Shape-shifting villain introduced in 52 who has shown up in the less than a year since 52 ended as a “twist” in quite literally THREE (perhaps four, I forget if he was used in the Superman titles or not) different comic books!!!
Doesn’t he die everytime he appears? Rereading the showdown between him and Steel in 52, it’s pretty clear he falls to his death.
Man, that character sucks.
“He’s a member of the everyman program.”
“Oh? What’s his name?”
“Everyman.”
The fact that he can alter his DNA cheapens every story he appears in.
It makes me laugh that everyone in the company is/was using him.
He sounds like the kind of idea that a writer would introduce early on in a run, and then just put in a drawer in case they write themselves into a hole and have no other way out - not something that the editors tell people to use.
(You would have thought an editor upon receiving that would send it back to the writer with a note asking for something a little better).
Geez, I read 52, but I have absolutely no recollection of the Everman character. Even when I read GA/BC #1, I didn’t remember him. Am I getting that old & forgetful or was Everyman that unmemeorable?
Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.
20 Comments
Andrew Collins
October 15, 2007 at 3:53 pm
When I read that revelation in GA/BC, my first thought was “Wow, Didio & his editors finally killed off a character that actually deserved to die.”
buttler
October 15, 2007 at 3:56 pm
But how can we be sure Everyman is dead? Maybe it was just Everyman posing as Everyman, and . . . um, oh, I see. Never mind.
John Seavey
October 15, 2007 at 3:57 pm
The twist: It will have been Granny Goodness, posing as Everyman.
Ian Astheimer
October 15, 2007 at 3:59 pm
Who’s Everyman?
Brian Cronin
October 15, 2007 at 4:08 pm
Shape-shifting villain introduced in 52 who has shown up in the less than a year since 52 ended as a “twist” in quite literally THREE (perhaps four, I forget if he was used in the Superman titles or not) different comic books!!!
How uncreative is THAT?
Bill Reed
October 15, 2007 at 4:28 pm
I can’t wait till we learned that Everyman boffed Black Canary when disguised as Ollie Queen and that now she has… gasp… HIV!
Stephane Savoie
October 15, 2007 at 4:28 pm
Doesn’t he die everytime he appears? Rereading the showdown between him and Steel in 52, it’s pretty clear he falls to his death.
Man, that character sucks.
“He’s a member of the everyman program.”
“Oh? What’s his name?”
“Everyman.”
The fact that he can alter his DNA cheapens every story he appears in.
Dave T. Game
October 15, 2007 at 5:38 pm
And it proves that the shock at the end of the wedding special was needless and cheap! Big surprise.
Brian Cronin
October 15, 2007 at 5:47 pm
And the amount of times he was used in just this past year makes the mystery of Ollie’s death seem really quite silly.
“Oh hey, remember that guy who passed every test as being the real Ted Kord, but wasn’t really Ted?”
“Oh yeah, he’s the same one who fooled everyone into thinking that Sarge Steel just turned evil out of nowhere!”
“Yep! Good thing those situations aren’t at all like this one!”
Jacob T. Levy
October 15, 2007 at 6:39 pm
and he wasn’t that interesting to start with…
The Mutt
October 15, 2007 at 7:10 pm
Those damned Skrull are everywhere!
FunkyGreenJerusalem
October 15, 2007 at 7:46 pm
It makes me laugh that everyone in the company is/was using him.
He sounds like the kind of idea that a writer would introduce early on in a run, and then just put in a drawer in case they write themselves into a hole and have no other way out - not something that the editors tell people to use.
(You would have thought an editor upon receiving that would send it back to the writer with a note asking for something a little better).
Paperghost
October 15, 2007 at 10:34 pm
He’s like a Superboy Prime Continuity Punch wrapped in spandex.
FunkyGreenJerusalem
October 15, 2007 at 11:27 pm
They should have called him ‘The Butler’, because it’s always the butler.
Sean Whitmore
October 16, 2007 at 1:16 am
I don’t think they remember they’re allowed to do that.
They’re like the cats from that Sandman story.
suedenim
October 16, 2007 at 3:08 am
Smart rabbit. Everyman is one of those comparatively rare characters who *should* have been killed off in his first use.
Ben Herman
October 16, 2007 at 10:22 am
They should have called him ‘The Butler’, because it’s always the butler.
*Snicker!* Admittedly that’s a lot shorter name than calling him The Plot Device That Walks Like A Man.
John Trumbull
October 16, 2007 at 3:32 pm
Geez, I read 52, but I have absolutely no recollection of the Everman character. Even when I read GA/BC #1, I didn’t remember him. Am I getting that old & forgetful or was Everyman that unmemeorable?
Marc
October 16, 2007 at 4:21 pm
Yeah, but does DC have any other shapeshifters they can go to? Durlans aren’t really the type to be on earth really, and besides them, who’s left?
David
October 16, 2007 at 7:36 pm
The character was better when called Shapeshifter, in Elementals.