i am never lost to comic finest commentary. drawn to some loss of vital. kept in concern by those so focused on defining their own victories. that is the call. a fictitious victor because no other possibility was the allowance. but then it became forecast of such lack of great appliance when it was an easy playground. so it came to secondary judgment considered insulting in option but soon seen as an oversight? yes it is that determined. me i’m not enigmatic in this just is representation. no one can represent a person that lets it lie as your position. at first delay then real taunting of your best in resulting fix. you know about fix. it is a given in early release. best by letting your other top gamers solve to your credit. know it as this if i say it, it means nothing unless it is found in process. no process works without positioning for a power grab does it? if it does name one. please. power grab? are you spending time at the ces? i’d say the draw may still be the best of show. certain to disdain but never stated any differently. think and react. it is finer human quality. thanks for your divided support? what is that? a folly of low regard to those so expecting to make it such. process is the key.

WTF???

Is someone playing with a random sentence generator?

Who would you say is the most imaginative writer in ('mainstream') comics then? At this moment, which isn't really the most imaginative time period.

Great lists all around, though.

Will

No one issue stood out really, it doesn't ship on schedule, it is all pre-existing characters (so no "best new characters"). I considered it for minor villain, but I don't think it really works, because the actual villains of the book are not minor (Venom, Osborn and Bullseye).

The art on the book isn't great (although it is pretty good).

The only thing I could really see it working as is maybe Best Story Arc, but even there - have they really even HAD a story arc? The whole book seems like one big story.

"But Morrison pulls from a REALLY broad range of stuff.

Hence why I’d call him “The most imaginative writer in mainstream comics.”"

Whereas I'd apply that title to the people he's "pulling from". Morrison rarely comes up with ideas of his own. He just takes other people's ideas, applies a few of his own well-worn tropes to them, and presents them to an audience who either doesn't acknowledge the source, or assumes he's being "ironic" in his presentation. I think his presentation is magnificent, don't get me wrong, but he's no more an 'imaginative writer' than Mark Waid or Geoff Johns or Jeph Loeb is. He just doesn't get the flack that they do for stealing from the Silver Age, because he's Grant Morrison, God of All Comics.

KG