<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Into the back issue box #31</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:12:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Hester</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-126744</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Hester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-126744</guid>
		<description>Nestor Redondo is one of the most underrated artists in mainstream comics. Ragman isn&#039;t up to his Swamp Thing standards, but still fantastic. Let it be known that Kubert not only did covers, and this back up (which is a master class in storytelling and certainly noteworthy in my book), but he also pitched in laying out pages and re-inking panels to his liking. I own a page that underwent such treatment. 

Don&#039;t be blinded by the corniness. In 1977 this is about as cutting edge as a super hero comic could get. No matter how goofy the stories, Ragman&#039;s existence is warranted by the haunting covers alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nestor Redondo is one of the most underrated artists in mainstream comics. Ragman isn&#8217;t up to his Swamp Thing standards, but still fantastic. Let it be known that Kubert not only did covers, and this back up (which is a master class in storytelling and certainly noteworthy in my book), but he also pitched in laying out pages and re-inking panels to his liking. I own a page that underwent such treatment. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be blinded by the corniness. In 1977 this is about as cutting edge as a super hero comic could get. No matter how goofy the stories, Ragman&#8217;s existence is warranted by the haunting covers alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moon Man</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-126599</link>
		<dc:creator>Moon Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-126599</guid>
		<description>For my money, overall, I would endorse most publications by DC and Marvel in the seveneties as &quot;must-haves&quot;, when the story was lacking the art gave new depth.  Some titles nowadays, the writing has to be soo much better, to hopefully rise the anime styly art to superhero status.  Next I would endorse about 75% of the eighties stuff from the two biggies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my money, overall, I would endorse most publications by DC and Marvel in the seveneties as &#8220;must-haves&#8221;, when the story was lacking the art gave new depth.  Some titles nowadays, the writing has to be soo much better, to hopefully rise the anime styly art to superhero status.  Next I would endorse about 75% of the eighties stuff from the two biggies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-124622</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-124622</guid>
		<description>I missed your comment, &quot;O,&quot; but now I read it.  Yes, I know that artists used studios way back when, but I meant the fact that it was credited that way.  I didn&#039;t know about the 1970s stuff, but thanks to everyone for chiming in about it.

I also knew about the period problem and the use of exclamation points.  I just like being a snarky modern reader and pointing out how exciting comics back then were!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed your comment, &#8220;O,&#8221; but now I read it.  Yes, I know that artists used studios way back when, but I meant the fact that it was credited that way.  I didn&#8217;t know about the 1970s stuff, but thanks to everyone for chiming in about it.</p>
<p>I also knew about the period problem and the use of exclamation points.  I just like being a snarky modern reader and pointing out how exciting comics back then were!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Kashtan</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-124413</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Kashtan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-124413</guid>
		<description>Check this post, from Classic Comics forum regular MichikoS, for some information about the Redondo Studio and other related matters: 

http://forums.comicbookresources.com/archive/index.php/t-106748.html

Or if you&#039;re too lazy to click on the link:

According to CBA vol. 2 #4 (which I worked on, by the way), the exact composition of the Redondo Studio is unknown, but it probably consisted of Nestor Redondo&#039;s associates or assistants. 

Nestor Redondo was one of the great Filipino cartoonists. He had two brothers, Virgilio and Frank (a.k.a. Francisco), who both worked in American comics. Nestor also used &quot;Quico Redondo&quot; as a pseudonym, and Nestor and Frank both used &quot;Fred Redondo&quot; as a pen name. 

Jesus Redondo is a Spanish artist, and is apparently no relation to any of the other Redondos. 

I have no idea which member of the Redondo studio did that artwork from Ragman #4, but it probably wasn&#039;t Nestor himself. It&#039;s not nearly detailed enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this post, from Classic Comics forum regular MichikoS, for some information about the Redondo Studio and other related matters: </p>
<p><a href="http://forums.comicbookresources.com/archive/index.php/t-106748.html" rel="nofollow">http://forums.comicbookresources.com/archive/index.php/t-106748.html</a></p>
<p>Or if you&#8217;re too lazy to click on the link:</p>
<p>According to CBA vol. 2 #4 (which I worked on, by the way), the exact composition of the Redondo Studio is unknown, but it probably consisted of Nestor Redondo&#8217;s associates or assistants. </p>
<p>Nestor Redondo was one of the great Filipino cartoonists. He had two brothers, Virgilio and Frank (a.k.a. Francisco), who both worked in American comics. Nestor also used &#8220;Quico Redondo&#8221; as a pseudonym, and Nestor and Frank both used &#8220;Fred Redondo&#8221; as a pen name. </p>
<p>Jesus Redondo is a Spanish artist, and is apparently no relation to any of the other Redondos. </p>
<p>I have no idea which member of the Redondo studio did that artwork from Ragman #4, but it probably wasn&#8217;t Nestor himself. It&#8217;s not nearly detailed enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-124105</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-124105</guid>
		<description>&quot;I always thought that using â€œstudiosâ€ for the art was a relatively modern sensation...&quot;

Such studios were actually in place during the Golden Age.  Will Eisner was part of a studio (don&#039;t recall if it was his or if he was working under someone else), as did many others at that time.  The novel The Adventures of Cavalier and Clay even gives us a fictional peek at what studio life may have been like back then.  And as I understand it, the studio concept has remained with us in various incarnations through the decades.
-r-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I always thought that using â€œstudiosâ€ for the art was a relatively modern sensation&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Such studios were actually in place during the Golden Age.  Will Eisner was part of a studio (don&#8217;t recall if it was his or if he was working under someone else), as did many others at that time.  The novel The Adventures of Cavalier and Clay even gives us a fictional peek at what studio life may have been like back then.  And as I understand it, the studio concept has remained with us in various incarnations through the decades.<br />
-r-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-124064</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-124064</guid>
		<description>Not to pick on Kanigher further, but his word choice in one of the spotlighted panels is pretty silly as well.  &quot;The tattered tatterdemalion&quot; indeed.  You know he teamed up with &quot;the dark Dark Knight&quot;, right?  Not only is a tatterdemalion tattered by definition, but the word is even contained in the larger word.  Kanigher should have gone with something else, or just left the adjective off altogether.

I do like the &quot;Tatterdemalion of Justice&quot; description on the cover though.  Has a nice ring to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to pick on Kanigher further, but his word choice in one of the spotlighted panels is pretty silly as well.  &#8220;The tattered tatterdemalion&#8221; indeed.  You know he teamed up with &#8220;the dark Dark Knight&#8221;, right?  Not only is a tatterdemalion tattered by definition, but the word is even contained in the larger word.  Kanigher should have gone with something else, or just left the adjective off altogether.</p>
<p>I do like the &#8220;Tatterdemalion of Justice&#8221; description on the cover though.  Has a nice ring to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "O" the Humanatee!</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-124051</link>
		<dc:creator>"O" the Humanatee!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-124051</guid>
		<description>Greg Geren is correct about Ragman&#039;s (original) origin; if memory serves, the &quot;down-on-their-luck characters&quot; Rory absorbed his abilities from were friends of Rory&#039;s father, from whom he inherited his junkshop.

&quot;I always thought that using â€œstudiosâ€ for the art was a relatively modern sensation, but here we have a comic from 1977 doing it.&quot;

Sure, I mean whoever heard of, say, the &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.willeisner.com/biography/2_eisner_iger.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Eisner-Iger Studio&lt;/A&gt; from the late 1930s and early 1940s? (Note especially the following: &quot;As Eisner and Iger&#039;s contract work increased, the two evolved a comic book equivalent of an assembly line. A job traveled through the shop and each employee tightened a bolt or inked a line, and at the end of the line there was a completed story.&quot;) And there were plenty of other comic book &quot;packaging&quot; studios both in those early days and later on, even if I can&#039;t recall any specific names right now.

And even if you&#039;re just referring to explicitly &lt;i&gt;crediting&lt;/i&gt; comics to studios, in the 1970s one would sometimes see inking credits for the &quot;Crusty Bunkers,&quot; who were Neal Adams, Dick Giordano, and various other members and hangers-on at their studio (I don&#039;t recall whether it was yet called Continuity Studios); and for &quot;The Tribe,&quot; who were a group of Filipino artists who I believe were based around Tony De Zuniga. Even art - especially inking -that was credited to a single individual often included work by assistants. For example, Wally Wood employed at various times such folks as Dan Adkins and Larry Hama. Both Terry Austin and Klaus Janson were assistants to Giordano before establishing their own inking careers. Also, a great many comic &lt;i&gt;strip&lt;/i&gt; producers, working under very demanding deadlines, employed assistants. A particularly famous case is the work Frank Frazetta did for Al Capp on &quot;Li&#039;l Abner.&quot; However, Charles Schulz famously never used assistants on &quot;Peanuts.&quot;

For more on Filipino comics artists and their role in both the Filipino and US comics industries, see &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.topshelfcomix.com/catalog.php?type=4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Comic Book Artist magazine, vol. 2, no. 4&lt;/A&gt;.

&quot;Kanigher never saw an exclamation point he didnâ€™t like, apparently!!!!&quot;

Surely you know, Greg, that back then almost all comic books (at least American comic books) avoided the use of periods, because they too often didn&#039;t show up with the poor printing and paper of the time? I think most readers of the time just ignored the exclamation points and treated them as if they were periods (though there may have been some subliminal effect). For more modern readers, of course, the exclamation points are distracting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg Geren is correct about Ragman&#8217;s (original) origin; if memory serves, the &#8220;down-on-their-luck characters&#8221; Rory absorbed his abilities from were friends of Rory&#8217;s father, from whom he inherited his junkshop.</p>
<p>&#8220;I always thought that using â€œstudiosâ€ for the art was a relatively modern sensation, but here we have a comic from 1977 doing it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure, I mean whoever heard of, say, the <a HREF="http://www.willeisner.com/biography/2_eisner_iger.html" rel="nofollow">Eisner-Iger Studio</a> from the late 1930s and early 1940s? (Note especially the following: &#8220;As Eisner and Iger&#8217;s contract work increased, the two evolved a comic book equivalent of an assembly line. A job traveled through the shop and each employee tightened a bolt or inked a line, and at the end of the line there was a completed story.&#8221;) And there were plenty of other comic book &#8220;packaging&#8221; studios both in those early days and later on, even if I can&#8217;t recall any specific names right now.</p>
<p>And even if you&#8217;re just referring to explicitly <i>crediting</i> comics to studios, in the 1970s one would sometimes see inking credits for the &#8220;Crusty Bunkers,&#8221; who were Neal Adams, Dick Giordano, and various other members and hangers-on at their studio (I don&#8217;t recall whether it was yet called Continuity Studios); and for &#8220;The Tribe,&#8221; who were a group of Filipino artists who I believe were based around Tony De Zuniga. Even art &#8211; especially inking -that was credited to a single individual often included work by assistants. For example, Wally Wood employed at various times such folks as Dan Adkins and Larry Hama. Both Terry Austin and Klaus Janson were assistants to Giordano before establishing their own inking careers. Also, a great many comic <i>strip</i> producers, working under very demanding deadlines, employed assistants. A particularly famous case is the work Frank Frazetta did for Al Capp on &#8220;Li&#8217;l Abner.&#8221; However, Charles Schulz famously never used assistants on &#8220;Peanuts.&#8221;</p>
<p>For more on Filipino comics artists and their role in both the Filipino and US comics industries, see <a HREF="http://www.topshelfcomix.com/catalog.php?type=4" rel="nofollow">Comic Book Artist magazine, vol. 2, no. 4</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Kanigher never saw an exclamation point he didnâ€™t like, apparently!!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>Surely you know, Greg, that back then almost all comic books (at least American comic books) avoided the use of periods, because they too often didn&#8217;t show up with the poor printing and paper of the time? I think most readers of the time just ignored the exclamation points and treated them as if they were periods (though there may have been some subliminal effect). For more modern readers, of course, the exclamation points are distracting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Geren</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-124016</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Geren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 14:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-124016</guid>
		<description>Hey! I bought this comic brand new off the rack when it came out.  As I remember Ragman&#039;s origin as it was initially presented, Rory absorbed the abilities of 3 or 4 down-on-their-luck characters through a lightning strike involving the rag suit.  One of the &quot;donors&quot; was a acrobat, one a circus strongman, and I don&#039;t remember the rest--it was 30 years ago.  I still buy my comics at the same shop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! I bought this comic brand new off the rack when it came out.  As I remember Ragman&#8217;s origin as it was initially presented, Rory absorbed the abilities of 3 or 4 down-on-their-luck characters through a lightning strike involving the rag suit.  One of the &#8220;donors&#8221; was a acrobat, one a circus strongman, and I don&#8217;t remember the rest&#8211;it was 30 years ago.  I still buy my comics at the same shop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-124009</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 14:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-124009</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t sure about the costume, as my first experience with Ragman was the Broderick mini-series, which brings it up.  I didn&#039;t recall if the &quot;souls of the dead&quot; thing was new or not.  It&#039;s a better idea than Rory just dressing up in a ragged costume and fighting crime, and it allows him to join groups like Shadowpact!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t sure about the costume, as my first experience with Ragman was the Broderick mini-series, which brings it up.  I didn&#8217;t recall if the &#8220;souls of the dead&#8221; thing was new or not.  It&#8217;s a better idea than Rory just dressing up in a ragged costume and fighting crime, and it allows him to join groups like Shadowpact!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Hatcher</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-123991</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Hatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 14:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-123991</guid>
		<description>Not only did Kanigher never meet an exclamation point he didn&#039;t like, he never found a plot point he couldn&#039;t beat to death or a thematic idea he couldn&#039;t overstate.

As Kanigher comics go, &lt;i&gt;Ragman&lt;/i&gt; was not nearly the collection of those excesses that some of his other work was. I think I bought the first three or four off the stands when they came out and then gave up on it... just a little ahead of DC as it happens. But it was very pretty to look at. 

I know he was a Silver Age star at DC but I have never been a big Kanigher booster. He was always a B-lister for me; Kanigher books were what I read when there was nothing else to be had. To be honest, even the books that he absolutely poured his soul into -- &lt;i&gt;Sgt. Rock&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Enemy Ace&lt;/i&gt; -- suffer from the same thumping repetition you are talking about here. He was clearly of the &#039;tell them three times&#039; school of writing, which is something you got a lot when I was in school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only did Kanigher never meet an exclamation point he didn&#8217;t like, he never found a plot point he couldn&#8217;t beat to death or a thematic idea he couldn&#8217;t overstate.</p>
<p>As Kanigher comics go, <i>Ragman</i> was not nearly the collection of those excesses that some of his other work was. I think I bought the first three or four off the stands when they came out and then gave up on it&#8230; just a little ahead of DC as it happens. But it was very pretty to look at. </p>
<p>I know he was a Silver Age star at DC but I have never been a big Kanigher booster. He was always a B-lister for me; Kanigher books were what I read when there was nothing else to be had. To be honest, even the books that he absolutely poured his soul into &#8212; <i>Sgt. Rock</i> and <i>Enemy Ace</i> &#8212; suffer from the same thumping repetition you are talking about here. He was clearly of the &#8216;tell them three times&#8217; school of writing, which is something you got a lot when I was in school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mutt</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-123975</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 13:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-123975</guid>
		<description>&quot;Poor Teddy, pathetic wretch... doomed to a life of misery and degradation because he can&#039;t see... or speak. Say... you don&#039;t suppose he can hear me, do you?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Poor Teddy, pathetic wretch&#8230; doomed to a life of misery and degradation because he can&#8217;t see&#8230; or speak. Say&#8230; you don&#8217;t suppose he can hear me, do you?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-123936</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Atkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 12:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-123936</guid>
		<description>Yes, the supernatural aspects of the character were added when he was re-invented in his early &#039;90s mini-series.  (One of those post-Crisis retcons that didn&#039;t actually have any spillover effect onto the rest of continuity, unlike, say, Hawkworld.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the supernatural aspects of the character were added when he was re-invented in his early &#8217;90s mini-series.  (One of those post-Crisis retcons that didn&#8217;t actually have any spillover effect onto the rest of continuity, unlike, say, Hawkworld.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidwynne</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-123890</link>
		<dc:creator>davidwynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-123890</guid>
		<description>Actually sounds like an okay comic, and the art looks really nice. The writing sounds pretty poor, but bsically of it&#039;s time. And at least it tells one whole story that make sense. An awful lot of today&#039;s more respected writers don&#039;t seem to be capable of doing that.

And just to add to the whole &quot;Redondo Studio&quot; thing, it may be worth mentioning that Nester Redondo was only one of several extremely talented cartoonists working in the industry around that time all bearing the name Redondo (in the UK we saw a lot of work by Jesus Redondo, whose art was a little more expressionistic than Nestor&#039;s) and all from the Philipenes. It seems reasonable to think that they may have been related, and furthermore, may have had a studio together. Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually sounds like an okay comic, and the art looks really nice. The writing sounds pretty poor, but bsically of it&#8217;s time. And at least it tells one whole story that make sense. An awful lot of today&#8217;s more respected writers don&#8217;t seem to be capable of doing that.</p>
<p>And just to add to the whole &#8220;Redondo Studio&#8221; thing, it may be worth mentioning that Nester Redondo was only one of several extremely talented cartoonists working in the industry around that time all bearing the name Redondo (in the UK we saw a lot of work by Jesus Redondo, whose art was a little more expressionistic than Nestor&#8217;s) and all from the Philipenes. It seems reasonable to think that they may have been related, and furthermore, may have had a studio together. Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mantistotem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-123766</link>
		<dc:creator>Mantistotem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 05:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-123766</guid>
		<description>Kanigher probably never wrote anything about Ragman&#039;s costume because, IIRC, that was a later development for the character (retcon maybe?).

Originally he didn&#039;t have any superhuman powers. He was given near maximum human abilities through a freak accident that was definitely a Kanigher origin!

And is it just me, or does Teddy look like Computo in that fourth panel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kanigher probably never wrote anything about Ragman&#8217;s costume because, IIRC, that was a later development for the character (retcon maybe?).</p>
<p>Originally he didn&#8217;t have any superhuman powers. He was given near maximum human abilities through a freak accident that was definitely a Kanigher origin!</p>
<p>And is it just me, or does Teddy look like Computo in that fourth panel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-123622</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 00:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-123622</guid>
		<description>Ragman, Ragman, does whatever a rag can!

He&#039;s tough on crime and on stains!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ragman, Ragman, does whatever a rag can!</p>
<p>He&#8217;s tough on crime and on stains!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Reed</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-123549</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 22:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-123549</guid>
		<description>Mr. Seriph is really Dan DiDio and I claim my ten dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Seriph is really Dan DiDio and I claim my ten dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jccalhoun</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-123535</link>
		<dc:creator>jccalhoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 22:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-123535</guid>
		<description>I just googled Nestor Redondo studio and a few references came up but nothing terribly authoritative.  
Basically he was the hot artist from the Philippines and it looks like he had a studio where he gave work to other Filipino artists who hadn&#039;t broke into the USA yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just googled Nestor Redondo studio and a few references came up but nothing terribly authoritative.<br />
Basically he was the hot artist from the Philippines and it looks like he had a studio where he gave work to other Filipino artists who hadn&#8217;t broke into the USA yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawwolfe</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-123527</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawwolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 22:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-123527</guid>
		<description>Although I have absolutely nothing to back it up with, &quot;The Redondo Studio&quot; was probably connected to Nestor Redondo, the great artist originally from the Philippines who worked on a number of DC books in the 1970s.  I think he may be primarily remembered for &quot;Rima the Jungel Girl&quot;.  In fact, I think Joe Kubert did the covers on that book as well, with Redondo doing the interior art.  That appears to be the case on the &quot;Ragman&quot; issue here; the interior art doesn&#039;t look like Kubert, but it also doesn&#039;t look line Redondo--the stuff I have from him is a lot better-looking.  Best guess--&quot;Redondo Studios&quot; would refer to younger artists assisting and working with Nestor Redondo during that period of time, as he was producing a lot of work, and probably had a lot of assistants, just like today&#039;s studios.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I have absolutely nothing to back it up with, &#8220;The Redondo Studio&#8221; was probably connected to Nestor Redondo, the great artist originally from the Philippines who worked on a number of DC books in the 1970s.  I think he may be primarily remembered for &#8220;Rima the Jungel Girl&#8221;.  In fact, I think Joe Kubert did the covers on that book as well, with Redondo doing the interior art.  That appears to be the case on the &#8220;Ragman&#8221; issue here; the interior art doesn&#8217;t look like Kubert, but it also doesn&#8217;t look line Redondo&#8211;the stuff I have from him is a lot better-looking.  Best guess&#8211;&#8221;Redondo Studios&#8221; would refer to younger artists assisting and working with Nestor Redondo during that period of time, as he was producing a lot of work, and probably had a lot of assistants, just like today&#8217;s studios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Fitzpatrick</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-123524</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Fitzpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 22:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-123524</guid>
		<description>There was a terrific Ragman series in 1991 drawn by Pat Broderick, I think it was co-written by Keith Giffen and someone else.
Check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a terrific Ragman series in 1991 drawn by Pat Broderick, I think it was co-written by Keith Giffen and someone else.<br />
Check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sterg</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/comment-page-1/#comment-123523</link>
		<dc:creator>sterg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/01/into-the-back-issue-box-31/#comment-123523</guid>
		<description>The Redondo studio, if memory serves, was a group of Filipino artists who worked for hire mostly for DC in the 1970&#039;s. I think that the name comes from Nestor Redondo.
Here&#039;s a link to a catalog of Filipino comic artists: 

http://www.komikero.com/museum/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Redondo studio, if memory serves, was a group of Filipino artists who worked for hire mostly for DC in the 1970&#8242;s. I think that the name comes from Nestor Redondo.<br />
Here&#8217;s a link to a catalog of Filipino comic artists: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.komikero.com/museum/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.komikero.com/museum/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

