<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comics Should Be Good&#039;s Top 100 Comic Book Runs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Resources Presents... Comics Should Be Good!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:09:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lead sharp</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-672506</link>
		<dc:creator>lead sharp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-672506</guid>
		<description>The 100 issues rule is utterly bizzare, there aren&#039;t that many series that have done that. 20 plus issues on anything would be good as most writers only seem to stick around for 20 issues unless it&#039;s their own series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 100 issues rule is utterly bizzare, there aren't that many series that have done that. 20 plus issues on anything would be good as most writers only seem to stick around for 20 issues unless it's their own series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contests Should Be Good &#171; Goki&#8217;s Giving Groin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-657135</link>
		<dc:creator>Contests Should Be Good &#171; Goki&#8217;s Giving Groin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-657135</guid>
		<description>[...] http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/" rel="nofollow">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorendiac</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-635254</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorendiac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 02:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-635254</guid>
		<description>On the subject of runners-up: I&#039;ll just mention some big names who didn&#039;t end up being represented by anything on my &quot;Top Ten,&quot; although each of them has been involved in at least one run (sometimes several) which sprang into my mind as I was trying to work out a &quot;long list&quot; of serious contenders, before I started culling the herd. Somewhat to my surprise, I ended up omitting anything by the following:

Chris Claremont
John Byrne
Roger Stern
James Robinson
Roy Thomas
Tom DeFalco
Steve Englehart
Erik Larsen
Paul Levitz
Grant Morrison
Gerard Jones
Mark Waid
Walt Simonson
Denny O&#039;Neil
Mark Gruenwald
D.G. Chichester
Kurt Busiek
And probably others who aren&#039;t occurring to me on the spur of the moment, but whose runs on one thing or another still came reasonably close to making it to the Top Ten Favorites in my mind. 

On the other hand, I don&#039;t think I even seriously considered voting for any theoretically qualified &quot;runs&quot; I&#039;ve ever read by Warren Ellis, Brian Michael Bendis, Garth Ennis, Geoff Johns, J.M. DeMatteis, Alan Grant, Jeph Loeb, or Ann Nocenti. I don&#039;t say those people never entertained me -- just about all of them have definitely done so, at various times! -- but by and large their writing styles don&#039;t seem to fit neatly into whatever it takes to come anywhere near being &quot;one of my all-time favorites.&quot; I understand that a great many people feel differently about it in one or another of those cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the subject of runners-up: I'll just mention some big names who didn't end up being represented by anything on my "Top Ten," although each of them has been involved in at least one run (sometimes several) which sprang into my mind as I was trying to work out a "long list" of serious contenders, before I started culling the herd. Somewhat to my surprise, I ended up omitting anything by the following:</p>
<p>Chris Claremont<br />
John Byrne<br />
Roger Stern<br />
James Robinson<br />
Roy Thomas<br />
Tom DeFalco<br />
Steve Englehart<br />
Erik Larsen<br />
Paul Levitz<br />
Grant Morrison<br />
Gerard Jones<br />
Mark Waid<br />
Walt Simonson<br />
Denny O'Neil<br />
Mark Gruenwald<br />
D.G. Chichester<br />
Kurt Busiek<br />
And probably others who aren't occurring to me on the spur of the moment, but whose runs on one thing or another still came reasonably close to making it to the Top Ten Favorites in my mind. </p>
<p>On the other hand, I don't think I even seriously considered voting for any theoretically qualified "runs" I've ever read by Warren Ellis, Brian Michael Bendis, Garth Ennis, Geoff Johns, J.M. DeMatteis, Alan Grant, Jeph Loeb, or Ann Nocenti. I don't say those people never entertained me -- just about all of them have definitely done so, at various times! -- but by and large their writing styles don't seem to fit neatly into whatever it takes to come anywhere near being "one of my all-time favorites." I understand that a great many people feel differently about it in one or another of those cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Curran</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-634675</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Curran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-634675</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny how this opens the floodgates on comics you forgot. Especially if your original list came to you during a really long, boring lunch hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's funny how this opens the floodgates on comics you forgot. Especially if your original list came to you during a really long, boring lunch hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Curran</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-634670</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Curran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-634670</guid>
		<description>Did anyone try to get Miller&#039;s Batman counted as a  series of minis or something? &#039;Cause that would have to go on there if you&#039;d allow it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone try to get Miller's Batman counted as a  series of minis or something? 'Cause that would have to go on there if you'd allow it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Curran</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-634666</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Curran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-634666</guid>
		<description>Crap! I forgot Lee/Ditko Dr. Strange! Ah, screw it, I&#039;ve got enough Silver Age Marvel on there. Sleeper, Milligan and Allred X-Force (not so much X-Statix), Miller DD, Morrison Animal Man, JLA, and 7 Soldiers, Black and White by Matsumoto (the one manga I&#039;ve read all of), O&#039;Neil&#039;s Batman, and Blue Monday all could have made that ten spot. This also reminds me that I have a lot of runs to start (or finish) reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crap! I forgot Lee/Ditko Dr. Strange! Ah, screw it, I've got enough Silver Age Marvel on there. Sleeper, Milligan and Allred X-Force (not so much X-Statix), Miller DD, Morrison Animal Man, JLA, and 7 Soldiers, Black and White by Matsumoto (the one manga I've read all of), O'Neil's Batman, and Blue Monday all could have made that ten spot. This also reminds me that I have a lot of runs to start (or finish) reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-634491</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-634491</guid>
		<description>Does a series of OGN&#039;s count?  For example, would Scott Pilgrim count, or the Girlfriend trilogy by Jeffrey Brown?

Also, does Action Philosophers count as an on-going?  It ran 12 issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does a series of OGN's count?  For example, would Scott Pilgrim count, or the Girlfriend trilogy by Jeffrey Brown?</p>
<p>Also, does Action Philosophers count as an on-going?  It ran 12 issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Bird</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-634385</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-634385</guid>
		<description>Older than your realize!  Barr/ Rude?  (I had BARON-Rude Nexus at number one, so I&#039;m old too.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Older than your realize!  Barr/ Rude?  (I had BARON-Rude Nexus at number one, so I'm old too.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-634353</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-634353</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a lot more interested in this one than I was in the top characters poll. I&#039;ve been always more of a fan of specific creators and stories than of specific characters.

Anyone care to make preditions? Here are mine:

- DC Silver Age stuff will have a lot less votes than expected. It&#039;s like the Bible - many consider it Holy and the True Way, but not as many have read it and enjoyed it. And it&#039;s also not as associated with specific writers and pencillers.

- Converselly, Marvel stuff from the 1960s will have a lot of votes.

- Byrne and Claremont stuff will have a lot of votes, also despite many people badmouthing them, a lot of fans cut their teeth on their works. Marvel 1980s will have a lot of votes too.

- Gerber&#039;s Howard the Duck will have more votes than it would have a year ago, when Gerber was still alive.

- The only Pre-Crisis DC stuff to have lots of votes will be Green Lantern/Green Arrow, Wolfman/Perez Teen Titans, Levitz/Giffen Legion of Superheroes, and 1970&#039;s Batman.

- Except for David&#039;s Hulk, there will be no love for anything Marvel did in the 1990s.

- There will be no love for early Image Comics either, from before the Image founders started to hire cool writers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm a lot more interested in this one than I was in the top characters poll. I've been always more of a fan of specific creators and stories than of specific characters.</p>
<p>Anyone care to make preditions? Here are mine:</p>
<p>- DC Silver Age stuff will have a lot less votes than expected. It's like the Bible - many consider it Holy and the True Way, but not as many have read it and enjoyed it. And it's also not as associated with specific writers and pencillers.</p>
<p>- Converselly, Marvel stuff from the 1960s will have a lot of votes.</p>
<p>- Byrne and Claremont stuff will have a lot of votes, also despite many people badmouthing them, a lot of fans cut their teeth on their works. Marvel 1980s will have a lot of votes too.</p>
<p>- Gerber's Howard the Duck will have more votes than it would have a year ago, when Gerber was still alive.</p>
<p>- The only Pre-Crisis DC stuff to have lots of votes will be Green Lantern/Green Arrow, Wolfman/Perez Teen Titans, Levitz/Giffen Legion of Superheroes, and 1970's Batman.</p>
<p>- Except for David's Hulk, there will be no love for anything Marvel did in the 1990s.</p>
<p>- There will be no love for early Image Comics either, from before the Image founders started to hire cool writers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Bird</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-634299</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-634299</guid>
		<description>Yeah, same here, Rebis.  But since I can&#039;t see yours, I assume you can&#039;t see mine, so that now re-assures me.  This was really hard.  Here were my runners-up:

11.	Claremont and Byrneâ€™s X-Men
12.	Moore and Davisâ€™s Captain Britain
13.	Grellâ€™s Jon Sable, Freelance
14.	Starlinâ€™s Dreadstar
15.	Levitz and Giffenâ€™s Legion of Super-Heroes
16.	Oâ€™Neil and Adamsâ€™ Green Lantern/Green Arrow
17.	Kirbyâ€™s Original Fourth World
18.	Starlinâ€™s Warlock
19.	Morrison and Truogâ€™s Animal Man
20.	Grellâ€™s Warlord
21.	Ostrander and Oâ€™Donnelâ€™s The Suicide Squad
22.	Miller and Mazzuchelliâ€™s Daredevil
23.	Englehart and Rogersâ€™ Detective Comics
24.	Davisâ€™ second run on Excalibur
25.	Verheiden and Oâ€™Donnelâ€™s The Phantom
26.	Grant and Breyfogleâ€™s Detective Comics
27.	Stern and Smithâ€™s Dr. Strange
28.	Oâ€™Neil and Cowanâ€™s The Question
29.	Wein and Wrightsonâ€™s Swamp Thing
30.	Goodwin and Simonsonâ€™s Manhunter
31.	Conway, Colan and Newtonâ€™s Detective Comics
32.	Moore and Williams IIIâ€™s Promethea
33.	Starlinâ€™s Captain Marvel
34.	David and McFarlaneâ€™s Hulk
35.	Englehart and Rogersâ€™ Silver Surfer

In order to winnow it down, I limited myself to just runs with the same writer AND artist.  As you can see, I still had a lot spillover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, same here, Rebis.  But since I can't see yours, I assume you can't see mine, so that now re-assures me.  This was really hard.  Here were my runners-up:</p>
<p>11.	Claremont and Byrneâ€™s X-Men<br />
12.	Moore and Davisâ€™s Captain Britain<br />
13.	Grellâ€™s Jon Sable, Freelance<br />
14.	Starlinâ€™s Dreadstar<br />
15.	Levitz and Giffenâ€™s Legion of Super-Heroes<br />
16.	Oâ€™Neil and Adamsâ€™ Green Lantern/Green Arrow<br />
17.	Kirbyâ€™s Original Fourth World<br />
18.	Starlinâ€™s Warlock<br />
19.	Morrison and Truogâ€™s Animal Man<br />
20.	Grellâ€™s Warlord<br />
21.	Ostrander and Oâ€™Donnelâ€™s The Suicide Squad<br />
22.	Miller and Mazzuchelliâ€™s Daredevil<br />
23.	Englehart and Rogersâ€™ Detective Comics<br />
24.	Davisâ€™ second run on Excalibur<br />
25.	Verheiden and Oâ€™Donnelâ€™s The Phantom<br />
26.	Grant and Breyfogleâ€™s Detective Comics<br />
27.	Stern and Smithâ€™s Dr. Strange<br />
28.	Oâ€™Neil and Cowanâ€™s The Question<br />
29.	Wein and Wrightsonâ€™s Swamp Thing<br />
30.	Goodwin and Simonsonâ€™s Manhunter<br />
31.	Conway, Colan and Newtonâ€™s Detective Comics<br />
32.	Moore and Williams IIIâ€™s Promethea<br />
33.	Starlinâ€™s Captain Marvel<br />
34.	David and McFarlaneâ€™s Hulk<br />
35.	Englehart and Rogersâ€™ Silver Surfer</p>
<p>In order to winnow it down, I limited myself to just runs with the same writer AND artist.  As you can see, I still had a lot spillover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebis</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-634284</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-634284</guid>
		<description>Hey Brian, here&#039;s another dopey question about voting. I did several days back, and added those four key letters at the top of my post. But I can still see my list on the comments thread (even after many days), although it also notes, at the top of my post, &quot;Your comment is awaiting moderation.&quot;  So does that mean it&#039;s invisible to everyone but me? 

Like Spiffy says, it&#039;s no biggie. But I&#039;m curious about how WordPress works, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Brian, here's another dopey question about voting. I did several days back, and added those four key letters at the top of my post. But I can still see my list on the comments thread (even after many days), although it also notes, at the top of my post, "Your comment is awaiting moderation."  So does that mean it's invisible to everyone but me? </p>
<p>Like Spiffy says, it's no biggie. But I'm curious about how WordPress works, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Loughlin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-634238</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Loughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-634238</guid>
		<description>Shoot. I listed them from bottom (10) to top (my #1 pick). Should I revote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shoot. I listed them from bottom (10) to top (my #1 pick). Should I revote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-633918</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-633918</guid>
		<description>Just repost your list in the right order, Larry, I&#039;ll delete the first one after you post the second one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just repost your list in the right order, Larry, I'll delete the first one after you post the second one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorendiac</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-633814</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorendiac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 05:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-633814</guid>
		<description>Brian -- I just realized that somewhere over the weekend, I had completely forgotten that in the original post you said we were supposed to number our ballots from &quot;top&quot; to &quot;bottom.&quot; I was rereading the rules of the game just now, and it leaped out at me (a little late). 

I numbered my votes just to help me keep count as I gradually eliminated &quot;also-rans&quot; from my notes, but they weren&#039;t arranged in any special order. Is there anything I can do about that at this point, or should I just learn to live with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian -- I just realized that somewhere over the weekend, I had completely forgotten that in the original post you said we were supposed to number our ballots from "top" to "bottom." I was rereading the rules of the game just now, and it leaped out at me (a little late). </p>
<p>I numbered my votes just to help me keep count as I gradually eliminated "also-rans" from my notes, but they weren't arranged in any special order. Is there anything I can do about that at this point, or should I just learn to live with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiffy</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-633804</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 05:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-633804</guid>
		<description>Got it, Brian.  Thanks!

I guess what I kind of meant was that if people want to pick my picks apart, I&#039;m not vested enough in their opinions of me to CARE all that much!

Although I get your reasons.  Not everyone can be that blase, and you don&#039;t want flamewars.

Personally, my picks were weighed heavily towards runs I actually read, either originally or in reprint.  I mean some of the &quot;what&#039;s the greatest&quot; nitpicking that goes on ignores the very real fact that even the most devoted of us can&#039;t read everything.  I mean, for example, people always tell me how great Peter David&#039;s Hulk is, but the problem is that I&#039;ve just never gotten around to reading it.  How in good conscience could I vote for something I haven&#039;t read?  Even if it means something lesser slips onto my list, well... I can only call it like I saw it.

Another problem is Spider-Man.  I mean part of me wants to just put EVERY writer from its great years in there, but if I did that?  What else would be on my list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it, Brian.  Thanks!</p>
<p>I guess what I kind of meant was that if people want to pick my picks apart, I'm not vested enough in their opinions of me to CARE all that much!</p>
<p>Although I get your reasons.  Not everyone can be that blase, and you don't want flamewars.</p>
<p>Personally, my picks were weighed heavily towards runs I actually read, either originally or in reprint.  I mean some of the "what's the greatest" nitpicking that goes on ignores the very real fact that even the most devoted of us can't read everything.  I mean, for example, people always tell me how great Peter David's Hulk is, but the problem is that I've just never gotten around to reading it.  How in good conscience could I vote for something I haven't read?  Even if it means something lesser slips onto my list, well... I can only call it like I saw it.</p>
<p>Another problem is Spider-Man.  I mean part of me wants to just put EVERY writer from its great years in there, but if I did that?  What else would be on my list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-633790</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-633790</guid>
		<description>Fixed it for you, spiffy!

And I wasn&#039;t saying anyone should be ashamed of their picks, just that by keeping them private, we avoid having OTHER people make fun of them (among the other reasons for keeping it private, like keeping it a surprise how the voting is going).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed it for you, spiffy!</p>
<p>And I wasn't saying anyone should be ashamed of their picks, just that by keeping them private, we avoid having OTHER people make fun of them (among the other reasons for keeping it private, like keeping it a surprise how the voting is going).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorendiac</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-633787</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorendiac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-633787</guid>
		<description>Well, just now I went through my notes from a couple of days ago, and gradually narrowed it down to eleven runs (which meant deleting several other serious contenders). Now I&#039;m trying to figure out which of the 11 gets the ax. No matter what I do, I&#039;m going to feel guilty . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, just now I went through my notes from a couple of days ago, and gradually narrowed it down to eleven runs (which meant deleting several other serious contenders). Now I'm trying to figure out which of the 11 gets the ax. No matter what I do, I'm going to feel guilty . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiffy</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-633784</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-633784</guid>
		<description>Damn.  Missed that thing to make the ballot invisible.

Oh well.  I&#039;m not ashamed of my choices.  No biggie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn.  Missed that thing to make the ballot invisible.</p>
<p>Oh well.  I'm not ashamed of my choices.  No biggie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-633783</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-633783</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Seriously, though, Lee/Kirby X-Men and Byrne FF ahead of Kirby/Fantastic Four or Thor?
Wow.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Another reason for private ballots. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Seriously, though, Lee/Kirby X-Men and Byrne FF ahead of Kirby/Fantastic Four or Thor?<br />
Wow.</p></blockquote>
<p> Another reason for private ballots. <img src='http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy F</title>
		<link>http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs/comment-page-3/#comment-633547</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/03/01/comics-should-be-goods-top-100-comic-book-runs-2/#comment-633547</guid>
		<description>I just realized I completely forgot about Rucka&#039;s Queen and Country, and Raspler and Madan&#039;s Young Heroes in Love and Wagner&#039;s Grendel.  

shucks.  I hope they make the list anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just realized I completely forgot about Rucka's Queen and Country, and Raspler and Madan's Young Heroes in Love and Wagner's Grendel.  </p>
<p>shucks.  I hope they make the list anyway...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
