blows shit up as Gambit and Sunfire escape.  Sort of bad and good: the climax, as Malice has possessed Omega Sentinel, which is awesome (Malice is a great character) and the Marauders show up and betrayals abound!  Why is it bad?  Well, the Marauders were cool back in the day, but as usual, the way the X-Men took them down was pretty cool too, and it’s always a shame when cool stories no longer stick.  I mean, I can go back and re-read them, but I’ll always know the stories are irrelevant now.  It’s annoying.  Also annoying: why are they at Rogue’s house????

Still, it’s a pretty good issue, except for Ramos’ art.  It’s full of action and some nice twists, and it sets up the arc very well.  Carey is really doing well, except for the inexplicable sex.  And the back-up story is more chatter.  Sheesh, can’t something happen in this crossover?

Well, that’s it for this week.  As always, your scorn is greatly appreciated!  Lay it on me!

28 Comments

There was some confusion over Marrow, since apparently the handbook said she still had her powers, but Mike Marts said she was depowered.

Her control over her powers always varied, so the bone growth was often random. So she’d have some random bone growths sticking out, or she’d have those bones sticking out of her back as reserve weapons. When she was depowered, she lost the ability of rapid bone growth, but the deformed bones aren’t going to shrink back or drop off. So they remain where they were. As long as they aren’t hitting or blocking anything vital, she should be OK. I think it was the stress of growing bones and having them burst their way through the body that would kill her, but she did have a Wolverine-like healing factor.

And, bah, she’s cool. She’s interesting because of how gross and deforming her powers are. Some powers are kinda romanticized and not really examined beyond how they could be used in a fight. This is something random, an actual mutation screwing with the body, instead of a convienient, cool ability. Marrow’s bone powers sorta forces you to think about how powers/mutant abilities make one ostracized, or how they actually affect the person with them. You can see right off the bat how Marrow’s powers affect her. Not to mention she’s a member of a group descriminated against by larger descriminated group.

To be honest, no one’s really been consistent — not even at an individual-writer level — regarding the effects of the Decimation on the more unusual mutant physiologies out there. For everty Chamber who ends up on life support with a big hole in him, there’s a Marrow who isn’t in constant pain from what amounts to multiple compound fractures or a Stacy-X who isn’t freezing to death because scales are lousy insulation for a warm-blooded creature.

You didn’t review it, but I must admit that Thunderbolts #115 was a fun read but a very mixed bag. There are several excellent moments of payoff, but the six-issue format prompts some outside writing on Ellis’s part, so that half the cast has next to nothing to do and we’re robbed of a proper epilogue.

Slott can’t tell us what happened to Jen in between last issue and this one because it would spoil World War Hulk.

And he does mention, in a caption, that Mastermind Excello gave Jen something that allowed her to become She-Hulk temporarily, but that it wore off.

As for the Legion thing, it was probably either a lettering or coloring error.

Streets of Glory was pretty much the most disappointing thing I read this week. The entire thing just seemed lifted directly out of the Saint of Killers miniseries, except with worse art and less investment in the characters. Also, as presented, the gunfight in the issue made very little sense and left me confused as to whether or not they had simply left about 2 pages out of the fight, since the rest of the preview seemed like a pretty uninterrupted story sequence.

The artwork in LSH made it almost unreadable to me, and I had no idea who the character is that was revealed on the last page. I’m really looking forward to seeing what Dennis Calero does on the series. He’s quickly becoming a favorite.

Quicksilver got the power to move future versions of himself around int time in the Son of M Mini when he exposed himself to the Terrigan mists

how the Legion defeated the Dominators (with extreme prejudice, it seems)

Go read the previous issue, if you can find it. I won’t spoil it, but if you’re going to read the rest of this arc it’s probably important to know the real story of the events under investigation.

Stephane Savoie

June 29, 2007 at 5:57 am

Bluue Beetle: The parents ran away with the baby to a safe location. When Traci 13 went off the get Jaime, Eclipso attacked them at the safe location, webbed them up, and stole the baby. Jaime and Traci arrive to find the parents webbed, and the baby gane.
See, perfectly sensible! (Not sure why she was able to use Jaime as a champion… something to do with the “rules” of magic, no doubt.

“I will point out that in one panel, Lightning Lad and Mekt Ranzz are arguing because the second-place finisher in the election is a sore loser. I don’t identify him because on one page, it’s Lightning Lad, but when they’re arguing, it appears Mekt is the sore loser. Lightning Lad even calls him the sore loser, but then he calls Lightning Lad “Mekt.” What the hell is going on, Legion fans?????”

I’m pretty sure this was just a production error with the word balloon switched. It took me a second to figure out what was going on as well. I was a little dissapointed with this issue, mostly because of the art. I just didn’t enjoy it as much as Barry Kitson’s.

If you enjoyed this issue at all, but haven’t been reading, I’d say go and check out one of the earlier trades. Kitson’s art is great and there’s a lot of good superhero stories.

If everyone else can nitpick over the fact that “Dreamgirl” should be two words, I can nitpick over the use of homonyms!

I think I was the only one nitpicking about “Dreamgirl”, but I support you in the phase/faze thing.

Anyway, like a lot of books out there, this is a perfectly competent superhero comic, but it doesn’t really grab me. I don’t know if it’s the fact that I really have never been into the Legion, or if the fact that not a lot happens

Aah, well. It wasn’t as good as I hoped it was going to be (although not bad). Believe me, Legion comics can get a lot better than that. Bringing Calero in instead of Sharpe will help (or it should, anyway), but I was hoping for something a bit snappier from Bedard. Oh well; there’s still time.

I had no idea who the character is that was revealed on the last page.

He’s nobody new; he’s the lawyer guy from earlier in the issue.

(Longtime Legion fans will recognize him (his name’s Tenzil Kem) easily; in the original Legion he called himself Matter-Eater Lad and was a Legionnaire himself. He had the power of being able to eat anything. He also appeared in the reboot Legion with the same power but wasn’t a superhero. But you don’t really need to know that for this issue.)

Michael – yeah, I went back and checked, and didn’t realize that referred to the issue of Incredible Hulk. Some sort of “grape soda.” I know we’ll find out everything eventually, but it bugs me.

jlg wrote: “I think it was the stress of growing bones and having them burst their way through the body that would kill her, but she did have a Wolverine-like healing factor.”

There’s actually a real disease which causes continual bone growth and the conversion of soft tissue to bone. Joints freeze up, the body gets contorted, and the person dies young.

Not so much with the giant bone spikes projecting from the body, though.

“(Longtime Legion fans will recognize him (his name’s Tenzil Kem) easily; in the original Legion he called himself Matter-Eater Lad and was a Legionnaire himself. He had the power of being able to eat anything. He also appeared in the reboot Legion with the same power but wasn’t a superhero. But you don’t really need to know that for this issue.)”

He also has one of the coolest super powers in the entire world of comics. Super strength? Flight? Super speed? Bah, Tenzil can EAT ANYTHING. It’s hard to get cooler than that.

Return of Tenzil aside, though, Bedard’s opening issue left me fairly lukewarm. It wasn’t bad, but it didn’t really stand out. And we already have a blatant error with the Waid run in the Legion handing out extra flight rings, when it had always been a major point that the rings are so expensive it’s insanely hard to get more. Still, it’s not terrible.

Meanwhile, Blue Beetle continues to be one of my favorite books out there right now. Jaime’s ultimate power fantasy… I can’t remember the last time I laughed so loud when I was reading a comic book. I actually got some weird looks. This book deserves to be around far longer than a fringe title with a new character replacing an obscure hero likely will.

Hey. Just thought I’d pipe in to agree that Blue Beetle was fun. (Loved the twist of Jaime’s ultimate power fantasy! Almost as laugh-out-loud funny as Jaime’s mom yelling at him and Guy Gardner a couple issues back.)

But the best thing I read this week was the Crossing Midnight trade from Vertigo. First five issues for just ten bucks. Intriguing stuff! I like the characters and find the new (to me) mythology really captivating. Check it out.

I bought it, Rebis. I haven’t read it yet, but it’s in my possession!

Greg — Good catch on the “phase” typo. I will have it fixed for the trade. As for the narrative voice, third person is a completely valid and common narrative voice for any kind of fiction. I don’t know why you would be bothered by it, or why the choice of using it will somehow indicate whether the story is good or not. Kind of a bizarre comment, really.

Ed: It’s not that third person is bad or anything, it’s just that it seems an odd choice for this kind of fiction, because so much of “hard-boiled noir pulp crime” stuff is in first person, and a lot of the narration in this story feels like it’s in first person, and then suddenly we read “Tracy did …” or something that lets us know it’s in third.  I know it’s more of a “me” problem than anything else, but when I said it could turn out to be a poor choice, I meant more that if we get deeper into Tracy’s head, it might feel forced.  Given your track record with these kind of stories, I doubt if it will, but it’s a possibility. 

Actually, much of crime fiction, maybe even most of it, is written in third person subjective, which is what this is. All the Parker novels are third person, for example, as are most of the Jack Reacher or Lucas Davenport novels. More detective fiction is in first person, though, which is where you might be getting confused. But if you grabbed ten popular crime novels off a shelf, more than half would be written in third person subjective, probably.

For this story, I didn’t feel like Tracy was a guy who would narrate his own story, as such, so I went with third person, because it creates a slight distance.

Ed,
Yes, but Persuader was one of the best Jack Reacher novels to date (not that they haven’t all been good – but that one certainly stands out). There’s definitely something to be said for having a first person narrative, even if that means that you know the character will come out alright…or will he? I’ve read examples – and even seen films – where the narration was being done from beyond the grave. Can’t think of any particular examples right now.

Consider, weren’t all of the Mike Hammer books written in first person? Weren’t many of Dashiell Hammett’s novels likewise writtten in that manner?

Even though the narration IS in third person, couldn’t it possibly make sense to introduce a character who, it turns out, has BEEN the narrator the whole time?

Greg is correct about first person narration giving a more noirish feel to a book. However, that’s not to say that regardless of the choice of narrator, Criminal is not an excellent work. It is.

The Maltese Falcon is written in third person, and that’s Hammett’s most famous novel and possibly the most famous noir novel of all time. So are the Glass Key and some of his short stories. Jim Thompson and David Goodis both wrote in third person sometimes. It’s simply a different choice. It’s certainly not less noir to write in third, and thinking it is implies a lack of knowledge of the genre, honestly. It just depends on what kind of noir you’re going for.

And again, I’m glad you guys dig our book, honestly. And it’s always nice to talk about noir and writing, too.

I’m possibly a little too touchy about this because I’ve actually seen comic reviewers say they don’t understand third person narration because they don’t know who the narrator is supposed to be. As an avid reader most of my life, seeing statements like that makes me a little sick to my stomach. Not saying Greg is on that level, but it’s things like that that made me feel I should chime in here to answer his curiosity.

Actually, Ed, the more I think about it, the more I was surprised by the narration not because I expected noir to be in first person (I haven’t read noir-ish fiction on the level that you have, so I accept your expertise on the subject) but because it’s kind of strange to see comic books in third person these days. So much is first person, and when it is third person (which is rare) it feels far more detached than what we’re getting here, to the extent it that it doesn’t rise above a “meanwhile” here and there. I was wondering why the third person stood out to me when I read plenty of books in third person, and I think that’s it. It’s a bit weird to see a comic book with such a strong omniscient narrator, and it took me off-guard. I’ll deal with it!

You’re probably right on that one, Greg. Most comics third person is REALLY removed, like an alien looking down at earth and commenting or something.

I don’t think about other comics at all when I write Criminal, so it never occurred to me that it might be jarring at all.

Greg, it might also be the fact that caption boxes have replaced thought balloons for the most part, so we’ve become conditioned to think of captions as narration from the main character. So it’s an adjustment (for superhero readers, at least) to switch to third-person narration. Just one of those weird comic things, I think.

This exchange has made me more interested in Criminal than I ever have been before, since I don’t ordinarily enjoy crime comics. I am the sort of person to go “third-person subjective narration in a modern book?! I gotta see that!”, though. I don’t know what this says about me, but there you have it.

Criminal is, along with Kabuki, easily one of my favorite comics. It’s just masterfully done, and the Brubaker/Phillips pairing is pretty awesome. The first arc was great and had a genuinely surprising twist.

Well, I’m fighting a guy on e-bay for a copy of the first trade now. Wish me luck!

Kabuki I’ve never managed to get interested in. Nice art, no hints of a story I would particularly enjoy, heavy whiffs of Weeaboo Syndrome.

Leave a Comment

 

Categories

Review Copies

Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.

Browse the Archives