<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 365 Reasons to Love Comics #180</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:09:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Bourque</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-196417</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Bourque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 03:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-196417</guid>
		<description>Take Hank and Don as Law (their father was a judge, after all) and Dawn and Holly as Chaos, but both still Hawk and Dove and Dove and Hawk, and I think something interesting could happen there.

Aaron &quot;The Mad Whitaker&quot; Bourque</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take Hank and Don as Law (their father was a judge, after all) and Dawn and Holly as Chaos, but both still Hawk and Dove and Dove and Hawk, and I think something interesting could happen there.</p>
<p>Aaron "The Mad Whitaker" Bourque</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkAndrew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-130079</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkAndrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-130079</guid>
		<description>&quot;Seriousl, look up ditko. He wasnâ€™t right wing, and if he was, it certainly was never reflected in anything he wrote.&quot;

I...I have no idea if this is serious or some kind of elaborate joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Seriousl, look up ditko. He wasnâ€™t right wing, and if he was, it certainly was never reflected in anything he wrote."</p>
<p>I...I have no idea if this is serious or some kind of elaborate joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blues</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-130035</link>
		<dc:creator>Blues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-130035</guid>
		<description>&quot;hehehâ€¦ I love Ditko, that mad old fascist. I love the way he TRIES to be reasonable, and present both sides of an argument, but canâ€™t help himself.&quot;

you&#039;re nuts
How can people misunderstand Ditko so greatly... he  left because he didn&#039;t like dove&#039;s portrayal. Seriousl, look up ditko. He wasn&#039;t right wing, and if he was, it certainly was never reflected in anything he wrote. his beliefs were based on reasoning, not religion(or what have you).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"hehehâ€¦ I love Ditko, that mad old fascist. I love the way he TRIES to be reasonable, and present both sides of an argument, but canâ€™t help himself."</p>
<p>you're nuts<br />
How can people misunderstand Ditko so greatly... he  left because he didn't like dove's portrayal. Seriousl, look up ditko. He wasn't right wing, and if he was, it certainly was never reflected in anything he wrote. his beliefs were based on reasoning, not religion(or what have you).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wynne</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-126202</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 01:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-126202</guid>
		<description>heheh... I love Ditko, that mad old fascist. I love the way he TRIES to be reasonable, and present both sides of an argument, but can&#039;t help himself. 

&quot;The Challenger... and The Challenged!&quot; 

Cor, doesn&#039;t that make Dove sound heroic? Nothing says &quot;hero&quot; like a euphamism for mental disability...

And yet- he&#039;s one of the greatest cartoonists of his generation, without a doubt.

Anyoone else notice paralels (I give up I can&#039;t remember how to spell the word) with Frank Miller?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heheh... I love Ditko, that mad old fascist. I love the way he TRIES to be reasonable, and present both sides of an argument, but can't help himself. </p>
<p>"The Challenger... and The Challenged!" </p>
<p>Cor, doesn't that make Dove sound heroic? Nothing says "hero" like a euphamism for mental disability...</p>
<p>And yet- he's one of the greatest cartoonists of his generation, without a doubt.</p>
<p>Anyoone else notice paralels (I give up I can't remember how to spell the word) with Frank Miller?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cage</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-122790</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 23:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-122790</guid>
		<description>They did a great job with the characters in the JLU episode. To be fair though, the episode was a little ham-fisted in it&#039;s take on war and peace and all that, but Hawk and Dove came off very well in the episode, which, because of it&#039;s 2004 air-date, made the Hawk and Dove characters surprisingly relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They did a great job with the characters in the JLU episode. To be fair though, the episode was a little ham-fisted in it's take on war and peace and all that, but Hawk and Dove came off very well in the episode, which, because of it's 2004 air-date, made the Hawk and Dove characters surprisingly relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Seavey</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-122775</link>
		<dc:creator>John Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-122775</guid>
		<description>I read and loved the Kesel Hawk and Dove series, still have the complete run, and have very fond memories of the whole thing. It had an excellent supporting cast of friends and family; it managed to make both Hawk and Dove sympathetic and intelligent characters, without compromising their viewpoints; it didn&#039;t resort to any &quot;they&#039;re secretly in love&quot; cliches; it had a lot of fun moments and quotable dialogue; and it introduced some fun new villains (let me explain this to folks who might have only been reading comics for the last decade or so; back in the old days, sometimes villains would show up that had never showed up before, that the writer of the series made up all by themselves. Weird, huh?)

In short, it was a great series, criminally unnoticed, and absolutely desecrated by &#039;Armageddon 2001&#039;. Go back, buy the back issues, they&#039;re all cheap, and join me in lobbying for &#039;DC Showcase Presents Hawk and Dove&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read and loved the Kesel Hawk and Dove series, still have the complete run, and have very fond memories of the whole thing. It had an excellent supporting cast of friends and family; it managed to make both Hawk and Dove sympathetic and intelligent characters, without compromising their viewpoints; it didn't resort to any "they're secretly in love" cliches; it had a lot of fun moments and quotable dialogue; and it introduced some fun new villains (let me explain this to folks who might have only been reading comics for the last decade or so; back in the old days, sometimes villains would show up that had never showed up before, that the writer of the series made up all by themselves. Weird, huh?)</p>
<p>In short, it was a great series, criminally unnoticed, and absolutely desecrated by 'Armageddon 2001'. Go back, buy the back issues, they're all cheap, and join me in lobbying for 'DC Showcase Presents Hawk and Dove'.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mullon</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-122727</link>
		<dc:creator>Mullon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-122727</guid>
		<description>If only we could just have Hawk and Dove running around to act as political allegories, instead of Civil War or Amazons Attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only we could just have Hawk and Dove running around to act as political allegories, instead of Civil War or Amazons Attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Astheimer</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-122690</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Astheimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 21:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-122690</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You skipped the weird guitar-playing, gun-shooting Hawk and Dove of a few years ago. I donâ€™t know anything about them, though, so Iâ€™m not too upset.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That mini did get a mention, actually. Here:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Mike Baron came up with a completely new iteration of Hawk and Dove in a â€™90s mini-series, but Iâ€™m told it wasnâ€™t very good. Dang.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I don&#039;t know anyone who picked up the title, but the revamp -- divorced from the Lords of Chaos and Order and featuring a slacker Dove with a guitar and a military brat Hawk with guns, a telepathic link between them -- had the potential to be an effective modernization of the core dichotomy. Of course, aside from a cameo or two in &lt;i&gt;Titans&lt;/i&gt;, the duo&#039;s been all but forgotten. With a necessary name change to differentiate between the Granger girls, the team -- or at least the battle-ready Hawk -- could be viable players on any youth-friendly team. Teen Titans needs someone(s) to fill out its ever-thinning ranks, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You skipped the weird guitar-playing, gun-shooting Hawk and Dove of a few years ago. I donâ€™t know anything about them, though, so Iâ€™m not too upset.</p></blockquote>
<p>That mini did get a mention, actually. Here:</p>
<blockquote><p>Mike Baron came up with a completely new iteration of Hawk and Dove in a â€™90s mini-series, but Iâ€™m told it wasnâ€™t very good. Dang.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don't know anyone who picked up the title, but the revamp -- divorced from the Lords of Chaos and Order and featuring a slacker Dove with a guitar and a military brat Hawk with guns, a telepathic link between them -- had the potential to be an effective modernization of the core dichotomy. Of course, aside from a cameo or two in <i>Titans</i>, the duo's been all but forgotten. With a necessary name change to differentiate between the Granger girls, the team -- or at least the battle-ready Hawk -- could be viable players on any youth-friendly team. Teen Titans needs someone(s) to fill out its ever-thinning ranks, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Kirbydotter</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-122523</link>
		<dc:creator>The Kirbydotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-122523</guid>
		<description>HAWK AND DOVE was an interesting concept in theory but hardly an easy one to sell on a monthly basis.  Extremes are not easy for the reader to identify with and Hawk and Dove were such opposite extremes that they were caricatures.  The fact that there were many creative change in this short lived series didn&#039;t help either.  A failed Ditko idea when it came out.

I also liked the Kesel/Liefeld mini. As Doug said it, having a good inker and still doing human bodies with proportions that had yet to defy laws of physics made it a fun read.  I think the association with the whole Gods of Law and Order thing was a good idea for those two.  Dawn was a much better character than Don, even if the two opposite brothers idea was a good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAWK AND DOVE was an interesting concept in theory but hardly an easy one to sell on a monthly basis.  Extremes are not easy for the reader to identify with and Hawk and Dove were such opposite extremes that they were caricatures.  The fact that there were many creative change in this short lived series didn't help either.  A failed Ditko idea when it came out.</p>
<p>I also liked the Kesel/Liefeld mini. As Doug said it, having a good inker and still doing human bodies with proportions that had yet to defy laws of physics made it a fun read.  I think the association with the whole Gods of Law and Order thing was a good idea for those two.  Dawn was a much better character than Don, even if the two opposite brothers idea was a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: km</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-122447</link>
		<dc:creator>km</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-122447</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I agree, thereâ€™s a lot of potential here, if rethought with an overtly political 21st century twist â€” two characters who really canâ€™t get along and who have totally different aims, but who are bound to each other in order to activate their powers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, Just from the looks of those covers, I&#039;m with stealthwise on the &#039;concept that wasn&#039;t executed well at all&#039; thing. Punch up the complexity even a bit and you&#039;ve got a potentially extraordinary setup there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I agree, thereâ€™s a lot of potential here, if rethought with an overtly political 21st century twist â€” two characters who really canâ€™t get along and who have totally different aims, but who are bound to each other in order to activate their powers.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, Just from the looks of those covers, I'm with stealthwise on the 'concept that wasn't executed well at all' thing. Punch up the complexity even a bit and you've got a potentially extraordinary setup there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme Burk</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-122429</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Burk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-122429</guid>
		<description>You actually missed out one of the original Hawk and Dove&#039;s finest appearance-- a team up with Batman in 1981 in Brave and the Bold. It was later deemed &quot;out of continuity&quot; because the premise was kind of a &#039;reunion movie&#039; of Hawk and Dove, where Don and Hank did fight crime in the 1960s but had retired from superheroing and had now grown up-- or not grown up as the case was-- never quite learning to overcome their blindspots, to the detriment of their jobs and marriages. It was a poignant story about the values of the 60s in the 1980s and actually gave an good ending to the original 1960s comic. And Jim Aparo&#039;s art is superb.

Of course, because Hawk and Dove teamed up with the Teen Titans, their being 30 would create headaches with the non-existent aging of the Titans, so in the Donna Troy wedding issue it&#039;s casually dismissed as though to say &quot;it didn&#039;t happen&quot;.

But it was an awesome story that held up when I re-read it as an adult. I miss those days when Alan Burnett came to DC once or twice a year and wrote the best Batman story of the year and then went back to Hollywood to write and produce television. Those were the days...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You actually missed out one of the original Hawk and Dove's finest appearance-- a team up with Batman in 1981 in Brave and the Bold. It was later deemed "out of continuity" because the premise was kind of a 'reunion movie' of Hawk and Dove, where Don and Hank did fight crime in the 1960s but had retired from superheroing and had now grown up-- or not grown up as the case was-- never quite learning to overcome their blindspots, to the detriment of their jobs and marriages. It was a poignant story about the values of the 60s in the 1980s and actually gave an good ending to the original 1960s comic. And Jim Aparo's art is superb.</p>
<p>Of course, because Hawk and Dove teamed up with the Teen Titans, their being 30 would create headaches with the non-existent aging of the Titans, so in the Donna Troy wedding issue it's casually dismissed as though to say "it didn't happen".</p>
<p>But it was an awesome story that held up when I re-read it as an adult. I miss those days when Alan Burnett came to DC once or twice a year and wrote the best Batman story of the year and then went back to Hollywood to write and produce television. Those were the days...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-122424</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-122424</guid>
		<description>You skipped the weird guitar-playing, gun-shooting Hawk and Dove of a few years ago.  I don&#039;t know anything about them, though, so I&#039;m not too upset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You skipped the weird guitar-playing, gun-shooting Hawk and Dove of a few years ago.  I don't know anything about them, though, so I'm not too upset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AFKAP</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-122314</link>
		<dc:creator>AFKAP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-122314</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Iâ€™d also like to see a smart writer handle a liberal Dove as someone whoâ€™s not a wimp. How to balance pacificistic philosphies with superhero action? That would be an achievement! &lt;/blockquote&gt;

perhaps J. Marc DeMatteis?

he&#039;s often spoken about the fact that he is himself a pacifist and feels a bit uncomfortable writing characters who resolve problems through violence...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Iâ€™d also like to see a smart writer handle a liberal Dove as someone whoâ€™s not a wimp. How to balance pacificistic philosphies with superhero action? That would be an achievement! </p></blockquote>
<p>perhaps J. Marc DeMatteis?</p>
<p>he's often spoken about the fact that he is himself a pacifist and feels a bit uncomfortable writing characters who resolve problems through violence...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stealthwise</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-122221</link>
		<dc:creator>stealthwise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 07:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-122221</guid>
		<description>This one would probably fit better under &quot;Reasons to Be Embarassed of Comics,&quot; or perhaps &quot;Concepts that weren&#039;t executed well at all.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one would probably fit better under "Reasons to Be Embarassed of Comics," or perhaps "Concepts that weren't executed well at all."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebis</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-122161</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 05:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-122161</guid>
		<description>I agree: In my memory, at least (as I haven&#039;t looked at those issues in YEARS), Liefeld was turning out some good work. Well, decent at least. Not the self-parodying pencils he manages today. And apparently back then he could draw quicker too. 

What strikes me about Hawk and Dove today is their color scheme: How amusing that Hawk is Red (State) and Dove is Blue (State). I agree, there&#039;s a lot of potential here, if rethought with an overtly political 21st century twist â€” two characters who really can&#039;t get along and who have totally different aims, but who are bound to each other in order to activate their powers. I&#039;d also like to see a smart writer handle a liberal Dove as someone who&#039;s not a wimp. How to balance pacificistic philosphies with superhero action? That would be an achievement! (As would making a neo-con Hawk something more than a bloodthirsty caricature.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree: In my memory, at least (as I haven't looked at those issues in YEARS), Liefeld was turning out some good work. Well, decent at least. Not the self-parodying pencils he manages today. And apparently back then he could draw quicker too. </p>
<p>What strikes me about Hawk and Dove today is their color scheme: How amusing that Hawk is Red (State) and Dove is Blue (State). I agree, there's a lot of potential here, if rethought with an overtly political 21st century twist â€” two characters who really can't get along and who have totally different aims, but who are bound to each other in order to activate their powers. I'd also like to see a smart writer handle a liberal Dove as someone who's not a wimp. How to balance pacificistic philosphies with superhero action? That would be an achievement! (As would making a neo-con Hawk something more than a bloodthirsty caricature.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/comment-page-1/#comment-122110</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Atkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 03:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/06/29/365-reasons-to-love-comics-180/#comment-122110</guid>
		<description>I very much enjoyed the Kesel H&amp;D series; it wasn&#039;t earth-shattering, but it was pretty entertaining (until, as noted, it went off the rails during Armageddon 2001--particularly disappointing because they actually had one of the best A2001 annuals--and there were a couple of weak issues toward the end of the run).  There were some good character-driven sequences, such as the one where Dove went on a date with someone who only knew her in her superhero identity   (she wore a wig), and it&#039;s the only place I&#039;ve personally been able to stand the original Hawk as a character rather than a mouthpiece for a highly polar viewpoint. (The supporting cast has been criminally underused since the book ended; Barter is the sort of character you&#039;d expect to see used more often as a plot device.)

(The Liefeld-drawn miniseries wasn&#039;t as badly drawn as all that; since it was early in his career he hadn&#039;t developed into such a caricature, and having a good inker helped.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very much enjoyed the Kesel H&amp;D series; it wasn't earth-shattering, but it was pretty entertaining (until, as noted, it went off the rails during Armageddon 2001--particularly disappointing because they actually had one of the best A2001 annuals--and there were a couple of weak issues toward the end of the run).  There were some good character-driven sequences, such as the one where Dove went on a date with someone who only knew her in her superhero identity   (she wore a wig), and it's the only place I've personally been able to stand the original Hawk as a character rather than a mouthpiece for a highly polar viewpoint. (The supporting cast has been criminally underused since the book ended; Barter is the sort of character you'd expect to see used more often as a plot device.)</p>
<p>(The Liefeld-drawn miniseries wasn't as badly drawn as all that; since it was early in his career he hadn't developed into such a caricature, and having a good inker helped.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
