web stats

CBR Live! Archive

Saturday at the (virtual) garage sale

Writing this column can occasionally be hard on my wallet. Reminiscing about this or that book often leads to an impulse buy. I can usually keep my impulses under control.... but a while back I discovered something deadly.

See, normally I have two impulses at war within my comics-reading self at any given time. The first will be familiar to many of you -- the driven, obsessive collector's need to own everything. This is something of a reflex for many of us and it can be a chore to keep it from overpowering common sense when I catch myself wanting to purchase comics I hate, just to fill out a run or something like that. I have managed to largely break myself of that tendency over the last couple of decades, though it still sneaks up on me every so often. (Blindly buying Judd Winnick's run on Batman is my most recent embarrassment in that area.) The completist's urge is always there, lurking.

Against that, though, is an equally-powerful horror of paying full price for anything, especially when it comes to shelling out for the gouger's prices people charge on back issues of comics. Let's not even get into what it costs to keep up with new comics these days.

So it's usually been pretty easy to keep myself from getting out of control buying trades or back issues or anything like that; our funds for this sort of thing are limited and that generally is enough to keep my insatiable collector lusts in check.

That is, until I discovered the wiles of the online dealers. A great many of them have a search function on their sites that will sort by price and title and oh, my God, that is so evil.

Think about it. A back-issue quarter box tied to a search engine. It's diabolical. I can't resist that. I'm only human.

My wife loves a bargain even more than I do, so she's no help. I will be sitting at the computer and blurt out, "Oh, my Gawd, this guy has the entire run of Flash Gordon paperbacks for 99 cents each!"

Julie will usually say, "Ooo, you should get that," or something similarly encouraging. Sometimes she'll add, "Maybe you can write about it in your column, even."

And so I will. We had a bunch of these bargains arrive in the mail over the last week and a half and I figure I can justify them this way. Indulge me.

*

I wasn't kidding about Flash Gordon. 

 This was actually my first experience of Flash Gordon, in 1974.

These paperback prose adaptations came from Avon Books in 1974, and they were very cool. Ron Goulart wrote them, under the name "Con Steffanson," with covers by the indefatigable George Wilson.

 Terrific covers by our old friend George Wilson.

These were actually my introduction to Flash and his world. Back then, I'd never seen the newspaper strip and to this day I've seen very little of Raymond's original work on Flash Gordon. (Though the Alex Raymond reprints from Checker Books are on the shopping list too; they're still a little spendy for me to grab yet, though.) Writing about the Sci-Fi Network's trainwreck of a Flash Gordon TV show reminded me that I'd been meaning to replace these books, and when I found that Powell's online store had a bunch of them for under a buck, well, I was their helpless bitch, that's all.

The books are every bit as much fun as I remembered. Ron Goulart's no-nonsense prose keeps things moving at a nice clip, and they're smart, funny reads. The amazing thing is that they look almost new. At that price I'd have expected dog-eared pages, spines split, library stamps, all of that stuff... but they are crisp and clean and gorgeous. My inner bibliophile is beside himself with glee. I'm still astonished at the low price. The companion series of Lee Falk's Phantom paperbacks from Avon -- also by Goulart with covers from Wilson -- that came out around the same time are going for insanely high prices the last time I checked.

Speaking of old-school fantasy swashbucklers, NewKadia had the entire run of SilverBlade for about thirty cents each.

 An INCREDIBLY under-rated series, from a criminally under-rated writer.

This was a 12-issue series from Cary Bates and Gene Colan that came out from DC in the late 80's. I liked it a lot, though I can see why it really didn't play well to a traditional comic-book audience.

 Meta-commentary before it was fashionable.

It's enormously difficult to sum up. To me, that is one of its great charms, the fact that it's a story combining surrealism, superheroics, and a love of old Hollywood. Overall it's more of a character meditation than a plot-driven piece. Sadly, it was a little ahead of its time; even as little as five years later I think it would have been a big hit for Vertigo. It was in the same general surrealist fantasy territory that Vertigo titles like Enigma and Doom Patrol would cover down the road, but with a Sunset Boulevard spin.

 Of course, it works out well for the consumer that it's uncollected... I nabbed the whole thing for under four dollars.

Here's a synopsis I stole off another site:

The series centered on a fictional has-been movie star named Jonathan Lord. He had a career playing a wide variety of swashbucklers and other fantasy roles during Hollywood's golden age, his greatest being in the film Silverblade, an Errol Flynn-type adventure story. Unfortunately Lord had become typecast as a swashbuckler, and grew too old to play such roles.

He lived alone in a mansion, with only his butler for company. The butler, a former child actor named Bobby Milestone, is the Silverblade series' narrator.

Milestone recounts how the mansion used to be a happier place, before the movie deals dried up, Lord's various marriages failed, and the actor became a bitter old recluse. He says of Lord, "He was my hero once, a thousand reels ago. Once he was even my friend."

One day the butler is on a shopping trip when he sees and buys a Maltese Falcon-like statue of a bird. Milestone takes the statue home hoping to make the statue part of a decorative exhibit he is building to cheer up the atmosphere at the mansion, but Lord complains about the exhibit as well. Tired of his boss's constant complaints, Milestone flies into a rage and storms out of the house.

Shortly afterwards, Milestone is kidnapped by someone from his own past with a grudge against him. The kidnapper blames Milestone for a career-ruining injury he suffered during a movie stunt and now plans to kill him.

Jonathan Lord is left alone in the mansion when the bird statue suddenly comes to life, telling Lord he will restore him to what the star once was. Lord is immediately enveloped by a magical plume of flame. Bobby Milestone is later rescued from his kidnapper by a man who appears to be a younger Jonathan Lord, the age at which he appeared in the film Silverblade. Milestone passes out and reawakens in the mansion, where he sees it is indeed Lord, wearing his costume from Silverblade and appearing fifty years younger. Lord has been given the power to transform into any character he portrayed on film, effectively turning him into a real-life superhero.

Now, here's the amazing part. That's not the series. That's the FIRST ISSUE. Take that, decompressionists.

Jonathan Lord's voyage of self-discovery over the next eleven issues -- who is he? Is he the actor or is he a man trapped behind a role? And what is his role now? Throughout the issues that follow, as Jonathan Lord tries to somehow reassemble his life and he finds himself a pawn of demonic forces much larger than himself, Bates plays with the idea of the role versus the man, fiction versus reality. Plus there are ghosts, demons, vampires, Native American mythology and lots of old-time Hollywood lore, with every issue as densely-plotted as the first. It's a hoot.

The series was somewhat hampered by commercial considerations -- I think it would have worked a little better without an obligatory action scene in every issue -- but everyone involved with it was clearly having a fine old time, and I enjoyed it a great deal. This is far and away the most ambitious thing Cary Bates ever did, and it deserves a little love. This is something that's screaming to be collected, but probably most people who work at DC these days don't even know it exists. At any rate, I was thrilled to find it so cheap.

*

The reason I was looking up stuff on NewKadia was because I happened across a couple of other back issues that I'd inexplicably missed the first time out. I found the first two parts in a quarter box at the convention a couple of weeks ago and I was trying to scare up the third.

 Why has this never been collected?

"Dark Knight Over Metropolis" was, I think, the second official post-Crisis teaming of Batman and Superman, though I'm sure someone will leap to correct me if I'm wrong. Anyway, it was the first real attempt to evoke the old World's Finest feel while also serving as our first real look at the new "they're NOT friends!" dynamic between them that DC was striving to set up. Literally dozens of stories have spun out of this one in the Superman books over the years, most of them riffing on the Kryptonite ring that plays such a large part in the plot.

I forget why I didn't pick it up at the time, but you know, it's a nice little three-parter. Considering I got it for less than cover price I can't complain. I do wonder why it's never been collected.

*

In addition to all these bargains, we keep getting fun free stuff too. I am not sure who was behind this -- I think it might have been the ECCC/Comic Stop guys up north putting my students on a list for these kind of freebies -- but whoever our angel was, someone sent the Madison Cartooning Class ten free tickets to an advance screening of Enchanted.

 Hey, it was free. And as it turns out, terrific.

Thankfully, it was at a place and time where not very many of my kids could go, or there would have been a feeding frenzy. Usually when my students hear the word 'free' it has about the same effect on them that you see with sharks sensing blood in the water. Tiffany and Marcus and some of their family and friends could go, though, and there were a couple left over for Julie and me. So we went.

I was ambivalent about the premise -- characters from a fairy-tale world fall into our world, and hilarity ensues. This is a well that's been dipped into pretty often, and it often seems as though the people doing it expect the premise to be enough, so you don't need to have a story.

 More interesting than actually good.

Disney's even gone there before, as far back as Bedknobs and Broomsticks, though the one people remember is Who Framed Roger Rabbit? That was a fun movie, and certainly it's a technical masterpiece, but I assure you, it isn't a patch on the original novel.

 This book is AWESOME.

Gary Wolf's book was much darker and more layered; it owed as much or more to the Hammett/Chandler tradition as it did to the cartoons of the 1940's, and all that went overboard with the Robert Zemeckis film. The difference between Disney's Roger Rabbit and the original novel is about the same as the difference between Disney's Pinocchio and Carlo Collodi's, if that helps any.

But I digress, as usual. All this is by way of saying that to my delighted surprise, we loved Enchanted.

 It uses the same self-aware mockery to get laughs that we've seen in movies like Shrek or the aforementioned Roger Rabbit, but this is much more sweet-natured. Amy Adams, in particular, is amazing, and despite Patrick "McDreamy" Dempsey getting all the press attention, it's Ms. Adams that almost completely carries this picture on her back.

 This girl is a revelation.

It's easy to play a character that's naive and a little dense that you laugh AT. It's quite a bit more of a tightrope for an actor to walk when you want the audience to like that naive dumb girl and root for her and ache when she aches. In particular, there's a bit where Patrick Dempsey is trying to explain what divorce is to Amy Adams, and she wells up, "They don't see each other again EVER? But... that's... that's so SAD!" and it just destroys her, she starts weeping uncontrollably. You're laughing, but at the same time you think, damn, you know, she's right, it IS sad, that's a sad thing, divorce, and you can see why it gets to her so. That's a remarkable piece of acting work, there.

There are lots of other things to like besides Ms. Adams.  Watching the nearly-seamless transitions between animation and live-action and back again are great fun, this is the sort of special-effects thing that Disney used to do better than anyone. Nice to see they've still got it.

 Whoever designed this did a nice job of evoking old-school Disney.

Susan Sarandon is amazing too.

And the actors are clearly enjoying themselves, particularly Susan Sarandon and James Marsden. I had no idea the guy who played Cyclops could be so hilarious, but his Prince Edward is fall-down funny.

Enchanted goes into general release November 21 and I recommend it unreservedly. In a way it's kind of the anti-Shrek. You know, the Shrek movies smirk at the audience and elbow you in the ribs, saying, "Yeah, we know, the fairy-tale stuff is ridiculous."  Enchanted winks at you instead and gets you to admit that "Yeah, fairy tales are often ridiculous, but deep down, we still love them." Certainly we loved this movie, and so did my students. Its utter lack of mean-spiritedness, more than anything else, is what makes it irresistible.

*

The tireless Chip Mosher at Boom Studios continues to shower CSBG with good stuff. Most recently he sent along 2 Guns, which apparently has been prey to scheduling issues that Chip swears are behind them.

 Another cool crime entry from BOOM! studios.

Mr. Burgas talked about this a couple of days ago and I'll try not to go over the same ground too much, but I have to say that I am coming to it cold and that makes quite a difference. Chip kindly provided the first two issues along with the third so I was able to read them all at once, and I enjoyed them a lot. Steven Grant knows how to do hard-boiled crime and the art from Mat Santolouco is just as cool and expressive as it was on Cover Girl. Also, I have to differ with our other Greg a little in that I didn't notice any padding; I was struck by how dense the storytelling was, to be honest, especially in the first issue.

I do still think that this is something that will work a lot better in the trade paperback format and I hope it's going to get one. What I'm noticing about the Boom! output that I've seen is that the action/crime/caper stuff -- 2 Guns, Potter's Field, Cover Girl, Left On Mission -- absolutely rocks my socks. Their other books aren't nearly as fun for me. I wonder if there isn't a bigger audience for that; there are a lot of us that occupy the middle ground between superhero fanboy and indie snob who would welcome more of this sort of contemporary action thriller, if we knew it was there.

The trouble is that I am afraid Boom! is stuck in this specialty-comics-shop ghetto that caters primarily to superhero fans.  Non-costume crime comics usually founder in that market, especially when they are shackled to this ludicrous system that insists everything be presented in overpriced 22-page installments and sell well in that format before it gets put in a book. I hope they can hang in there long enough to find the audience they deserve. The audience that loves movies like Casino Royale and Die Hard and Ronin would get a huge kick out of the crime comics Boom! is doing. If they can figure out how to put their comics in front of those people and persuade them to check the books out, they'll be golden.

*

And that's that. A cross-section of the deep-discounted loot that arrived in the mail the last couple of weeks. I didn't even get to all of it -- there were the Gladstone Dick Tracy reprints and the Fran Striker Lone Ranger book and the Kandor and El Cazador collections...

....agh. Somebody stop me. I'm out of control!

See you next week.

  • Posted on November 10, 2007 @ 09:00 PM

29 Comments

Two points:

1: "Think about it. A back-issue quarter box tied to a search engine. It’s diabolical. I can’t resist that. I’m only human."
...And so am I. Do you know how cruel it is to post that without a link? Where do I find such a wonder?

2: "there are a lot of us that occupy the middle ground between superhero fanboy and indie snob who would welcome more of this sort of contemporary action thriller, if we knew it was there."
Amen. I think I may have to pick up Two Guns.

Do you know how cruel it is to post that without a link? Where do I find such a wonder?

Amazon, NewKadia.com and eBay all let you do searches by title that sort by price low to high, and NewKadia also lets you look at "all DC under a dollar," or "all Marvel under fifty cents," or whatever, sorted alphabetically. It's really addictive.

There. I feel like the neighborhood crack dealer now. But you asked.

Hey, you won't get any complaints from me.

Now, my fiancee, maybe. But not me.

Oh jesus.

"5,000 comics for under 50 cents!"

Paradoxically, this is going to be expensive.

You, sir, are a bastard. I guess I'll be spending the next hour or two surfing NewKadia. I'll send you the bill.

Julie will usually say, “Ooo, you should get that,” or something similarly encouraging. Sometimes she’ll add, “Maybe you can write about it in your column, even.”

I think the word you're looking for here is "enabler."

(I kid, she's a swell person!)

OH MY GOD I CAN GET ALMOST THE ENTIRE RUN OF THE QUESTION FOR FORTY FIVE QUID

"OH MY GOD I CAN GET ALMOST THE ENTIRE RUN OF THE QUESTION FOR FORTY FIVE QUID "

not if I beat you to it David.

I'm amazed and astonished.

You actually preferred 'Who Censored Roger Rabbit?' to 'Who Framed Roger Rabbit?'? I thought the book was a sour, joyless little turd with a poorly set up ending, while the movie is an all-time classic, a brilliant and charming tribute to Hollywood's legendary animated films with any number of brilliant vocal performances and an absolutely heroic performance by Bob Hoskins opposite what was essentially thin air.

I had long taken it as an article of faith that it was one of the few books vastly improved by adaptation (I think one of the others is 'The Princess Bride', so you can judge for yourself how well my tastes fit with yours), so I'm just kind of surprised to see someone championing the book in this instance.

After 20 years of collecting and the increasing availability of desired collected editions, SPACE is now the limiting factor... Almost (not quite) makes me wish I hadn't seen this post.

How many of those Flash gordon novels were there? I have The Lion Men Of Mongo, The Time Trap Of Ming XIII, and The Witch Queen Of Mongo, and according to the inside blurb there were at least two others, The Plague Of Sound and The Space Circus... were there any others besides these?

I remeber picking up the first issue of Silverblade when it came out, but my 19-year self didn't quite know what to make of it at the time. Perhaps I should go back and hunt the rest of those issues down some day...

Oh, there's a simple creed that Dawn and I live by when hunting for stuff on a budget... "Cheap + Cool = VERY COOL".

I agree, a Silverblade reprint is probably the longest of longshots, which is why I have a scattering of the issues and it's on my "to buy" list always.

It did rate a mention on Rip Hunter's infamous chalkboard in the pages of 52, however, so at least someone over there must remember it...and who knows, with the occasional weird concept from the distant past getting dusted off and spit back out again, there's always a chance.

"not if I beat you to it David."

Well, sadly I don't have £45 to spare right now, so go ahead.

*sob*

I never read Silverblade. Gene Colan was a vexing artist for me. On the right title, he was perfection. On the wrong title, he could cause me to drop a book. I never liked his superhero work.

His work on Tomb of Dracula is a masterpiece.

How many of those Flash Gordon novels were there? I have The Lion Men Of Mongo, The Time Trap Of Ming XIII, and The Witch Queen Of Mongo, and according to the inside blurb there were at least two others, The Plague Of Sound and The Space Circus… Were there any others besides these?

One other, Perry. There were six in all and the last one was called The War of the Cybernauts.

As for Roger Rabbit, well, John, mileage varies. I like the book better, it's more of a head-on collision between Raymond Chandler and the funny-animal comics. But I love the old hard-boiled pulps so I'm doubtless enjoying that angle more than others might. One man's joylessness is another man's noir.

I do LOVE the movie... just not quite as much as I did the book. I think it makes a difference if you come to the book first, too; I read it when it came out, long before there was any thought of a movie. In fairness, though, Wolf's follow-up Roger Rabbit novel, that came out AFTER the movie, I didn't care for much at all. He should have quit when he was ahead.

silverblade should be made into a movie. i would rather see that than the flash, or wonder woman made into movies.

I remember Silverblade from back in the day, but never picked it up. However, between your recommendation and the writeup it received in the latest BACK ISSUE Magazine, I think I'm going to have to track it down.

We've got one "yay" and one "nay" on the Roger Rabbit book.

Anyone want to be the tie-breaker so I can go see if I want to hunt it down and take the time to read it or not?

Chandler's one of my favorite authors, by the by. And I'm really fond of the movie.

I thought the movie was better, but I would say to still give it a read, if only to see how vastly different it was from the movie. The 4 characters: Eddie Valiant, Roger & Jessica Rabbit, and baby Herman are there, but everything else is very different.

I think that the reason that Dark Knight over Metropolis hasn't been collected is because it is too short.

If the same story had been done just two or three years later, it wouldn't have had three parts. It would have had at least one part in a given month's release of Action, Adventure, Superman, Man of Steel, Detective, Batman, Robin, Shadow of the Bat and possibly even Superboy, Steel, Azrael, Catwoman and Birds of Prey.

If they could have justified getting the JLA involved, they could have done it as a summer crossover event and get almost 50 or 60 issues out of it. Three months each of the previous twelve titles and also JLA, Flash, Green Lantern, Wonder Woman and Aquaman.

That story would have been collected. And, sadly, probably would have been a much worse story due to contrived elements bringing in the other books and filling out space.

Does anyone tell simple, enjoyable stories like DKOM anymore? Or, is it as it seems, and everything is either a filler waiting for the next crossover event, or an out of continuity story?

Theno

Greg--It seems to me that tomorrow is your birthday. I'm still older than you, you know...
Hope you're doing well!!

XOJL

I'll agree with Greg the reviewer here... a couple of years ago I took the opportunity to read "Who Censored Roger Rabbit" and then rented and watched "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" back-to-back and I thought the book was about 1000 times better.

The book was brilliantly written and it held together very well. The movie, on the other hand, I felt didn't age well. The effects seemed right out of the '80s and the plot, particularly the conclusion, didn't make much sense.

"NewKadia also lets you look at “all DC under a dollar,” or “all Marvel under fifty cents,” or whatever, sorted alphabetically."

How?... I visited the site, and I can't figure out how to sort through the cheap comics. I am I missing something?

I was always unsettled by Who Censored Roger Rabbit. I could have been seeing subtext where there was none, but I remember reading it as an 18 year-old and being alarmed that at finding it could be read as a racist allegory-- the toons are like African Americans, being integrated into white culture with toon sports players and toons living among humans and experiencing discrimination... and yet, there isn't any benefit shown to this society from the toons' presence, and, worse, there's not a single toon in the novel that is remotely sympathetic; even Roger (not to spoil the ending) is revealed to be less than nice. The theme of the novel almost seemed to be saying: integration is a bad thing. People should stay among their own kind.

I haven't read it in almost 20 years and maybe I wouldn't see the novel that way now, but I remember at the time finding it disturbing. To my thinking, this was why the film was so different: to avoid that kind of a reading.

How?… I visited the site, and I can’t figure out how to sort through the cheap comics. I am I missing something?

You have to call up the cheap books first-- then, once it gives you the list of the books under a dollar or whatever, you click on the menu option that says "DC only," or "Marvel only," or whatever you're looking for. It's a two-step process, it won't call them out both at once. It's a 'search these results' thing.

Goddammit, now *I* can't do it.

Maybe it's the other way around. But I remember it was a two-step process and I cleaned them out of a bunch of cheap DC 'S' books... SilverBlade,  80's old-school Superboy.

I'll look again later when I have more time and once I figure out how I did it, I'll see if I can just link to an example.

that would be awesome. i was beginning to think i had forgotten to use the internet.

Thanks for the tip on http://www.NewKadia.com I bought some comics there and bingo...got them in 2 days....with free shipping. How do they do that????

I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:

Leave a Comment

 

Subscribe to CSBG

Categories

Review Copies

Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.

Browse the Archives