free hit counter

javascript

CBI Archive

Saturday Among the Ruins

Saturday, January 5th, 2008 at 12:43 PM EST

Updated: Monday, January 7th, 2008 at 11:03 AM EST

It’s widely regarded as one of the most influential classics of science fiction. It’s been made into a movie three times, adapted for comics, and stolen from more times than it’s even worth counting, whether you consider the novels, comics, TV shows, or movies. The current zombie craze can trace its ancestry pretty directly to this book. Any measurement you use, it’s a seminal genre work.

So why is it so difficult to adapt it properly?

I am speaking, of course, of Richard Matheson’s “peculiarly PRACTICAL” (as Stephen King once put it) vampire novel, I Am Legend.

 Where it all began.

The book itself was published in 1956. Despite its horror trappings, it’s basically a science-fiction story — Robert Neville is the lone survivor of a plague that has turned the rest of humanity into vampires. He hunts them by day, they come after him at night. The book follows him as he tries to figure out the cause of the plague and keep himself alive…. and sane.

It’s a terrific book, but that is to be expected. Really, Richard Matheson ought to be declared some sort of national treasure at this point — in addition to I Am Legend, he also wrote The Shrinking Man, Hell House, Bid Time Return, Duel, Trilogy of Terror, and countless other gems. With all the genre classics he’s given us over his fifty-plus year career– not to mention the TV stuff like his classic episodes of Star Trek, Twilight Zone, and the original Night Stalker – as far as I’m concerned there’s no one better than Matheson working in the horror genre, and damned few to equal him.

I Am Legend may not be his best book, but it is my favorite. I don’t want to spoil it too much, even though many of you must have read it — but for me the novel’s great strength is the quiet role reversal that happens between Neville and the monsters he is fighting, to the point that Neville himself becomes a kind of monster. Most writers that try this sort of the-abyss-gazes-also character study tend to hit you over the head with it. Matheson paces it in such a way that the reader is swept along with Neville in his obsession, we’re rooting for him all the way to the end. Really, if all you know is the movies, you need to read the novel. I can’t recommend it enough.

I am also very fond of many of the adaptations that have been done, even if most all of them manage to miss the point, including this latest one that came out in theatres a couple of weeks ago. (Of course, one bonus of any new adaptation of a classic is that the original book gets re-issued, and it’s nice to have Legend back in print again.)

The original. Genius. Seriously. One of Matheson's best and that's saying a LOT.

Now that the latest attempt at a movie has put the story back in the public consciousness, I thought it might be fun to look at the other movies and comics that have come from this book.

To begin with, there’s the first movie, the one with Vincent Price.

Probably the best of the movies.

The Last Man on Earth, from 1964, is probably the best pure adaptation in terms of capturing the book’s atmosphere and the bleak isolation of the life Neville is leading, as well as the horror of watching the world fall apart a little at a time as the plague spirals out of control. Matheson himself worked on the screenplay, though he was dissatisfied with the final product and substituted a pen name, “Logan Swanson.”

There were a couple of changes from the novel; some worked, some didn’t. The smartest change, and one that has stuck for all the subsequent adaptations, was making Neville a biochemist actively working on a cure for the vampire plague. This adds a lot of plausibility to his researches and his relentless quest to wipe out the monsters and make everything right again. (Inexplicably, “Neville” is changed to “Morgan” in the movie, but I think of him as “Neville” and I will not confuse the issue by changing the name here.)

What goes overboard in this version, ironically, is a lot of the science. Perhaps the movie people thought it was too much exposition, though I think they threw the baby out with the bathwater there. The science adds to the horror, it brings a weight and a concrete reality to the vampire menace that isn’t there otherwise. It also adds punch to the notion that there is a new society evolving among the infected people, that they are learning to live with this horrifying change to their biology. Without that crucial piece of the story, you lose a lot of the impact. Remember that point, because we’ll be coming back to it.

There is a lot to like about this movie though. It’s dark and scary in a way that none of the other movie adaptations are, even with the state of the art CGI on display in the new one. Vincent Price is terrific as Neville, giving a subtle, bleakly naturalistic performance of a kind that you really don’t see him do in any other movie he ever worked in. The key to this story is believing in the day-to-day horror of the life Neville is leading, trudging through the ruined city looking for vampires to kill. And Price absolutely sells it, he completely pulls off Neville’s quiet despair; you’d never recognize him as the over-the-top guy who played Egghead or the abominable Dr. Phibes. There are a lot of black-and-white horror movies from the late 50’s and early 60’s that modern audiences laugh at today, but this is not one of them. It’s every bit as creepy today as when it was released. It’s fallen into the public domain, so you can find it on several different “Vincent Price Horror Classic!” bargain-bin DVD’s. Best $3.99 you’ll spend in the video store, especially since it’s often paired with The House on Haunted Hill, which is also a lot of fun.

Cheap AND entertaining.

*

The next adaptation, 1971’s The Omega Man, isn’t nearly as faithful to the novel but it certainly has merit.

 I have such an unholy love for this movie, even though it's probably the worst of the adaptations.

I have to admit there’s not much horror to this version. And a lot of it looks terribly dated, especially for a supposedly post-apocalypse SF film; everything about it, from Rosalind Cash’s foxy black-power role as Lisa to Anthony Zerbe’s not-very-subtle Manson family references, screams “70’s social relevance fable.”

Nevertheless, I have a ridiculous love for this movie. It’s just so damn much fun. Charlton Heston as Neville is awesome — his wry, bitter sarcasm and sheer exasperation at the vampire mutant population is hysterical. Where Vincent Price was wistful and sad, Heston is mostly gritty and pissed off: Take your paws off me, you damn dirty mutants. He has dozens of terrific one-liners, especially in the early scenes where he snaps off one quip after another to the moldering corpses lying around Los Angeles.

It’s not JUST cheesy fun, though. The interesting thing about this version to me is that is IS so completely of its time. It ends up being a fable about the young versus the old, and it takes Matheson’s idea of the hero inadvertantly becoming the same as the monsters he fights one step further, by implying that it’s not just a product of horrific circumstance but actually an inevitable consequence of adulthood. The idea seems to be that sooner or later all grownups are forced into some kind of a monstrous compromise, settling for half a life; whether it’s Matthias and his book-burning technophobic mutants or Neville and his bunker mentality, it’s what happens when you let yourself get old and establishment, man. Innocence and goodness is the province of youth. (Only the adults are affected by the plague; it’s revealed about halfway through the movie that there are teenage survivors who are infected but don’t become monstrous until they become adults. Subtle, huh?)

If you spend too much time thinking about this sort of thing (I do) The Omega Man is actually the perfect bookend to 1973’s The Wicker Man.

 Beware the pagan hippies!

Both of them are horror stories that are thinly disguised fables about the growing power of the youth movement. Both of them find the primary conflict built on youth versus adulthood, old versus new. Both of them are cult classics. But in The Omega Man the teenage hippies are the valiant survivors trying to save humanity from the ruined adults who can’t help being evil, while in The Wicker Man the heroic establishment grownup is pitted against young pagan hippies who can’t help being evil. If I were in college I’d write a learned paper on it. Since I’m not, it’s my gift to you film majors out there looking for a thesis idea. Enjoy.

…Wups, got a little sidetracked there. Anyway, there’s not a lot of Matheson’s I Am Legend in The Omega Man, but it’s still worth checking out. There’s a nice DVD issue with some interesting extras, including a making-of featurette that was shot at the same time as the film, and a retrospective with reminiscences from screenwriter Joyce Corrington and several of the supporting actors (who definitely aren’t teenagers any more.) And you might as well get the original Wicker Man while you’re at it.

*

Far and away the best adaptation of I Am Legend wasn’t in film at all — it’s a comic book. (I bet you were wondering if I was even going to mention comics this week at all.)

 This was actually my first exposure to Matheson's novel.

Eclipse Comics put out a really magnificent four-issue prestige format adaptation in the early 90’s, scripted by Steve Niles (whatever happened to him? You could see he had a real future in mutant zombie post-apocalypse comics…) and lush, beautifuilly-rendered art by Elman Brown.  It pretty much is the novel, profusely illustrated, in the style of Berni Wrightson’s Frankenstein. This was my first exposure to Matheson’s original novel and I fell helplessly in love with it. Blessedly, it’s back in print in a nice collected edition from IDW.

 A completely awesome comic book.

It’s well worth your time even if you already have the novel on your shelf. I really don’t have much to say beyond that — Comics Should Be Good and this one is. So buy it.

*

Which brings me to the newest version.

You thought Will Smith as Jim West was mis-cast....brutha, you have no idea.

I probably wouldn’t have found it such a disappointment if they hadn’t actually called it I Am Legend. That really does set up all sorts of expectations for those of us that loved the book. Of course, the mere fact that it stars Will Smith probably tells you everything you need to know about the big Hollywood dumbing-down process that’s going on here. Still, I had hopes that this version might be something more than a jumped-up videogame despite the trailers. But it’s not, not really.

The key mistake is that the infected, the vampire people, are just snarling animal mutants devoid of intelligence. So there’s no society of the mutants, no social metaphor or commentary to speak of going on here — this is just Will Smith shooting monsters. For all the cheesiness and dated sixties references in The Omega Man, at least they were reaching for something beyond that. This is mostly a CGI shoot-em-up, and even though it’s exquisitely crafted, it’s still a big dumb effects movie. Independence Day with vampires. Fine, I like big dumb movies as much as the next guy, but why bother with Matheson’s book at all if you just want a popcorn movie? It’s not like the novel has a big cachet outside us few geek faithful that remember it.

That said… it IS exquisitely crafted. The scenes of ruined New York are incredibly evocative and spooky; the visuals are the best that CGI technology has offered to date, I think. It’s a shame it’s attached to something so shallow. Smith is trying, you can see HE is reaching for something; but to be honest, Will Smith just isn’t believable to me as Robert Neville. You want to cast African-American, fine, get Denzel Washington, Laurence Fishburne, Morgan Freeman — hell, even Avery Brooks — but not Will Smith. I just don’t buy it. He seems more out of place to me in this than he did in The Wild Wild West, and that’s saying something.

There is an interesting comics-related spinoff, though.

 This prequel book looked kind of interesting. More interesting than the movie, really.

Vertigo has done a prequel book, I Am Legend: Awakening, that is presented online here, as part of Warner Bros. official movie web site. No word so far on whether or not DC is ever going to make a print version available.

It’s an interesting experiment. I’m ambivalent about online comics as a whole, I admit it — I prefer something in print, that I can hold in my hands — but this is lovely work, and almost all of the short stories in this prequel collection are weightier than the main story of the Will Smith movie. There are entries from Steve Niles (him again!) and Bill Sienkewicz, Dawn Thomas and Jason Chan, and even a story by Matheson’s son Richard Christian Matheson with art by David Levy. The project is endorsed by Matheson Senior himself, according to publicity at the 2007 San Diego Con, and the Niles/Sienkewicz entry was available there as a giveaway promo comic — dealers are moving quite a few of those on eBay, if you prefer a printed version as well. Or you could download the PDF version and print that out, I suppose — I confess, that’s what I did so I could get this column written. I guess I’m too old school.

Nevertheless, it opens a door to a possible new way of doing business for DC. And it’s nice to see that Richard Matheson (and son) are actively participating in the comics project. Admittedly, I wanted to like it better than I did — mostly I’d have to call it “okay but not great” —  but it’s nice that it’s happening at all. There is a promised Book Two in the works and I’ll be curious to see what that looks like. But it’s not the real I Am Legend, at least not to me.

I do have hopes that someday I’ll get to see a faithful version of I Am Legend on the big screen, complete with scientific vampire biology and suburban ruins and the gentle, decent family man who eventually becomes a monster that terrifies a society of monsters. Someday. And in the meantime, we still have the novel. If the various adaptations lead folks there, that’s worth something.

See you next week.

27 Comments

Of course, the mere fact that it stars Will Smith probably tells you everything you need to know about the big Hollywood dumbing-down process that’s going on here.

Will Smith’s performance is excellent, easily the best thing about the movie, and that shouldn’t come as a surprise considering that Will Smith is, all things considered, honestly a pretty good actor once you stop making the Fresh Prince jokes that were old a decade ago.

The problem with his version of I Am Legend is a hastily tacked-on ending which blows, and which is the result of a reshoot after the original, grimmer ending tanked with test audiences. It’s nothing to do with Smith at all.

Well, I haven’t read it (yes, I suck), so I appreciate the lack of spoilers, sir, but are you saying there have been times when it HASN’T been in print? Wow. Even I know how popular and influential it is, so I’m surprised it occasionally goes out of print. Weird.

I know I should read it. I’ll get to it someday!

I also have to take issue with the cracks with Will Smith. Personally, his performance rose above this movie. The feel of him clinging to sanity was wonderful. The scene with Sam really got to me. It WOULD have been better if they had titled it something else. In a lot of ways, the film is talking about different things than the book was. The characters in the film are Will Smith and the scenery. The zombies are only set dressing. It is ‘Cast Away’ with zombies.

And really, if your associations for Will Smith are still Independence Day and MIB (both good movies for what they were) then you need to see Ali and Pursuit of Happiness. The latter is particularly defining.

My biggest problem is with the title. The phrase “I am legend” refers to how Neville is perceived by the vampires. Before, vampires were legends, outside the norm. Now they are the norm, and Neville is the “legend.”

However, this all falls apart when the vampires are reduced to snarling, subhuman creatures. They can’t tell “legends” about the “human” if they can’t TALK.

It’s probably the most crystal-clear example of “missing the point” that I’ve ever seen from Hollywood. Omega Man was closer in intent to the novel, and they went ahead and changed the name for that. Why keep a title that doesn’t make a scrap of sense?

There was a while there (in the early-to-mid-90s) where NONE of Matheson’s books were in print. I remember searching through second-hand bookstores all over Toronto and Southern Ontario searching in vain for anything, anything at all with his name on it. I did manage to find copies of Legend and Hell House (two of my three faves, along with Shrinking Man), Somewhere In Time, and two volumes of the “Shock!” short story compilations.

Eventually they a lot of them got re-published and I got to more fully explore his mastery of the genre. Easily my favourite horror/scifi writer.

Also, one of my fondest memories of my early teens is an overnight birthday party where my friends and I watched Omega Men til 5am. What a riot!

Oops…Omega MAN.

Tom Fitzpatrick

January 5, 2008 at 3:15 pm

I remember watching the Wicker Man (the original not the remake).

Britt Ekland was downright sexy in that movie! ;-)

Let me add to the Will Smith supporters: he’s downright great in Six Degrees of Separation, and that was 15 years ago or so. He’s been good for a while, but he’s become the only black actor who can carry a blockbuster action movie, so he gets all those roles.

Will Smith is not an actor, he’s a celebrity. He always plays Will Smith in whatever movie he’s doing. He just switches it from “Serious Will Smith” to “Action Will Smith” to “Family Will Smith”.

That’s why he does so many bio-pics. You don’t have to convince the audience that you’re the character, because they already know you’re impersonating someone else. No need to suspend the disbelief, since no one’s trying to convince you.

While I agree that Smith is talented, for some reason I can’t fully get into his performances. He’s one of those actors who, for me, never fully disappears into a character (Angelina Jolie is another one). I never really saw Muhammad Ali, I was always cognisant of the fact that it was Will Smith pretending to be him.

Wow, while I was composing that post, Apodaca explained got there first and did it much better.

This blog post is a story all about how Wills rep got flipped-turned upside down.

So…anyone feel like mentioning the ending(s) to the new one? I really wouldn’t mind.

You could write the word SPOILERS a million times around it so that others don’t get frustrated.

Heh. It’s funny how someone’s taste in actors can so fundamentally affect their opinion of a film.

I LOVE this book. I knew within the first twenty minutes that the end of the movie was going to be completely different from the book, because of the mindlessness of the vampires. makes the third act of the book basically impossible, straight off the bat.

But I really enjoyed the movie anyway, mainly because I like Will Smith as an actor. I thought he turned in a fantastic performance, and nailed the tone for me. He was 100% the Robert Neville I read about in the book (at least for me).

On the other hand, I can’t stand that hammy old cowboy Heston, so I hated the Omega Man.

Different strokes, etc. etc…

It was kinda weird that the new movie decided to give a completely different meaning and context to the title, but aside from that, it’s a fantastic film.

To be honest, the interesting thing to me about the story has always been ‘what would the last survivor of a zombie holocaust do with his time?’, which this version really makes the most of. It’s certainly not just a big dumb action movie- it’s quite an affecting character study, aided by a great performance from Will Smith.

Man, I’m totally missing out. As much as I know of the greatness of Matheson and the various takes on this book, the only one I’ve seen is… well, the Homega Man, from the Simpsons Treehouse of Horror. I *adore* Vincent Price and Charlton Heston, and love Heston’s dystopic 70s stuff like Soylent Green, but I’ve somehow managed to never see Omega Man– a terrible act of neglect I have to rectify.

My thoughts:

I’ve read ‘I Am Legend’, and it’s an interesting book…not as good as I was expecting, but that’s more down to expectation management than quality or lack thereof. It’s hard to come to a book that everyone describes as “brilliant, seminal, classic”, and not feel a little disappointed. That aside, I certainly felt it was unfilmable as was. Too much of the book is internal narrative, very little of it is action. It’s no coincidence that they’ve been working on the Will Smith adaptation for something like a decade. (It was in the book, ‘The Greatest Science Fiction Movies Never Made’.)

I’ve watched ‘Night of the Living Dead’ several times, and I’m a little surprised you didn’t mention it here, because Romero’s been very open about the fact that he lifted ‘Night’ from ‘Legend’, substituting zombies for vampires in order to avoid plagarism charges. (Matheson’s response was apparently to say, “I’d have sued if you made any money on it, but you didn’t, so who cares?”) ‘Night’ obviously takes place over far less time and adds cast members (the latter being a theme of adaptations of ‘Legend’), but does convey the apocalyptic nature of the plague far better.

‘The Omega Man’ is actually a terrible movie, but it’s interesting that it’s so close to being a really good movie. Heston is woefully miscast; he’s a big, brawny he-man action type, not given to introspection, and it’s a very introspective role. The disease doesn’t make a ton of sense; it’s implied at several points in the film that getting the disease makes you join the Family, which isn’t supported by descriptions of what the disease is. The symbolism is heavy-handed and obvious, the Family wouldn’t realistically last two seconds against someone armed with as many guns as Heston has, and the ending is basically the writer second-guessing his own instincts in an attempt to be “relevant”. (Matthias should have died at the hands of the dying Heston.) But just a few script polishes here and there, and a few better actors, and this could be a great movie. It’s a bit like motorcycle jumping. You don’t “almost” clear the canyon. :)

Not seen ‘Last Man on Earth’ (it’s in my stack of “movies to watch” in the rec room), or the new version (lost interest when I found out the vampires were all mindless). It’s interesting to watch all the solutions that people attempt in adapting such a problematic text, though.

Given that The Last Man On Earth is one of my favorite Vincent Price movies (second only to The Haunted Palace), I *really* should get around to reading the book someday.

Speaking of books, how did the move go, Greg?

Nice to see Last Man on Earth get some love - best 99 cents I ever spent.

Steve Niles wrote (at least at first) 30 Days of Night, a vampire comic which mainly stands out because of Ben Templesmith’s amazing art. I just can’t get enough of that guy.

I think “Omega Man” and “I am Legend” ‘07 are two sides of the same coin. How funny they recycled the “tag line” from Omega for the Smith movie.

Both have stars who are first and foremost celebrities and bring themselves to the story, rather than inhabiting a character they’ve created for that story. That being said, I felt Smith did a good version of “Will Smith post-apocalyptic & brooding”, whereas Heston felt like he never quite was comfortable in Omega Man. Perhaps he was worried he might be getting stuck in a sci-fi ghetto he didn’t want to be in, after Planet of The Apes? Omega Man likely got greenlit because of Apes.

Omega Man was a too 60s-relevant version of Matheson’s book; Legend ‘07 feels like a first-person shooter horror game adaptation. I think the reason the Smith movie did so well has everything to do with the movie season, which was pretty poor. Mainstream audiences were itching for something to see that wasn’t political or controversial. There’s no way Smith’s film would have been a blockbuster hit in a regular summer season.

I read that book a bit back. Good book.

Mainstream audiences were itching for something to see that wasn’t political or controversial. There’s no way Smith’s film would have been a blockbuster hit in a regular summer season.

I think you underestimate the size of the “see-whatever-opened-this-weekend” crowd. I mean, Alvin & the Chipmunks made $40 million, for pete’s sake!

I should probably clarify that I tend to agree with Dan Apodaca up there. Will Smith is always Will Smith to me. That’s all it is. I don’t DISLIKE him. But he’s not Robert Neville in my eyes.

On the other hand, neither is Charlton Heston, really, but Heston being Heston works in The Omega Man for me because it really plays into the whole 60’s youthquake idea underlying it.

I knew someone who was working on the set of the movie, re-routing people around the streets they were filming on and every time someone would ask him about the movie he’d say, “Alright, Will Smith…last person alive”.

I knew someone who was working on the set of the movie, re-routing people around the streets they were filming on and every time someone would ask him about the movie he’d say, “Alright, Will Smith…last person alive”.

If only that was the plot of the movie. Just poor Will Smith, all alone, with no cameras to mug to. Dancing around with the corpse of DJ Jazzy Jeff, desperately ignoring the flesh falling off the carcas.

And then he goes up to the roof of a skyscraper and does the “Big Willy” dance while the sun goes down, just crying and crying.

“Sniff sniff, ‘It’s Big Willy time.’ WAAAUUUHHHH!!!”

For me, the only performance where it did seem that Will Smith was actually the character he was portraying and not himself was Pursuit of Happiness. I think he did a good job in this movie, from what he had to work with anyways, but I think if there had been a better focus on themes and not blowing things up, his performance could have been much better.

Leave a Comment

 

Subscribe to CSBG

Categories

Review Copies

Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.

Browse the Archives