Isn’t the concept just adding Wonder Woman to Superman/Batman?

Yep. But now you get 3, not 2, but 3 internal monologues!!! Isn't it wonderful?

To be honest, a lot of titles are going seem redundant. I mean, Trinity appears to be good (on paper) but I don't see how the dynamics are going to be that much different from what we have seen in Justice League and Batman/Superman.

You know, I would've loved to see Billy Batson added to the mix (even if that meant paying royalties to Mark Waid & Alex Ross for their original Kingdom idea).

Seriously, the dynamics of Wonder Woman, Superman and Batman teaching a young Billy Batson (ala Books of Magic); and then having him go off in different adventures with his mentors seems that much more exciting and new! Realistically speaking, he is the future of the DC Universe (that is, if anyone of the big 3 ever thought of themselves as mortal beings)

Think about it. You could have stories about Wonder Woman and Captain Marvel. Wonder Woman, Captain Marvel and Batman. Wonder Woman, Superman and Captain Marvel. Etc.

You could have stories that featured all four characters, combinations of three, or team-ups of two. It would be priceless and original.

To me that seems more appealing than Justice League Lite or Two guys, a girl and a Batcave.

(That's my 90's reference y'all).

Heck, I was sold when I heard “Busiek/Bagley”. I don’t need it to have ‘weight’; I could do with a little less weight, a little less, “Oh, but how does it advance the metaplot?” in my stories. Metaplots and big arcs and changing the status quo are all so 90s.

As usual, Mr. Seavey hits it on the head. The only bad thing about this is that I'm going to be buying a current title set in one of the Big Two's universes again. I really like Busiek, and man, I loves me some Bagley art.

I understand it takes longer to produce AC for KB & Co. but it's still a shame.

Mr Szaz barely appears and he still not as terrifying as the Joker.

Are you kidding? The Joker's not scary at all.

That being said, I am on board with this. Busiek does world building well and I'd like to see a more Astro City mentality to the DCU.

But I like that sort of stuff. Not every character has to become so popular he or she starts showing up all over the place all the time. Sometimes a character's scarcity of apeparances show how durable they are -- that no one else wants to write a watered-down follow-up story with them that pales by comparision.

I mean, with every Doomsday appearance he descends from Monster That Killed Superman to Superman's Killer Croc. Wouldn't the Joker be scarier if he only showed up once every three years or so?

Can't villains be more like Ultron: so challenging they spend years in the wings?

Any "crossovers" will be done a la Brave and the Bold and will happen in the backup sections written by Busiek and Nicieza.

The interview linked to at the top says they won't.

Just how many titles will I be expected to buy to keep up with the story?

If the book is just dangling out there as an iconic Superman/Batman/Wonder Woman tale, great, but if it doesn't have some weight behind it in seeding things for the future or changing the status quo, or whatever, I'm not sure the fanbase will get behind it as much as they might otherwise.