<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 365 Reasons to Love Comics #214</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:18:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-581635</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-581635</guid>
		<description>This is something I never understood about Bill Watterson-he goes on at length about the problems of newspaper comics, and mentions once or twice that he could have gotten more freedom AND more money by ditching newspapers altogether and publishing in book form.  

So, I wonder-why didn&#039;t he do that?  Why didn&#039;t he just publish in book form, where he could have drawn longer stories like &quot;A Nauseous Nocturne&quot; to his heart&#039;s content?  He could have done anything he liked, and even if he didn&#039;t particularly care how much money he made, the additional financial gravy couldn&#039;t have hurt.  

So, if he had so many griefs with newspapers, just why did he stick with them and finally hang up his pen for good?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is something I never understood about Bill Watterson-he goes on at length about the problems of newspaper comics, and mentions once or twice that he could have gotten more freedom AND more money by ditching newspapers altogether and publishing in book form.  </p>
<p>So, I wonder-why didn't he do that?  Why didn't he just publish in book form, where he could have drawn longer stories like "A Nauseous Nocturne" to his heart's content?  He could have done anything he liked, and even if he didn't particularly care how much money he made, the additional financial gravy couldn't have hurt.  </p>
<p>So, if he had so many griefs with newspapers, just why did he stick with them and finally hang up his pen for good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Felton</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147878</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Felton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 02:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147878</guid>
		<description>&quot;Calvin &amp; Hobbes,&quot; quite literally, changed my life! I discovered it at age 6, and from that moment on sequential art and writing were my thing.

One of my most prized possessions is the Complete Collection. I see that many people agree with me when I say that Bill Watterson made the world a little better with his comic strip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Calvin &amp; Hobbes," quite literally, changed my life! I discovered it at age 6, and from that moment on sequential art and writing were my thing.</p>
<p>One of my most prized possessions is the Complete Collection. I see that many people agree with me when I say that Bill Watterson made the world a little better with his comic strip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Dragon</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147759</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 22:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147759</guid>
		<description>I got the collected books for birthdays and Christmases, and now I think I pretty much have the full set. Absolute joy.

Must agree with the &quot;know when to end it&quot; sentiment. A brave thing to do with Calvin and Hobbes, but the right thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the collected books for birthdays and Christmases, and now I think I pretty much have the full set. Absolute joy.</p>
<p>Must agree with the "know when to end it" sentiment. A brave thing to do with Calvin and Hobbes, but the right thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard J. Marcej</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147646</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard J. Marcej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 19:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147646</guid>
		<description>If there&#039;s one thing that I wish all creators of entertainment in America would learn from Watterson&#039;s Calvin &amp; Hobbes...

(and that covers comic strips, comic books, TV shows, Movies and character driven fictional novels) 

...know when to end it.
Don&#039;t overstay your time and wind up beating a dead horse.

Leave &#039;em wanting more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there's one thing that I wish all creators of entertainment in America would learn from Watterson's Calvin &amp; Hobbes...</p>
<p>(and that covers comic strips, comic books, TV shows, Movies and character driven fictional novels) </p>
<p>...know when to end it.<br />
Don't overstay your time and wind up beating a dead horse.</p>
<p>Leave 'em wanting more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daly</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147627</link>
		<dc:creator>Daly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147627</guid>
		<description>I had a friend that despised religous calvin stickers on the back of cars. A calvin stickers should be made saying &quot;calvin was agnostic.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a friend that despised religous calvin stickers on the back of cars. A calvin stickers should be made saying "calvin was agnostic."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scavenger</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147529</link>
		<dc:creator>Scavenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 16:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147529</guid>
		<description>Things like Watchmen, Maus, much of Eisner&#039;s work had been out for quite some time when Waterson made his comments. Don&#039;t assume he&#039;s talking about X-Men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things like Watchmen, Maus, much of Eisner's work had been out for quite some time when Waterson made his comments. Don't assume he's talking about X-Men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mullon</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147527</link>
		<dc:creator>Mullon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 16:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147527</guid>
		<description>I have loved Calvin and Hobbes since the second grade and I will go to my grave defending it as the greatest comic of all time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have loved Calvin and Hobbes since the second grade and I will go to my grave defending it as the greatest comic of all time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul King</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147512</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147512</guid>
		<description>on 03 Aug 2007 at 5:25 am  15.km said â€¦


The official reason Watterson gave is that he felt heâ€™d covered all the possibilities inherent in the format - which, yeah, is probably â€˜getting repetitiveâ€™ with his self-esteem intact. Every domestic-based strip, no matter how imaginative, eventually falls preyâ€¦

â€¦now, if only Lynn Johnston of â€˜For Better or For Worseâ€™ has realised the same thing about five years ago. 



Or if only the guy who writes &quot;Family Circus&quot; realised it about 25 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on 03 Aug 2007 at 5:25 am  15.km said â€¦</p>
<p>The official reason Watterson gave is that he felt heâ€™d covered all the possibilities inherent in the format - which, yeah, is probably â€˜getting repetitiveâ€™ with his self-esteem intact. Every domestic-based strip, no matter how imaginative, eventually falls preyâ€¦</p>
<p>â€¦now, if only Lynn Johnston of â€˜For Better or For Worseâ€™ has realised the same thing about five years ago. </p>
<p>Or if only the guy who writes "Family Circus" realised it about 25 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Strand</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147498</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Strand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147498</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true that Watterson expanded the possibilities of the Sunday comic strip. Too bad absolutely no one has followed his lead though. 

Also, I agree that Watterson is incredibly pretentious. Reading the 10th Anniversary book, you get the feeling that he really believes he&#039;s the only person in the world who understands how important newspaper comics are. I think he&#039;s an amazing writer and artist, and I&#039;m a huge fan, but still - he&#039;s a crazy person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's true that Watterson expanded the possibilities of the Sunday comic strip. Too bad absolutely no one has followed his lead though. </p>
<p>Also, I agree that Watterson is incredibly pretentious. Reading the 10th Anniversary book, you get the feeling that he really believes he's the only person in the world who understands how important newspaper comics are. I think he's an amazing writer and artist, and I'm a huge fan, but still - he's a crazy person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h3yd</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147480</link>
		<dc:creator>h3yd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147480</guid>
		<description>Oh, I agree, I think Erik Larsen was just reading too much into it...perhaps the fact that the comics that Bill was trying to insult were a few that Erik had a large part in.  You have to remember, Bill Watterson retired in 1995.  Anyone remember what most comics were like back in those halcyon days?  Ah, yes, the 90&#039;s...I think Wolverine was still sans adamantium in those days, and being depicted as anything between a normalish guy that&#039;s just a bit angry, and some kind of half-retarded ape-thing.  Remember that?  So, yeah...I can see the point.  Plus, most people that form an opinion based on the mainstream pap that&#039;s readily available never read the actual *good* comics.  Basically comes down to: if you hear 25 crappy emo bands, why would you give another emo band you haven&#039;t heard a chance?  Unfortunately, this leads to people missing out on great things like WE3 and Circa Survive.  I vow to all: when I am made king of the world, such idiocies will be abolished.  Along with Good Charlotte.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I agree, I think Erik Larsen was just reading too much into it...perhaps the fact that the comics that Bill was trying to insult were a few that Erik had a large part in.  You have to remember, Bill Watterson retired in 1995.  Anyone remember what most comics were like back in those halcyon days?  Ah, yes, the 90's...I think Wolverine was still sans adamantium in those days, and being depicted as anything between a normalish guy that's just a bit angry, and some kind of half-retarded ape-thing.  Remember that?  So, yeah...I can see the point.  Plus, most people that form an opinion based on the mainstream pap that's readily available never read the actual *good* comics.  Basically comes down to: if you hear 25 crappy emo bands, why would you give another emo band you haven't heard a chance?  Unfortunately, this leads to people missing out on great things like WE3 and Circa Survive.  I vow to all: when I am made king of the world, such idiocies will be abolished.  Along with Good Charlotte.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Lutefisk</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147476</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Lutefisk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147476</guid>
		<description>I had received the complete edition of C&amp;H last year, and my 9-year daughter immediately adopted it. I was thrilled to pass on something that was so righteous to me when I was a kid. But they were also the first books she treated with reverence. I&#039;m very grateful to have that with her.

Thank you Bill, and thank you Bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had received the complete edition of C&amp;H last year, and my 9-year daughter immediately adopted it. I was thrilled to pass on something that was so righteous to me when I was a kid. But they were also the first books she treated with reverence. I'm very grateful to have that with her.</p>
<p>Thank you Bill, and thank you Bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: km</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147468</link>
		<dc:creator>km</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147468</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also the famous strip in which Hobbes enquires, roughly, &#039;Is Atomic Girl&#039;s power the ability to squeeze into that suit?&#039; and Calvin&#039;s response is &#039;Nahhh, they can all do that.&#039;

Yeah, Watterson has a mile-wide pretentious streak of his own - as he sees it he&#039;s defending the comic medium as an art form (among his own heroes is George Herriman). 

Can&#039;t really see where that statement &#039;doesn&#039;t allow for any wiggle room&#039;, though. From the context here and elsewhere, he&#039;s talking about mainstream superhero comics...which, let&#039;s face it, by and large *are* incredibly stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's also the famous strip in which Hobbes enquires, roughly, 'Is Atomic Girl's power the ability to squeeze into that suit?' and Calvin's response is 'Nahhh, they can all do that.'</p>
<p>Yeah, Watterson has a mile-wide pretentious streak of his own - as he sees it he's defending the comic medium as an art form (among his own heroes is George Herriman). </p>
<p>Can't really see where that statement 'doesn't allow for any wiggle room', though. From the context here and elsewhere, he's talking about mainstream superhero comics...which, let's face it, by and large *are* incredibly stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h3yd</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147458</link>
		<dc:creator>h3yd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147458</guid>
		<description>Totally forgot about this little quote from Bill...found this while looking to see what Watterson had been up to (also found out he only lives like 25 miles from me!)...

Posted by Erik Larsen (Member # 7781) on 07-19-2007 10:39 PM:
 
Bill Watterson: &quot;You can make your superhero a psychopath, you can draw gut-splattering violence, and you can call it a &quot;graphic novel,&quot; but comic books are still incredibly stupid.&quot;

The sad thing about this statement is--there&#039;s no wiggle room. He doesn&#039;t allow for any exceptions. 70+ years of comics and not one worthwhile in Bill Watterson&#039;s mind.

Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally forgot about this little quote from Bill...found this while looking to see what Watterson had been up to (also found out he only lives like 25 miles from me!)...</p>
<p>Posted by Erik Larsen (Member # 7781) on 07-19-2007 10:39 PM:</p>
<p>Bill Watterson: "You can make your superhero a psychopath, you can draw gut-splattering violence, and you can call it a "graphic novel," but comic books are still incredibly stupid."</p>
<p>The sad thing about this statement is--there's no wiggle room. He doesn't allow for any exceptions. 70+ years of comics and not one worthwhile in Bill Watterson's mind.</p>
<p>Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Strasburg</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147423</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Strasburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147423</guid>
		<description>Over the past 2 years or so, I&#039;ve been slowly reading my way through the entire Calvin and Hobbes collection.  I couldn&#039;t afford the massive hardcover tome, though, so I hunted down all the paperback collections instead, plus the Tenth Anniversary Book and the Lazy Sunday Book.  I&#039;m currently reading the last of the regular collections (&quot;It&#039;s a Magical World&quot;) and although I&#039;m anxious to finish what I started, I&#039;m sad to know that it will end (again).  I read the last C&amp;H strip in the newspaper the day it was published and cut it out to hang on my wall.  I&#039;m almost dreading reading it again ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past 2 years or so, I've been slowly reading my way through the entire Calvin and Hobbes collection.  I couldn't afford the massive hardcover tome, though, so I hunted down all the paperback collections instead, plus the Tenth Anniversary Book and the Lazy Sunday Book.  I'm currently reading the last of the regular collections ("It's a Magical World") and although I'm anxious to finish what I started, I'm sad to know that it will end (again).  I read the last C&amp;H strip in the newspaper the day it was published and cut it out to hang on my wall.  I'm almost dreading reading it again ....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: km</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147388</link>
		<dc:creator>km</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 12:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147388</guid>
		<description>The official reason Watterson gave is that he felt he&#039;d covered all the possibilities inherent in the format - which, yeah, is probably &#039;getting repetitive&#039; with his self-esteem intact. Every domestic-based strip, no matter how imaginative, eventually falls prey...

...now, if only Lynn Johnston of &#039;For Better or For Worse&#039; has realised the same thing about five years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The official reason Watterson gave is that he felt he'd covered all the possibilities inherent in the format - which, yeah, is probably 'getting repetitive' with his self-esteem intact. Every domestic-based strip, no matter how imaginative, eventually falls prey...</p>
<p>...now, if only Lynn Johnston of 'For Better or For Worse' has realised the same thing about five years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Seavey</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147371</link>
		<dc:creator>John Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 12:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147371</guid>
		<description>I actually think that &quot;ended before it went stale&quot; is a tiny wee bit off...I thought he realized that it was getting a bit repetitive, and ended it then (which implies that it was just a little bit stale towards the end)...

...but compared to &#039;Dennis the Menace&#039; or &#039;Blondie&#039;, even the most repetitive &#039;Calvin and Hobbes&#039; strips seem brand-new, and the series as a whole is, of course, wonderful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think that "ended before it went stale" is a tiny wee bit off...I thought he realized that it was getting a bit repetitive, and ended it then (which implies that it was just a little bit stale towards the end)...</p>
<p>...but compared to 'Dennis the Menace' or 'Blondie', even the most repetitive 'Calvin and Hobbes' strips seem brand-new, and the series as a whole is, of course, wonderful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Wind</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147222</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Wind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 07:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147222</guid>
		<description>Kind of a shame to use that Spaceman Spiff strip at the top, since it was before Watterson had fully established the strip&#039;s characterizations: in later years, Susie would *never* ask Calvin for help on a test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of a shame to use that Spaceman Spiff strip at the top, since it was before Watterson had fully established the strip's characterizations: in later years, Susie would *never* ask Calvin for help on a test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkAndrew</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147175</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkAndrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 05:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147175</guid>
		<description>&quot;I notice that you&#039;re oeuvre is monochromatic.&quot;

HA!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I notice that you're oeuvre is monochromatic."</p>
<p>HA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alejandro</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147151</link>
		<dc:creator>Alejandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 05:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147151</guid>
		<description>One of the best strips ever!

This and Mafalda by Quino are really great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the best strips ever!</p>
<p>This and Mafalda by Quino are really great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flush it all away</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/comment-page-1/#comment-147121</link>
		<dc:creator>Flush it all away</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 04:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/02/365-reasons-to-love-comics-214/#comment-147121</guid>
		<description>I just loved, loved, loved Calvin &amp; Hobbes. I was so sad when Watterson walked away from it. I&#039;ve got the last strip framed and hanging in my office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just loved, loved, loved Calvin &amp; Hobbes. I was so sad when Watterson walked away from it. I've got the last strip framed and hanging in my office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
