<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questions about comics I just read (may contain spoilers)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:58:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Comics Should Be Good! &#187; Friday bits and pieces</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-555936</link>
		<dc:creator>Comics Should Be Good! &#187; Friday bits and pieces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-555936</guid>
		<description>[...] Icebox Questions: I read our other Greg&#8217;s post with great amusement, here, a few days ago. As it happens, it reminded me of a similar phenomenon I&#8217;ve been meaning to talk about for a while now, called &#8220;icebox questions.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Icebox Questions: I read our other Greg&#8217;s post with great amusement, here, a few days ago. As it happens, it reminded me of a similar phenomenon I&#8217;ve been meaning to talk about for a while now, called &#8220;icebox questions.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suedenim</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-550167</link>
		<dc:creator>suedenim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-550167</guid>
		<description>I think ZZZ got it right on the Amazons.  Plus there are a few nuances.  Reading between the lines slightly, I think Alkyone and her crew are basically the last remnants of &quot;tribal&quot; Amazon culture.  As the relative &quot;loners&quot; of the Amazons (and/or not quite right in the head), they were more prone to negative feelings than those in the thick of enlightened &quot;modern&quot; (well, still incredibly old, but post-tribal, anyway) Amazon civilization.  (And incidentally, I think Hipployta, who manifestly does not *need* a Royal Guard, created one in a failed attempt to better integrate Alkyone and crew into the wider Amazon society.)

To them, it seems reasonable that jealousy over Diana might destroy their society, but the rest of the Amazons have mostly managed to get past that sort of thing.

I loved this story, and it was the first time I&#039;ve ever found the Amazons qua Amazons to be really *interesting*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think ZZZ got it right on the Amazons.  Plus there are a few nuances.  Reading between the lines slightly, I think Alkyone and her crew are basically the last remnants of "tribal" Amazon culture.  As the relative "loners" of the Amazons (and/or not quite right in the head), they were more prone to negative feelings than those in the thick of enlightened "modern" (well, still incredibly old, but post-tribal, anyway) Amazon civilization.  (And incidentally, I think Hipployta, who manifestly does not *need* a Royal Guard, created one in a failed attempt to better integrate Alkyone and crew into the wider Amazon society.)</p>
<p>To them, it seems reasonable that jealousy over Diana might destroy their society, but the rest of the Amazons have mostly managed to get past that sort of thing.</p>
<p>I loved this story, and it was the first time I've ever found the Amazons qua Amazons to be really *interesting*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apodaca</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-549695</link>
		<dc:creator>Apodaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-549695</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not arguing the accuracy of the X-Men being short on villains or not. I&#039;m saying it&#039;s a lame excuse to dredge up the stinkers.

And I&#039;d rather have more new characters, even if they stink like the Neo. Because sometimes they rock, like Cassandra Nova. How are they ever supposed to get more villains, if no one&#039;s making new ones?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not arguing the accuracy of the X-Men being short on villains or not. I'm saying it's a lame excuse to dredge up the stinkers.</p>
<p>And I'd rather have more new characters, even if they stink like the Neo. Because sometimes they rock, like Cassandra Nova. How are they ever supposed to get more villains, if no one's making new ones?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-548343</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-548343</guid>
		<description>NOTHING would be better than a last page Hawd-Boiled Henwy reveal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOTHING would be better than a last page Hawd-Boiled Henwy reveal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-547883</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-547883</guid>
		<description>@Eric: I agree. But then again without an &quot;Okay come on guys, let&#039;s just let &#039;em go. They&#039;ve been through enough for one day&quot; moment every few issues, that series really wouldn&#039;t have a good way to continue.



And as for Bastion? Meh, there are worse villains to bring back. At least he kicked ass when he first appeared. It&#039;s better than a Hawd Boiwled Henwy last-page reveal, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eric: I agree. But then again without an "Okay come on guys, let's just let 'em go. They've been through enough for one day" moment every few issues, that series really wouldn't have a good way to continue.</p>
<p>And as for Bastion? Meh, there are worse villains to bring back. At least he kicked ass when he first appeared. It's better than a Hawd Boiwled Henwy last-page reveal, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-547817</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-547817</guid>
		<description>I think the arguement that the X-Men have no &quot;great&quot; villains left is a fair assessment.  In the last five years the majority of the X-Men&#039;s villains, great or lame, have been depowered or killed off:

Blob - depowered
Acolytes - majority depowered or dead
MLF - majority depowered or dead
Brotherhood - just a mish-mash of mutant villains, see Acolytes and MLF
Magneto - depowered
Sentinels - became bodyguards, but now status unknown
Hellfire Club - which version?  most recently run by Sunspot
Selene - running around New X-Men subplot, probably forgotten
Sauron - in the Savage Land or in jail
Mastermind - all three versions dead
Reavers - cannon fodder
Lady Deathstrike - possibly dead
Sabretooth - dead
Avalanche - mia


These are just off the top of my head.  Any character, hero or villain, is not inherently lame.  I would go so far as to say Bastion has been used in some lame stories (the less said about Operation Zero Tolerance the better), but his origins are quite interesting.  Used correctly, he can be a great villain, any character can.

And the problem with &quot;just create new villains&quot; is that it&#039;s been done with mixed results.  Remember the Neo?  Bastion himself was an attempt to create a new villain.

My only complaint about Bastion is that after blowing him up three or four times, you&#039;d think the x-men would lock up the scraps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the arguement that the X-Men have no "great" villains left is a fair assessment.  In the last five years the majority of the X-Men's villains, great or lame, have been depowered or killed off:</p>
<p>Blob - depowered<br />
Acolytes - majority depowered or dead<br />
MLF - majority depowered or dead<br />
Brotherhood - just a mish-mash of mutant villains, see Acolytes and MLF<br />
Magneto - depowered<br />
Sentinels - became bodyguards, but now status unknown<br />
Hellfire Club - which version?  most recently run by Sunspot<br />
Selene - running around New X-Men subplot, probably forgotten<br />
Sauron - in the Savage Land or in jail<br />
Mastermind - all three versions dead<br />
Reavers - cannon fodder<br />
Lady Deathstrike - possibly dead<br />
Sabretooth - dead<br />
Avalanche - mia</p>
<p>These are just off the top of my head.  Any character, hero or villain, is not inherently lame.  I would go so far as to say Bastion has been used in some lame stories (the less said about Operation Zero Tolerance the better), but his origins are quite interesting.  Used correctly, he can be a great villain, any character can.</p>
<p>And the problem with "just create new villains" is that it's been done with mixed results.  Remember the Neo?  Bastion himself was an attempt to create a new villain.</p>
<p>My only complaint about Bastion is that after blowing him up three or four times, you'd think the x-men would lock up the scraps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Seavey</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-547682</link>
		<dc:creator>John Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-547682</guid>
		<description>No, Ch&#039;p, you nailed my take on it pretty much just right, and I think we&#039;re light-years away from each other on this one. :) I feel, fundamentally, that comics these days have become too much about, &quot;But how does this story move the status quo?&quot; Comics fans aren&#039;t satisfied with a perfectly good, entertaining story, they demand that it must end with things being different than they&#039;ve ever been before.

The problem with this is, you can only do that so many times before you wind up taking the story somewhere that a) you don&#039;t want to go, and b) you can&#039;t get back from easily. Which then leads to messy, ugly, kludgy retcons that fans lament because, &quot;Oh, now things are just back to the way they always were,&quot; not understanding that they had to put them that way because they&#039;d written themselves into a corner trying to &quot;do something different.&quot;

Now, I&#039;m not getting too worked up over Bendis&#039; Avengers run because it doesn&#039;t fall afoul of &quot;B&quot;. The next writer to do &#039;Avengers&#039; once Bendis gets sick of the title or the readers get sick of Bendis can clear everything up in about five issues, just like John Byrne quickly wiped away Walt Simonson&#039;s run, just like Kurt Busiek hit the ground running after Bob Harras&#039; run, et cetera et cetera. It&#039;s the way the Avengers works. As a team book with a rotating membership, clearing the decks is easy. But I still object strongly to the idea that a comic is only worth reading if it advances the metaplot, because ultimately, that leads to a comic that used to be high-octane super-hero action with the stars of the Marvel Universe, now becoming 22 pages of Power Man arguing with his girlfriend. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Ch'p, you nailed my take on it pretty much just right, and I think we're light-years away from each other on this one. <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I feel, fundamentally, that comics these days have become too much about, "But how does this story move the status quo?" Comics fans aren't satisfied with a perfectly good, entertaining story, they demand that it must end with things being different than they've ever been before.</p>
<p>The problem with this is, you can only do that so many times before you wind up taking the story somewhere that a) you don't want to go, and b) you can't get back from easily. Which then leads to messy, ugly, kludgy retcons that fans lament because, "Oh, now things are just back to the way they always were," not understanding that they had to put them that way because they'd written themselves into a corner trying to "do something different."</p>
<p>Now, I'm not getting too worked up over Bendis' Avengers run because it doesn't fall afoul of "B". The next writer to do 'Avengers' once Bendis gets sick of the title or the readers get sick of Bendis can clear everything up in about five issues, just like John Byrne quickly wiped away Walt Simonson's run, just like Kurt Busiek hit the ground running after Bob Harras' run, et cetera et cetera. It's the way the Avengers works. As a team book with a rotating membership, clearing the decks is easy. But I still object strongly to the idea that a comic is only worth reading if it advances the metaplot, because ultimately, that leads to a comic that used to be high-octane super-hero action with the stars of the Marvel Universe, now becoming 22 pages of Power Man arguing with his girlfriend. <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomer S</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-547300</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomer S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-547300</guid>
		<description>M Bloom: You sure it was the case with the ending of Zero Tolerance? Because I&#039;ve heard the same about Lobdell&#039;s Eve of Destruction, which had to be scrapped faster than planned because Marvel just signed Morrison for the book. Or could it be he had to change the endings for both stories?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M Bloom: You sure it was the case with the ending of Zero Tolerance? Because I've heard the same about Lobdell's Eve of Destruction, which had to be scrapped faster than planned because Marvel just signed Morrison for the book. Or could it be he had to change the endings for both stories?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apodaca</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-547004</link>
		<dc:creator>Apodaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-547004</guid>
		<description>I think the &quot;X-Men don&#039;t have any great villains left&quot; excuse is pretty lame. They could always try creating someone NEW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the "X-Men don't have any great villains left" excuse is pretty lame. They could always try creating someone NEW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelei</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-546538</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 02:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-546538</guid>
		<description>4. Bastion? Really?



Exactly what i said to my friend when i read x-force :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4. Bastion? Really?</p>
<p>Exactly what i said to my friend when i read x-force <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: text</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-546308</link>
		<dc:creator>text</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-546308</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Bastion.  LOLZ.  Needless to say, I won&#039;t be picking up X-Force #2 or any other issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Bastion.  LOLZ.  Needless to say, I won't be picking up X-Force #2 or any other issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ch'p</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-546286</link>
		<dc:creator>ch'p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-546286</guid>
		<description>@ John Seavey-

Internet-mandated disclaimer of non-hostility: I&#039;ve read a good amount of your writing on comics, and for the most part I think it&#039;s good, interesting stuff, so I&#039;m not trying to bag on you. (end disclaimer)  That being said, you seem to be saying that comic books should remain largely unchanged in any major sense across a period of ten years. If I dropped X-Men today and picked it up again in 2018, should I be able to without difficulty drop in on a serialized story that had had about 120 installments, give or take, since my last reading? Why? If that were the case, I&#039;d sure feel like a sucker if I had BOUGHT any of those intervening issues!

Apologies if I&#039;ve misunderstood (maybe you were just noting the change?), but I couldn&#039;t disagree more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ John Seavey-</p>
<p>Internet-mandated disclaimer of non-hostility: I've read a good amount of your writing on comics, and for the most part I think it's good, interesting stuff, so I'm not trying to bag on you. (end disclaimer)  That being said, you seem to be saying that comic books should remain largely unchanged in any major sense across a period of ten years. If I dropped X-Men today and picked it up again in 2018, should I be able to without difficulty drop in on a serialized story that had had about 120 installments, give or take, since my last reading? Why? If that were the case, I'd sure feel like a sucker if I had BOUGHT any of those intervening issues!</p>
<p>Apologies if I've misunderstood (maybe you were just noting the change?), but I couldn't disagree more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-546183</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-546183</guid>
		<description>Average looking women are a pain to draw.

Actually this is sort of true. When I did life drawing in high school the easiest people to draw where either really good looking people or less attractive people. Just easier to focus on distinctive features.

That&#039;s probably not the reason for the Ghost Rider nurses though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Average looking women are a pain to draw.</p>
<p>Actually this is sort of true. When I did life drawing in high school the easiest people to draw where either really good looking people or less attractive people. Just easier to focus on distinctive features.</p>
<p>That's probably not the reason for the Ghost Rider nurses though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Seavey</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-546179</link>
		<dc:creator>John Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-546179</guid>
		<description>I read my room-mate&#039;s copy of &#039;New Avengers&#039;, trying to put myself into the mindset of someone who&#039;d walked away from comics for a decade, then wandered back into a comics store and picked up an issue of their favorite book. (A decade ago, to remind everyone, you&#039;d be seeing the beginning of Kurt Busiek and George Perez&#039;s run on &#039;Avengers&#039;. Yes, it&#039;s hard to believe that anyone would drop that, but suspend your disbelief for a moment.)

There&#039;s no Cap (they mention he&#039;s dead), no Iron Man (they mention he may or may not be a Skrull), no Thor, and the entire issue is a long conversation between Power Man and some woman who&#039;s apparently his girlfriend or wife about their break-up, conducted in front of Ms. Marvel, Spider-Woman, and Wonder Man (who&#039;s gone back to the &quot;safari jacket&quot; look.)

Not only could I not imagine someone being interested in continuing to read the Avengers based on this issue, I couldn&#039;t even conceive of them believing they&#039;d actually picked up the right series. I picture them checking the indicia to make sure there wasn&#039;t a stapling error, and the cover to their favorite comic hadn&#039;t wound up on an issue of &quot;70s Rejects In Love&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read my room-mate's copy of 'New Avengers', trying to put myself into the mindset of someone who'd walked away from comics for a decade, then wandered back into a comics store and picked up an issue of their favorite book. (A decade ago, to remind everyone, you'd be seeing the beginning of Kurt Busiek and George Perez's run on 'Avengers'. Yes, it's hard to believe that anyone would drop that, but suspend your disbelief for a moment.)</p>
<p>There's no Cap (they mention he's dead), no Iron Man (they mention he may or may not be a Skrull), no Thor, and the entire issue is a long conversation between Power Man and some woman who's apparently his girlfriend or wife about their break-up, conducted in front of Ms. Marvel, Spider-Woman, and Wonder Man (who's gone back to the "safari jacket" look.)</p>
<p>Not only could I not imagine someone being interested in continuing to read the Avengers based on this issue, I couldn't even conceive of them believing they'd actually picked up the right series. I picture them checking the indicia to make sure there wasn't a stapling error, and the cover to their favorite comic hadn't wound up on an issue of "70s Rejects In Love".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-546010</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Coil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-546010</guid>
		<description>2. Why are all the nurses in Ghost Rider hot, except for the big one?

That&#039;s obvious. At Marvel, you are either a hot, desirable woman, or you are a worthless, fat cow who needs to have her ovaries removed before you procreate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2. Why are all the nurses in Ghost Rider hot, except for the big one?</p>
<p>That's obvious. At Marvel, you are either a hot, desirable woman, or you are a worthless, fat cow who needs to have her ovaries removed before you procreate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Reed</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-545582</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-545582</guid>
		<description>They should&#039;ve named the kid &quot;Christmas.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should've named the kid "Christmas."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Bloom</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-545452</link>
		<dc:creator>M Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-545452</guid>
		<description>4. The thing that has to be understood about the X-Men is that they have a pretty small rogue&#039;s gallery, and it&#039;s been actively dwindled over the years. Magneto and Juggernaut have largely given up being evil, Apocalypse was dead for years and is now lost in space, there is no Brotherhood of Evil Mutants anymore, the Sentinels are now the team&#039;s personal babysitters, the Hellfire Club is under friendly management, and they just killed Sinister. Of the major enemies that appeared before Morrison&#039;s run, the only ones really left are the Marauders, Acolytes, and MLF, and they&#039;ve all been amalgamated into one group. So I, for one, don&#039;t mind bringing back Bastion.

In spite of being a product of the dark days of the mid-90s X-Men books, Bastion was a pretty decent villain. He was powerful, competent, and smart enough to attack the X-Men on multiple fronts - with both a new breed of Sentinels and government legislation. He had a decent background that connected him to two of the X-Men&#039;s old adversaries from the Claremont era and explained his motivations quite nicely. Bastion&#039;s only real failing was that he was intrinsically tied to the Operation Zero Tolerance crossover, which was one of the lamest and most pathetic crossover events in the history of the X-franchise, made even worse by the fact that Scott Lobdell cut out the planned ending so he could leave the books on time. And after that, Bastion&#039;s fate was concluding in a couple of team-up annuals which very few people read. I think Bastion is definitely worth another shot, and bringing him back to lead the anti-mutant Purifiers is a perfect place for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4. The thing that has to be understood about the X-Men is that they have a pretty small rogue's gallery, and it's been actively dwindled over the years. Magneto and Juggernaut have largely given up being evil, Apocalypse was dead for years and is now lost in space, there is no Brotherhood of Evil Mutants anymore, the Sentinels are now the team's personal babysitters, the Hellfire Club is under friendly management, and they just killed Sinister. Of the major enemies that appeared before Morrison's run, the only ones really left are the Marauders, Acolytes, and MLF, and they've all been amalgamated into one group. So I, for one, don't mind bringing back Bastion.</p>
<p>In spite of being a product of the dark days of the mid-90s X-Men books, Bastion was a pretty decent villain. He was powerful, competent, and smart enough to attack the X-Men on multiple fronts - with both a new breed of Sentinels and government legislation. He had a decent background that connected him to two of the X-Men's old adversaries from the Claremont era and explained his motivations quite nicely. Bastion's only real failing was that he was intrinsically tied to the Operation Zero Tolerance crossover, which was one of the lamest and most pathetic crossover events in the history of the X-franchise, made even worse by the fact that Scott Lobdell cut out the planned ending so he could leave the books on time. And after that, Bastion's fate was concluding in a couple of team-up annuals which very few people read. I think Bastion is definitely worth another shot, and bringing him back to lead the anti-mutant Purifiers is a perfect place for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gokitalo</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-545420</link>
		<dc:creator>Gokitalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-545420</guid>
		<description>I think you summed things up pretty well, ZZZ. It kind of reminds me of the Rannians, who were once resentful of Adam Strange because he was the only person on Rann who wasn&#039;t sterile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you summed things up pretty well, ZZZ. It kind of reminds me of the Rannians, who were once resentful of Adam Strange because he was the only person on Rann who wasn't sterile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-545401</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-545401</guid>
		<description>My big Avengers-related question is, how is Carol not getting arrested? After the Venom bomb, after the Hood stuff, and now after Luke and Jessica&#039;s talk, she just lets the New Avengers walk away without arresting them. How is Luke convinced that registration is so bad if those who registered don&#039;t even take it seriously? Honestly, in the last three issues of of Avengers released, Carol let the New Avengers just walk away in each issue. And all three were written by Bendis, so you think he&#039;d get a new trick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My big Avengers-related question is, how is Carol not getting arrested? After the Venom bomb, after the Hood stuff, and now after Luke and Jessica's talk, she just lets the New Avengers walk away without arresting them. How is Luke convinced that registration is so bad if those who registered don't even take it seriously? Honestly, in the last three issues of of Avengers released, Carol let the New Avengers just walk away in each issue. And all three were written by Bendis, so you think he'd get a new trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red-Ricky</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-544710</link>
		<dc:creator>red-Ricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/16/questions-about-comics-i-just-read-may-contain-spoilers/#comment-544710</guid>
		<description>I had a friend who once hired one of those &lt;i&gt;&quot;average Amazons on the street&quot;&lt;/i&gt; for a bachelor&#039;s party. 

Let me tell, it didn&#039;t end well... not well at all!

Trust me, you don&#039;t want to meet their Madame.  
&lt;i&gt;(...or is it still called a Pimp if she has a mustage?)&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a friend who once hired one of those <i>"average Amazons on the street"</i> for a bachelor's party. </p>
<p>Let me tell, it didn't end well... not well at all!</p>
<p>Trust me, you don't want to meet their Madame.<br />
<i>(...or is it still called a Pimp if she has a mustage?)</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
