<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed #110</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:32:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Durrant</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-869357</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Durrant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-869357</guid>
		<description>Moreover, there was a real-life strongman called the Mighty Atom who was still performing at this time period even though he was nearing seventy years old.  It could very well have been that the Atom learned of the Astro Boy cartoon and it was he who called up the studio and urged them to change the character&#039;s name.  The real name of the Mighty Atom was Joseph Greenberg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moreover, there was a real-life strongman called the Mighty Atom who was still performing at this time period even though he was nearing seventy years old.  It could very well have been that the Atom learned of the Astro Boy cartoon and it was he who called up the studio and urged them to change the character&#8217;s name.  The real name of the Mighty Atom was Joseph Greenberg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Durrant</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-800144</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Durrant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 04:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-800144</guid>
		<description>I have just seen the Japanese version of &quot;The Birth of Astro Boy&quot; on the Net, so at least that episode exists.  As for the name issue, D.C. did own an earlier character called the Atom, who was very different from his 1960s version: the original Atom was a man about five feet tall who became a champion boxer and then set out to fight crime when his trainer was killed.  Therefore, it is both reasonable and understandable that the character&#039;s name was changed from Mighty Atom to Astroboy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just seen the Japanese version of &#8220;The Birth of Astro Boy&#8221; on the Net, so at least that episode exists.  As for the name issue, D.C. did own an earlier character called the Atom, who was very different from his 1960s version: the original Atom was a man about five feet tall who became a champion boxer and then set out to fight crime when his trainer was killed.  Therefore, it is both reasonable and understandable that the character&#8217;s name was changed from Mighty Atom to Astroboy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Bernhard Warg</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-241740</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Bernhard Warg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-241740</guid>
		<description>As I said, I got a lot of the details wrong, the big one being that I thought the 70&#039;s ruling stated the networks weren&#039;t allowed to own shows when, in fact, it merely prohibited them from owning shows that were wholly created by outside  production companies (and I realize that even that is simplifying it a bit).

The first article I linked says &quot;The rules prohibited network participation in two related arenas: the financial interest of the television programs they aired beyond first-run exhibition, and the creation of in-house syndication arms, especially in the domestic market.&quot;  This would seem to indicate that the syndication branch of NBC, which syndicated &lt;i&gt;Astro Boy&lt;/i&gt; and, I&#039;m sure, many other shows not actually created by NBC, was eliminated by the FCC&#039;s Financial Interest and Syndication (&quot;Fin-Syn&quot;) Rules.  Hence my admittedly confusing use of &quot;back then.&quot;

I&#039;m glad you called me out on my inaccuracies--it gave me the chance to do some research on what the rules actually were.  Prior to this, all I had read were some 90&#039;s articles in TV Guide and the like which said very little about the Fin-Syn rules and much about how the networks only renewed some shows with borderline ratings in exchange for partial ownership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said, I got a lot of the details wrong, the big one being that I thought the 70&#8242;s ruling stated the networks weren&#8217;t allowed to own shows when, in fact, it merely prohibited them from owning shows that were wholly created by outside  production companies (and I realize that even that is simplifying it a bit).</p>
<p>The first article I linked says &#8220;The rules prohibited network participation in two related arenas: the financial interest of the television programs they aired beyond first-run exhibition, and the creation of in-house syndication arms, especially in the domestic market.&#8221;  This would seem to indicate that the syndication branch of NBC, which syndicated <i>Astro Boy</i> and, I&#8217;m sure, many other shows not actually created by NBC, was eliminated by the FCC&#8217;s Financial Interest and Syndication (&#8220;Fin-Syn&#8221;) Rules.  Hence my admittedly confusing use of &#8220;back then.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you called me out on my inaccuracies&#8211;it gave me the chance to do some research on what the rules actually were.  Prior to this, all I had read were some 90&#8242;s articles in TV Guide and the like which said very little about the Fin-Syn rules and much about how the networks only renewed some shows with borderline ratings in exchange for partial ownership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Watson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-241252</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-241252</guid>
		<description>I just read all three of your linked in items. Did you? They are ALL about the networks having financial interest in post-network syndicated reruns of programs made by OUTSIDE production companies--I admit that the first one isn&#039;t as clear as it should have been that this is its subject, but careful reading shows that this IS it. Not one of them is about prohibiting the networks from owning programs completely. They have always had &quot;in-house&quot; productions, although in this day and age, with a major studio being a corporate sibling in most cases---CBS &amp; UPN having been sold by Paramount--owner Viacom two or three years ago, the former is the sole exception among the current six commercial broadcast nets---that&#039;s how they tend to be done. One example: Disney--owned ABC had a major hit with HOME IMPROVEMENT, produced by Touchstone Films, an imprint created by Disney for less--than--family--friendly productions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read all three of your linked in items. Did you? They are ALL about the networks having financial interest in post-network syndicated reruns of programs made by OUTSIDE production companies&#8211;I admit that the first one isn&#8217;t as clear as it should have been that this is its subject, but careful reading shows that this IS it. Not one of them is about prohibiting the networks from owning programs completely. They have always had &#8220;in-house&#8221; productions, although in this day and age, with a major studio being a corporate sibling in most cases&#8212;CBS &amp; UPN having been sold by Paramount&#8211;owner Viacom two or three years ago, the former is the sole exception among the current six commercial broadcast nets&#8212;that&#8217;s how they tend to be done. One example: Disney&#8211;owned ABC had a major hit with HOME IMPROVEMENT, produced by Touchstone Films, an imprint created by Disney for less&#8211;than&#8211;family&#8211;friendly productions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Bernhard Warg</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-235843</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Bernhard Warg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 07:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-235843</guid>
		<description>&quot;Iâ€™ve never come across the slightest hint of any such prohibition in all my readings and documentaryâ€“watching about the mediumâ€™s history, which is considerable.&quot;

Looks like I was a bit fuzzy (or outright wrong) on the details, but information on the FCC&#039;s restriction on networks&#039; ownership of programming can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/F/htmlF/financialint/financialint.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CE5DF133AF930A25752C1A965958260&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/press_releases/1993/211669.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Iâ€™ve never come across the slightest hint of any such prohibition in all my readings and documentaryâ€“watching about the mediumâ€™s history, which is considerable.&#8221;</p>
<p>Looks like I was a bit fuzzy (or outright wrong) on the details, but information on the FCC&#8217;s restriction on networks&#8217; ownership of programming can be found <a href="http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/F/htmlF/financialint/financialint.htm" rel="nofollow">here</a>, <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CE5DF133AF930A25752C1A965958260" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/press_releases/1993/211669.htm" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Watson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-233282</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-233282</guid>
		<description>&quot;...the period when the FCC decreed that networks weren&#039;t allowed to own programs....&quot;

When was that? I&#039;ve never come across the slightest hint of any such prohibition in all my readings and documentary--watching about the medium&#039;s history, which is considerable. On the other hand, the only hint I ever encountered of the nets being involved in syndication way back was that CBS had developed a series called THE WHIRLYBIRDS in the late 50s, but syndicated it out instead (just now remembered that). That, and &quot;NBC&quot; being in ASTRO BOY&#039;s credits, pretty much proves that they were, of course, so I am open to this other being true as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the period when the FCC decreed that networks weren&#8217;t allowed to own programs&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>When was that? I&#8217;ve never come across the slightest hint of any such prohibition in all my readings and documentary&#8211;watching about the medium&#8217;s history, which is considerable. On the other hand, the only hint I ever encountered of the nets being involved in syndication way back was that CBS had developed a series called THE WHIRLYBIRDS in the late 50s, but syndicated it out instead (just now remembered that). That, and &#8220;NBC&#8221; being in ASTRO BOY&#8217;s credits, pretty much proves that they were, of course, so I am open to this other being true as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Bernhard Warg</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-231086</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Bernhard Warg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-231086</guid>
		<description>&quot;Thanks, E. Bernhard Warg, but, as far as your comments about me are concerned, you are just a wee little bit off, but only that much, and understandably so.&quot;

Well, I was trying to make a joke about how most articles about &lt;i&gt;Astro Boy&lt;/i&gt; appear to have been written by people who see &quot;NBC&quot; in the credits and think &quot;Aha! That means it must have aired on the NBC network!&quot; whereas your post was based (correctly) on your memory of it being in syndication.  In other words, they exclude syndication due to the NBC connection, you appeared to have excluded the NBC connection due to syndication.

It seemed funny at the time (when I was tired, and had been hit in the head with part of a staircase)...

&quot;If [NBC&#039;s syndication arm] is defunct (as your use of the phrase â€œBack thenâ€¦â€ implies), it has not been for long...&quot;

I don&#039;t know the logistics of NBC&#039;s syndication arm then vs. now, but I&#039;m reasonably sure it either didn&#039;t exist (or possibly existed under a different name) during the period when the FCC decreed that networks weren&#039;t allowed to own programs (hence the &quot;Back then&quot;).  I guess they revived it (or re-renamed it...&quot;un-renamed&quot; it?) when the ruling was overturned in, I believe, the 90&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Thanks, E. Bernhard Warg, but, as far as your comments about me are concerned, you are just a wee little bit off, but only that much, and understandably so.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, I was trying to make a joke about how most articles about <i>Astro Boy</i> appear to have been written by people who see &#8220;NBC&#8221; in the credits and think &#8220;Aha! That means it must have aired on the NBC network!&#8221; whereas your post was based (correctly) on your memory of it being in syndication.  In other words, they exclude syndication due to the NBC connection, you appeared to have excluded the NBC connection due to syndication.</p>
<p>It seemed funny at the time (when I was tired, and had been hit in the head with part of a staircase)&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;If [NBC's syndication arm] is defunct (as your use of the phrase â€œBack thenâ€¦â€ implies), it has not been for long&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know the logistics of NBC&#8217;s syndication arm then vs. now, but I&#8217;m reasonably sure it either didn&#8217;t exist (or possibly existed under a different name) during the period when the FCC decreed that networks weren&#8217;t allowed to own programs (hence the &#8220;Back then&#8221;).  I guess they revived it (or re-renamed it&#8230;&#8221;un-renamed&#8221; it?) when the ruling was overturned in, I believe, the 90&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Watson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-227931</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-227931</guid>
		<description>Thanks, E. Bernhard Warg, but, as far as your comments about me are concerned, you are just a wee little bit off, but only that much, and understandably so. I am well aware of NBC&#039;s syndication arm, but just did not know it existed THEN, let alone that it has ever distributed anything but its own productions, let alone foreign imports. If it is defunct (as your use of the phrase &quot;Back then...&quot; implies), it has not been for long, as it was responsible for a recent weekday daytime talk show that was &quot;&#039;The View&#039; but with men,&quot; as one of its hosts, Danny Bonaduce, acknowledged at the time. Otherwise, thanks for the additional info.

Pete: &quot;Wikipedia is still far more reliable than imdb.com.

&quot;Updating imdb is damn near impossible, while a bunch of volunteers are generally quick to fix incorrect info on wikipedia.&quot;

Yes, but the difficulty in getting things posted to IMDb in general means that stuff that is blatant garbage to those knowledgeable of the subject at hand but not to anybody else does not get put up in the first place. So it is more reliable than Wiki, and I speak as a regular contributor to both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, E. Bernhard Warg, but, as far as your comments about me are concerned, you are just a wee little bit off, but only that much, and understandably so. I am well aware of NBC&#8217;s syndication arm, but just did not know it existed THEN, let alone that it has ever distributed anything but its own productions, let alone foreign imports. If it is defunct (as your use of the phrase &#8220;Back then&#8230;&#8221; implies), it has not been for long, as it was responsible for a recent weekday daytime talk show that was &#8220;&#8216;The View&#8217; but with men,&#8221; as one of its hosts, Danny Bonaduce, acknowledged at the time. Otherwise, thanks for the additional info.</p>
<p>Pete: &#8220;Wikipedia is still far more reliable than imdb.com.</p>
<p>&#8220;Updating imdb is damn near impossible, while a bunch of volunteers are generally quick to fix incorrect info on wikipedia.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, but the difficulty in getting things posted to IMDb in general means that stuff that is blatant garbage to those knowledgeable of the subject at hand but not to anybody else does not get put up in the first place. So it is more reliable than Wiki, and I speak as a regular contributor to both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Bernhard Warg</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-227476</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Bernhard Warg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-227476</guid>
		<description>&quot;Finally, aside from that Trivia note, even the IMDb doesnâ€™t associate NBC with the show, which jibes with my memory of it being in syndication.&quot;

It was syndicated, and the syndicator was NBC.  Back then, the network had a seperate syndication branch.  A lot of sources are confused by this in the opposite manner from Ted, and list the show as having actually aired on NBC.

&quot;Tetsuwan&quot; litrerally means &quot;Iron Arm&quot; but, as already pointed out, it&#039;s also the Japanese term for &quot;Mighty,&quot; thus Atom&#039;s name is a bit of a pun, as his arms literally are made of iron (or possibly space titanium...).

Finally, while I don&#039;t doubt the truth of the third urban legend, I know for a fact that at least some of the original Japanese episodes still exist, as a few were included in The Right Stuf&#039;s box sets and one, shot in color, was included as an extra on the DVD for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en-f.tezuka.co.jp/anime/sakuhin/mv/mv004.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;60&#039;s compilation film&lt;/a&gt; (it was one of the episodes included in the film, somewhat edited--the extra was the uncut version).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Finally, aside from that Trivia note, even the IMDb doesnâ€™t associate NBC with the show, which jibes with my memory of it being in syndication.&#8221;</p>
<p>It was syndicated, and the syndicator was NBC.  Back then, the network had a seperate syndication branch.  A lot of sources are confused by this in the opposite manner from Ted, and list the show as having actually aired on NBC.</p>
<p>&#8220;Tetsuwan&#8221; litrerally means &#8220;Iron Arm&#8221; but, as already pointed out, it&#8217;s also the Japanese term for &#8220;Mighty,&#8221; thus Atom&#8217;s name is a bit of a pun, as his arms literally are made of iron (or possibly space titanium&#8230;).</p>
<p>Finally, while I don&#8217;t doubt the truth of the third urban legend, I know for a fact that at least some of the original Japanese episodes still exist, as a few were included in The Right Stuf&#8217;s box sets and one, shot in color, was included as an extra on the DVD for the <a href="http://en-f.tezuka.co.jp/anime/sakuhin/mv/mv004.html" rel="nofollow">60&#8242;s compilation film</a> (it was one of the episodes included in the film, somewhat edited&#8211;the extra was the uncut version).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Watson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-225632</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-225632</guid>
		<description>In the first item, Brian does say, &quot;...created in 1951...,&quot; which must refer to something other than the cartoon show, so that&#039;s probably the manga, but he should have made that much more clear. Problem with this is that DC&#039;s &quot;Mighty Atom&quot; made the last appearance of his original publication career in an issue of ALL-STAR COMICS with a 1951 cover date, which would really have given DC solid footing for a lawsuit. On the other hand, waiting until 1963 to file might well work against its standing in court. It comes down to this: DC had just put their original Atom on the shelf when the manga was launched, and had their second one well under way when the cartoon version came to the States; either way, Brian&#039;s statement about the Japanese character preceding DC&#039;s &quot;by a good many years&quot; is highly misleading at best. I&#039;ll concede that &quot;pure D wrong&quot; was inaccurate, but not by much, and everything else I pointed out stands as given.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the first item, Brian does say, &#8220;&#8230;created in 1951&#8230;,&#8221; which must refer to something other than the cartoon show, so that&#8217;s probably the manga, but he should have made that much more clear. Problem with this is that DC&#8217;s &#8220;Mighty Atom&#8221; made the last appearance of his original publication career in an issue of ALL-STAR COMICS with a 1951 cover date, which would really have given DC solid footing for a lawsuit. On the other hand, waiting until 1963 to file might well work against its standing in court. It comes down to this: DC had just put their original Atom on the shelf when the manga was launched, and had their second one well under way when the cartoon version came to the States; either way, Brian&#8217;s statement about the Japanese character preceding DC&#8217;s &#8220;by a good many years&#8221; is highly misleading at best. I&#8217;ll concede that &#8220;pure D wrong&#8221; was inaccurate, but not by much, and everything else I pointed out stands as given.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkAndrew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-224526</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkAndrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-224526</guid>
		<description>I BELIEVE Astro Boy/Might Atom was a Manga in the fifties before he was a TV cartoon.  (Can someone check dates?  I have a paper due in half-an-hour and ohgot I shouldn&#039;t even be typing this.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I BELIEVE Astro Boy/Might Atom was a Manga in the fifties before he was a TV cartoon.  (Can someone check dates?  I have a paper due in half-an-hour and ohgot I shouldn&#8217;t even be typing this.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Watson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-224518</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-224518</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Brian, but with the Atom/Mighty Atom, while your bottom line might be right, almost everything you said to get there seems to be wrong. That same IMDb has the JAPANESE version first going on the air in January 1963 (same year as &quot;Astro Boy&quot; in the US), while the GCD has DC putting the Atom in his own book beginning with a cover date of June-July 1962 (which means it was in stores no later than April), to say nothing of however farther back his SHOWCASE tryout began (on the other hand, the full phrase was to my knowledge never associated with that version, but only his Golden Age counterpart). Therefore, to say &quot;The Mighty Atom PRECEEDED [sic] DC&#039;s current Atom by a good many years&quot; is pure D wrong. Finally, aside from that Trivia note, even the IMDb doesn&#039;t associate NBC with the show, which jibes with my memory of it being in syndication. Just because something aired on a network affiliate in the New York market doesn&#039;t mean that said net had a damned thing to do with it, beyond the fact that the NYC affiliates are owned and operated by the webs (at least back then; I know that the UPN carrier was WOR, owned by Universal/MCA, and I have no idea what the subsequent CW&#039;s or the new My Network&#039;s carriers are). THIS attitude is a piece of New York geo-arrogance (that&#039;s geo-centrism taken to an extreme) that I&#039;ve encountered more times than I care to count (although errors based on such faulty presumptions are not limited to New Yorkers; it&#039;s just much more frequent from them). One of the IMDb&#039;s &quot;external links&quot; for ASTRO BOY, http://www.retroland.com/pages/retropedia/tv/item/262/, states &quot;syndication,&quot; not NBC. That one isn&#039;t YOUR error, Brian, but it does indicate that you didn&#039;t research your topic adequately.

BTW, I was just checking the archive for less than likely additional postings, and took a better look at this page than I did originally (I preferred GIGANTOR, which alternated with AB, at least in Houston, TX). I have NOT spent a great deal of time looking up this stuff (just a preemptive strike, since people here have a history of grasping at unlikely straws to criticize me instead of dealing with my actual points).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Brian, but with the Atom/Mighty Atom, while your bottom line might be right, almost everything you said to get there seems to be wrong. That same IMDb has the JAPANESE version first going on the air in January 1963 (same year as &#8220;Astro Boy&#8221; in the US), while the GCD has DC putting the Atom in his own book beginning with a cover date of June-July 1962 (which means it was in stores no later than April), to say nothing of however farther back his SHOWCASE tryout began (on the other hand, the full phrase was to my knowledge never associated with that version, but only his Golden Age counterpart). Therefore, to say &#8220;The Mighty Atom PRECEEDED [sic] DC&#8217;s current Atom by a good many years&#8221; is pure D wrong. Finally, aside from that Trivia note, even the IMDb doesn&#8217;t associate NBC with the show, which jibes with my memory of it being in syndication. Just because something aired on a network affiliate in the New York market doesn&#8217;t mean that said net had a damned thing to do with it, beyond the fact that the NYC affiliates are owned and operated by the webs (at least back then; I know that the UPN carrier was WOR, owned by Universal/MCA, and I have no idea what the subsequent CW&#8217;s or the new My Network&#8217;s carriers are). THIS attitude is a piece of New York geo-arrogance (that&#8217;s geo-centrism taken to an extreme) that I&#8217;ve encountered more times than I care to count (although errors based on such faulty presumptions are not limited to New Yorkers; it&#8217;s just much more frequent from them). One of the IMDb&#8217;s &#8220;external links&#8221; for ASTRO BOY, <a href="http://www.retroland.com/pages/retropedia/tv/item/262/" rel="nofollow">http://www.retroland.com/pages/retropedia/tv/item/262/</a>, states &#8220;syndication,&#8221; not NBC. That one isn&#8217;t YOUR error, Brian, but it does indicate that you didn&#8217;t research your topic adequately.</p>
<p>BTW, I was just checking the archive for less than likely additional postings, and took a better look at this page than I did originally (I preferred GIGANTOR, which alternated with AB, at least in Houston, TX). I have NOT spent a great deal of time looking up this stuff (just a preemptive strike, since people here have a history of grasping at unlikely straws to criticize me instead of dealing with my actual points).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-157262</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-157262</guid>
		<description>I think you are correct, Pete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are correct, Pete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-157250</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-157250</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia is still far more reliable than imdb.com.

Updating imdb is damn near impossible, while a bunch of volunteers are generally quick to fix incorrect info on wikipedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia is still far more reliable than imdb.com.</p>
<p>Updating imdb is damn near impossible, while a bunch of volunteers are generally quick to fix incorrect info on wikipedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael-Sensei</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-140294</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael-Sensei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-140294</guid>
		<description>I attended a birthday celebration for Atomu on April 7th, 2003 in an Otaku&#039;s tiny room in his home in Sendai. He had a huge collection of Astroboy toys from the last several decades and about a dozen of us were interviewed by 4 different local networks. My friend and I had limited Japanese ability and their English ability was neglible, but we sang the theme song for them in English and talked about the show and our fondness for the character. All over Japan, the date was celebrated in various ways in most cities. 
The newer short-lived tv show was one of the only reasons for me to get up early on a Sunday morning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attended a birthday celebration for Atomu on April 7th, 2003 in an Otaku&#8217;s tiny room in his home in Sendai. He had a huge collection of Astroboy toys from the last several decades and about a dozen of us were interviewed by 4 different local networks. My friend and I had limited Japanese ability and their English ability was neglible, but we sang the theme song for them in English and talked about the show and our fondness for the character. All over Japan, the date was celebrated in various ways in most cities.<br />
The newer short-lived tv show was one of the only reasons for me to get up early on a Sunday morning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thenodrin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-137982</link>
		<dc:creator>Thenodrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-137982</guid>
		<description>&quot;Translation isnâ€™t a simple find and replce operation, you have to understand what the word expresses, and then express the same thing in your own language. &quot;

&quot;Japanâ€™s weird? Weâ€™ve got a real town named Smallville basically devoted to the man of steel, 7-11â€™s being remade in the image of The Simpsonsâ€™ Qwik E Marts, and a statue of a fake boxer in Philly?&quot;

Hey, if the board is going to be pedantic about words, then that second quote should say, &quot;a statue of a FICTIONAL boxer in Philly&quot;

Because Rocky never threw a fight.

:-)

Theno</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Translation isnâ€™t a simple find and replce operation, you have to understand what the word expresses, and then express the same thing in your own language. &#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Japanâ€™s weird? Weâ€™ve got a real town named Smallville basically devoted to the man of steel, 7-11â€™s being remade in the image of The Simpsonsâ€™ Qwik E Marts, and a statue of a fake boxer in Philly?&#8221;</p>
<p>Hey, if the board is going to be pedantic about words, then that second quote should say, &#8220;a statue of a FICTIONAL boxer in Philly&#8221;</p>
<p>Because Rocky never threw a fight.</p>
<p> <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Theno</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnathan Ender</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-129230</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnathan Ender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-129230</guid>
		<description>Good ol&#039; Astro Boy.  Personally, I wish that the 2003 remake of the series received a bit more love.  It was kinda just shoe-horned onto American TV, cancelled, and given a crappy DVD release -- they didn&#039;t even keep the Japanese version&#039;s music, which was all orchestral and thus cool; instead they went with some bs electronica.

Tezuka be praised. ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good ol&#8217; Astro Boy.  Personally, I wish that the 2003 remake of the series received a bit more love.  It was kinda just shoe-horned onto American TV, cancelled, and given a crappy DVD release &#8212; they didn&#8217;t even keep the Japanese version&#8217;s music, which was all orchestral and thus cool; instead they went with some bs electronica.</p>
<p>Tezuka be praised. ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alextron</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-128081</link>
		<dc:creator>Alextron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 03:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-128081</guid>
		<description>Oh NO, they  don&#039;t burn shows today. That means we&#039;ll have all the seasons of the Family Guy for decades!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh NO, they  don&#8217;t burn shows today. That means we&#8217;ll have all the seasons of the Family Guy for decades!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ykw06</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-127658</link>
		<dc:creator>ykw06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 06:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-127658</guid>
		<description>Sadly, NBC has a sad, almost disgusting history of burning or wiping master tapes. Nearly all pre-1970s programs stored in their library were purged during that decade, resulting in the loss of thousands of TONIGHT SHOWS, TODAY programs and nearly the entirety of the NBC daytime and syndicated archive up to that time.

Frankly, given the extent of the damage done, I&#039;m surprised even the English-language versions of ASTRO BOY survived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, NBC has a sad, almost disgusting history of burning or wiping master tapes. Nearly all pre-1970s programs stored in their library were purged during that decade, resulting in the loss of thousands of TONIGHT SHOWS, TODAY programs and nearly the entirety of the NBC daytime and syndicated archive up to that time.</p>
<p>Frankly, given the extent of the damage done, I&#8217;m surprised even the English-language versions of ASTRO BOY survived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V. Smith</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/comment-page-1/#comment-127511</link>
		<dc:creator>V. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 21:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/07/05/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-110/#comment-127511</guid>
		<description>Japan&#039;s weird? We&#039;ve got a real town named Smallville basically devoted to the man of steel, 7-11&#039;s being remade in the image of The Simpsons&#039; Qwik E Marts, and a statue of a fake boxer in Philly?

I think we&#039;re weird, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japan&#8217;s weird? We&#8217;ve got a real town named Smallville basically devoted to the man of steel, 7-11&#8242;s being remade in the image of The Simpsons&#8217; Qwik E Marts, and a statue of a fake boxer in Philly?</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re weird, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

