<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1/26 - Curious Cat Asksâ€¦</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:51:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pierre</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-660288</link>
		<dc:creator>pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 15:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-660288</guid>
		<description>buscema</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buscema</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobelius Rodelius</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-496829</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobelius Rodelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-496829</guid>
		<description>60&#039;s Buscema and Byrne are both more legitimately visually appealing to a modern reader (i.e. someone who didn&#039;t read any of these issues as a kid) than Perez. 

That said, Olivier Coipel&#039;s brief run a few years ago was probably the best the Avengers have ever looked. Take off the nostalgia goggles and see if I&#039;m not right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>60's Buscema and Byrne are both more legitimately visually appealing to a modern reader (i.e. someone who didn't read any of these issues as a kid) than Perez. </p>
<p>That said, Olivier Coipel's brief run a few years ago was probably the best the Avengers have ever looked. Take off the nostalgia goggles and see if I'm not right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Geren</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-492735</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Geren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-492735</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t realize that posted.

I was going to say &quot;already-established characters&quot; and also mention that Kirby didn&#039;t get to really let loose and establish the look-and-feel of the series the way that other artists mentioned in this thread did.  Look at all the hallmarks that John Buscema provided-- Ultron, The Vision, Arkon, the early Quinjets, Yellowjacket, Wasp&#039;s outfit-of-the-week.  Kirby gave us Baron Zemo, the Space Phantom and Kang.  His most long-lived Avengers contribution was arguably Jarvis, and that was from Tales of Suspense.

That&#039;s not a slam of Jack Kirby, just a realization that he was more creative elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn't realize that posted.</p>
<p>I was going to say "already-established characters" and also mention that Kirby didn't get to really let loose and establish the look-and-feel of the series the way that other artists mentioned in this thread did.  Look at all the hallmarks that John Buscema provided-- Ultron, The Vision, Arkon, the early Quinjets, Yellowjacket, Wasp's outfit-of-the-week.  Kirby gave us Baron Zemo, the Space Phantom and Kang.  His most long-lived Avengers contribution was arguably Jarvis, and that was from Tales of Suspense.</p>
<p>That's not a slam of Jack Kirby, just a realization that he was more creative elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Albertson</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-492727</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Albertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-492727</guid>
		<description>Don Heck is unjustly overlooked usually, but for all that Avengers was his book for so long, I&#039;ve got to give the nod to John Buscema&#039;s work from 41-97 (not coninuous, but that run), especially the Klein-inked issues.  (Had Kirby been inked by Stone for all his issues, Kirby would have won my vote, though.)

For all the later artists, Perez wins out.  Honorable mention to Byrne, Ordway, Milgrom, Epting (the only bright spot on a very long run of Bob Harras scripted stories), and Paul Ryan who really should get more love from fans than he does.

IF we&#039;re including West Coast Avengers, Dave Ross deserves an honorable mention also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don Heck is unjustly overlooked usually, but for all that Avengers was his book for so long, I've got to give the nod to John Buscema's work from 41-97 (not coninuous, but that run), especially the Klein-inked issues.  (Had Kirby been inked by Stone for all his issues, Kirby would have won my vote, though.)</p>
<p>For all the later artists, Perez wins out.  Honorable mention to Byrne, Ordway, Milgrom, Epting (the only bright spot on a very long run of Bob Harras scripted stories), and Paul Ryan who really should get more love from fans than he does.</p>
<p>IF we're including West Coast Avengers, Dave Ross deserves an honorable mention also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Geren</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-492519</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Geren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-492519</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think one can fault AVENGERS fans for not placing Kirby at the top of their favorite artists lists for this title.  Sure he is THE Jack Kirby, but his influence on this single title is not as great as his influence on Fantastic Four, or Thor, or New Gods.  He was the first artist on the book, but the book featured already-esta characters</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't think one can fault AVENGERS fans for not placing Kirby at the top of their favorite artists lists for this title.  Sure he is THE Jack Kirby, but his influence on this single title is not as great as his influence on Fantastic Four, or Thor, or New Gods.  He was the first artist on the book, but the book featured already-esta characters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Rice</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-492276</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-492276</guid>
		<description>The mind boggles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mind boggles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gonger</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-492002</link>
		<dc:creator>Gonger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-492002</guid>
		<description>Buscema, Perez, Adams, Kirby, Heck â€¦ in that order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buscema, Perez, Adams, Kirby, Heck â€¦ in that order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Priske</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-491951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Priske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-491951</guid>
		<description>George Perez. Easy.

There were other great artists (all of whom have been mentioned, I think), like Buscema, Byrne, Epting.

(Paul Ryan? Seriously?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Perez. Easy.</p>
<p>There were other great artists (all of whom have been mentioned, I think), like Buscema, Byrne, Epting.</p>
<p>(Paul Ryan? Seriously?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-491900</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-491900</guid>
		<description>Perez. To be fair, I never read the Buscema issues, but to me, Perez is the creator synonomous with the Avengers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perez. To be fair, I never read the Buscema issues, but to me, Perez is the creator synonomous with the Avengers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Midnight</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-491805</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Midnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-491805</guid>
		<description>Perez....Byrne and Buscema. But I think a lot with my choices has to also do with the inkers working with those artists...(Gene Day&#039;s inks on Byrne&#039;s pencils in issue #181 were damn gorgeous !!!). Plus the stories written for these artist were incredible. Ahhhh....good art and intelligent stories both in the same book. Those were the days my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perez....Byrne and Buscema. But I think a lot with my choices has to also do with the inkers working with those artists...(Gene Day's inks on Byrne's pencils in issue #181 were damn gorgeous !!!). Plus the stories written for these artist were incredible. Ahhhh....good art and intelligent stories both in the same book. Those were the days my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Vingoe</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-491481</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Vingoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-491481</guid>
		<description>definitely George Perez but Neil Adams and barry Windsor Smith - issues are also lovely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definitely George Perez but Neil Adams and barry Windsor Smith - issues are also lovely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anun</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-491458</link>
		<dc:creator>Anun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-491458</guid>
		<description>Perez.  Buscema.  Byrne (vol. 1, anyway).

On the flipside, while I know that they were fine artists elsewhere, Bob Brown and George Tuska were my least favorite artists on the title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perez.  Buscema.  Byrne (vol. 1, anyway).</p>
<p>On the flipside, while I know that they were fine artists elsewhere, Bob Brown and George Tuska were my least favorite artists on the title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Herman</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-491218</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 04:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-491218</guid>
		<description>As a long-time Avengers fan, all I can say is... I just can&#039;t decide!!!  George Perez was the first name to come to mind.  But then almost immediately after, John Buscema&#039;s name also occurred to me.  I really cannot pick one over the other.  So, as far as I&#039;m concerned, Perez and Buscema are tied for first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a long-time Avengers fan, all I can say is... I just can't decide!!!  George Perez was the first name to come to mind.  But then almost immediately after, John Buscema's name also occurred to me.  I really cannot pick one over the other.  So, as far as I'm concerned, Perez and Buscema are tied for first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Loughlin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-490478</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Loughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-490478</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t decide between Perez &amp; Buscema, so I&#039;ll chicken out and put them at a tie for first. 

Kirby created the book and brought back Captain America, but I don&#039;t put his Avengers on the same level as his FF, Cap, Thor, or New Gods. It was still very good super-hero comics, of course. Neal Adams is the best Avengers artist who didn&#039;t draw enough Avengers comics to really count as &quot;regular,&quot; and Alan Davis is a close second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't decide between Perez &amp; Buscema, so I'll chicken out and put them at a tie for first. </p>
<p>Kirby created the book and brought back Captain America, but I don't put his Avengers on the same level as his FF, Cap, Thor, or New Gods. It was still very good super-hero comics, of course. Neal Adams is the best Avengers artist who didn't draw enough Avengers comics to really count as "regular," and Alan Davis is a close second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurice F</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-490459</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurice F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-490459</guid>
		<description>1 Perez
2 Buscema
3 Kirby
4 Byrne
5 Heck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 Perez<br />
2 Buscema<br />
3 Kirby<br />
4 Byrne<br />
5 Heck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-490286</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-490286</guid>
		<description>Did everyone forget Barry Smith&#039;s brief run? Of course this was before the Windsor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did everyone forget Barry Smith's brief run? Of course this was before the Windsor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanctumSanctorumComix</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-490246</link>
		<dc:creator>SanctumSanctorumComix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-490246</guid>
		<description>I have a real soft spot for those old Don Heck issues.
Truly classic stuff that I could read/look at all day.
Maybe it&#039;s the nostalgia of it (issues 21 &amp; 22 were the first I had ever read/seen), but that run has a strong place of honor in my mind.

I also was a big fan of Steve Epting&#039;s run, and even though it was only a shadow of his quality which he produces today, you could still see the work was strong.
It only suffered due to it&#039;s (perhaps mandated) similarity to Image stuff.

Byrne&#039;s work on the title (not West Coast) was beautiful, classic Byrne, and some of the best work on the title by anyone. However, at the time, ANYTHING Byrne worked on had that level of quality. It&#039;s just that he gave a fantastic flair to the characters.

John Buscema&#039;s work was iconic.
No way around it.
He truly gave the Avengers their overall template.
His later work on the title, however, looked a bit rough (inker perhaps?) but still maintained the quality of bombast that he was called to the plate to deliver.
 
Those are my top 4.
If I HAD to choose only ONE... it would have to be DON HECK.
But only because the old-time look that was present in those issues deeply resonates with me.

I&#039;ll give 2nd place to John Byrne&#039;s issues.
His work back then was a hallmark of Marvel comics and the bar which I looked at all other art of the time.

~P~
P-TOR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a real soft spot for those old Don Heck issues.<br />
Truly classic stuff that I could read/look at all day.<br />
Maybe it's the nostalgia of it (issues 21 &amp; 22 were the first I had ever read/seen), but that run has a strong place of honor in my mind.</p>
<p>I also was a big fan of Steve Epting's run, and even though it was only a shadow of his quality which he produces today, you could still see the work was strong.<br />
It only suffered due to it's (perhaps mandated) similarity to Image stuff.</p>
<p>Byrne's work on the title (not West Coast) was beautiful, classic Byrne, and some of the best work on the title by anyone. However, at the time, ANYTHING Byrne worked on had that level of quality. It's just that he gave a fantastic flair to the characters.</p>
<p>John Buscema's work was iconic.<br />
No way around it.<br />
He truly gave the Avengers their overall template.<br />
His later work on the title, however, looked a bit rough (inker perhaps?) but still maintained the quality of bombast that he was called to the plate to deliver.</p>
<p>Those are my top 4.<br />
If I HAD to choose only ONE... it would have to be DON HECK.<br />
But only because the old-time look that was present in those issues deeply resonates with me.</p>
<p>I'll give 2nd place to John Byrne's issues.<br />
His work back then was a hallmark of Marvel comics and the bar which I looked at all other art of the time.</p>
<p>~P~<br />
P-TOR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme Burk</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-490245</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Burk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-490245</guid>
		<description>Neal Adams (whose all-too-brief Avengers run is gorgeous-- Tom Palmer was such a great inker for him. I love Adams&#039; Avengers work better than a good chunk of his DC stuff), George Perez and John Buscema.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neal Adams (whose all-too-brief Avengers run is gorgeous-- Tom Palmer was such a great inker for him. I love Adams' Avengers work better than a good chunk of his DC stuff), George Perez and John Buscema.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannibal</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-490132</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannibal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 14:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-490132</guid>
		<description>For me it has to be George Perez. His first run on the Avengers was a revelation back in the 70&#039;s and his return in the 90&#039;s was a joy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me it has to be George Perez. His first run on the Avengers was a revelation back in the 70's and his return in the 90's was a joy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Kwango</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-490006</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Kwango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/01/26/126-curious-cat-asks%e2%80%a6/#comment-490006</guid>
		<description>1. Buscema
2. Deodato
3. Epting
4. Byrne
5. Heck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Buscema<br />
2. Deodato<br />
3. Epting<br />
4. Byrne<br />
5. Heck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
