CSBG Archive
I Like the Published Cover Better…
- by Brian Cronin
- in General
…but this original idea for the Doctor Thirteen cover from Cliff Chiang is awesome, too! Check out this sketch of Chiang’s original idea!
![]()
Check out his site to find out where the other parts of his interview with Brian Azzarello are found.
- Posted on September 19, 2007 @ 04:37 PM






20 Comments
Apodaca
September 19, 2007 at 5:59 pm
It’s neat, but some of the faces are really weird-looking. Superman’s, for example.
Brian Cronin
September 19, 2007 at 6:06 pm
Oh, sorry, I’ll edit in that that is just a sketch of what the cover WOULD look like.
Conor E
September 19, 2007 at 6:45 pm
I’m not sure if this counts as a spoiler or not, but the faces of the ‘big gun’ heroes are supposed to look weird.
Apodaca
September 19, 2007 at 7:12 pm
Okay, well fair enough, then. Also, I don’t care about spoilers. I have more important things to worry about, like if I should eat that sandwich or not.
yo go re
September 19, 2007 at 8:20 pm
I don’t know – I think cross-company cover homage trumps Superfriends homage. If nothing else, they should have let him go ahead with that, and put it on the back cover. Maybe upside down, like Previews…
FunkyGreenJerusalem
September 19, 2007 at 8:35 pm
[SPOILERS]
He eats it.
[/SPOILERS]
Apodaca
September 19, 2007 at 11:22 pm
Retcon!
I had pizza instead.
FunkyGreenJerusalem
September 19, 2007 at 11:52 pm
you raped my childhood!
Apodaca
September 20, 2007 at 12:14 am
I raped your childhood with pizza.
Oh yeah.
avengers63
September 20, 2007 at 6:43 am
I always like a well done cover swipe. I don’t mind at all if the art is stylized, as in this case. So what if the background characters look odd… they’re apparently supposed to.
It’s not that often we see a cross-publisher swipe. As long as it’s done respectfully, and due credit is given, this is a nice show of respect.
CBrown
September 20, 2007 at 9:15 am
It’s a cool cover, but isn’t the one they used, a swipe of a vintage DC cover, more appropriate than a swipe of a vintage Marvel cover?
Ian Astheimer
September 20, 2007 at 11:03 am
I thought the finished cover was an homage to Super Friends, not a previous DC cover.
Unless it was a cover to a Super Friends tie-in, I guess.
Brad Curran
September 20, 2007 at 12:49 pm
I remmeber that composition from something. Maybe a Super Friends DVD.
Rohan Williams
September 20, 2007 at 2:27 pm
Isn’t it an Alex Toth image, from the old Super-Friends comics, or at the very least, the trade?
T.
September 20, 2007 at 3:50 pm
Here’s the link to the Toth Superfriends image.
I think the Toth homage trumps the cross-company homage simply because that X-Men cover has been homaged to DEATH by now.
Anonymous
September 20, 2007 at 4:53 pm
Sure has, my first thought wasn’t even Giant Sized X-men, but rather ‘oh, and X-Statix #1 homage’.
I miss that book.
CBrown
September 21, 2007 at 8:02 am
Ian,
It’s definately an homage to Super Friends. I don’t know if that image was first used in the comics or the show or the merchandizing or what. But my point is it’s still a DC reference rather than a Marvel one.
avengers63
September 21, 2007 at 8:19 am
CBrown: Please tell me you’re talking about the published cover, not the one pictured in this post. The one up top is clearly a GS X-Men swipe. Even the cover banners are placed & designed alike.
http://www.comics.org/coverview.lasso?id=28072&zoom=4
CBrown
September 21, 2007 at 8:03 pm
Avengers63, I don’t get what the confusion is. The published cover is obviously a Super Friends swipe. The unused cover is obviously a swipe of Giant Size X-Men. I know that. Everyone knows that. If it WASN’T obvious, they wouldn’t be very effective swipes.
MarkAndrew
September 21, 2007 at 8:37 pm
My childhood is destroyed forever.