<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Six issues in, NOTHING about Amazing Spider-Man and &#8220;Brand New Day&#8221; could NOT have been done with a married Peter Parker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hydrocodone.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-703652</link>
		<dc:creator>Hydrocodone.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-703652</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hydrocodone....&lt;/strong&gt;

Hydrocodone....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hydrocodone&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Hydrocodone&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yo go re</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-569317</link>
		<dc:creator>yo go re</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-569317</guid>
		<description>An opinion? Strongly voiced? On THE INTERNET?! Unheard of!

My god, what a strange, bleak future we live in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An opinion? Strongly voiced? On THE INTERNET?! Unheard of!</p>
<p>My god, what a strange, bleak future we live in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-568332</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-568332</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind the critique, Gil. That said, I don&#039;t think it is as notable as you say. While I, too, disagree with Greg&#039;s position, it still seems to be firmly in the arena of personal opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind the critique, Gil. That said, I don&#8217;t think it is as notable as you say. While I, too, disagree with Greg&#8217;s position, it still seems to be firmly in the arena of personal opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunkyGreenJerusalem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-568317</link>
		<dc:creator>FunkyGreenJerusalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-568317</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Eh, whatever. Enjoy the righteousness of your clique.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hey, enjoy the self-righteousness of running from blog to blog, reading one post and judging all with in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Eh, whatever. Enjoy the righteousness of your clique.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey, enjoy the self-righteousness of running from blog to blog, reading one post and judging all with in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil Jaysmith</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-568279</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil Jaysmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-568279</guid>
		<description>Eh, whatever. Enjoy the righteousness of your clique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, whatever. Enjoy the righteousness of your clique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunkyGreenJerusalem</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-568264</link>
		<dc:creator>FunkyGreenJerusalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-568264</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I wonder how many people have come to the front page of CBR and seen - and taken as the gospel truth - this lengthy title, which it turns out is making at best an incomplete and at worst a plain incorrect assertion? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

It isn&#039;t on the front page of CBR, it&#039;s on the front page of Comic Should Be Good, a blog hosted by CBR, but a separate entity.
And nothing should be taken as gospel, as it&#039;s a collection of the contributers opinions. 

The only one making incorrect assertions is... you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I wonder how many people have come to the front page of CBR and seen &#8211; and taken as the gospel truth &#8211; this lengthy title, which it turns out is making at best an incomplete and at worst a plain incorrect assertion? </p></blockquote>
<p>It isn&#8217;t on the front page of CBR, it&#8217;s on the front page of Comic Should Be Good, a blog hosted by CBR, but a separate entity.<br />
And nothing should be taken as gospel, as it&#8217;s a collection of the contributers opinions. </p>
<p>The only one making incorrect assertions is&#8230; you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil Jaysmith</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-568061</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil Jaysmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-568061</guid>
		<description>So do the Spider-Man writers get a retraction from Greg Burgas concerning his misleading thread title?

I wonder how many people have come to the front page of CBR and seen - and taken as the gospel truth - this lengthy title, which it turns out is making at best an incomplete and at worst a plain incorrect assertion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So do the Spider-Man writers get a retraction from Greg Burgas concerning his misleading thread title?</p>
<p>I wonder how many people have come to the front page of CBR and seen &#8211; and taken as the gospel truth &#8211; this lengthy title, which it turns out is making at best an incomplete and at worst a plain incorrect assertion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: entzauberung</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-567707</link>
		<dc:creator>entzauberung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-567707</guid>
		<description>I meant it was new relative to how the book was some months ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant it was new relative to how the book was some months ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Midnight</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-567670</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Midnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-567670</guid>
		<description>But I have to agree with the point you made...good beats new anyday of the week. We just seem to disagree on what is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I have to agree with the point you made&#8230;good beats new anyday of the week. We just seem to disagree on what is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Midnight</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-567668</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Midnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-567668</guid>
		<description>You said it was new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said it was new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: entzauberung</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-567547</link>
		<dc:creator>entzauberung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-567547</guid>
		<description>Who said it was new? IÂ´ll take good over new any day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said it was new? IÂ´ll take good over new any day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Midnight</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-567352</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Midnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-567352</guid>
		<description>Whats new about attempting to return a character exactly where he was three decades ago? 

What would have been new was letting Aunt May die ...for real this time.

But it&#039;s a free country. That&#039;s what Captain America died for, right?

Until then...keep bopping up to the counter shelling out $3.00 every other week and smiling thinking...man this Jackpot character is really cool while the piper music continues to play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whats new about attempting to return a character exactly where he was three decades ago? </p>
<p>What would have been new was letting Aunt May die &#8230;for real this time.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s a free country. That&#8217;s what Captain America died for, right?</p>
<p>Until then&#8230;keep bopping up to the counter shelling out $3.00 every other week and smiling thinking&#8230;man this Jackpot character is really cool while the piper music continues to play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: entzauberung</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-567266</link>
		<dc:creator>entzauberung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-567266</guid>
		<description>&quot;I agree with Robâ€™s comments. The only amazing thing to me in this whole mess is the amount of people who continue to allow themselves to be pulled along by Marvel playing the role of the Pied Piper to eager to be sperated from their money Spider-groupies.

Support intelligent and creative efforts and save your money for the gas tank. &quot;

Yes, because it obviously coudnÂ´t be so easy that people actually dig the new direction. There simply HAS to be a hivemind at work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I agree with Robâ€™s comments. The only amazing thing to me in this whole mess is the amount of people who continue to allow themselves to be pulled along by Marvel playing the role of the Pied Piper to eager to be sperated from their money Spider-groupies.</p>
<p>Support intelligent and creative efforts and save your money for the gas tank. &#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, because it obviously coudnÂ´t be so easy that people actually dig the new direction. There simply HAS to be a hivemind at work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Seavey</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-567251</link>
		<dc:creator>John Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-567251</guid>
		<description>Graeme Burk said:

&quot;And if memory serves me correctly about that story (and I havenâ€™t read it in over a decade) the webbing he made from that was inferior in quality and didnâ€™t work.&quot;

It was inferior in quality, yes, but not drastically so, and he was able to afford &quot;standard-issue&quot; webbing while working at a coffee shop as a barista. Two grand for webbing is an absurd figure, given what we know of Peter&#039;s historical income and expenditures. At that rate, he&#039;d never be able to break even taking pictures of himself in action as Spidey, let alone turn a profit.

No, I&#039;m Mopeeing away that whole notion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graeme Burk said:</p>
<p>&#8220;And if memory serves me correctly about that story (and I havenâ€™t read it in over a decade) the webbing he made from that was inferior in quality and didnâ€™t work.&#8221;</p>
<p>It was inferior in quality, yes, but not drastically so, and he was able to afford &#8220;standard-issue&#8221; webbing while working at a coffee shop as a barista. Two grand for webbing is an absurd figure, given what we know of Peter&#8217;s historical income and expenditures. At that rate, he&#8217;d never be able to break even taking pictures of himself in action as Spidey, let alone turn a profit.</p>
<p>No, I&#8217;m Mopeeing away that whole notion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Midnight</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-567248</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Midnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-567248</guid>
		<description>I agree with Rob&#039;s comments. The only amazing thing to me in this whole mess is the amount of people who continue to allow themselves to be pulled along by Marvel playing the role of the Pied Piper to eager to be sperated from their money Spider-groupies.

Support intelligent and creative efforts and save your money for the gas tank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Rob&#8217;s comments. The only amazing thing to me in this whole mess is the amount of people who continue to allow themselves to be pulled along by Marvel playing the role of the Pied Piper to eager to be sperated from their money Spider-groupies.</p>
<p>Support intelligent and creative efforts and save your money for the gas tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HellRazor</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-567081</link>
		<dc:creator>HellRazor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-567081</guid>
		<description>Oh, yeah.  I also like the return to the basics regarding the types of stories they are telling and the types of villains Spidey is fighting.  Please, no more &quot;Spider Totem Gods&quot;, organic webbing, and armored battle suits.  And for Gods sake...no more clones!

The jury is still out on Harry.  I don&#039;t think it was a good idea to bring him back.  I would have rather seen a new character introduced to fulfill the &quot;best friend&quot; role.  I think all the types of Green Goblin stories that can be told with Harry have been pretty much told.  They should have let Harry rest in peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yeah.  I also like the return to the basics regarding the types of stories they are telling and the types of villains Spidey is fighting.  Please, no more &#8220;Spider Totem Gods&#8221;, organic webbing, and armored battle suits.  And for Gods sake&#8230;no more clones!</p>
<p>The jury is still out on Harry.  I don&#8217;t think it was a good idea to bring him back.  I would have rather seen a new character introduced to fulfill the &#8220;best friend&#8221; role.  I think all the types of Green Goblin stories that can be told with Harry have been pretty much told.  They should have let Harry rest in peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HellRazor</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-567074</link>
		<dc:creator>HellRazor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-567074</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no fan of ONE MORE DAY.  And I think that some of the writing in BRAND NEW DAY seems very forced.  They are trying way too hard to give us the Spidey from the 60&#039;s when it shouldn&#039;t be quite so obvious.  Ideally they would incorporate some of those things in more subtle ways that don&#039;t announce themselves and beat us over the head with a hammer every time they come up.

But having said all that -

One change that is reflected in BRAND NEW DAY is that Peter isn&#039;t so tied down to one person regarding his supporting cast.  When you are dealing with a married Spidey, its hard to justify going multiple issues spanning days without having him (or the reader) checking in with his wife - which often doesn&#039;t add much to the story, its just something you are obliged to do with a married character.  Without the marriage, Spidey&#039;s life seems a lot more dynamic and he is more free to interact with ALL of his supporting cast members, as opposed to being mostly tied to ONE member of his supporting cast.  

I can&#039;t really say I have missed MJ.  I sincerely hope MJ isn&#039;t JACKPOT.  Geeze, that&#039;s dumb.  Let her retain some dignity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no fan of ONE MORE DAY.  And I think that some of the writing in BRAND NEW DAY seems very forced.  They are trying way too hard to give us the Spidey from the 60&#8242;s when it shouldn&#8217;t be quite so obvious.  Ideally they would incorporate some of those things in more subtle ways that don&#8217;t announce themselves and beat us over the head with a hammer every time they come up.</p>
<p>But having said all that -</p>
<p>One change that is reflected in BRAND NEW DAY is that Peter isn&#8217;t so tied down to one person regarding his supporting cast.  When you are dealing with a married Spidey, its hard to justify going multiple issues spanning days without having him (or the reader) checking in with his wife &#8211; which often doesn&#8217;t add much to the story, its just something you are obliged to do with a married character.  Without the marriage, Spidey&#8217;s life seems a lot more dynamic and he is more free to interact with ALL of his supporting cast members, as opposed to being mostly tied to ONE member of his supporting cast.  </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t really say I have missed MJ.  I sincerely hope MJ isn&#8217;t JACKPOT.  Geeze, that&#8217;s dumb.  Let her retain some dignity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJA</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-566809</link>
		<dc:creator>MJA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-566809</guid>
		<description>you don&#039;t need to get rid of MJ to return the parker luck, i think the parker luck returned when he revealed his identity then realised it was the wrong decision which made him a fugitive and let his entire rouges gallery know who he and his family were.

but thats all been negated now so 
parker luck = being poor without a wife</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you don&#8217;t need to get rid of MJ to return the parker luck, i think the parker luck returned when he revealed his identity then realised it was the wrong decision which made him a fugitive and let his entire rouges gallery know who he and his family were.</p>
<p>but thats all been negated now so<br />
parker luck = being poor without a wife</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.D.</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-2/#comment-566803</link>
		<dc:creator>E.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-566803</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If Peteâ€™s webbing was so expensive, how did he afford it all those years as a struggling high school and college student?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Theft.

Seriously, he could afford it because nobody really gave much thought to what chemicals actually cost.  So it was effectively free.

Two thousand seems a little on the high side, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s completely unrealistic.  It&#039;d depend on the specific chemicals, the companies he&#039;d have to deal with, the shipping costs, whatever costs might be involved with obfuscating his purchases, and (most importantly) the quantities involved.

I can see why it might, for continuity&#039;s sake, be preferable not to revisit the issue (or visit it in the first place), but if they were to do so . . . I think they could make worse estimates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If Peteâ€™s webbing was so expensive, how did he afford it all those years as a struggling high school and college student?</p></blockquote>
<p>Theft.</p>
<p>Seriously, he could afford it because nobody really gave much thought to what chemicals actually cost.  So it was effectively free.</p>
<p>Two thousand seems a little on the high side, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s completely unrealistic.  It&#8217;d depend on the specific chemicals, the companies he&#8217;d have to deal with, the shipping costs, whatever costs might be involved with obfuscating his purchases, and (most importantly) the quantities involved.</p>
<p>I can see why it might, for continuity&#8217;s sake, be preferable not to revisit the issue (or visit it in the first place), but if they were to do so . . . I think they could make worse estimates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Waters</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/comment-page-1/#comment-566796</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/02/27/six-issues-in-nothing-about-amazing-spider-man-and-brand-new-day-could-not-have-been-done-with-a-married-peter-parker/#comment-566796</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a bit superficial to blame anorexia and bulimia entirely on the fashion industry (and of course, MJ is not a runway model and so doesn&#039;t have to be the waif type anyhow- it&#039;s a specific body type for a specific category because it&#039;s easier to swap around clothes during a show if you know they&#039;ll fit every model about as well.)

Even if MJ started speaking out on body issues, she probably would still be able to find work. 

Wait, this was about Spider-Man, right?

Mullon, of course, has yet to learn the whole &quot;different people have differing opinions&quot; business...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a bit superficial to blame anorexia and bulimia entirely on the fashion industry (and of course, MJ is not a runway model and so doesn&#8217;t have to be the waif type anyhow- it&#8217;s a specific body type for a specific category because it&#8217;s easier to swap around clothes during a show if you know they&#8217;ll fit every model about as well.)</p>
<p>Even if MJ started speaking out on body issues, she probably would still be able to find work. </p>
<p>Wait, this was about Spider-Man, right?</p>
<p>Mullon, of course, has yet to learn the whole &#8220;different people have differing opinions&#8221; business&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

