<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nice House Ad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:39:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apodaca</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-150209</link>
		<dc:creator>Apodaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 20:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/#comment-150209</guid>
		<description>Is DC&#039;s new ad thing pretending like some omniscient person carved the titles out of stone just before the picture was taken?

I&#039;m betting Final Crisis involves a lot of sculpting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is DC&#8217;s new ad thing pretending like some omniscient person carved the titles out of stone just before the picture was taken?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m betting Final Crisis involves a lot of sculpting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally Pascale</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-149895</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally Pascale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/#comment-149895</guid>
		<description>Well guys, I&#039;m a woman, and I must admit that I don&#039;t mind being pandered to...for a change.  But as has also been pointed out, Green Arrow has been pretty good, so has Black Canary, and I&#039;d prefer to have a wedding instead of a funeral...again, for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well guys, I&#8217;m a woman, and I must admit that I don&#8217;t mind being pandered to&#8230;for a change.  But as has also been pointed out, Green Arrow has been pretty good, so has Black Canary, and I&#8217;d prefer to have a wedding instead of a funeral&#8230;again, for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-149864</link>
		<dc:creator>T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/#comment-149864</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;most women that Iâ€™ve heard speak on the matter would prefer decent characterization and plots than patronizing stunts, again, just like the boys, but in a different skew.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wait...the boys want decent characterization and plots rather than patronizing stunts?  Based on the success of the Didio&#039;s DC from Identity Crisis onward, I&#039;m not so sure of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>most women that Iâ€™ve heard speak on the matter would prefer decent characterization and plots than patronizing stunts, again, just like the boys, but in a different skew.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wait&#8230;the boys want decent characterization and plots rather than patronizing stunts?  Based on the success of the Didio&#8217;s DC from Identity Crisis onward, I&#8217;m not so sure of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jedeye</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-149468</link>
		<dc:creator>Jedeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 02:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/#comment-149468</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I was perhaps disingenuously suggesting that most readers of this book will be buying it fr the lovingly rendered cheesecake artwork (or at least, the expectation thereof, although saying that I do really like Amanda Conner&#039;s cover, it&#039;s funky) rather than the expectation of a good story. Do the readers of RapeySadFaceDC (tm barbelith, thanks guys) want a simple, &#039;girly&#039; book about planning a wedding? 

I think it smells a little of DC pandering to &#039;women&#039; (like with he Supergirl debacle), when the females that are reading DC books are most likely in it for the spandex and facepunching anyway, like the boys. It feels a little like &#039;hey, girls like weddings! Lets make a wedding book and give it a pink cover, they&#039;ll flip for it!&#039;, when really, most women that I&#039;ve heard speak on the matter would prefer decent characterization and plots than patronizing stunts, again, just like the boys, but in a different skew.

That said, what do I know, they might be fun books. I&#039;m enjoying the Black Canary mini right now, and I thought I&#039;d hate that, so my end reaction may differ from my initial impression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I was perhaps disingenuously suggesting that most readers of this book will be buying it fr the lovingly rendered cheesecake artwork (or at least, the expectation thereof, although saying that I do really like Amanda Conner&#8217;s cover, it&#8217;s funky) rather than the expectation of a good story. Do the readers of RapeySadFaceDC (tm barbelith, thanks guys) want a simple, &#8216;girly&#8217; book about planning a wedding? </p>
<p>I think it smells a little of DC pandering to &#8216;women&#8217; (like with he Supergirl debacle), when the females that are reading DC books are most likely in it for the spandex and facepunching anyway, like the boys. It feels a little like &#8216;hey, girls like weddings! Lets make a wedding book and give it a pink cover, they&#8217;ll flip for it!&#8217;, when really, most women that I&#8217;ve heard speak on the matter would prefer decent characterization and plots than patronizing stunts, again, just like the boys, but in a different skew.</p>
<p>That said, what do I know, they might be fun books. I&#8217;m enjoying the Black Canary mini right now, and I thought I&#8217;d hate that, so my end reaction may differ from my initial impression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunkyGreenJerusalem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-149333</link>
		<dc:creator>FunkyGreenJerusalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/#comment-149333</guid>
		<description>meh.

Feels rather standard to me.

I feel no sense of movement from the villains, and the fact the two characters aren&#039;t reacting to them just adds to the static feeling of it.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Actually, thinking again, one of them does buy Shi and Ant, so I may be wrong.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Are Shi and Ant &#039;girly&#039; books, or books with female protagonists?
From the pics I&#039;ve seen of Ant, it doesn&#039;t look like it&#039;s chasing a female audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meh.</p>
<p>Feels rather standard to me.</p>
<p>I feel no sense of movement from the villains, and the fact the two characters aren&#8217;t reacting to them just adds to the static feeling of it.</p>
<blockquote><p>Actually, thinking again, one of them does buy Shi and Ant, so I may be wrong.</p></blockquote>
<p>Are Shi and Ant &#8216;girly&#8217; books, or books with female protagonists?<br />
From the pics I&#8217;ve seen of Ant, it doesn&#8217;t look like it&#8217;s chasing a female audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jedeye</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-149171</link>
		<dc:creator>Jedeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/#comment-149171</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it be funny if it was Acuna colouring Sook? 

I thought it was maybe Adam Hughes, from the colours. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s Acuna though, the detail is a little fine for him. I may be wrong though.

I&#039;m still of two minds about this. One one hand, I&#039;ve been reading GA since the Kevin Smith relaunch, enjoy the character and whathaveyou, and as Paul says, I&#039;ve been enjoying the minis at the moment as well. But still... I&#039;m not super-psyched about it. It&#039;s be fine if it was running in GA with a new creative team, but the idea of relaunching the series and having a confusing slew of one-shots is a bit money-grubbing to my eyes. I&#039;m still getting Countdown (it&#039;s a 2.99 reminder that Final Crisis is coming out in... 39 weeks!!), so I&#039;ll probably end up getting this too as it&#039;s on my pull-list since I&#039;m a GA fan. But is that how I want to get a book? Through apathy and laziness to cancel it, so when it comes out it&#039;ll be in my bag like-it-or-not?

And, unless the Wedding Planner has something shocking up it&#039;s sleeves, how crappy is that going to be? I&#039;ve seen the people in my comic shop, they&#039;re not really the market for the &#039;girliest book DC has ever done&#039;. Are they? Actually, thinking again, one of them does buy Shi and Ant, so I may be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be funny if it was Acuna colouring Sook? </p>
<p>I thought it was maybe Adam Hughes, from the colours. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s Acuna though, the detail is a little fine for him. I may be wrong though.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still of two minds about this. One one hand, I&#8217;ve been reading GA since the Kevin Smith relaunch, enjoy the character and whathaveyou, and as Paul says, I&#8217;ve been enjoying the minis at the moment as well. But still&#8230; I&#8217;m not super-psyched about it. It&#8217;s be fine if it was running in GA with a new creative team, but the idea of relaunching the series and having a confusing slew of one-shots is a bit money-grubbing to my eyes. I&#8217;m still getting Countdown (it&#8217;s a 2.99 reminder that Final Crisis is coming out in&#8230; 39 weeks!!), so I&#8217;ll probably end up getting this too as it&#8217;s on my pull-list since I&#8217;m a GA fan. But is that how I want to get a book? Through apathy and laziness to cancel it, so when it comes out it&#8217;ll be in my bag like-it-or-not?</p>
<p>And, unless the Wedding Planner has something shocking up it&#8217;s sleeves, how crappy is that going to be? I&#8217;ve seen the people in my comic shop, they&#8217;re not really the market for the &#8216;girliest book DC has ever done&#8217;. Are they? Actually, thinking again, one of them does buy Shi and Ant, so I may be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-149066</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/#comment-149066</guid>
		<description>I feel you re: Countdown, Paul, but I think DC is just literally putting &quot;Countdown&quot; on every story they have, whether it really has to do with it or not, so I don&#039;t let it me dissuade me (yet ;)).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel you re: Countdown, Paul, but I think DC is just literally putting &#8220;Countdown&#8221; on every story they have, whether it really has to do with it or not, so I don&#8217;t let it me dissuade me (yet <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-149054</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 15:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/#comment-149054</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a nice piece of art, I admit, but as an advert it didn&#039;t exactly have the desired effect on me.  My thought processes, pretty much: &quot;This GREEN ARROW miniseries isn&#039;t bad.  In fact, this BLACK CANARY miniseries isn&#039;t bad either.  You know, maybe I&#039;ll pick up that wedding story they&#039;re building to...  what?  COUNTDOWN?  Run away!  Run away!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a nice piece of art, I admit, but as an advert it didn&#8217;t exactly have the desired effect on me.  My thought processes, pretty much: &#8220;This GREEN ARROW miniseries isn&#8217;t bad.  In fact, this BLACK CANARY miniseries isn&#8217;t bad either.  You know, maybe I&#8217;ll pick up that wedding story they&#8217;re building to&#8230;  what?  COUNTDOWN?  Run away!  Run away!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomer</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-149046</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 15:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/08/05/nice-house-ad/#comment-149046</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s Sook, most definitely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Sook, most definitely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

