free hit counter javascript

CBI Archive

2/13 - Declarative Rabbit Says…

Wednesday, February 13th, 2008 at 2:11 PM EST

Updated: Wednesday, February 13th, 2008 at 2:11 PM EST

There is only one “n” in Winick.

we3-3_edited.jpg

Comments below

16 Comments

Apodaca

February 13, 2008 at 2:14 pm

No nicks shall be won.

Tom Fitzpatrick

February 13, 2008 at 2:31 pm

How “Nth” of him.

Lorelei

February 13, 2008 at 4:20 pm

no waiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii1!!!!!!!!!!1

GarBut

February 13, 2008 at 4:29 pm

And no ‘rarebit’ in ‘rabbit’. Fiend.

LanghorneFats

February 13, 2008 at 5:35 pm

There’s also an “e” in Kelley Puckett, 3…

3

February 13, 2008 at 5:41 pm

Duly noted! Thanks!

Vert

February 13, 2008 at 8:13 pm

One “n”.

So true. Well said. I appreciate your honesty.

Ron

February 13, 2008 at 9:08 pm

Contrary to popular belief, there is no ‘win’ in ‘winick’

Stony

February 14, 2008 at 1:55 am

It is “Why Nick?” not “Win Nick!”

Master Mahan

February 14, 2008 at 2:59 am

There’s also only one “n” in both inept and hackneyed.

joshschr

February 14, 2008 at 7:01 am

Are we talking about the same Winick? I thought we were talking about David Winnick, the MP from Walsall North.

or…

But there are still two D’s in JuDD, right?

DanCJ

February 14, 2008 at 7:55 am

But - I’m never quite sure where to put the ‘E’ in Owsley/Owsely

Dan

Gavin

February 14, 2008 at 12:46 pm

Still doesn’t make him a good writer.

Alan Coil

February 14, 2008 at 9:32 pm

5 “d”s in Judd the Dudd.

Brian Smith

February 15, 2008 at 1:02 am

Also? Charles Schulz. Not “Schultz.” How famous does he have to get for more people to get it right?

DanCJ

February 15, 2008 at 6:30 am

Still doesn’t make him a good writer.

Even changing his name to Priest couldn’t do that ;)

Leave a Comment

 
 

Subscribe to CSBG

Categories

Review Copies

Comics Should Be Good accepts review copies. Anything sent to us will (for better or for worse) end up reviewed on the blog. See where to send the review copies.

Browse the Archives