So, where am I supposed to have seen this? I have a decent selection of comics blogs & news sites that I make fairly regular rounds of, so I’m honestly not trying to be all “oh, I can’t be bothered looking”, but seriously, this is new to me. The only place that I check out regularly that covers toy stuff at all is blog@newsarama, what am I skipping?
Couldn’t you have dropped in a link or something

Nah, it's cool, Jack, I get what you're saying. I would have put in a link, but the news story was almost a week ago, so I figured it was old news by now.

Here's a picture of the toy.

And while I don't like the new version of Joker's appearance (Glasgow Smiles just... Don't work for me) I have to say that you, Mr. Trumbull, are a buffoon.

You know, since the Scarecrow was reinvented as a guy with a bag over his head and the Joker was interpreted as a goth dude in makeup, I’m hoping not.

You better double-check your indignant stance, there, dude. Scarecrow has been shown as a guy with a sack-mask for a long time, now. Also, since when is Joker NOT a guy in make-up?

I don't understand what makes him a "goth dude"? If it's the make-up, then your comment's redundant and ridiculous. Other than that, you haven't seen the movie or even close to enough of the character to know what his personality is like.

So, basically, your comment is completely stupid.

Nope, I’m guessing its just an addition to spice up the toyline (but odd there’s only the one…)

There's also a Firefly figure.

I think if he were to be a character in the movie, the figure wouldn't have been revealed, like the Two-Face figure (and Abomination for Hulk)

Though in that case, maybe he's based on the videogame? That would have been a better Curious Cat Cuestion: "Do you think Deathstroke will be in the new Batman movie's videogame?"

Isn't there a Teen Titans movie in production somewhere? You figure they have dibs.