CSBG Archive
What I bought – 29 August 2007
This was an odd week. Some solid stories, but nothing that was unbelievably good. I guess it’s because it’s fifth week - I kind of wish DC still did “fifth week” events (did Marvel ever do them?) to make them kind of odder than normal. I like how DC released the Tangent trade paperback on a fifth week, since it was originally a fifth week thing. Anyway, it’s a slow week, with nothing here that is too controversial! Or maybe there is. You guys surprise me sometimes.
Batman Annual #26 by Peter Milligan, David López, and Ãlvaro López. $3.99, DC.
I imagine this is setting up the new Ra’s al Ghul that Morrison will be writing about in the main title, so we get an origin story with an ambiguous ending. It’s not a bad story, but it lacks Milligan’s flair, so it’s simply a story that needed to be told to lead to other things. Batman heads to Australia to investigate the disappearance of two ecologists who worked for the Wayne Ecological Foundation, while Talia and Damian learn the history of Talia’s father. Batman figures out that there’s an underground Lazarus pit in the area, and he arrives at the scene a bit too late. Ra’s al Ghul’s right-hand man, the White Ghost, has plans for Damian, but they go awry and he ends up in the pit, his fate … unknown! So there’s that.
López, as usual, does a fine job with the art. He draws the action scenes very nicely, and he also has a good eye for features that make each character unique. The story contains some of Milligan’s oddities, like his portrayal of the Duke of Wellington as a whiny coward at the Battle of Waterloo and the weird old guy who was transported to Australia as a prisoner some years before. Of course, I spent six months in Australia and never heard anyone say “fair dinkum,” but I suppose our Aussie readers can say whether people actually use that term! And I like how the Aussies living out on the outback are at the Hewlett place – a reference to Jamie Hewlett, perhaps?
Damian remains a problem, because he’s really a whiner. I mean, he was bad enough when Morrison wrote him, but shouldn’t Talia slap him once or twice? She just puts up with his poor behavior, and I don’t like this Talia. She always seemed stronger than this. Come on, Talia!
It’s not really that necessary of a book. It’s an okay story, but nothing spectacular.
Enigma Cipher #2 (of 2) by Andrew Cosby, Michael Alan Nelson, and Greg Scott. $6.99, Boom! Studios.
This book should have been out ages ago, but it’s been slow in coming. I wish it had been better, but it disappoints at the end after a strong first issue and a strong first half of this issue.
In case you don’t remember, in the first issue a professor at a university found a coded message in a book he bought at an estate sale. The message was encrypted by an Enigma machine, the code the Nazis used in World War II. He tells his students to try to break the code, and then evil men come and start killing them all. Casey Williams (whose real name is Cassandra, a nice touch) escapes and manages to convince a cop that she’s not crazy. In this issue, they evade the bad guys and manage to decode the message, which reveals why people are willing to kill for a code from World War II. It’s all very political, as you might expect.
Cosby and Nelson do a nice job setting the story up and maintaining a frenetic pace, which this kind of story demands, but they let us down at the end. The story comes to a screeching halt at what I guess is the alloted page count, because it feels like they were told to wrap it up and they realized they had only two pages left. It’s a shame, because what the message says and its implications – and even whether it’s authentic – could easily sustain another issue, or at least several more pages. This was originally solicited as a five-issue mini-series before being released as two extra-long issue, so maybe it should have been packaged a bit differently in order to allow a better resolution.
Scott’s art is odd, too. For three-quarters of the book it’s dark and moody, as Casey is moving at night for the most part. Then, suddenly, the action shifts to the daytime, and Scott’s art is less murky and the lines are much cleaner. You might think this is a good thing, but it’s not necessarily, because it feels too bright for a spy saga like this. I actually thought it was a different artist, but none are credited. It’s not bad art, but it’s a strange shift that might signal a speeded-up process because of the book’s lateness. Maybe, maybe not.
Two issues at seven bucks a pop is a bit much to spend for this (I know it’s cheaper than a four-issue mini-series at 4 bucks an issue would be, but at least that’s spread out!), but it has an intriguing premise that works for almost the entire way. Unfortunately, Cosby and Nelson can’t close the deal. Oh well!
Ex Machina Masquerade Special by Brian K. Vaughan and John Paul Leon. $3.50, DC/Wildstorm.
Here’s another book that is told well and looks nice (remember when Leon was drawing The Winter Men? good times), but feels pretty inconsequential. I don’t mind seeing some of Mitch’s superhero exploits, and Vaughan does a good job letting us know just how ineffectual Mitch really felt when he was superheroing (despite his success with the World Trade Center), which ties into the framing story and his decision to let the Klan hold a rally in Central Park. But when you think about it, why would he deny the Klan a permit to hold a rally in Central Park? All the arguments he makes at the end of the book, about how people who hide behind masks are cowards, are ones plenty of people have made in the past, and that’s why the Klan still gets permits to march, because then people who aren’t, you know, insane racists can come out and ridicule them. Mitch wouldn’t deny a permit because then it would become an issue of the First Amendment. Vaughan gets to tell a pretty good story, but the basis of the story is silly and shouldn’t spark such soul-searching by Mitch. Some of Vaughan’s political stories deal with more nuanced issues that cause Mitch some pause, but this isn’t one of them. Even a dyed-in-the-wool liberal like me understands that denying the Klan a permit to rally is asinine. We need these people out in front of us so we can mock them, after all.Â
Fallen Angel #19 by Peter David and J. K. Woodward. $3.99, IDW.
I’m glad we got the Shi crossover out of the way, because although it wasn’t bad, it wasn’t as good as the rest of the series, even though David does a nice job bringing in elements from the rest of the series (like how Yurei knows a bit more about Bete Noire than Lee does). I’m still a bit mystified that Tucci allowed David to use Shi, because she really doesn’t do very much (yes, she saves Lee, but it’s not all that dramatic and it’s kind of lucky) and she’s treated rather poorly again. Her portrayal is better than it was in the first two issues, but it still feels like David doesn’t have much respect for her. Am I misreading it? Maybe I am.
As usual, this is a quality book even when it’s not at the top of the game. These last three issues haven’t been great, but they add another layer of meaning onto the story of Bete Noire, one that will certainly have ramifications in the future. David, at least, makes each story count in the grand scheme of things.
The Last Fantastic Four Story by Stan Lee and John Romita, Jr. Marvel, $4.99.
There’s not much to say about this story, because it’s pretty silly, but it’s nice to see some unnecessary exposition from Lee (“Bolts of flame!” “Melting our weapons!”), unironic commentary about heroism, and an overabundance of exclamation points. It’s not worth 5 bucks (even for Romita’s art), but it’s a goofy reminder of why we love Lee – because he has the stones to place Doctor Doom at the United Nations cheering for the Fantastic Four after they save the world. Go, Stan!
Mice Templar #1 by Bryan J. L. Glass and Michael Avon Oeming. Image, $3.99.
In the back of this issue, there’s an odd unsigned essay detailing Oeming’s long, gradual creation of the Mice Templar. I’m sure it’s not in any way in there to deflect criticism that this is a rip-off of Mouse Guard! Of course it’s not! Anyway, the comparisons are inevitable, but I’m not sure why. When someone writes yet another superhero comic, does anyone say “They must have ripped off _____!”? No, they don’t. Well, unless it’s blatant. But I don’t care if Oeming was drawing mice with swords in his crib – all I care about is whether the book is any good or not.
Well, it’s nice to look at. I’ve never been the biggest fan of Oeming’s art, but in this book, he really cuts loose, and it’s nice to see. The battle scenes are wonderful, and the mystical scenes are mystical. Even though the mice generally look alike, we get enough little quirks to their appearances to distinguish them, even though I didn’t like the fact that the female mice actually had breasts (part of a point I’ll get to in a bit). It’s a big book, too, packed with pages for your dollar, which is nice. You may not like it, but they don’t skimp on the page count!
The story is rather simple: once there was a group of mice called the Templar who fought evil. Then they turned on each other and disappeared. Now no one believes they even existed, except for a few young mice who haven’t been jaded by the world yet. One night a group of rats comes to the village looking for a Templar, who turns out to be a blacksmith who earlier in the book was yelling at the young mice to stop telling stories of the Templar (I know, shocking). A massive battle ensues in which many mice are slaughtered and the rest captured. One young mouse survives and is given a task by the Fish Gods (I’m so not joking) to “liberate the dark lands.” He finds an older mouse who was also a Templar and the two head out on a quest to save the world. This all sounds rather familiar, doesn’t it?
I can deal with the familiar plot but for one thing: there’s nothing in here, really, to tell us why these creatures are mice rather than human. “What?” you might say, but bear with me. In Mouse Guard (yes, I must compare), we are acutely aware of the fact that these creatures are mice, facing all the dangers you expect mice to face, even though they’re, you know, intelligent. In this first issue, there’s nothing that says these mice face the dangers real mice would face. They’re just human beings doing their stuff, but drawn as mice. Like, for instance, female mice with breasts. Uh, no. The rats are just ugly humans. The gods are gods. There’s a spider attack in the book, which is one of the few places that the mice face something that real mice would face. There are very few references to cats and such, but not enough. I’m just wondering why these characters are mice. Get it? Is it just to disguise the fact that the story isn’t terribly original? If these were humans, would we simply ignore it because we’ve seen it so many times before?
I’m torn on issue #2. I want to like the book, because it looks nice and is very entertaining, for the most part. It’s far more brutal than that book we’re not comparing it to, which is kind of neat, and quest books are usually pretty good. But I’m just wondering if it’s going to separate itself from the crowd of fantasy that have used this plot since the dawn of time. If not, there’s not much reason to buy it.
MINI-SERIES I BOUGHT BUT DID NOT READ.
Local #10 (of 12) by Brian Wood and Ryan Kelly. $2.99, Oni Press.
I know that each issue is largely self-contained, so I ought to be reading each one, but as I’ve mentioned before with regard to this excellent mini-series, in the middle issues Wood made me hate Megan so much that I didn’t want to read another issue about her being a reprehensible human being without immediately following up with an issue where she redeems herself. Considering how late this series is, that could be a while. So I’m just waiting for the thing to finish so that, when I re-read issue #5 (or 6?) and I gnash my teeth at how horrible Megan is, I can immediately move on and read an issue where she at least tries to act like a regular person. My hope is that by the end I won’t hate her anymore because she’ll have grown up. Anyway, this is excellent even though I haven’t read an issue in a while. Just trust me!
Fifth week is over! Bring on September!






27 Comments
John Seavey
August 30, 2007 at 3:31 pm
Marvel did do at least one 5th week event–they put out seven one-shots showing what had happened to the ‘Heroes Reborn’ universe in the three years since the Marvel heroes had left it. (‘Rebel’, ‘Young Allies’, ‘Ashema’, ‘Masters of Evil’, ‘Doom’, ‘Doomsday’, and ‘Remnants’, which had an extremely clever logo; each letter was taken from the logo of one of the four ‘Heroes Reborn’ titles.)
ISTR that it didn’t do particularly well. By then, strong HR backlash had set in, and it basically answered questions nobody was asking. But they did do it.
Colossus 2000
August 30, 2007 at 3:42 pm
I’ve never once heard anyone use the phrase ‘fair dinkum’ in conversation… We just don’t do it. Yes, we call everyone mate. But you don’t often hear ‘G’day’ or ‘Strewth’… Unless we are taking the piss out of tourists…
So if you ever hear an ‘Aussie’ talking like you’d expect one to, he’s laughing at you behind your back.
acespot
August 30, 2007 at 3:51 pm
Did you forget that Brit #1 was coming out yesterday?
Joel A
August 30, 2007 at 3:58 pm
Occasionally I’ve heard ‘fair dinkum’, but not often. G’day on the other hand is my favoured greeting. I didn’t realise how often I said it until I went overseas and everyone was pointing out the Aussie
Apodaca
August 30, 2007 at 4:39 pm
Well put.
Greg Burgas
August 30, 2007 at 4:50 pm
Shoot, acespot, I forgot that you recommended that. I’ll have to go check it out. It went completely under my radar.
BizarroBeachHead
August 30, 2007 at 4:59 pm
I can believe that Oeming desired to create Mice Templar independently from Mouse Guard. After all, it’s not as if Mouse Guard is the first story in the mouse genre(Redwall, Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH). However, I do bet that the success of Mouse Guard spurred Oeming to put Mice Templar at this point in time.
I’m disappointing that it’s so generic. I was vaguely interested in it, but it sounds like it’s not for me. My favorite thing about Mouse Guard is that they are mice(same as NIMH) and not just anthropomorphic characters like Usagi Yojimbo(which is still awesome though). Breasts on animals annoy the CRAP out of me, it’s a pet peeve of mine.
I may still look at it, because I do like Oeming, but when it’s so generic that it sounds like the opening to Eragon, well, I doubt I’ll stick around.
Michael
August 30, 2007 at 5:24 pm
I think you are misreading Fallen Angel’s treatment of Shi, Greg. While Lee doesn’t think much of her, I think you have to remember that Lee is a fairly unreliable narrator, especially in issues of faith. I saw Shi’s portrayal as a much-needed foil to Lee, pointing out how Lee’s cynicism is a flaw in her character, and the inner peace she gives up by believing (however accurately) that everyone’s a bastard and the world’s the worst bastard of all. Remember that the last moment of their association is Shi, the avatar of hope, giving Lee, the avatar of cynicism, a well-deserved sock in the kisser.
Bill Reed
August 30, 2007 at 6:40 pm
Man, that Last Fantastic Four Story had an astonishingly terrible script, but the art was gorgeous. I was laughing all the way through.
It in no way makes Stan any less awesome.
FunkyGreenJerusalem
August 30, 2007 at 7:22 pm
I’ve heard, and used, ‘fair dinkum’,on occasion, and use, and hear, ‘g’day’ all the time.
‘Strewth’ as well.
And I’m a city boy, so I’d say that streth and g’day are extremely common, and fair dinkum wouldn’t raise an eyebrow.
I usually find ‘fair dinkum’ awkward when I read it, as even if used in correct context it sounds like the author is striving for authenticity.
Colossus 2000
August 30, 2007 at 7:41 pm
This has been bugging me all morning actually. I had no idea I use g’day so often. I’m on the phone a lot, and I start nearly every conversation with it…
But it is the authenticity issue. Hell, if you wanted an authentic story involving someone who lives in the outback, just fill it full of explectives.
“No f***in way mate, that s*** ain’t mine, f***d if I know how it got there, probably fell outta the f****in sky…”
Sounds more realistic than “Strewth cobber, them galah’s are gonna go crazier than a bunyip when they find out who ate me lamington!”
Greg Burgas
August 30, 2007 at 7:42 pm
Michael: I agree with your assessment of Lee’s treatment of Shi, but it seemed like David was putting her in situations where she was outclassed and made to look silly. Lee seemed to do most of the heavy lifting in the issue (both literally and figuratively). I didn’t mind Lee’s attitude toward Shi, because I agree with your thought process. Maybe I’m reading too much into it.
I don’t think I ever heard “strewth” while I was in Australia, but everyone said “G’day.” It was far more fun pointing out the subtle differences, like saying “whinging” instead of “whining” and when it was your “shout” when it was time to buy the beer. The use in the comic was amusing because I do think it was in there to make the Aussies sound “authentic.”
ninjawookie
August 30, 2007 at 9:32 pm
The Prime Minister uses it on occasion to try and relate to everyone over the age of 50 and the so called “aussie battler”. Current Affair programs will also use it in manipulative ways as well, usually when there’s an issue of race or there’s a shady business or some crap like that.
G’day is the only one that is widely used by all. It’s always really distracting whenever the accent is played up in a comic book, or a writer tries to cram in every single known Australian colloquialism. Brian K Vaughan is almost guilty of it when he introduced that cycloptic ‘sheila’ in Y the Last Man, but i’m willing to forgive because he writes a neat story.
FunkyGreenJerusalem
August 30, 2007 at 9:34 pm
I had a similar realisation a couple of years ago – since then I decided to embrace it.
Oh, and for those curious, ‘mate’ really is said in every other sentence by Australians.
And wanker.
And any variation of ‘piss’ – ‘on the piss’, ‘taking the piss’, ‘pissed off’, ‘what a pisser’, ‘pissing myself’, ‘totally pissed’ etc.
1 Fair Dinkum point to anyone who’s not ffrom Australia, and never spent more than a couple of months here, who can actually give me the meaning of all of those – not cheating allowed – it’s just not cricket.
Russell H
August 31, 2007 at 6:21 am
As an Englishman I feel I’d be cheating if I tried.
Matthew E
August 31, 2007 at 7:02 am
After all, it’s not as if Mouse Guard is the first story in the mouse genre(Redwall, Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH).
Mus of Kerbridge!
s1rude
August 31, 2007 at 7:42 am
Great point re: Mice Templar, Greg. The lack of any compelling reason these characters have to be mice was a big problem with it, and one I hadn’t been able to articulate until your review. The problems I could articulate were: it’s dull, plodding and trite. And I usually love Oeming’s art, but I thought it was a bad fit for this. I never could tell the mice children apart, and had to spend way too much time with the fight scenes to determine who was a rat, who was a mouse, which mouse, etc. There was nothing inventive in the depiction of the mouse “city” or anything that made me think, “yeah, mice would live like that” – which was a highlight of the last issue of the book we’re not comparing it to – it was just generic fantasy backdrop #3, etc. The ironic thing is that if they dropped the anthropomorphic angle and he drew it a la Hammer of the Gods, I’d probably keep buying it for the art despite the unoriginal story. As it is, I think one book about mice knights is good for me, and this ain’t it (not that I’m comparing it to anything).
Also had the same reaction to the Batman annual. It was fine (man, Milligan has no qualms about cashing paychecks, huh? Good for him – he deserves them and you can still count on him for the unusual & innovative in his less high-profile work), but definitely not spectacular or necessary. The Lopez’s art looked great; one upside of this would be a greater appreciation for their always solid stuff. I’d hate to see them leave Catwoman (one of DC’s best books), though.
My recollections of Australia are (1)damn, you people can drink, and (2)the women are wholesomely “hawt”. Given those two things, you can say whatever you want…
BillyRay
August 31, 2007 at 10:05 am
“She just puts up with his poor behavior, and I don’t like this Talia. She always seemed stronger than this. Come on, Talia!”
It’s obvious that she’s a Skrull.
Doug Atkinson
August 31, 2007 at 11:56 am
I can’t help but think of John Ostrander’s comment about what happened when he started having Captain Boomerang use Australian slang in “Suicide Squad”; apparently an Australian friend called him up and said, “Yes, we do say those things…but not all in the same sentence.”
Apodaca
August 31, 2007 at 1:52 pm
I don’t think he could get any less awesome at this point.
Fascination Place » This Week’s Haul
August 31, 2007 at 2:20 pm
[...] I think Greg Burgas nails it in his review of the Ex Machina special: It’s not a story of any great consequence, and the sentiment driving the plot doesn’t ring true. Plus, I’ve never warmed to John Paul Leon’s pencils, as the renderings aren’t to my taste, and his layouts never seem to really tell the story, they just sit there. The earlier 2-part special, drawn by Chris Sprouse, was much better than this one in every way. [...]
stealthwise
August 31, 2007 at 7:51 pm
Dude, seriously, just read the LOCAL issues. The latest one (well, not this one, but the one before it), really gives you a bit more incite into her character, and maybe makes her a little bit less unlikeable.
Greg Burgas
August 31, 2007 at 9:43 pm
I can wait, I tells ya! I will survive!
Rohan Williams
September 1, 2007 at 7:29 pm
Yeah, I’ve probably used ‘Fair Dinkum’ a maximum of once or twice in my entire life. And both times, I was probably just referring to the discount store ‘Fair Dinkum Bargains’, not actually, unironically using it in conversation. I don’t hear it said by other people much, either.
Honestly, I can’t remember reading a non-Australian writer ever writing a convincing Australian accent. Anyone got any examples to the contrary?
FunkyGreenJerusalem
September 2, 2007 at 6:29 pm
I can’t remember Australian writers ever writing a convincing Australian accent.
Bully
September 2, 2007 at 7:30 pm
My thoughts on the Last FF story is that it is an old-style FF narrative and dialogue expanded to fit into new-style decompressed visual storytelling. Look at all the ellipses and broken sentences that continue into the next balloons, making the dialogue read reallllllllllllly slowly, or even dialogue continuing across the next panels or next page. It looks like Stan’s has written what would have been (in the old days) a fairly densely dialogued page, and JR Jr has spread that single page worth of material across two or three pages.
Both approaches have their value and can lead to great stories. But it looks odd, if not downright awkward, to have both in the same story.
Sumerian Cry
November 11, 2007 at 6:00 pm
Sumerian Cry
news