<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I bought - 9 January 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:56:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the times conspiracy trackback this post closed</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-665037</link>
		<dc:creator>the times conspiracy trackback this post closed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-665037</guid>
		<description>[...] was a small week for me, so I decided to check out some of the higher-profile comics coming out.http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/trackback/Judge Throws Out Tom Delay Conspiracy Charges ? Outside The ...Dec 5, 2005 ... Ditto the New York [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was a small week for me, so I decided to check out some of the higher-profile comics coming out.http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/trackback/Judge Throws Out Tom Delay Conspiracy Charges ? Outside The ...Dec 5, 2005 ... Ditto the New York [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Cheng</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-463684</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Cheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-463684</guid>
		<description>The Teen Titans Lost Annual was horrendously bad. Even in the spirit of &quot;zany fun&quot; it was atrocious--it simply wasn&#039;t fun! Combine that with an intelligence-insulting plot and you have Greg&#039;s spot-on (if a bit drawn out) review.

I liked The Twelve #1 more than the reviewer did. I&#039;m not bringing much JMS bias into it, because I frankly haven&#039;t read much of his stuff, but the series is reading like a post-Decompression era Watchmen, albeit with 20% of the literary depth. Which is fine, since that&#039;s already more than most of the shlock that sees print.

As a complete stranger to the Hulk books, Hulk #1 was a solid entry, even with the protagonist missing for most of it. The setup device was solid, having a neo-noirish feel to it, and I like the team of Samson and She-Hulk. Also amused that Red Hulk never makes an appearance, although he&#039;s prominently featured on the cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Teen Titans Lost Annual was horrendously bad. Even in the spirit of "zany fun" it was atrocious--it simply wasn't fun! Combine that with an intelligence-insulting plot and you have Greg's spot-on (if a bit drawn out) review.</p>
<p>I liked The Twelve #1 more than the reviewer did. I'm not bringing much JMS bias into it, because I frankly haven't read much of his stuff, but the series is reading like a post-Decompression era Watchmen, albeit with 20% of the literary depth. Which is fine, since that's already more than most of the shlock that sees print.</p>
<p>As a complete stranger to the Hulk books, Hulk #1 was a solid entry, even with the protagonist missing for most of it. The setup device was solid, having a neo-noirish feel to it, and I like the team of Samson and She-Hulk. Also amused that Red Hulk never makes an appearance, although he's prominently featured on the cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunkyGreenJerusalem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-462434</link>
		<dc:creator>FunkyGreenJerusalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-462434</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Just so you know, a friend of mine works at Marvel and heâ€™s seen all the scripts to date on the Twelve.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow.
He must be the coolest guy ever, making you cool by default.
Yay for you!
Do you ever drop lines like that at bars to pick up hot chicks?
&lt;blockquote&gt;
And guess what? Other than the part about one of the guys dying (not hard to predict since that happens in the very first issue), NONE of the rest of the things you â€œpredictâ€ in your review happen.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Then it sounds like it will be the bestest comic ever in the world!

Especially as, if none of Greg&#039;s predictions come true it will end on an anti-climax, like all JMS comics seem too!

I seem to find JMS comics like a chick you pick up at a bar (perhaps because you know a guy who reads comic scripts - before they are published), who you are really into for a bit, but then as the night goes on, notice that they aren&#039;t as cute as they were at first, their conversations run out of steam, they&#039;ve contradicted themselves twice, and are now so drunk, on expensive drinks you paid for, you just know the sex will be average.
So you either just leave them there, and maybe have one passing thought, later on when the memories are dimming, that maybe you should have gone there, or, you go home with them, and if not regret it, wonder why you even bothered, taking their number, knowing you&#039;ll never call it again. 
(If I were ever to write a review of Midnight Nation, that would be it).
&lt;blockquote&gt;
So when the series has run its course, will you be as quick to say you were wrong as you were to insist youâ€™re right?

Not only that, he&#039;ll shave his head, give away all his possessions, give his wife and children over to slavers, and spend the rest of his life in a quarry eating rocks.
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Otherwise, as you say, whatâ€™s the point? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Making you feel like a man?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Just so you know, a friend of mine works at Marvel and heâ€™s seen all the scripts to date on the Twelve.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow.<br />
He must be the coolest guy ever, making you cool by default.<br />
Yay for you!<br />
Do you ever drop lines like that at bars to pick up hot chicks?</p>
<blockquote><p>
And guess what? Other than the part about one of the guys dying (not hard to predict since that happens in the very first issue), NONE of the rest of the things you â€œpredictâ€ in your review happen.</p></blockquote>
<p>Then it sounds like it will be the bestest comic ever in the world!</p>
<p>Especially as, if none of Greg's predictions come true it will end on an anti-climax, like all JMS comics seem too!</p>
<p>I seem to find JMS comics like a chick you pick up at a bar (perhaps because you know a guy who reads comic scripts - before they are published), who you are really into for a bit, but then as the night goes on, notice that they aren't as cute as they were at first, their conversations run out of steam, they've contradicted themselves twice, and are now so drunk, on expensive drinks you paid for, you just know the sex will be average.<br />
So you either just leave them there, and maybe have one passing thought, later on when the memories are dimming, that maybe you should have gone there, or, you go home with them, and if not regret it, wonder why you even bothered, taking their number, knowing you'll never call it again.<br />
(If I were ever to write a review of Midnight Nation, that would be it).</p>
<blockquote><p>
So when the series has run its course, will you be as quick to say you were wrong as you were to insist youâ€™re right?</p>
<p>Not only that, he'll shave his head, give away all his possessions, give his wife and children over to slavers, and spend the rest of his life in a quarry eating rocks.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Otherwise, as you say, whatâ€™s the point? </p></blockquote>
<p>Making you feel like a man?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Reed</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-461665</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-461665</guid>
		<description>I realized I promised more comments and never gave them. Oops. I tend to do that. Anyhoo:

I found the Teen Titans special to be pretty lame, actually; but then, what could live up to the blogosphere hype? I&#039;ve been awaiting this thing since it was originally announced as a Swingin&#039; Elseworlds Special, and begging for its release more and more as I fell deeper and deeper into lust with the work of Bob Haney, who wrote some wonderfully bizarre stories and had a complete disregard for continuity: basically, he&#039;s everything I want in a comics writer. 

It&#039;s a damn tragedy they didn&#039;t release what became his final work while he was still alive, but we&#039;ve got it now. It was certainly bizarre and thoroughly &#039;60s-y-- I think it really captured that era. Hell, it was lettered by Gaspar Saladino! Awesome! But it didn&#039;t thrill me as much as I would&#039;ve liked. I didn&#039;t find it offensive or off-putting, just a little less wacky than I&#039;d hoped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realized I promised more comments and never gave them. Oops. I tend to do that. Anyhoo:</p>
<p>I found the Teen Titans special to be pretty lame, actually; but then, what could live up to the blogosphere hype? I've been awaiting this thing since it was originally announced as a Swingin' Elseworlds Special, and begging for its release more and more as I fell deeper and deeper into lust with the work of Bob Haney, who wrote some wonderfully bizarre stories and had a complete disregard for continuity: basically, he's everything I want in a comics writer. </p>
<p>It's a damn tragedy they didn't release what became his final work while he was still alive, but we've got it now. It was certainly bizarre and thoroughly '60s-y-- I think it really captured that era. Hell, it was lettered by Gaspar Saladino! Awesome! But it didn't thrill me as much as I would've liked. I didn't find it offensive or off-putting, just a little less wacky than I'd hoped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-460062</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-460062</guid>
		<description>&quot;Exceptions donâ€™t really prove rules.&quot;

Well, they do, just not in the common sense of the word. &quot;Prove&quot; used to mean &quot;test,&quot; and &quot;the exception that proves the rule&quot; was coined with that meaning.

*inserts &quot;The More You Know&quot; graphic*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Exceptions donâ€™t really prove rules."</p>
<p>Well, they do, just not in the common sense of the word. "Prove" used to mean "test," and "the exception that proves the rule" was coined with that meaning.</p>
<p>*inserts "The More You Know" graphic*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apodaca</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-459743</link>
		<dc:creator>Apodaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-459743</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;but itâ€™s tiring to never hear about any good companies in comics.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Really? I guess someone has to care about the reputation of corporate America.

Me? Not so much. I think they&#039;re doing just fine for themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>but itâ€™s tiring to never hear about any good companies in comics.</p></blockquote>
<p>Really? I guess someone has to care about the reputation of corporate America.</p>
<p>Me? Not so much. I think they're doing just fine for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denn</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-459698</link>
		<dc:creator>Denn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-459698</guid>
		<description>I was wondering who that was too. Thanks guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering who that was too. Thanks guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-459566</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-459566</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m 99% sure it&#039;s Monet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I'm 99% sure it's Monet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mecha-Shiva</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-459437</link>
		<dc:creator>Mecha-Shiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-459437</guid>
		<description>Oh, wait, I think it&#039;s M?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, wait, I think it's M?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mecha-Shiva</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-459396</link>
		<dc:creator>Mecha-Shiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-459396</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m completely irritated by not being able to recognize this one character in x-factor #27 who&#039;s totally conspicuous in the early scene with Cyclops and Emma, when they&#039;re at Forge&#039;s and find out that cerebra&#039;s working again.  She&#039;s just standing there and never talks.  She&#039;s wearing a purple costume with a long cape type thing and has black hair.  Can anyone help me out?

(it&#039;s probably someone obvious, cause despite loving the fox cartoon growing up, I&#039;ve never read X-books at all really, and I started checking them out shortly before Messiah Complex to try to get into them, which has resulted in much wikipedia-ing to figure out what&#039;s going on)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm completely irritated by not being able to recognize this one character in x-factor #27 who's totally conspicuous in the early scene with Cyclops and Emma, when they're at Forge's and find out that cerebra's working again.  She's just standing there and never talks.  She's wearing a purple costume with a long cape type thing and has black hair.  Can anyone help me out?</p>
<p>(it's probably someone obvious, cause despite loving the fox cartoon growing up, I've never read X-books at all really, and I started checking them out shortly before Messiah Complex to try to get into them, which has resulted in much wikipedia-ing to figure out what's going on)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McGee</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-458928</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-458928</guid>
		<description>Greg: I haven&#039;t been a consistent Spider-Man reader in years myself (I read JMS&#039; first book, kinda liked it, read on, didn&#039;t like it, stopped but for the occasional glance into the train wreck), but the reaction to this book is curious to me, mostly because it puts me in the awkward position of halfass defending Joe Quesada (!). The reboot may not be to their tastes, but I think he can be forgiven for speculating that it would be. If readers don&#039;t want to go back to the silver age, then frankly they have a funny way of showing it -- reprint books of all kinds sell like crazy, a significant portion of the comics blogosphere seems exclusively devoted to recapping old Jimmy Olsen stories, and the demand to do away with &quot;grim n&#039; gritty&quot; has been loud and constant (even if sales often fail to lend it credence). So while I don&#039;t really care all that much about this character, I do think the success or failure of this reboot will have big implications for the direction the big two take their books in, at least for the next few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg: I haven't been a consistent Spider-Man reader in years myself (I read JMS' first book, kinda liked it, read on, didn't like it, stopped but for the occasional glance into the train wreck), but the reaction to this book is curious to me, mostly because it puts me in the awkward position of halfass defending Joe Quesada (!). The reboot may not be to their tastes, but I think he can be forgiven for speculating that it would be. If readers don't want to go back to the silver age, then frankly they have a funny way of showing it -- reprint books of all kinds sell like crazy, a significant portion of the comics blogosphere seems exclusively devoted to recapping old Jimmy Olsen stories, and the demand to do away with "grim n' gritty" has been loud and constant (even if sales often fail to lend it credence). So while I don't really care all that much about this character, I do think the success or failure of this reboot will have big implications for the direction the big two take their books in, at least for the next few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian lockhart</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-458870</link>
		<dc:creator>brian lockhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-458870</guid>
		<description>Never collected a Hulk title in my life but I might be sticking around for the Loeb/McGuinness run. Look, I like my share of &quot;brainy&quot; comics as well (Grant Morrison and James Robinson are two of my top mainstream writers). But I have to admit that the combo of Loeb and McGuinness is a guilty pleasure. Their first Superman/Batman was over the top and filled with contrivances and plotholes, but I&#039;ll be damned if it wasn&#039;t just fun to read as well.
And so was this first issue of the Hulk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never collected a Hulk title in my life but I might be sticking around for the Loeb/McGuinness run. Look, I like my share of "brainy" comics as well (Grant Morrison and James Robinson are two of my top mainstream writers). But I have to admit that the combo of Loeb and McGuinness is a guilty pleasure. Their first Superman/Batman was over the top and filled with contrivances and plotholes, but I'll be damned if it wasn't just fun to read as well.<br />
And so was this first issue of the Hulk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-458724</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-458724</guid>
		<description>Mike: I don&#039;t really know what they should have done with the Spider-Man books.  I haven&#039;t read ASM in four years, and that was only for the first part of JMS&#039; run - before that, it had probably been a decade.  I don&#039;t really care what they do with it, because I don&#039;t need to read it.  I just don&#039;t know why they have to pretend like it&#039;s 1975 all over again.  But if they want to appeal to kids (which is kind of what Joey Q wants, I guess), they should do some research into what kids want.  That&#039;s kids today, not kids in some Shangri-La past.  I doubt very much if Marvel and DC do any kind of market research and find out what kids today are looking for in their comics.  They just think, &quot;We&#039;ll do slightly hipper versions of the comics we read when we were kids!&quot; and the kids of today will run over others trying to get them.  And I don&#039;t think the &quot;graying fanboy crowd&quot; wants comics like those they read as a kid - if they did, there are plenty of kid-friendly superhero comics out there that they aren&#039;t reading already.  I&#039;m not sure what Marvel wants to accomplish with this beyond some vague pronouncements from Joey Q.  And that&#039;s the problem.

I wish them luck with the new-and-improved Spider-Man.  The great thing is, I don&#039;t need to read a certain character to enjoy comics, so I&#039;ll just read stuff that appeals to me.  If Marvel and DC want to turn all their superhero books into &quot;kid-friendly&quot; stuff to convert a new generation, good for them.  I encourage it, because there&#039;s plenty of stuff for adults.  I&#039;m just not sure that either of them ever study the issue.  Maybe they&#039;d have a better idea of how to reel kids back into comics then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: I don't really know what they should have done with the Spider-Man books.  I haven't read ASM in four years, and that was only for the first part of JMS' run - before that, it had probably been a decade.  I don't really care what they do with it, because I don't need to read it.  I just don't know why they have to pretend like it's 1975 all over again.  But if they want to appeal to kids (which is kind of what Joey Q wants, I guess), they should do some research into what kids want.  That's kids today, not kids in some Shangri-La past.  I doubt very much if Marvel and DC do any kind of market research and find out what kids today are looking for in their comics.  They just think, "We'll do slightly hipper versions of the comics we read when we were kids!" and the kids of today will run over others trying to get them.  And I don't think the "graying fanboy crowd" wants comics like those they read as a kid - if they did, there are plenty of kid-friendly superhero comics out there that they aren't reading already.  I'm not sure what Marvel wants to accomplish with this beyond some vague pronouncements from Joey Q.  And that's the problem.</p>
<p>I wish them luck with the new-and-improved Spider-Man.  The great thing is, I don't need to read a certain character to enjoy comics, so I'll just read stuff that appeals to me.  If Marvel and DC want to turn all their superhero books into "kid-friendly" stuff to convert a new generation, good for them.  I encourage it, because there's plenty of stuff for adults.  I'm just not sure that either of them ever study the issue.  Maybe they'd have a better idea of how to reel kids back into comics then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McGee</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-458574</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-458574</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t like The Goon?! What...what the...okay, moving on:

I&#039;m the last person to defend One More Day, but I am curious here: What do you think they &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; have done, in terms of the Spider-books? Like, leaving aside the awful comics that led to the new status quo, now that they&#039;re at a new status quo entry point, what should they have done differently? Because for years all I&#039;ve heard is that Marvel and DC publish superhero comics that are neither fish nor fowl -- inherently impossible to take completely seriously, being that they&#039;re about men in tights, yet too grownup to sell to kids, ostensibly their target audience. So now Marvel&#039;s actually made Spider-Man a kid-friendly book again (the price point aside), and the argument is suddenly: Well, what kid is gonna read this, anyway? I&#039;m unsure myself whether a comic that reads as if it could just as easily have been published thirty years ago is really the solution -- though I&#039;m damn sure I&#039;d read it well before I picked up a ninety-part epic about Marilyn Manson eating Spider-Man&#039;s eyeball and beating him to death or whatever &quot;The Other&quot; was supposed to be -- but it does seem to be at least a step in the right direction, if Marvel would like these books to sell beyond the graying fanboy crowd. Or am I &lt;i&gt;totally&lt;/i&gt; wrong, and this is what the graying fanboy crowd actually wants -- a throwback to the comics we read as kids? And if no one at all wants this...

Well, you see what I&#039;m saying here. What are they getting wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don't like The Goon?! What...what the...okay, moving on:</p>
<p>I'm the last person to defend One More Day, but I am curious here: What do you think they <i>should</i> have done, in terms of the Spider-books? Like, leaving aside the awful comics that led to the new status quo, now that they're at a new status quo entry point, what should they have done differently? Because for years all I've heard is that Marvel and DC publish superhero comics that are neither fish nor fowl -- inherently impossible to take completely seriously, being that they're about men in tights, yet too grownup to sell to kids, ostensibly their target audience. So now Marvel's actually made Spider-Man a kid-friendly book again (the price point aside), and the argument is suddenly: Well, what kid is gonna read this, anyway? I'm unsure myself whether a comic that reads as if it could just as easily have been published thirty years ago is really the solution -- though I'm damn sure I'd read it well before I picked up a ninety-part epic about Marilyn Manson eating Spider-Man's eyeball and beating him to death or whatever "The Other" was supposed to be -- but it does seem to be at least a step in the right direction, if Marvel would like these books to sell beyond the graying fanboy crowd. Or am I <i>totally</i> wrong, and this is what the graying fanboy crowd actually wants -- a throwback to the comics we read as kids? And if no one at all wants this...</p>
<p>Well, you see what I'm saying here. What are they getting wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Brown</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-458019</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-458019</guid>
		<description>In Spiderman, he broke into the Scorpions place, right? But isn&#039;t he Venom now? Is that part of the new retcon? I&#039;m asking because I wasn&#039;t about to pay good money for that book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Spiderman, he broke into the Scorpions place, right? But isn't he Venom now? Is that part of the new retcon? I'm asking because I wasn't about to pay good money for that book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-457467</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-457467</guid>
		<description>&quot;Exceptions donâ€™t really prove rules.&quot;

Actually they can but not in the sense that people usually think:

http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a3_201.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Exceptions donâ€™t really prove rules."</p>
<p>Actually they can but not in the sense that people usually think:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a3_201.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a3_201.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-457056</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-457056</guid>
		<description>I read End League after seeing the banner here, and I liked it quite enough. I&#039;m surprised to see that it wasn&#039;t reviewed. On the other hand I suppose you are just going to wait for the trade, considering it&#039;s probably going to be a well closed mini.

About mutant death I think Caliban will really stay dead for a very very long time. On the other hand I don&#039;t believe that lady mastermind is already dying, nor - for even a moment - that sinister, of all people, died in such a stupid way because he trusted gambit and mystica - of all people - too much.

I&#039;m also losing my patience with Exodus, that it&#039;s practically being ignored since issue number 2. This crossover is better than I hoped, but it&#039;s honestly overcrowded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read End League after seeing the banner here, and I liked it quite enough. I'm surprised to see that it wasn't reviewed. On the other hand I suppose you are just going to wait for the trade, considering it's probably going to be a well closed mini.</p>
<p>About mutant death I think Caliban will really stay dead for a very very long time. On the other hand I don't believe that lady mastermind is already dying, nor - for even a moment - that sinister, of all people, died in such a stupid way because he trusted gambit and mystica - of all people - too much.</p>
<p>I'm also losing my patience with Exodus, that it's practically being ignored since issue number 2. This crossover is better than I hoped, but it's honestly overcrowded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy F</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-456616</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-456616</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who bought Youngblood, and further, am I the only one who liked it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who bought Youngblood, and further, am I the only one who liked it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burgas</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-456568</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burgas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-456568</guid>
		<description>Other Dan: In the comic, Pickman mentions that it&#039;s not his real name, but he took it from the artist.  I just assumed it was a real artist, but that&#039;s interesting.  Yes, there&#039;s something definitely supernatural going on, we just don&#039;t know what it is yet.  I&#039;ll be disappointed if it has much to do with Lovecraft (not because I hate Lovecraft, but because I would want someone to come up with something new).

I won&#039;t go into The Goon (which did come out this week) except to say I don&#039;t like it.  So I don&#039;t buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other Dan: In the comic, Pickman mentions that it's not his real name, but he took it from the artist.  I just assumed it was a real artist, but that's interesting.  Yes, there's something definitely supernatural going on, we just don't know what it is yet.  I'll be disappointed if it has much to do with Lovecraft (not because I hate Lovecraft, but because I would want someone to come up with something new).</p>
<p>I won't go into The Goon (which did come out this week) except to say I don't like it.  So I don't buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-456496</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/10/what-i-bought-9-january-2008/#comment-456496</guid>
		<description>Barry: Theyâ€™ve always been the exceptions that prove the rule.


Exceptions don&#039;t really prove rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry: Theyâ€™ve always been the exceptions that prove the rule.</p>
<p>Exceptions don't really prove rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
